Climate adaptation assistance cuts would leave NZers 'on their own'
Photo:
RNZ
Phasing out government assistance for climate adaptation and property buy-outs would be "morally bankrupt", a climate policy expert says.
An independent reference group set up by the Ministry for the Environment yesterday released a suite of recommendations to help the government shape climate adaptation legislation.
Following a 20-year transition period, homeowners whose houses are flooded or damaged by weather events should not expect buy-outs,
the group recommended
.
The group also recommended that funding for adaptation measures such as flood schemes, sea walls and blue-green infrastructure, should follow a 'beneficiary pays' approach in most cases.
"This would mean those who benefit most from these investments contribute more."
Central government should only invest in adaptation if it would protect Crown assets, "or where broader national benefits can be realised".
"Central government investment or other financing strategies may be appropriate to help overcome challenges in particularly vulnerable areas, where there is less ability to pay."
Victoria University emeritus professor Jonathan Boston, who was part of a previous expert working group on climate adaptation, said the message from the latest report to New Zealanders was clear: "You are on your own."
The report rightly recognised the need for urgent action on climate adaptation, and to make consistent, reliable information about climate hazards available, Boston said.
However, the recommendations to withdraw financial assistance for both property buy-outs and adaptation measures, and to leave decision-making up to individuals, were "fundamentally flawed".
"One of the core responsibilities of any government is to protect its citizens and to deal with natural disasters and so on. That is above almost anything else."
To put an end-date on that was "morally bankrupt and highly undesirable", he said.
The report wrongly assumed that people would act rationally if they were properly informed of the risks, he said.
"We know from vast amounts of literature that people suffer from all kinds of cognitive biases... and that these have a profound influence on whether people make sensible decisions or not.
"And quite apart from cognitive bias, lots of people lack choices. They lack the [financial] resources to make good decisions."
Boston also criticised the recommendation of a transitional period, saying the risks from climate change would continue to evolve well past 2045 or another hard end-date.
He and others had previously warned against the 'moral hazard' of creating expectations of generous property buy-outs every time there was a severe weather event.
"We certainly need to be ensuring that we don't create incentives for people to stay in risky areas or indeed to build in areas that are going to become risky because of climate change," he said.
"But the idea that you can just sort of leave it to individuals to decide what's going to happen and have no oversight or involvement in helping people to make good decisions and helping people to move where they have to move, I just think it's bizarre."
Environmental Defense Society policy director Raewyn Peart said the report seemed to be moving away from the concept of "managed retreat", where communities moved out of harm's way in a coordinated fashion.
"The approach seems to be unmanaged retreat, where we'll give people information and a transition period - they're on notice - and at that point, people can make their own decisions about whether to move or not."
That would be unworkable, Peart said.
"Some people will move, some won't, councils [will have] to provide services to a community that's gradually emptying out, people there who can't afford to move will be trapped into a risky situation - they may be facing regular floods of their properties.
"I just don't think it's in the best interests of the country to essentially leave it to the market and people's individual decisions."
The report recommended handing over responsibility for adaptation planning to local councils, but it was unclear whether central government would provide any financial or administrative support, she said.
"Some councils are really on to it and are already doing it - they have the resources. It's the small councils who may only have one planner, who have no expertise in adaptation planning."
The latest report echoes previous warnings that insurers could increase premiums to unaffordable levels, and even withdraw from some areas, as the risk from climate change hazards continued to increase.
Insurance Council chief executive Kris Faafoi - whose organisation has long called for greater national direction from central government on climate adaptation - said it was good to see the report authors recommending urgent action.
"There's still some very difficult issues to work through - but these extreme weather events are going to happen, and being able to protect communities and to keep insurance affordable and available is really important in the long-term."
There was little appetite anywhere on the political spectrum for expensive buy-outs of properties to continue, he said.
The question of who would actually pay for adaptation measures still needed to be answered, Faafoi said.
"In the report itself, there was an expectation that councils will do a lot of the heavy lifting and where some communities might find it a challenge to be able to pay for some of the protections … then investment from the Crown might be necessary."
