SECC of 2011: When caste data was collected but not published
The most recent data on the populations of individual castes and tribes in India were collected between 2011 and 2013 as part of the Socio Economic and Caste Census (SECC), 2011, an exercise that followed the Census of 2011.
The SECC collected data on a range of parameters, parts of which were published in 2016. But the data on caste populations, other than the total numbers of SCs and STs, was not made public.
The wartime Census of 1941 collected data on individual castes, which were, however, not released. Censuses in independent India have never collected disaggregated caste data.
As such, the most recent publicly available data on caste populations at the national level are from the 1931 Census, which will serve as the baseline for the caste data that the government has now decided to collect as part of the upcoming, pandemic-delayed Census 2021.
SECC 2011 & Census 2011
SECC 2011 was a study of socio-economic status of rural and urban households, and allowed the ranking of households based on predefined parameters.
The Union Ministry of Rural Development began the SECC on June 29, 2011 through a nationwide door-to-door enumeration exercise. It was mainly carried out in 2011 and 2012, but in a few states, enumeration and verification went on until 2013.
The data, which were to be used for policy, research, and the implementation of various development programs, were compiled from 24 lakh enumeration blocks, each containing around 125 households.
The caste census was under the administrative control of the Ministry of Home Affairs, through the Registrar General of India (RGI) and Census Commissioner of India.
Census 2011 was carried out before the SECC, between February 9 and February 28, 2011. Personal data collected in the population Census are confidential.
But all personal information in SECC is open for use by government departments to grant and/ or restrict benefits to households.
Questions in exercises
COMMON QUESTIONS: Many questions were common to the Household Schedule of the population Census — which collects data on broad demographic characteristics and economic activities of households and their members — and SECC 2011.
These included questions on gender, marital status, religion, literacy, date of birth, and relationship to the head of the family. However, the SECC 2011 sought some additional specific details on economic conditions. (See below)
HOUSEHOLD SCHEDULE: The questionnaire for the Household Schedule in Census 2011 had 29 questions. They sought information on mother tongue, other languages known, migration characteristics and reasons for migration, surviving children (daughters and sons), children ever born alive, and number of children born alive over the previous year, among other things.
DISABILITY & ILLNESS: The questionnaire for the Household Schedule only asked about disability. The SECC sought more details on the nature of the disability — sight, hearing, speech, movement, mental retardation, mental illness, multiple disability, other disability — as also additional information about diseases such as cancer, TB, and leprosy.
Specific caste groups
The Household Schedule 2011 asked if the person belonged to a Scheduled Caste (SC) or a Scheduled Tribe (ST), but not the name of the caste or tribe within the larger SC/ ST tent. It did not ask respondents if they belonged to Other Backward Classes (OBCs) or to the 'general category'.
The SECC sought disaggregated details of caste. It asked for the respondents' 'Caste/ Tribe Status', choosing from 'SC' (Code 1), 'ST' (Code 2), 'Other' (Code 3), and 'No Caste/ Tribe' (Code 4), and for the 'Name of Caste/ Tribe' if the respondent belonged to any of the first three categories.
The SECC clarified that 'SC can be only among the Hindus, Sikhs and Buddhists', while 'ST can be from any'. This follows from a Government Order from 1990, which says: 'No person who professes a religion different from the Hindu, the Sikh or the Buddhist religion shall be deemed to be a member of Scheduled Caste.'
Additional details in SECC
ECONOMIC STATUS: The SECC asked for information on housing/ dwelling, such as ownership and the predominant material of wall and roof (grass/ bamboo/ wood/ mud/ brick/ stone, etc). It also collected information on household amenities such as the source of drinking water and lighting (electricity/ kerosene/ solar etc), latrines, waste water outlets, and availability of a separate kitchen, and on assets such as refrigerator, telephone/ mobile phone, computer, motorised vehicles, ACs, and washing machines.
IN URBAN AREAS: The SECC sought the names of both father and mother, and main source of income — from begging/ ragpicking to street vending; domestic, construction, shop, transport, etc work; to 'non-work' (pension/ rent/ interest) and no income.
