
Ed Martin's new federal gun charge plan has 18 cases. All are Black men.
Police arrested one man after officers alleged they saw a gun fall out of his pocket as he walked away from a liquor store. They charged another who was smoking a blunt and ran away when police approached him in Southeast D.C. He, too, was carrying a gun, authorities said. Three more were taken into custody after officers stopped their vehicle in the 1500 block of Seventh Street NW, searched it and found three firearms along with red Solo cups and an open bottle of tequila.
The five men, who were convicted felons before their most recent encounters with law enforcement, face federal firearms charges, swept up in interim U.S. Attorney Ed Martin's 'Make D.C. Safe Again' initiative pledging to get guns off the city's streets. Martin boasted recently on social media and in a community meeting that his office had charged 18 felons with federal gun possession crimes in the month since he announced his plans, more than double the number charged in the same month a year ago.
All 18 are Black men, The Washington Post confirmed through court records and charging documents, fueling criticism by some District residents and defense attorneys that Martin's plans are putting the city back on a path of targeting racial minorities even as D.C. is experiencing a sharp decline in violent crime. D.C.'s federal court sentenced an average of four people a month for firearms charges in the nine years ending with 2023, the latest data available from the U.S. Sentencing Commission. Of those, 93 percent were Black.
None of the 18 — whose arrests occurred across the city — were charged with violent crimes alongside the recent gun charges. A similar initiative launched in 2020 was revealed to have targeted Black neighborhoods. At a recent community meeting where Martin pitched his plan to more than 200 people in Southeast Washington, he was met with jeers and sharp questions.
The plan focuses on felons, who aren't allowed to carry guns in the city. Martin says there's a link between violent crime and illegal gun possession, so he's ordering prosecutors to make every felony gun possession case a federal one. Moving the cases from superior court to federal court brings the prospect of longer prison sentences, which Martin says will keep criminals off the streets. The shift to federal court would also prevent people 24 and younger from qualifying for the District's Youth Rehabilitation Act, which results in a lighter sentence and potentially having the case sealed after they're released.
'Our kids in this city deserve to be safe. Our neighborhoods and families deserve to be safe and our laws deserve to be prosecuted. We needed to do better at that,' Martin told the audience.
Reducing crime is a goal everyone shares, said Ron Moten, longtime Ward 8 community activist and founder of the Go-Go Museum, but not in a way that targets only one group of people. Moten recalled the war on drugs that resulted in mass incarceration of Black men in the 1980s and '90s, including him.
'Will your gun crackdown turn into the same thing in our community? Will this war on guns result in locking up countless Black men, women and children for nonviolent crimes? Mass incarceration destroyed our community,' Moten said as other audience members shouted 'amen.'
Martin did not respond to their concerns.
Attorney Heather Shaner has defended clients in the District since 1979. She said some people in D.C. carry guns for protection because they live in violent neighborhoods, or because they have been shot before. 'But the guns don't protect them. They just get them locked up,' Shaner said.
Shaner said the aggressive arrest and prosecution policy can result in unlawful arrests. 'I'm just so sick of seeing these young men being stopped and a gun is found in the car with each of these kids and yet the cops had no reason to go into the car,' she says. 'Or an officer thinks he sees a bulge and stops and frisk them and finds a gun. They're driving while Black or walking while Black.'
Lamont Mitchell, chairman of the Anacostia Coordinating Council, which hosted the meeting in Anacostia, the city's largest and predominantly African American neighborhood, urged Martin to focus on how the guns were being brought into the city and focus on the suppliers, as opposed to individuals possessing guns.
'We have a plethora of gun violence in this city and in our community, yes,' Mitchell said. 'But what are you planning to do to intervene with these gun shipments?'
Martin said his office was working with other federal law enforcement agencies including the FBI and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, to identify firearms being transported from southern Virginia, North Carolina and Georgia into Washington. 'That is a priority. We now have new leadership in these agencies and they can help us go up the chain and try to cut the supply.' Martin's office has not announced any arrests or charges against alleged suppliers.
Attorneys say another reason Martin moved gun possession to federal court was to keep defendants locked up while they await trial. In federal court, prosecutors can request an emergency hearing with Chief Judge James E. Boasberg if another judge orders a defendant released from custody.
Boasberg has been the subject of Trump's ire since he temporarily blocked the administration, in a separate case, from deporting Venezuelan migrants without due process under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. After that ruling, Trump railed against Boasberg on social media, calling him a 'Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator' who should be impeached. And late last month Boasberg ordered the Trump administration to preserve the records of a Signal group chat about sensitive military operations in Yemen.
