logo
FBI Issues Advice on 'Swatting' Threat Across US

FBI Issues Advice on 'Swatting' Threat Across US

Newsweek30-04-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The FBI has issued a public service announcement warning Americans about the dangers of "swatting."
Swatting is the criminal practice of calling law enforcement, for example a Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team, to someone's house in order to harass or intimidate them.
The FBI has been contacted via email outside of working hours for further comment.
SWAT officers gain entry during a simulated domestic disturbance in the Travertine model home, San Francisco.
SWAT officers gain entry during a simulated domestic disturbance in the Travertine model home, San Francisco.
Paul Chinn/San Francisco Chronicle via AP
Why It Matters
Swatting exploits emergency response systems, leaving them less available to do their jobs. Additionally, raids from SWAT teams and other forms of armed law enforcement can result in loss of life and PTSD for those whose house was raided.
There is a case in front of the Supreme Court this week, Martin v. United States, suing the federal government over physical and psychological damage incurred by a SWAT team. This case does not involve the practice of swatting but demonstrates the harm that can be done by a SWAT team raiding an incorrect house.
What To Know
Although the FBI has said it is "aware of multiple recent 'swatting' incidents" targeting a wide range of individuals and institutions, the most high profile swatting incidents over the past few months have been instances of right-wing influencers becoming swatting targets.
In mid-March, FBI Director Kash Patel said he was investigating swatting calls after noting an uptick in conservative media figures saying they were targeted by them.
Conservative media show hosts Joe Pagliarulo of The Joe Pags Show, Shawn Farash of UNGOVERNED, and commentator Nick Sortor have all said they are swatting victims.
Sortor has said he believes sending a SWAT team to his house is essentially "attempted murder."
This week's advisory says "threat actors" use various tools and tactics to facilitate swatting. They "compile sensitive information from a wide range of publicly available sources, including online accounts," and often employ spoofing technology to hide their identities, according to the FBI. This may involve falsifying the origin of calls or messages to make it appear as though a threat is coming from the intended swatting victim.
The FBI has urged the public to take proactive steps to protect themselves. Recommendations include reviewing one's digital footprint for sensitive data, limiting the sharing of personal content online, using strong and unique passwords, and enabling multifactor authentication on accounts and smart devices.
While the FBI is warning people about the dangers of sending a SWAT team to the wrong house, the government argued in front of the Supreme Court on April 29 that "government agents are not liable for acts within their federal duties."
Meaning, the government believes that law enforcement should not be held responsible for any damage incurred during a SWAT raid—regardless of if the raid was in the wrong house or the result of a hoax.
What People Are Saying
The FBI said in its advisory on Tuesday: "Swatting is the malicious tactic of making hoax calls or reports to emergency services, typically feigning an immediate threat to life. Swatting is intended to draw a large response from SWAT teams or other law enforcement resources to an unsuspecting victim's location, causing chaos and the potential for injury or violence."
FBI Director Kash Patel on X (formerly Twitter): "Swatting is not a prank—it's a crime that puts lives at risk. My team and I are already taking action to hold perpetrators accountable. This has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with public safety. We won't tolerate the weaponization of law enforcement."
Swatting is not a prank—it's a crime that puts lives at risk.
My team and I are already taking action to hold perpetrators accountable. This has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with public safety.
We won't tolerate the weaponization of law enforcement. https://t.co/jZPPzGnq1r — FBI Director Kash Patel (@FBIDirectorKash) April 29, 2025
What Happens Next
Anyone who suspects they are a victim of swatting is advised to remain calm and cooperate fully with responding officers, the FBI advises. Victims should preserve any related information, including usernames, email addresses, platforms or messages associated with the incident.
Swatting attempts and hoaxes should be reported immediately to local law enforcement. For nonemergency reports or to provide tips, call 1-800-CALL-FBI (225-5324) or visit tips.fbi.gov.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. ambassador says Canadians facing device searches, detainment ‘not a pattern'
U.S. ambassador says Canadians facing device searches, detainment ‘not a pattern'

Hamilton Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

U.S. ambassador says Canadians facing device searches, detainment ‘not a pattern'