But following a 'beneficiary pays' approach could see the costs of adaptation fall heavily on some communities.
"I think reading between the lines, there could be the likes of targeted rates in some areas.
"Again, that has to be floated with communities and as to whether or not people who benefit from that might be able to pay for that."
The report noted the financial difficulties many councils faced.
"Funding will be a challenging proposition if councils' ability to increase rates is constrained," the authors wrote.
Climate Change Minister Simon Watts told RNZ the government welcomes the independent recommendations for how New Zealand can adapt to the impacts of climate change.
"We will now take the time to review recommendations and announce decisions in due course," Watts said.
"The report is not government policy, however the Government is considering the group's recommendations, alongside the findings of last year's cross-party climate adaptation inquiry and other advice, as it works to put in place the building blocks for a national adaptation framework."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Nobby Clark not impressed by brother's surprise mayoral bid
Invercargill Mayor Nobby Clark is not supporting his younger brother's bid for the job. Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER Invercargill mayor Nobby Clark is not backing his brother's attempt to take over his job when he finishes up this election. Nelson-based Andrew Clark is running for mayor in the southern city while simultaneously standing for Tasman district mayor. Up there, he is running as Maxwell Clark. The move has irked big brother Nobby, who is finishing up as mayor after just one term at the helm. "I do not support my brother's nomination," mayor Clark told Local Democracy Reporting. "Why is he using Andrew and not using his known name (Maxwell) - while he is also standing for the Tasman mayoralty for the fifth time?" Andrew Clark said he told Nobby he was running for mayor on Thursday after his nomination went in. He hadn't said anything earlier because he didn't want to rely on "connections". It could be difficult to get hold of Nobby, he said, and he didn't want to overload him in light of recent health issues. Andrew Clark, who also goes by middle name Maxwell, is standing for mayor at opposite ends of the South Island. Photo: Supplied The Invercargill mayor was hospitalised in late June following a minor stroke. Andrew wasn't sure why his brother hadn't taken the news well, but said the two were conversing. "I think there's a lot of stresses and strains in his life," he said. As for Invercargill, Andrew said he had been there "a few times" and would move down if successful. "I have a belief that ratepayers should come front and centre, and as a mayor I would treat the public's money in the same way I treat my own - carefully, intentionally and with accountability." The mayoral hopeful is not completely unfamiliar to council. At a June 2024 meeting, he surprised elected members by making his way to the table mid-meeting to introduce himself and thank them for being supportive in a time of need. Mayor Clark was under fire at the time for a code of conduct matter relating to comments he'd made at a private event a few months earlier. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
How bad is the tariff news for NZ, really?
Photo: ARNE DEDERT / AFP New Zealand has been hit with a higher tariff rate than Australia on exports to the US - but economists say the situation could have been worse. It was revealed on Friday that New Zealand exports would have a 15 percent tariff applied, up from 10 percent announced earlier. Australia remains at 10 percent. Brad Olsen, chief executive at Infometrics, said that was a clear challenge for New Zealand. "There is now a wedge between us and Australia." There were other parts of the world that previously had a higher tariff rate that were now on the same level as New Zealand, such as Europe. "Wine, for example, under the original tariffs, we might have had a slight advantage. Now we don't." But he said it was not necessarily true that the country would have been better off had it negotiated a deal. He said New Zealand did not have a lot to "give up" in those negotiations, and it could have ended up being costly . "I'm a little bit surprised by comments, including from the opposition's trade spokesperson, that the government failed to achieve a lower tariff rate. "The comments seem to make the implication that New Zealand could have found a way to come up with a trade agreement that might have given us a lower tariff rate. "That might be true, but we have no idea what we would have had to give up to achieve that… some of what had to be given up by other countries to get a 15 percent tariffs rate is consequential - Japan and other countries had to give up to half a trillion dollars of further investment into the US." He said the impact on New Zealand's trading partners might not be as bad as had been expected, which should prove positive for the economy. "It will be slightly more challenging to export to the US from a New Zealand point of view, but our trading partner activity might not be hit as bad as was feared in April. That's