50% of East Lothian's exclusive penthouses already claimed
Representing the only opportunity for penthouse living currently available in East Lothian, The Wireworks offers elevated living on a truly impressive scale – with nothing else of its magnitude currently on the market or in planning across the region.
Buyers can enjoy panoramic views stretching across to Edinburgh, out towards the iconic Bass Rock in North Berwick, and deep into East Lothian's picturesque countryside – all from the comfort of their own private penthouse.
Craig Fairfoull, Sales and Marketing Director at Dundas said: 'The Wireworks has proven to be hugely popular, particularly our penthouse collection which represents the only opportunity for penthouse living in East Lothian.
'With 50% of our first released penthouses already sold, this latest release presents an exclusive chance to secure a remarkable home, while further penthouses will arrive later this year in Block Four.'
Offering a mix of immediate and future availability, buyers can choose between move-in ready residences or homes that will be completed within the next 10-12 weeks. All feature contemporary design, premium finishes, and spacious layouts.
The Wireworks is a £35 million regeneration of Musselburgh's former Brunton Wireworks site, delivering a collection of high-spec one to three-bedroom apartments.
Each home features high-spec fittings throughout, from SMEG kitchen appliances and Porcelanosa tiling to Hive-controlled heating - combining style with energy efficiency.
Designed by Michael Laird Architects, The Wireworks draws inspiration from the site's industrial heritage while prioritising light, space and practical design.
Recently awarded Apartment of the Year at The Herald Property Awards, The Wireworks reflects Dundas' mission to create homes that make people feel great. Headquartered in Livingston, the proudly Scottish developer is known for its higher-than-average specifications and commitment to a smooth, stress-free buying experience.
To learn more about The Wireworks, visit: https://www.dundas.co.uk/developments/the-wireworks
1 . Contributed
Living room of exclusive penthouses at The Wireworks, development Photo: Submitted Photo Sales
2 . Contributed
Hallway of exclusive penthouses at The Wireworks, development Photo: Submitted Photo Sales
3 . Contributed
Kitchen of exclusive penthouses at The Wireworks, development Photo: Submitted Photo Sales
4 . Contributed
Balcony of exclusive penthouses at The Wireworks, development Photo: Submitted Photo Sales
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
4 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Train passengers face ‘outrageous' fare hike
A potential 5.5 per cent rise in England's train fares next year has been described by public transport groups as 'outrageous'. July's Retail Prices Index (RPI) measure of inflation – which is often used to determine increases in the cost of train travel – will be announced on Wednesday. The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap in regulated fare rises for 2026, but this year's 4.6 per cent hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024. Banking group Investec has forecast this year's July RPI figure will be 4.5 per cent, which means fares could jump by 5.5 per cent. Bruce Williamson, spokesman for pressure group Railfuture, said 'it would be outrageous' if fares rose by that much. He added: 'What would be the justification for jacking up fares above inflation? There isn't any. 'It's ripping off the customer, driving people off the trains and onto our congested road network, which is in no-one's interest.' Mr Williamson said he would support the Government marking its nationalisation of train operators by freezing fares. He continued: 'One would hope that there would be some efficiency savings and economies of scale that you get from having a more integrated railway. 'But of course, I strongly suspect that if there are any savings to be had, they'd be swallowed up by the Treasury and not passed back to the passengers, which I think is wrong.' Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Rising fares are not just burdening passengers, they are putting people off rail travel. 'Our survey found that 71 per cent of people would be more likely to take the train if fares were cheaper. 'Public support for nationalisation plummets if fares continue to rise, so as the Government progresses plans for Great British Railways (GBR), it must take the opportunity to reform fares and make rail travel more affordable.' GBR is an upcoming public sector body that will oversee Britain's rail infrastructure and train operation. About 45 per cent of fares on Britain's railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh Governments. They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities. The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year. Operators set rises in unregulated fares, although these are likely to be very close to regulated ticket increases because their decisions are heavily influenced by governments. A DfT spokesperson said: 'The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them. 'The Government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways, delivering the services they deserve and driving growth. 'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.'
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scotland - 'the Saudi Arabia of renewables'?
