logo
US wants Indonesia to undo trade barriers amid tariff threat, but Jakarta should stand firm: Analysts

US wants Indonesia to undo trade barriers amid tariff threat, but Jakarta should stand firm: Analysts

CNA02-05-2025

JAKARTA: Indonesia should stand firm against the United States' recent demands to remove a broad suite of trade practices Washington considers unfair, experts said, arguing that some of these policies are needed to protect Southeast Asia's largest economy's national interests.
These so-called 'trade barriers' were identified in a report by the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Mar 31 detailing factors hindering US companies from entering the Indonesian market.
The 2025 National Trade Estimate (NTE) Report on Foreign Trade Barriers has been used as one of the basis for US President Donald Trump to impose a planned 32 per cent tariff on Indonesian goods.
The USTR is leading the technical negotiations with various countries including Indonesia amid the tariff threat.
Among the barriers mentioned by the report are lax protection of copyright laws, rampant corruption and overly complicated bureaucracy which have been cause for concerns for many companies operating in Indonesia, US-owned or otherwise.
However, experts noted that the USTR list includes policies which should not be considered trade barriers.
These include Indonesia's efforts to develop its own cashless payment system and those which Indonesia needs to protect its own national interests such as import quotas and requirements to have some components produced locally before a product can be sold in Indonesia.
'We need some of these policies to protect our own manufacturing sector, spur investment and to stimulate our economy. It will be unreasonable for Indonesia to meet all these demands (from the US),' Tauhid Ahmad, an economist from Jakarta-based think-tank Institute for Development of Economics and Finance (INDEF) told CNA.
Without these policies, the archipelago could risk losing massive amounts of foreign investment, higher unemployment and even a recession, warn experts.
Over the last two weeks, several senior Indonesian officials have met with their US counterparts at the sideline of an International Monetary Fund and World Bank Group summit in Washington DC, to negotiate the proposed 32 per cent tariffs the US wants to impose on Indonesia.
These tariffs have been put on hold for 90 days since Apr 9, along with other 'reciprocal' tariffs on imports from almost 60 countries. The 10 per cent baseline tariff on all countries is still in place.
Coordinating minister for economy, Airlangga Hartarto who led the Indonesian delegation, said that Indonesia is willing to negotiate these trade barriers on top of buying billions of dollars worth of US products, in exchange for a lower tariff.
'In principle, what Indonesia is offering… is appreciated by America,' Airlangga told reporters on Monday. The minister refused to elaborate further but promised that any agreement between the two countries would be a 'win-win solution'.
When Indonesia became one of more than 180 countries and territories targetedby Trump's reciprocal tariffs on Apr 2, Southeast Asia's biggest economy responded by vowing not to retaliate and instead, import more goods from the US to balance Indonesia's trade surplus.
As negotiations continued, experts said it appeared that the Trump administration wanted more and urged Indonesia to also remove what the US considered to be 'trade barriers'.
'These trade barriers have been identified in previous USTR reports, long before Trump became president. The difference is this time the US is using the threat of tariffs to get what they want: the elimination of all these barriers for American goods,' Tauhid of INDEF said.
The tariff plan has already sparked fear of a potential recession, leading the Indonesian stock market to drop by nine per cent on Apr 8, its first trading day after the Idul Fitri holiday period.
The World Bank last week slashed Indonesia's growth forecast from 5.1 per cent to 4.7 per cent this year. Indonesia's Finance Ministry however is confident that the country can still grow by 5 per cent this year, although the figure is lower than Indonesia's economic growth target of 5.2 per cent.
SOME REQUIREMENTS RELAXED
Part of the reason why Trump is threatening to impose a 32 per cent tariff on Indonesian goods is that the US is buying more from Indonesia than the other way around.
Last year, Indonesia exported US$28.1 billion worth of electrical appliances, clothes, furniture and other products to the US, a 4.8 per cent rise from 2023. Conversely, US exports' to Indonesia amounted to US$10.2 billion, up 3.7 per cent from 2023.
This means that from 2023 to 2024, the US' trade deficit with Indonesia has grown by 5.4 per cent from US$16.9 billion to US$17.9 billion.
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto said the country is prepared to be flexible about its local content requirement policy, which the USTR has identified as a trade barrier. The policy, known as TKDN, requires a product to have a certain percentage of components produced locally before it can be sold in the Indonesian market.
'We have to be realistic. If we force TKDN (to be applied), in the end, we will lose a competitive advantage. TKDN needs to be flexible or perhaps replaced with incentives,' Prabowo said on Apr 9, a week after Trump announced his tariffs.