OTTAWA - The American ambassador to Canada is pushing back on Ottawa's travel advice, saying his country doesn't search phones at the border and arguing some Americans travelling here are having a tough time. 'We welcome Canadians to come in and invest, to spend their hard-earned Canadian dollars at U.S. businesses,' U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra told The Canadian Press in an interview Friday. 'If a Canadian has had a disappointing experience coming into the United States, I'm not denying that it happened, but I'm saying it's an isolated event and it is not a pattern.' In April, Ottawa updated its advice to Canadians travelling to the United States to warn them about the possibility they might be detained if denied entry. 'Expect scrutiny at ports of entry, including of electronic devices,' reads the new guidance. There have been reports of Canadians facing intensified scrutiny at the border, having phones searched and, in some cases, being detained. Hoekstra insisted concerns about device searches are not grounded in reality. 'Coming to the U.S., that's a decision for the Canadians to make. Searching devices and all of that is not a well-founded fear. We don't do that. America is a welcoming place,' he said. He said some Americans have expressed similar concerns about Canada. 'I've heard that from Americans coming into Canada as well, OK? Saying, 'You know, we've not received a warm reception when we've gotten to Canadian customs,'' he said. When asked if these reports from American travellers involve arbitrary phone searches and lengthy detainment, Hoekstra said there are consular cases of Americans complaining to the embassy about the Canada Border Services Agency. 'We've said, 'OK this may have been an isolated event. There may have been a Canadian border person who was having a bad day, and thought they'd take it out on, you know, somebody across the border,'' he said. In a statement, the CBSA said its officers follow a code of conduct and the federal ethics code that both require them to treat everyone equally, and the agency investigates any complaints of mistreatment. 'Employees are expected to conduct themselves in a way that upholds the values of integrity, respect and professionalism at all times,' wrote spokeswoman Karine Martel. 'Treating people with respect, dignity and fairness is fundamental to our border services officers' relationship with the public and a key part of this is serving all travellers in a non-discriminatory way.' Hoekstra said travel to the U.S. is up to individuals. 'If you decide that you're not going to come down or whatever, that's your decision and you're missing an opportunity. There are great things to see in America,' Hoekstra said. He also noted the case of CNN journalist Christiane Amanpour, who recently said she prepared to visit the U.S. last month as if she was 'going to North Korea' — with a 'burner phone' that didn't carry any personal information — only to experience a warm welcome. 'It's like, (let's) get past the rhetoric and let's look at the real experiences that people are having here,' Hoekstra said. Airlines have been cutting flights between Canada and the U.S. due to a slump in demand, and Flight Centre Travel Group Canada reported a nearly 40 per cent drop in flights between the two countries year-over-year in February. A survey in early May conducted by Leger Marketing for the Association for Canadian Studies found 52 per cent of respondents feel that 'it is no longer safe for all Canadians travelling to the United States,' with 29 per cent disagreeing and 19 per cent saying they were unsure. Roughly the same proportion said they personally feel unwelcome in the U.S. LGBTQ+ groups have opted against attending World Pride events in Washington and United Nations events in New York, citing scrutiny at the border as the Trump administration scales back protections for transgender and nonbinary people. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 7, 2025.

Johnson: Deploying Marines to Los Angeles protests would not be ‘heavy-handed'
Johnson: Deploying Marines to Los Angeles protests would not be ‘heavy-handed'

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Johnson: Deploying Marines to Los Angeles protests would not be ‘heavy-handed'

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said Sunday that deploying the Marine Corps to Los Angeles to suppress protests, as Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has suggested, would not be 'heavy-handed.' 'Secretary Hegseth said that active-duty Marines there at Camp Pendleton, there by San Diego, are on high alert and could be mobilized. Could we really see active-duty Marines on the streets of Los Angeles?' ABC News's Jonathan Karl asked on 'This Week.' 'You know, one of our core principles is maintaining peace through strength. We do that on foreign affairs and domestic affairs as well. I don't think that's heavy-handed,' Johnson responded. Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard members to the Los Angeles area on Saturday amid protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the action was due to 'violent mobs' attacking federal agents 'carrying out basic deportation operations.' 'The National Guard, and Marines if need be, stand with ICE,' Hegseth said in a post on the social platform X on Sunday morning. Deploying active-duty forces against Americans on U.S. soil would be an extraordinary move and would require bypassing laws that prevent the military from being used for domestic law enforcement purposes. There's also little precedent for deploying the National Guard to states that have not requested the help. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Sunday went after Trump over the deployment of the National Guard to the Los Angeles area, saying the president 'thinks he has a right to do anything.' 'He does not believe in the Constitution; he does not believe in the rule of law,' Sanders told CNN's Dana Bash on 'State of the Union.' 'My understanding is that the governor of California, the mayor of the city of Los Angeles, did not request the National Guard, but he thinks he has a right to do anything he wants,' he added. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store