On Tuesday, Martin's federal prosecutors and attorneys for Monte Tyree Johnson sparred in Boasberg's second-floor courtroom over whether Johnson could be released pending trial on weapons offenses.
Johnson, 29, who was convicted in 2021 of voluntary manslaughter in the 2016 shooting of a transgender woman during a robbery, was taken into custody March 18. Authorities said they went to pick him up on an alleged probation violation and found a Glock 27 and 22 rounds of ammunition in his backpack. Soon after, Magistrate Judge Matthew J. Sharbaugh ordered him released from jail, and Martin's office sought Boasberg's intervention.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Tiffany Wynn argued Johnson was a danger to the community and should remain in jail until trial. 'He has a propensity to use firearms,' Wynn told Boasberg, reminding him of his conviction in the killing of Deeniquia 'Dee Dee' Dodds.
Boasberg — a former federal prosecutor — agreed and ordered Johnson to remain in D.C. jail until trial. 'I don't find any restrictions that could guarantee the safety of the community,' he said.
Martin's critics question his decisions to shake up his office in a way that could make carrying out his gun initiative more difficult.
At the meeting last month in Southeast Washington, Martin — a longtime defense attorney who never worked as a prosecutor — told the audience he 'needed more prosecutors' in his office, the nation's largest U.S. attorney's office, to focus on violent crime in the city.
D.C. Shadow Sen. Ankit Jain (D) reminded Martin that in February, he oversaw the demotion of seven senior prosecutors who worked on the Jan. 6 Capitol seditious conspiracy and riot cases. Jain said Martin's actions 'created chaos' in the U.S. attorney's office and asked how the moves would help him in prosecuting violent criminals in the city.
The top criminal prosecutor in Martin's office resigned in February after refusing an order from Martin she said wasn't backed up by evidence. And Martin reassigned senior prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases to misdemeanors or early case assessment screening in D.C. Superior Court, positions often held by early career federal prosecutors.
The reassignments, Martin said, were the 'best use of our resources' and added 'we had focuses in our office that I think were misplaced.'
But he didn't explain how the moves would help him with his goal of charging more gun possession cases.
On March 19, Rickey Corey Watkins, Jr. was arrested after police say he was driving an all-terrain Suzuki around 8:30 p.m. inside the gated area of the Harrison Recreation Center in the 1300 block of V Street in Northwest Washington. Police say when they tried to pull Watkins over, he tossed what they said was a Glock 19X pistol and loading magazine. Watkins, 33, had been convicted in 2013 of assault with intent to kill while armed.
Watkins's attorney, Eugene Ohm of the Federal Public Defender Service, declined to comment on his client's case. But he said in recent weeks that he has seen an increase in similar cases in which he believed prosecutors used an initial stop for a minor offense to charge a more serious crime, such as felon in possession of a firearm.
'There are many aggressive police tactics that they know cross the line. They are hoping the judges in federal court will let them get away with things that D.C. Courts have already found unconstitutional,' Ohm said.
Thompkins and Watkins were among the recent federal gun charge cases touted by Martin's office.