The TKDN requirement was one of the reasons why tech giant Apple could not sell its iPhone 16 in Indonesia after its launch in October last year. The ban was lifted in March when Apple finally met the 40 per cent local component requirement set by Jakarta and agreed to build two Apple accessory factories in Indonesia.
Experts lambasted Prabowo's statement, saying that although so far it has yet resulted in any amendments to the requirement, the comment was enough to dissuade several investors from putting their money in Indonesia.
'Some investors are waiting to see what Indonesia is going to do next. If Indonesia really scraps the TKDN requirement as the US had wanted, what is the point of opening up a factory (in Indonesia) to produce local components?' Bhima Yudhistira, executive director of the Center of Economic and Law Studies (CELIOS), another Jakarta-based think tank, told CNA.
Experts have also defended Indonesia's decision to develop its own QR Code-based payment gateway, QRIS, which allows consumers to pay with their phones instead of debit or credit cards.
As more and more Indonesians prefer the QRIS over cards issued by Visa or Mastercard, both American multinational payment cards, the USTR listed the payment system as a trade barrier.
According to the US agency, US companies 'were not ... invited to share views on how the system might interact with existing global payment frameworks'.
According to Bank Indonesia, there were more than 2.6 billion rupiah (US$156,681) worth of transactions using the QRIS system in the first three months of 2025, a 170 per cent growth compared to the same period last year.
Bank Indonesia's Senior Deputy Governor Destry Damayanti said the central bank is open to working with any country, including the US, on QRIS or other fast payment technologies.
'Visa and Mastercard are still major players in our credit card space, so really, there's no issue,' she said last week as quoted by the Jakarta Globe.
On Monday, Airlangga confirmed that some trade barriers identified by USTR will either be relaxed or eliminated entirely, but did not say which ones.
The minister said over the next 60 days, there will be more meetings between the US and Indonesia over the matter.
RISK OF OPENING A FLOODGATE
Indonesia is also looking to increase its import of American products.
Airlangga said his country is prepared to bring this year's imports from the US to US$18.5 billion, a significant increase from last year's US$10.2 billion. The minister said Indonesia is also ready to provide incentives so that some American products are sold more competitively in Indonesia.
Bhima of CELIOS said Indonesia does not need to relax its non-tariff trade barriers, arguing that the offer to increase imports has been generous enough.
'Trump has time and time again argued that the tariffs are about overcoming the US trade deficit with other countries and Indonesia is offering to close that deficit,' he said, adding that relaxing some of Indonesia's protectionist policies like import quotas or the local component requirements could open a floodgate of foreign products.
'Because of the trade war, every country is looking to dump products which they cannot sell to the US. If we open some of these trade barriers, Indonesia will be flooded with foreign goods and our manufacturing sector will suffer,' Bhima said.
Yusuf Rendy Manilet, an economist from think tank, Center of Reform on Economics (CORE) said Indonesia could relax some quotas and requirements on certain products. 'Especially commodities that we cannot produce ourselves but the US has a lot of like wheat or soy,' he said.
'The bottom line is we should not be hasty about opening up our import quota or other non-tariff trade barriers.'
Yusuf said that other wheat and soy-producing countries might want to make sure Indonesia keeps buying their commodities over the US.
'We can use that to our advantage, particularly to diversify the market for our own products,' he added.
Minister Airlangga said Indonesia is currently in talks with many countries on how they can cooperate amid the ongoing trade war.
'At the same time, we need to address the more legitimate concerns the USTR had like the lack of copyright protection which led to the proliferation of pirated software developed by US tech companies,' Yusuf said.
For 13 years in a row, Indonesia has been on USTR's Priority Watch List with respect to intellectual property protection and enforcement.
The US agency wrote in its March report that pirated software, fake apparel and other counterfeited goods are being sold in the open with 'little or no enforcement actions.' Even when law enforcers decide to take action, producers and sellers of counterfeit goods are rarely prosecuted in court.
Bhima of CELIOS said Indonesia also needs to streamline bureaucracy and stamp out corruption.
'We need to show that for the more reasonable concerns raised by the USTR, we are addressing them seriously,' he said.
Indonesia also needs to remind Trump that Indonesia has been a very good friend of the US, said some experts.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Japan's Q1 GDP contraction narrows on consumption improvement, revised figure shows
Japan's Q1 GDP contraction narrows on consumption improvement, revised figure shows