probably a net benefit for us." Mike Jones, chief economist at BNZ, said the increase was not unexpected given indications of the past few weeks. "It's obviously unhelpful for NZ exports into the US, particularly how we line up with those coming from Australia and the UK, given the lower 10 percent baseline tariff rate for those countries. "Beef and wine exports could be affected. It's interesting in this context that we've seen the NZD/AUD exchange rate fall a little today in the wake of the announcements." Kelly Eckhold, chief economist at Westpac, said he thought New Zealand was in roughly the same position as in April. "On one hand, the tariff is higher, so there is a bigger direct cost, but it's a bit lower for a lot of our trading partners, so it's better for the economy than would otherwise be the case." He said how the lingering elements of uncertainty played out over the coming weeks would be important. "The legal basis of these tariffs, whether they're going to be able to continue or need to be replaced with a different type of tariff, is an issue. And the sectoral tariffs have not yet really been negotiated. "While I don't think these things affect the sort of goods New Zealand trades with the US, there may be some impact on our trading partners." He said it seemed strange that the US was calculating tariffs based on which countries exported more than they imported. "The concept that US authorities have had of countries ripping them off by selling more stuff to America than they're been buying is quite myopic. "We're only talking about goods trade here, we buy a lot of services from the US. "In large part, the trade imbalance is a cyclical rather than a structural story. "In the last few years, the economy has been relatively weak compared to the US. We're not sucking in as many imports, and the exchange rate has been lower than would normally be the case, which has encouraged export revenues. "I would have thought trade policy metrics like tariffs would be determined on the basis of structural, not cyclical factors. "All those things could easily be the other way around in a few years' time." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Electoral Commission rejects claims of Māori roll tampering
Photo: Getty Images / Hagen Hopkins The Chief Electoral Officer is adamant his commission is not changing people's enrolment details without their consent and is pleading with people struggling to access their enrolment details to get in touch. His comments come amidst a flood of claims on social media from Māori who allege their enrolment details have been changed, or erased, without their knowledge. Te Pāti Māori are seeking an explanation and has advised Crown Law it wants to look into the reports as part of a two-pronged legal action against the Electoral Commission. Chief Electoral Officer Karl Le Quesne. File photo. Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver Speaking to RNZ, the commission's top officer, Karl Le Quesne, said they have not and would not change anyone's details without their consent. "I can give you an assurance that we are not moving people from the Māori roll to the General roll or the other way, unless they're requesting that we do that," he said. The commission had been monitoring their online enrolment system "really" closely this week and had so far received 30,554 enrolments and updates - 92 percent of them made online. "We understand some people are having some trouble, so if you are, we really encourage you to call us on 0800 36 76 56 and we'll help you resolve it." Le Quesne said. It was likely those who could not find their details online were on the dormant roll, he said, echoing comments made by the commission's deputy chief executive of operations, Anusha Guler, earlier this week. "When we check today, we've got 114,451 people on the dormant role." According to the Electoral Commission 2023 General Election Report , the dormant roll contains voters who have been removed from the main roll for their electorate because they no longer live at an address and have not updated their enrolment details. At the election, there were 96,406 people on the dormant roll, and of those, 86 percent were on the general dormant roll while 14 percent were on the Māori dormant roll. Le Quesne said being on the dormant roll did not mean people had been taken off their main roll. "We don't switch roles for them when they go on the dormant role. We just need an address from them so we can update their enrollment." He said the system was designed to protect people's information, and getting your details "exact" was really important. The "auto-fill" feature on some people's mobile phones and laptops could be messing with an online entry. "We're really encouraging people to either turn off that auto-fill, or when it auto-fills, you delete it and try and find your address from the drop-down box, because that'll find the address that matches your enrollment record. "I tried myself this morning, and the auto-fill on my phone put in one address, but it wasn't exactly the address that I was enrolled under." People can go online to to enrol, check or update their details, or call 0800 36 76 56. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