IN RURAL AREAS: The SECC sought to know if any member in a household belonged to a primitive tribal group, was a legally released bonded labourer, or a manual scavenger. It collected details of the main source of household income — cultivation, manual casual labourer, foraging, begging, etc — and of land ownership and availability of mechanised agricultural equipment, etc.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
1931 caste census: In literacy, Baidyas, Kayasthas, Nayars on top; Yadavs, Pasis at bottom of the list
While decks have now been cleared for the Population Census 2027 along with the enumeration of castes, the last time India held a caste census was in 1931 during the British rule. Conducted till 1931, the caste count in the decennial Census provided key data across several socio-economic parameters including literacy among various castes, at both the all-India and state levels. The forthcoming Census with caste enumeration, to be completed by March 2027, will throw up similar data to enable the government to undertake focused welfare measures. According to the 1931 Census, at an all-India level, Baidyas of Bengal, Kayasthas based in several states, and Nayars of Kerala, were the most literate among castes. These three groups had traditional occupations or social circumstances that seemed to have facilitated their educational development. Baidyas were physicians by occupation, Kayasthas were scribes, and Nayars hailed from the Malabar region that had made early strides in education. While Baidyas recorded 78.2% male literacy and 48.6% female literacy, Kayasthas had 60.7% male and 19.1 % female literacy, and Nayars 60.3 % male and 27.6 % female literacy. Thus, even among the most literate castes, including the matrilineal Nayars, female literacy was significantly lower than male literacy, showing patriarchal relations where families focused on the education of men, who were supposed to find gainful employment, more than that of women, who were brought up to be homemakers. Khatris, a commercial caste of Punjab, stood fourth at the all-India level, accounting for 45.1 % male literacy and 12.6 % female literacy. At the fifth position in the all-India literacy list in the 1931 Census were Brahmins, the only caste found across the country. Brahmins had 43.7 % male literacy and 9.6 % female literacy at the national level. They were far ahead of the other major 'upper caste' community, Rajputs, who had 15.3 % male literacy and just 1.3% female literacy. Kurmis, an Other Backward Class (OBC) caste found in many northern states, which is one of the key beneficiaries of the current OBC quota regime, were just behind Rajputs in literacy, accounting for 12.6 % male literacy and 1.2% female literacy. Telis, another OBC caste, had 11.4 % male and 0.6 % female literacy. There were several castes lagging far behind at the all-India level in terms of literacy. The influential Jat community of Northwest India had a male literacy of 5.3 % and female literacy of 0.6 %. Yadavs, an influential OBC caste in north India, had just 3.9 % male and 0.2 % female literacy. Notably, Mahars, a key caste among Dalits to which Dr B R Ambedkar belonged, were found to be more educated than other Scheduled Caste (SC) groups, registering 4.4 % male literacy and 0.4 % female literacy. In general terms, as per the 1931 Census, the literacy rates among the OBCs, SCs and Scheduled Tribes (STs) were lower than those among the upper castes or influential groups. As per the 1931 Census, the literacy rates across castes varied across the country. What made Brahmins fall to the fifth rank in all-India literacy was their lower literacy rates in north India. This made castes like Nayars and Khatris, both concentrated largely in one province each, register higher national literacy rates than Brahmins. The most literate caste at the provincial level was Brahmins of Madras (state) that encompassed Cochin and Travancore. As many as 80 % Brahmin males in Madras were literate, while female literacy within the group was 28.6 %. They were clearly ahead of Nayars of the region, among whom 60.4 % males and 27.6 % females were literate. Chettis recorded 44.7 % male and 9.77 % female literacy. In Bombay (state) too, 78.8 % males and 23.1 % females from the Brahmin community were literate. Marathas lagged behind, accounting for 22.3 % male and 2.8 % female literacy. Significantly, the non-Brahmin movement undertaken by Jyotiba Phule in Bombay and the Dravidian movement launched in Madras, involved the two states where Brahmins had high male literacy and dominance in education and government jobs. These movements also got wide support among castes that were competing with Brahmins for education and jobs but were lagging behind, as per the data. With northern states recording lower literacy rates as compared to the southern ones, the pan-Indian caste patterns reflected sharp variations. For instance, Tamil Nadu's Labbai Muslim group, currently listed in the OBC category, had 43.8 % male literacy, which was higher than the male literacy rates among Brahmins of UP, Rajasthan, Punjab, Bihar and Odisha. In north Indian states, the Brahmin literacy figures were lower than those in the south, but still higher than most other castes. In Bihar and Odisha, the Kayastha group was the most