Tom Lynch, a D.C. police spokesman, said officers 'will continue our efforts of removing illegal firearms from our communities and leave the decision on how to prosecute each case to the prosecutors.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Republicans Say They're Cool With Trump Deploying Troops Against Protesters
The U.S. secretary of defense has threatened to send active-duty Marines into the streets of Los Angeles to confront protesters opposing the administration's detention and deportation of immigrants. At least three prominent Republicans don't seem concerned about potential overreach. 'The [Department of Defense] is mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles. And, if violence continues, active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert,' Hegseth wrote late Saturday on X, formerly Twitter, on his personal account. This prompted ABC's Jonathan Karl to ask House Speaker Mike Johnson: 'Could we really see active duty Marines on the streets of Los Angeles?' 'One of our core principles is maintaining peace through strength,' Johnson said during an interview on Sunday's episode of This Week. 'We do that on foreign affairs and domestic affairs as well. I don't think that's heavy handed. I think that's an important signal.' 'You don't think sending Marines into the streets of an American city is heavy-handed?' Karl asked. 'We have to be prepared to do what is necessary, and I think the notice that that might happen might have the deterring effect,' Johnson said. Active-duty military troops have not been sent in to suppress unrest since the 1992 Los Angeles protests after a jury acquitted four white police officers in the beating of Rodney King, a Black man who was pulled over for a traffic violation. The Posse Comitatus Act prohibits federal troops from engaging in civilian law enforcement unless there is a clear legal or constitutional basis for doing so. It was created to restrict the president's ability to use the military against civilians. The exception to Posse Comitatus is the Insurrection Act, which Trump has not invoked. Instead, Trump invoked Title 10 of the U.S. Code on Armed Services, which limits the troops' actions to protecting federal officials rather than enforcing laws. Title 10 gives Trump authority to deploy the National Guard during 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States' and two other specific circumstances. Chris Mirasola of Lawfare wrote that Trump's justification for using this authority is 'factually contestable and, even on the face of the memorandum, unusually weak.' Republican Sen. James Lankford on NBC's Meet the Press argued that by deploying the National Guard, Trump is 'trying to deescalate all the tensions that are there.' Newsom has said that Trump activating National Guard troops is 'purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions' 'This is an American city, and to be able to have an American city where we have people literally flying Mexican flags and saying, 'You cannot arrest us,' cannot be allowed,' Lankford said on Sunday. 'If someone violates the law, no matter what state that they're in, they're in violation of a federal law. They should face consequences for that.' Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin also criticized protesters for carrying Mexican flags. 'They were literally out there protesting, carrying a foreign flag. That is absolutely insane. They are not just peaceful protesters. These are illegals,' he said Sunday on State of the Union. 'Carrying a flag is not illegal, as you know,' CNN's Dana Bash responded. 'Foreign flag while you're attacking law enforcement, it's pretty bad,' Mullin said. Carrying a Mexican flag and saying 'You cannot arrest us' is not a prosecutable offense. It is free speech protected by the First Amendment. And the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) has been clear that anyone found destructing property will be arrested. 'Everyone has the right to peacefully assemble and voice their opinions,' LAPD posted on X. 'However, vandalizing property and attempting to seriously injure officers, whether Federal or LAPD, is not peaceful.' When Meet the Press host Kristen Welker pointed out to Lankford that 'Governor Newsom says there is no unmet law enforcement need. The LAPD says the protests were peaceful,' the senator claimed that it is 'clear' that the LAPD is 'being overwhelmed.' (LAPD has not said they are overwhelmed.) 'This wouldn't be an issue if California didn't promote sanctuary city policies to be able to tell people literally, 'You can violate federal law and live in our state, and no one will arrest you for this,'' Lankford said. 'Now suddenly when they are arrested for federal crimes then suddenly they go into this kind of protest saying, 'No, you can't arrest us here. We're immune from federal law.' That's not true.' Here, Lankford is being misleading. Sanctuary city policies do not grant anyone immunity, they only limit how state and local resources are allocated to aid federal immigration enforcement. Under the Tenth Amendment, states have the right to allocate resources as they see fit, and states have used that amendment in court to justify not assisting with federal immigration raids. It's disturbing that prominent GOP lawmakers are signing on to the president's use of authority to activate the National Guard — against a governor's wishes — and signaling their agreement that deploying active duty Marines against civilians would be fine with them should Trump choose to do so. 'Don't kid yourself they know they are absolutely getting cooked politically [with] their terrible bill and rising prices, and they want to create a violent spectacle to feed their content machine,' Democratic Sen. Brian Schatz posted on X late Saturday. 'It's time for the mainstream media to describe this authoritarian madness accurately.' More from Rolling Stone Trump's Response to L.A. Protests: What We Know The Biggest Boondoggles in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill Donald Trump Is Destroying the Economy and Waging War on the Poor Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact Check: Doctored photo shows ICE agents arresting man wearing 'Latinos for Trump' T-shirt