Read More: In our submission to the Scottish Government's consultation Offshore Wind Policy Statement, the STUC has made clear that communities up and down the land are being short-changed and given the short shrift by multinational corporations who reap the profits of the resources communities provide them. Further to the point, it's also not the 'just transition' Scotland was promised. It's a system where our natural resources generate massive wealth for private companies, with a trickle of jobs and community benefit in return and even then, those jobs are laced with precarity and insecure conditions. For example, developers are meant to provide Community Benefit Funds, with the Scottish Government recommending a baseline of £5,000 per megawatt. But in practice, many projects fall short and these funds pale in comparison to what community ownership can deliver. Contrast two wind projects in Argyll & Bute: Beinn an Tuirc, owned by Scottish Power Renewables, returns about £2,500 per megawatt to the community whilst Tilley, a single turbine owned by the Tiree Community Development Trust, returns over £263,000 per megawatt. That difference is transformative. That's true community wealth building. Yet in 2024, less than 1% of new renewable capacity in Scotland was under local or community ownership. When ministers first marketed Scotland as the 'Saudi Arabia of renewables', it was sold as the prize for embracing the low carbon transition, with an alleged wave of well-paid, high-quality jobs spread across our communities, delivering both climate justice and economic renewal. But if we strip away the spin and look at the hard data from the latest Office for National Statistics analysis of Scotland's Low Carbon and Renewable Energy Economy, as the STUC has done in our new report, that prize has yet to arrive. In fact, the growth we've seen is concentrated in a handful of areas and in the case of nuclear power, jobs are already disappearing. Meanwhile, the industries making the most money, onshore and offshore wind, continue to create relatively few jobs for the scale of their turnover, while far too much of the profit leaves Scotland entirely. Between 2022 and 2023, total jobs in Scotland's low carbon economy rose from 26,000 to 33,500, the highest level since ONS began collecting this data in 2014. That's a headline ministers will happily boast about. But let's look at the detail. Most of those new jobs came in sectors like low-emission vehicles and infrastructure, energy-efficient lighting and energy-efficient products. By contrast, the offshore and onshore wind industries, which dominate the Scottish Government's green industrial strategy, saw jobs barely move. Offshore wind added just 100 jobs in a year. Onshore wind added 200. Combined, they now account for just over 6,800 jobs, or about 20% of all low carbon employment, despite generating more than half of all turnover and exports in the sector. Put bluntly, for every million pounds of turnover, offshore wind creates just 1.3 jobs; onshore wind creates less than one. Compare that to low-emission vehicle manufacturing at over 21 jobs per million, or energy-efficient lighting at almost 19. The root problem is simple: Scotland still lacks a serious, joined-up green industrial strategy that links climate targets to secure, skilled, unionised jobs. Too much of our policy has been designed to maximise deployment of renewable energy without securing the domestic manufacturing base needed to turn that investment into lasting employment. As of 2024, Scotland has 12.4GW of installed onshore and offshore wind, compared to just 7.5GW in Denmark. Yet the Danes show what's possible when you do this right: they've captured 40% of the European wind market. Our report shows Scotland would need 19 major manufacturing sites for nacelles, blades, towers and more to fully capture the economic opportunity from ScotWind. So far, only two cable manufacturing sites have been announced. Without that domestic production capacity, developers will continue importing vast amounts of equipment and the jobs will stay overseas. Even when these huge projects come online, the picture gets even more skewed. Take Seagreen, now the world's sixth-largest offshore wind farm. In its first year of operation, it generated £449 million in revenue and produced a profit of £127 million. The entire operations and maintenance centre employs just 80 people. As new wind farms become operational and begin to generate electricity and therefore income for the developer, their spending falls dramatically, including for labour. Therein lies the palpable frustration felt by many local residents. They're not anti-renewables, per se. They're anti-rip off and want to see a real community benefit to the inevitable disruption that comes with large scale renewable projects. The Scottish Government's 2024 Green Industrial Strategy names wind as a 'priority area' but fails to address the real barriers: lack of manufacturing capacity, lack of community benefit, lack of job creation proportional to turnover. Even worse, it barely mentions the energy-efficiency sectors that already employ more than a third of all workers in the low carbon economy. The solution is apparent: the Scottish Government must reform their approach to the development of offshore wind if there is to be any meaningful and last economic footprint from these natural resources. That includes setting Fair Work and Just Transition conditions across leasing, planning applications and public investment projects. This can be achieved, in part, through negotiations between trade unions and wind industry representatives and finally giving unions a seat at the table of the Scottish Offshore Wind Energy Council (SOWEC). Secondly, we need to put communities at the heart of our national strategy, building greater public ownership of energy at a local level including with binding targets for community and local authority ownership of renewables. Lastly supporting reform of employment law to establish universal standards and minimum wage floors in the energy sector and clearer structures for collective bargaining. As the trade unionist Jimmy Reid once said, the untapped resources of Scotland's North Sea are as nothing compared to the untapped resources of our people. The answer isn't blowing in the wind, it's lying in our communities. Roz Foyer is the general secretary of the STUC
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
SNP government faces £36m black hole over refusal to copy Westminster benefits crackdown