CNA

time27 minutes ago

  • CNA

Japan's Q1 GDP contraction narrows on consumption improvement, revised figure shows

TOKYO :Japan's economy contracted in the January-March quarter at a slower pace than initially estimated, government data showed on Monday, with consumption figures revised upwards even as uncertainty on U.S. tariffs clouds the outlook. Gross domestic product shrank an annualised 0.2 per cent in the three months to March, the Cabinet Office's revised data showed, slower than the 0.7 per cent contraction in the initial estimate and economists' median forecast. The revised quarter-on-quarter number translates as flat in price-adjusted terms, compared with a 0.2 per cent shrinkage issued on May 16. Monday's revised data reinforced analysts' concern that the economy was losing steam even before U.S. President Donald Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs in April 2. Private consumption, which accounts for more than half of the Japanese economy, inched up 0.1 per cent, versus flat in the preliminary reading. The capital expenditure component of GDP, a barometer of private demand-led strength, rose 1.1 per cent in the first quarter, revised down from 1.4 per cent in the initial estimate. Economists had estimated a 1.3 per cent rise. External demand, or exports minus imports, knocked 0.8 per centage point off growth, the same as the initial reading. On the other hand, domestic demand contributed 0.8 per centage point. Japan faces a 24 per cent U.S. tariff starting in July unless it can negotiate a lower rate. It is also scrambling to find ways to persuade Washington to exempt its automakers from 25 per cent tariffs on automobiles, Japan's biggest industry. Policymakers and analysts are concerned global trade tension unleashed by U.S. tariffs may complicate the Bank of Japan's efforts to normalise monetary policy. The BOJ is set to hold a two-day policy meeting early next week.

What to know about the immigration protests in Los Angeles
What to know about the immigration protests in Los Angeles