Claim: A photo authentically shows U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arresting a man wearing a "Latinos for Trump 2024" T-shirt. Rating: In June 2025, online users claimed a picture showed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arresting a man wearing a "Latinos for Trump 2024" T-shirt. On June 1, an X user posted (archived) the photo with a caption mocking the man's alleged vote of Trump, whose immigration policies supposedly led to his arrest. The user wrote, "Well that did not go well huh?" The post received over 500,000 views. (Image courtesy of @JamesTate121/X) Following that post, other users shared the same picture on Bluesky (archived), Facebook, iFunny (archived), Mastodon (archived), Threads and X (archived). However, an unknown user doctored the photo with the "Latinos for Trump 2024" logo. The same user altered the agents' uniforms to read "ICE," when the original picture showed "HSI" for Homeland Security Investigations. ICE and HSI both operate under the umbrella of the Department of Homeland Security. The Alamy and Getty Images websites both hosted the original, unedited photo for licensing. The genuine caption read, "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) special agents arrested alleged immigration violators at Fresh Mark [in] Salem, [Ohio, on] June 19, 2018." The original picture confirmed no visible writing or logos appeared on the back of the detained man's T-shirt. ICE published the original photo (Image courtesy of Getty Images) As The Associated Press reported, based on its own survey of over 120,000 voters, Trump gained a larger share of both Black and Latino voters in 2024 than in the 2020 election, most notably among men under age 45. For further reading, Snopes compiled a collection of 20 fact checks involving U.S. immigration authorities. Brown, Matt, et al. "Young Black and Latino Men Say They Chose Trump Because of the Economy and Jobs. Here's How and Why." The Associated Press, 10 Nov. 2024, Catalini, Mike, and Rebecca Santana. "Just Days into the New Trump Administration, Worries Spike amid a Show of Force on Immigration." The Associated Press, 24 Jan. 2025, Chappell, Bill. "Homeland Security Secretary Orders ICE to Stop Mass Raids on Immigrants' Workplaces." Connecticut Public, 12 Oct. 2021, Santana, Rebecca. "Immigration Officers Are Operating with a New Sense of Mission. Now, 'Nobody Gets a Free Pass.'" The Associated Press, 28 Jan. 2025, "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agents Arrested Alleged Immigration Violators at Fresh Mark [in] Salem, [Ohio, on] June 19, 2018." Getty Images, ICE, 19 June 2018, Younge, Gary. "'They Want to Take Me Away': Immigrants under Attack as Trump Tries to Rally Republican Base." The Guardian, 23 Oct. 2018,
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump calls Musk ‘big-time drug addict' according to report, as feud shows no sign of ending
President Donald Trump referred to his former ally Elon Musk as a 'big-time drug addict' as he processed the end of their relationship, according to a new report. As Musk began publicly attacking Trump, the president started calling up confidants and acquaintances to discuss the falling out. During one such call, the president made the allegation about the Tesla CEO's alleged drug habits as he attempted to understand his behavior, reports The Washington Post. Musk has said that he uses ketamine for depression. According to The New York Times, he used ketamine on the campaign trail to such a degree that it was affecting his bladder, and he traveled with a pill box with Adderall markings. White House officials said Trump was concerned about Musk's drug use, and it was one reason the relationship eventually came to an explosive end, The Post noted. However, Trump took a calmer tone in pushing back on Musk in his social media posts than advisers and friends alike expected. Two people with knowledge of the situation told the paper that, following the Thursday feud with Musk, Trump instructed those around him not to escalate the confrontation. Speaking to Vice President JD Vance about how to address the Musk situation in public, Trump urged caution. However, the relationship between Musk, Trump, and the rest of the administration had deteriorated long before Thursday. Musk alienated White House staff and cabinet members, reportedly getting into a physical altercation with Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, according to The Post's report. Former White House strategist Steve Bannon, who worked in Trump's first term, told The Post that he was informed that as Bessent and Musk exited the Oval Office following an April meeting, the pair began insulting each other. Bessent mentioned Musk's claim that he would find more than $1 trillion in waste and abuse of government spending, something the billionaire had not yet achieved. 'Scott said, 'You're a fraud. You're a total fraud,'' Bannon told the paper. Musk subsequently pushed his shoulder into Bessent 'like a rugby player,' he added. Bessent struck back at Musk, and several people stepped in to break up the scuffle. 'President Trump heard about it and said, 'This is too much,'' said Bannon. 'President Trump and the entire Administration will continue the important mission of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse from our federal government on behalf of taxpayers, and the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill is critical to helping accomplish that mission,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told The Post. However, administration officials have discussed taking steps to retaliate against Musk. Trump took to TruthSocial to suggest that Musk's government contracts be scrutinized, potentially putting his businesses at risk. Musk has been consistently critical of the president's main congressional priority, the so-called 'big, beautiful bill,' expressing his concerns about the significant amount it adds to the deficit. Trump has threatened Musk with 'serious consequences' if he uses his massive wealth to fund Democratic challengers to Republicans who vote for the spending bill. Musk has also suggested that he may start a third political party to represent the '80 percent in the middle.' 'I feel like the kids of a bitter divorce, where you're just saying, 'I really wish Mommy and Daddy would stop screaming,'' Texas Senator Ted Cruz said on his podcast Friday.