logo
Gold holds steady ahead of Fed policy statement

Gold holds steady ahead of Fed policy statement

Zawya5 days ago
Gold prices steadied on Wednesday as investors held back on making big bets ahead of the Federal Reserve's policy statement later in the day for cues into future rate cuts, while focus remained on U.S. trade talks ahead of the August 1 deadline.
FUNDAMENTALS
* Spot gold was steady at $3,329.19 per ounce as of 0020 GMT. U.S. gold futures rose 0.1% to $3,327.70.
* U.S. and Chinese officials agreed to seek an extension of their 90-day tariff truce on Tuesday, following two days of talks in Stockholm.
* However, U.S. officials said it was up to President Donald Trump to decide whether to extend a trade truce that expires on August 12 or potentially let tariffs shoot back up to triple-digit figures.
* Meanwhile, the U.S. dollar index held steady after hitting a more than one-month high on Tuesday, making greenback-priced bullion more expensive.
* Investors turned their focus to the Fed's policy to gauge its future rate cut path, following the central bank's two-day meeting, during which it is widely expected to keep rates steady, despite Trump's constant call to lower them.
* The U.S. trade deficit in goods narrowed to its lowest in nearly two years in June as imports fell sharply, cementing economists' expectations that trade likely accounted for much of an anticipated rebound in economic growth in the second quarter.
* The International Monetary Fund slightly raised its global growth forecasts for 2025 and 2026 on Tuesday, citing stronger-than-expected buys ahead of a jump in U.S. tariffs on August 1 and a drop in the effective tariff rate to 17.3% from 24.4%.
* Meanwhile, on Tuesday, Trump threatened tariffs and other measures on Russia "10 days from today" if Moscow showed no progress toward ending its more than three-year-long war in Ukraine.
* Spot silver held steady at $38.20 per ounce, platinum fell 0.4% to $1,389.20 and palladium remain unchanged at $1,258.75.
DATA/EVENTS (GMT) 0530 France GDP preliminary QQ Q2 0800 Germany GDP flash QQ SA, YY NSA Q2 0900 EU GDP flash preliminary QQ, YY Q2 0900 EU consumer confidence final July 1230 U.S. GDP advance Q2 (Reporting by Anmol Choubey in Bengaluru; Editing by Sumana Nandy)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla's brand loyalty collapsed after Musk backed Trump, data shows
Tesla's brand loyalty collapsed after Musk backed Trump, data shows