literate with 60.5 % male literacy and 11.8 % female literacy, followed by Brahmins (35.6 % male and 2.8 % female literacy), Bhumihars (23.3 % male and 2.8 % female literacy) and Rajputs (21.7 % male and 1.3 % female literacy). In contrast, Yadavs had very low literacy rates, with just 3.7 % male literacy and 0.2 % female literacy. In the Central Provinces and Berar region, which later became Madhya Pradesh, Brahmins were the most literate with 59.1 % male literacy and 12.2 % female literacy, followed by Baniyas (59.8 % male and 7.4 % female literacy) and Rajputs (20 % male and 1.5 % female literacy). In UP, Kayasthas were the most literate with 70.2 % male literacy and 19.1 % female literacy, followed by Syeds from the Muslim community (38 % male and 8.7 % female literacy), Brahmins (29.3 % male and 2.5 % female literacy), and Rajputs (18.3 % male and 1.4 % female literacy). Ahirs (Yadavs), a major OBC caste, were lagging far behind, with just 2 % male and 0.1 % female literacy. OBC Jats and Kurmis were ahead of Yadavs, with the former recording 8.1 % male and 0.8 % female literacy and the latter having 5.4 % male and 0.1 % female literacy. Dalit Pasis had just 0.3 % male literacy and 0.3 % female literacy. In Hyderabad, Brahmins were ranked on top of the literacy chart with 70.1 % male literacy and 7.9 % female literacy, while Kapus lagged behind with 6.4 % male and 0.8% female literacy. In Rajasthan, Baniyas topped with 59.2 % male literacy and 2.3 % female literacy, followed by Brahmins (23.7 % male and 1.4 % female literacy) and Rajputs (7 % male and 1.1 % female literacy). Jats were a distant fourth with 1.2 % male and 0.1 % female literacy. In Bengal, Baidyas (77.7 % male and 47.6 % female literacy) were at the top, followed by Brahmins (64.5 % male and 21.6% female literacy) and Kayasthas (57.1 % male and 20.99 % female literacy). In Punjab, Brahmins had 26.8 % male and 3.4 % female literacy, with Khatris (43.8 % male and 11.4 % female literacy) topping the list. The 1931 Census defined literacy 'as the ability to write a letter and to read the answer to it' above the age of five. It did not list those as literate who could read but not write.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Telangna gears up for Census, mulls updating enumeration blocks
Hyderabad: In preparation for the first Census since its formation, Telangana has completed the mapping and digitisation of 75,000 enumeration blocks throughout the state. These blocks were physically enumerated during the previous Census in 2011 and subsequently they have undergone digitisation, prompting officials to consider whether to retain them or go for modifications. Officials said it was observed that the previously drawn blocks required adjustments, particularly in the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation and Warangal Corporation, due to significant geographical changes resulting from rapid urban expansion. Feedback on the updated maps has been received, but a definitive decision regarding potential alterations is yet to be taken, sources said. The population data will be collected on a 'revenue village' basis in rural regions and on a 'ward' basis in urban areas. Household mapping is scheduled to occur from April to Sept 2026, while a family survey will take place from Feb 9 to Feb 28, 2027. These timelines have been consistently adhered to since the initiation of population counting processes. Each enumerator is projected to cover between 175 and 200 households. Given that many enumerators are govt teachers, the data collection is planned to begin during school breaks. They will perform household mapping by gathering information regarding the head of the family. The family survey will focus on collecting personal details of each member. The household mapping phase will span 30 days, followed by an additional 15 days designated for the potential collection of details for the National Population Register, although a decision on this aspect is yet to be made. The state govt has the discretion to conduct the survey at suitable intervals within the 45-day timeline. Furthermore, it is anticipated that the population count will be conducted in an extended manner, with caste details to be recorded in accordance with the list provided by the central ministry of social justice.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 days ago
- Business Standard
Infirmities to caste-tech: How Census questions has changed since 1872
The evolution of India's Census questions over 150 years reflects the state's shifting priorities, from caste and infirmities to migration, fertility and tech-driven caste data Archis Mohan New Delhi Listen to This Article The 1872 House Register, the precursor to the first full-fledged Census in 1881, had 17 questions to which responses were sought. These were whittled down to 13 for the subsequent Census. For the 1881 Census, data were collected for questions on religion, caste, mother tongue, 'occupation of men, also of boys and females who may do work', and whether the respondent received education 'under instruction', or was 'not under instruction but able to read and write', or was illiterate. It also tabulated 'infirmities', including whether someone was of 'unsound mind' or was a 'leper'. Apart from asking the religion of