PA Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scotland's benefits agency could force a £36 million black hole in public finances over the SNP's refusal to follow Westminster's benefits crackdown. MPs are currently considering new legislation that would claw back debts incurred by fraud or overpaid welfare claims. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, social justice cabinet secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has refused to back the move by UK Labour as it is not in line with the ethos of the more 'dignified' Social Security Scotland (SSS). As the Scottish Government has insisted on diverging from the Westminster plans, the SNP administration will need to transfer the debts to SSS and rapidly develop a debt recovery scheme or write off the £36m owed. This has caused consternation among MSPs concerned about the strain on Scottish finances when the government is still operating under emergency spending controls introduced last year. Under plans outlined in the proposed new Public Authorities (Fraud, Debt and Recovery) Bill, the DWP would have powers to retrieve owed money directly from a person's bank account. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad If they were without sufficient funds, the DWP could then impose sanctions such as applying to the court for the temporary suspension of their driving licence. The dispute is detailed in letters acquired by The Scotsman from the DWP under freedom of information legislation. Identical requests for information were lodged with both the Scottish Government and the UK Government. However, while the DWP handed over letters from Mr Weston to Ms Somerville, the Scottish Government chose to entirely redact the contents of all correspondence from the SNP cabinet secretary to her Westminster counterpart. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The Scottish Government did not respond to a question about the refusal to provide the requested information. In the letters provided to The Scotsman by the DWP, it is made clear that Ms Somerville does not approve of introducing these debt recovery powers in Scotland. In correspondence from Andrew Weston, the UK minister for the DWP, from May and June this year it is explained to Ms Somerville that the DWP will no longer be able to recover debts on behalf of Social Security Scotland when a current arrangement comes to an end in spring 2026. Another letter details that 4000 current debts could be pursued using the new legislative powers and then around 1500 debts each year in the coming years. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When the plans were first announced in January this year, they were described by Labour as 'the biggest fraud crackdown in a generation' targeted at 'benefits cheats'. Mr Weston writes: 'This flow of new cases will decline as the Scottish Government continues to roll out its own benefit system and DWP does not administer benefits on your behalf.' He goes on to say that the 'continued recovery of debt under a separate system is not cost effective, even if this was limited to the recovery of debts already in repayment.' The MP adds that the DWP will not be able to continue to recover debts under any new long-term agreement or extensions to the current agreement between governments. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The debt recovery situation is also expected to have a knock-on effect on benefits claimants. Those who currently have stable repayment arrangements with the DWP are now in limbo waiting for news of the SNP's plans. Scottish Conservative shadow cabinet secretary for social security Alexander Stewart MSP criticised the Scottish Government's 'secrecy' and said its debt recovery position 'defies belief'. 'No wonder Scotland has a ballooning and unaffordable benefits bill when the SNP Government won't even try to recoup money fraudulently claimed or overpaid,' he said. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'This is taxpayers' cash that has been handed out in error. It defies belief that Shirley Anne Sommerville has no desire to get any of this money back. It's an insult to hard-working, over-taxed Scots. 'It's clear the SNP has no plan or even desire to rein in Scotland's soaring welfare bill. 'The abject lack of transparency from the social justice secretary over her correspondence with her Westminster counterpart is also depressingly predictable from an SNP government addicted to secrecy.' In one letter from May, Mr Weston thanks Ms Somerville for an in-person meeting and says there are 'several complex challenges' involved in her requests for separate legislation - or 'carve outs' - for Scotland. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The MP attempts to reassure the cabinet secretary that measures in the legislation would be used only as a 'last resort'. With other devolved benefits, the DWP transfers information about claimants to SSS. In order for SSS to take on debt recovery, it would require the cases to be transferred between agencies as well as resource debt enforcement. The Scottish Government pays the DWP for the exchange of information under the partially-devolved system. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In December last year, flawed information sharing between the two organisations led to nearly 40,000 Scots missing out on the newly devolved winter heating payment. The oversight came to light as a result of 'urgent number crunching' by the Scottish Government after the introduction of emergency spending controls across government departments. A Scottish Government spokeswoman said Scottish Ministers can seek debt recovery through the civil court process 'where an individual does not voluntarily repay and is no longer in receipt of benefit'. However, the most recent update from Social Security Scotland says the organisation does not yet have the provisions in place to be able to recover debt through the sheriff courts. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Its debt management strategy from 2023 lays out that the agency tries, where possible, to make voluntary arrangements to recover debt. Speaking to Holyrood's finance committee in January this year, SSS chief executive David Wallace said money that was overpaid would not be reclaimed where the benefit recipient could not have reasonably known they were being paid too much. He added: 'We have the powers to enforce deduction from on-going benefits, but we have not yet used them.' 'The Scottish social security system is focused on treating people with fairness, dignity and respect,' the government spokeswoman added. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Scottish Ministers have been clear they cannot support UK Government proposals to take powers to recover directly from an individual's bank accounts without requiring a court order, or to potentially suspend driving licences.' The spokeswoman said there is 'no hole in the Scottish Budget' but did not elaborate on where the money would be found to write off the £36m in fraud and overpayments. She added: 'Given both governments could not find an agreement on this issue, the Scottish Government is looking at what steps now need to be taken in the devolved social security system. There is therefore no impact on the Scottish Budget.'