Zawya

timean hour ago

  • Zawya

Tesla's brand loyalty collapsed after Musk backed Trump, data shows

Tesla for years had more repeat U.S. customers than any other major automotive brand but its loyalty has plunged since CEO Elon Musk endorsed President Donald Trump last summer, according to data from research firm S&P Global Mobility shared exclusively with Reuters. The data, which has not been previously reported, shows Tesla's customer loyalty peaked in June 2024, when 73% of Tesla-owning households in the market for a new car bought another Tesla, according to an S&P analysis of vehicle-registration data in all 50 states. That industry-leading brand loyalty rate started to nosedive in July, that data showed, when Musk endorsed Trump following an assassination attempt in Pennsylvania on the Republican nominee. The rate bottomed out at 49.9% last March, just below the industry average, after Musk launched Trump's budget-slashing Department of Government Efficiency in January and started firing thousands of government workers. Tesla's U.S. loyalty rate has since ticked back up to 57.4% in May, the most recent month the S&P data is available, putting it back above the industry average and about the same as Toyota but behind Chevrolet and Ford. S&P analyst Tom Libby called it "unprecedented" to see the runaway leader in customer loyalty fall so quickly to industry-average levels. "I've never seen this rapid of a decline in such a short period of time," he said. Tesla and Musk did not respond to requests for comment. The timing of Tesla's plunging brand loyalty suggests the CEO's involvement in politics turned off customers in the EV pioneer's eco-conscious customer base, some analysts said. "If they have Democratic leanings, then perhaps they consider other brands in addition to Tesla," said Seth Goldstein, an analyst at Morningstar. Tesla's aging model lineup also faces stiffer competition from an array of EVs from legacy automakers including General Motors, Hyundai and BMW. The only new model Tesla has released since 2020, its triangular Cybertruck, has proved a flop despite Musk's prediction of hundreds of thousands of annual sales. On an April earnings call, Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja singled out "the negative impact of vandalism and unwarranted hostility towards our brand and people," but also said there were "several weeks of lost production" when the company retooled factories to produce a refreshed version of its top-selling Model Y. Musk on the April call said that "absent macro issues, we don't see any reduction in demand." Tesla vehicle sales overall are falling globally and have declined 8% in the United States the first five months of 2025, according to S&P. Sales fell 33% over the first six months of the year in Europe, where public backlash to Musk's politicking has been particularly fierce. Musk's increased political activism was "very bad timing" for Tesla, said Garrett Nelson, an analyst who tracks the EV maker at CFRA Research, because it came exactly as the company faced heightened competition from Chinese EV makers and other traditional automakers. He said his top concerns for Tesla are its loss of market share and "what can be done to repair the brand damage." LOYALTY NOSEDIVE Tesla remains the U.S. electric-vehicle sales leader but has seen its dominance erode as Musk last year delved into politics and focused Tesla more on developing self-driving technology than on new affordable models for human drivers. Customer loyalty is a closely watched auto-industry metric because it is 'much more expensive' to take new customers from competitors than to retain existing ones, said S&P's Libby. S&P offers some of the most detailed industry data on automotive purchases because it analyzes vehicle registration data from all 50 states on a household-by-household basis. Unlike survey data, it follows actual vehicle transactions to track how consumers migrate among brands and models. From the fourth quarter of 2021 through the third quarter of last year, more than 60% of Tesla-owning households bought another one for their next car purchase, the data show. Only one other brand – Ford – posted a quarterly loyalty rate exceeding 60% during the period, and only once. CUSTOMER DEFECTIONS S&P's data also examines another aspect of the automotive market: Which brands and models are taking customers away from others, and which ones are losing them? Until recently, Tesla was in a different stratosphere than other automotive brands on this metric. For the four years prior to July 2024, Tesla, on average, acquired nearly five new households for every one it lost to another brand. No other brand from a major automaker was even close: Hyundai's luxury Genesis brand was the next best, acquiring on average 2.8 households for every one it lost, followed by Kia and Hyundai, which acquired on average 1.5 and 1.4 households, respectively, for every one they lost. Ford, Toyota and Honda lost more households on average than they gained during that period. Tesla's average inflow of customers started to decline in July 2024 along with its loyalty rate. Since February, Tesla has been gaining fewer than two households for every one it loses to the rest of the industry, its lowest level ever, according to the data. 'The data shows clearly that the net migration to Tesla is slowing,' Libby said. Brands that now attract more Tesla customers than they lose to Tesla include Rivian, Polestar, Porsche and Cadillac, the data show. Brian Mulberry, client portfolio manager at Tesla investor Zacks Investment Management, said he isn't concerned about Tesla's long-term earnings because he expects enormous profits from its plans to operate robotaxis and license self-driving technology to other automakers. Tesla launched a small test of robotaxis in Austin in June, giving rides to hand-picked fans and Internet personalities but the service isn't available to the general public. If Tesla succeeds in expanding the technology, Mulberry said, 'there's a case to be made that Tesla doesn't need to sell cars and trucks anymore.'​ (Reporting by Chris Kirkham in Los Angeles. Editing by Brian Thevenot and Michael Learmonth.)

Forget TACO trades and meme stocks, this rally is no illusion
Forget TACO trades and meme stocks, this rally is no illusion

The National

timean hour ago

  • The National

Forget TACO trades and meme stocks, this rally is no illusion

Are stocks ignoring reality? Or gorging on empty calories of 'TACO' (Trump Always Chickens Out) trading – or getting bloated from frothy meme stocks? Bears believe that since world stocks' rally quickly reversed 2025's early-year correction. The reality is way simpler: forward-looking stocks pre-priced a worst-case tariff scenario in the spring that never arrived. A better-than-feared world is now taking shape. In any bull market, that is all stocks need to rally. Stocks move most on surprises – and US President Donald Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' tariff debacle was a doozy of a negative surprise. You know the fears that followed, you have heard them for months. A huge retaliatory trade war engulfing the entire world. Recession roiling the globe. Hot inflation galloping again as tariffs turbocharge import prices and muck up supply chains. A reworking of long-held alliances and perhaps even the world order. Bad, bad, bad. The initial panic was fully understandable, given the proposed tariffs' stunning (and stupid) scope, as I detailed before. And how hard it would be to know what would happen since tariffs are always negative – governmentally picking winners and losers, discouraging investment, interrupting trade flows and worse. Some threatened tariff rates were prohibitive. Stocks had to pre-price that potential awful impact. Particularly US stocks. Tariffs always hurt the imposer the most, as I've said here before, because the imposer citizens ultimately pay them. Moreover, Mr Trump's vacillating sparked sweeping American uncertainty. But reality has proven far better than feared. Through late July, the US collected only about 42 per cent of worst-case scenario tariff estimates, based on import volumes. Why? Many tariffs are easily evaded, as I explained in June. Firms continue to transship through other countries that have lower tariff rates. They find loopholes – legal and illegal. Meanwhile, US Customs and Border Protection simply hasn't enough staff to inspect all shipments. Goods slip through. Yes, Mr Trump wants to hire 10,000 customs and border agents. Good luck. During his first term, a Department of Homeland Security report found hiring 5,000 qualified personnel is likely to require interviewing 750,000 candidates, based on hiring and attrition rates. And this is after the administration laid off many workers. What qualified workers will want that role and risk? Also, while we are far from the '90 deals in 90 days' Mr Trump promised, new trade agreements have emerged. They aren't great and leave tariffs much higher than a year ago. That is objectively bad. But not as bad as those lousy post-April 2 expectations. Less bad than feared is always bullish. Yes, America's deals with the UK and China were flimsy. But Japan and EU deals yielded lower tariff rates than feared. Vietnam, too. Don't misunderstand – these deals include abundant phoney baloney, like the US 'investment commitments' other countries supposedly made. Japan's $550 billion plan is mostly a lending facility with only 1 per cent to 2 per cent of funds deployed as direct American investment – if they ever are. China's 2018 investment pledges wildly under-delivered. The EU is already openly contradicting White House statements about its supposed US investment plan. Yet again, the totality is less bad than previous draconian fears, step by step – an OK for stocks. Retaliation? Little to speak of after China's initial tit-for-tat, which flipped to fizzle fast. Instead, non-US nations seem invested more in stimulating their own economies and freeing trade with other nations outside America. The UK signed a free trade agreement with India in May. It lowers tariffs and eases trade barriers. Now, the EU is working on doing similarly. Other talks are under way, spurred by Mr Trump's protectionist threats. Those pluses counteract some of his tariff turmoil. Further, the tariff-induced supply chain chaos some feared is nowhere to be found. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York's Global Supply Chain Pressure Index is at zero – exactly in line with the historical average since 1997. The number of ships entering US ports is in line with the median for the last four years. Ships anchored outside US ports have increased slightly but are a far cry from 2022's crazy back-ups. Hence, markets rebounded – rationally and justifiably. They see economies weathering the tariff terror and corporate earnings expectations climbing. US stocks lagging other countries in 2025 shows you tariffs are still worse for America than other countries. US stocks are up 9.4 per cent through July 28 versus 19.8 per cent for the rest of the developed world. Yes, the US regained some ground since the lows. But that is all about bouncing bigger after falling more. The hunt for froth, TACO trades or other explanations is unnecessary narrative creation conjuring biased takes. Tariffs are bad. Period. But as I told you, they are hard to implement and would likely not be as bad as expected. You are seeing that now – and that's bullish.

Why localised storytelling is the future of Chinese automotive branding
Why localised storytelling is the future of Chinese automotive branding

Campaign ME

time3 hours ago

  • Campaign ME

Why localised storytelling is the future of Chinese automotive branding

When we first partnered with a leading Chinese automotive brand, our goal wasn't just to build a social media presence — it was to start a conversation. We were one of the first local agencies to help Chinese automotive brands establish a real digital footprint in the Middle East and Africa. From day one, we knew this market demanded more than a simple translation of global content. It needed a transformation — an approach built on genuine understanding of local cultures and preferences. What gave us an edge was our ability to navigate both sides: we understood the expectations, mindset and brand language of Chinese clients just as well as we understood what resonates with consumers in this region. That balance made all the difference in how we brought their stories to life, in a way that felt both relevant and authentic. Chinese automotive brands on the rise Chinese automakers are gaining ground fast across the region. They've reshaped the global car market with a mix of design, technology, and accessibility. But growth in the Middle East and Africa isn't automatic. Success depends on making a brand feel local — giving it a voice that fits. Navigating challenges Competition here is tough. Legacy brands have built decades of trust. For automotive brands looking to deepen their roots in the region, the challenge is clear: how do you stand out and build authentic connections? It's not just about the car — it's about understanding the people. In this region, people look for brands that understand their lifestyle and reflect their identity — not just manufacturers of vehicles. A global strategy is only as good as its local relevance. Cheil's approach We worked closely with our clients to create an integrated strategy centred on culture, not just content. We focused on passion points like innovation and lifestyle, and built a multi-faceted plan that combined always-on digital storytelling with key offline activations. This wasn't about ticking boxes — it was about listening to the market. Every post, event, and collaboration was designed to reflect how people here live, drive and connect. Our journey Our work wasn't a campaign — it was a journey. We built partnerships with trusted regional voices and created content that resonated during moments that matter. Through both online engagement and offline experiences, Chinese automotive brands became more than names — they became part of conversations about innovation, progress and culture. We also celebrated the region's heritage alongside Chinese innovation — not just showcasing products, but building bridges between cultures. It's a big part of why these brands aren't just growing their presence — they're building engaged communities. Looking ahead The future belongs to brands that connect on a deeper level. In the Middle East and Africa, storytelling will matter more than ever. Our current focus is on deepening two-way cultural storytelling — continuing to celebrate both local identity and Chinese heritage. When brands respect and reflect the people they speak to, real loyalty follows. Final thoughts for automotive brands Growth in this region isn't about being everywhere. It's about being meaningful. Chinese automotive brands have an incredible opportunity — but lasting success will come from relevance, not reach. Our journey shows that when brands commit to listening, adapting and celebrating culture, they don't just grow — they thrive. At Cheil MEA, we believe it's not just about building brands. It's about building connections that last. By Wang Junwen, Group Director – Omnichannel, Cheil Middle East & Africa

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store