Straits Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

What to know about the immigration protests in Los Angeles

The National Guard, police and protesters stand off outside of a downtown jail in Los Angeles on June 8. PHOTO: AFP Los Angeles police officers arrest a person during protests near the Edward R. Roybal Federal Building in Los Angeles on June 8. PHOTO: EPA-EFE Protesters are blanketed in smoke along Alondra Boulevard during a standoff with law enforcement in the Los Angeles County city of Compton. PHOTO: REUTERS Demonstrators kneel with their hands raised in front of Los Angeles Metro Police during a protest in Los Angeles, California, on June 8. PHOTO: REUTERS What to know about the immigration protests in Los Angeles LOS ANGELES - The first of at least 2,000 National Guard troops began arriving in Los Angeles on June 8 morning, ordered in by President Donald Trump to deal with protests against workplace immigration raids after two days of unrest. Any demonstration that got in the way of immigration officials would be considered a 'form of rebellion,' Mr Trump said in his order, issued June 7. The dispatch of troops was an extraordinary escalation that put Los Angeles squarely at the centre of tensions over his administration's immigration crackdown. An expert said it was the first time since 1965 that a president had bypassed a state governor to activate that state's National Guard force for law enforcement or civil unrest purposes. Governor Gavin Newsom of California called Mr Trump's order 'purposefully inflammatory'. He said there was no shortage of law enforcement resources to deal with the protests, and that the federal government was sending the troops because it wanted 'a spectacle'. Protests broke out in Los Angeles on June 6 against a series of raids that appeared to be part of a new phase of the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, in which officials say they will focus increasingly on workplaces. Protesters continued demonstrating downtown and in nearby cities on June 7 as law enforcement officers made arrests and in some cases used crowd-control munitions, tear gas and flash-bang grenades against the protesters. Hundreds of National Guard troops had arrived in Los Angeles by June 8 afternoon, and protests flared up again in the city's downtown. Here's what to know: How have the protests developed? The demonstrations began on June 6 after camouflage-clad federal agents began combing the garment district in Los Angeles in search of people suspected of being immigrants in the country without legal permission. The raid, which spread alarm among workers in the city, incited chaotic scenes between protesters, who chanted and threw eggs, and law enforcement officers, who fired pepper spray and crowd-control munitions. Demonstrations continued on June 7, both downtown and in the greater Los Angeles area, including the largely Latino and working-class city of Paramount, about 24km to the south. Protests there were some of the most volatile in the region, with law enforcement officers using flash-bang grenades and firing crowd-control munitions. A firework sent by protesters explodes near by the Los Angeles Sheriff Department officers during immigration protest in Paramount, California, on June 7. PHOTO: AFP Mr Bill Essayli, the Trump administration's top law enforcement official in Southern California, said more than 100 people were arrested on June 6 and at least 20 more were arrested on June 7, mostly in Paramount. A Department of Homeland Security official added Sunday that US officials had arrested eight people in Paramount on June 7 on federal obstruction charges. Two of the eight were minors and have been released from custody, the official said. The streets of Los Angeles were largely quiet on the morning of June 8 as the first National Guard troops began to arrive downtown at the Metropolitan Detention Centre, where the Los Angeles Police Department had detained a number of protesters on June 7. By early afternoon on June 8, hundreds of demonstrators outside the detention centre were facing off with federal law-enforcement officials in riot gear. The officials – including from DHS and Immigration and Customs Enforcement – fired canisters of tear gas into the crowd. National Guard troops were also gathered in Paramount, near a Home Depot where protesters had clashed with agents on June 7. Who calls in the national guard? The National Guard is the only branch of the military that can be deployed both by state governors and by the president. Governors almost always control deployment in their states. The Guard operates similarly to the Army Reserve force. Most of its members do not serve full time. They generally hold civilian jobs and attend regular training sessions, and are called into active service only when needed. The National Guard is most often called upon during extreme weather events like hurricanes, floods and wildfires. Troops have sometimes been used to quell civil disturbances at the state governor's request. The National Guard is the only branch of the military that can be deployed both by state governors and by the president. PHOTO: AFP One example was in 1992, when Governor Pete Wilson of California asked President George H.W. Bush to deploy the Guard after riots erupted in Los Angeles over the acquittal of four white police officers in the beating of Mr Rodney King, a black man. Before Mr Trump's move, the last time a president activated a state's National Guard troops for such a purpose without being asked to do so by the state's governor was in 1965, according to Ms Elizabeth Goitein, senior director of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Centre for Justice, an independent law and policy organization. On that occasion, she said, President Lyndon B. Johnson used troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Alabama. What have officials said? Trump administration officials have criticised the state's political leadership over their handling of the protests, while California's Democratic leaders blasted Mr Trump's order as unnecessary and an inappropriate use of power. Ms Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said in a statement on the night of June 7 that Mr Trump was deploying the National Guard in response to 'violent mobs' that she said had attacked federal law enforcement and immigration agents. The 2,000 troops would 'address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester,' she said. A protester walks through smoke from flash-bang smoke grenades fired by federal agents near a Home Depot in Paramount, California, on June 7. PHOTO: EPA-EFE Mr Trump described the demonstrations, which have been largely peaceful, as 'insurrectionist' on social media on June 8. He did not rule out invoking the Insurrection Act, which would allow him to deploy the US military domestically, and told reporters that there were 'violent people' at the protests and that 'we're not going to let them get away with it'. State and local authorities in California and Los Angeles County have not indicated any need for federal assistance. State attorney general Rob Bonta said on social media that local law enforcement 'have the resources they need to meet the moment' and that Mr Trump's order was 'counterproductive'. Governor Newsom called the president's order 'purposefully inflammatory' and said that Trump had activated the National Guard only because his administration wanted 'a spectacle.' Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles said the National Guard's presence would 'not be helpful'. She said the city was capable of handling protests, adding that she had been in contact with White House officials and Mr Tom Homan, Mr Trump's 'border czar'. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

BYD unleashes an EV industry reckoning that alarms Beijing
BYD unleashes an EV industry reckoning that alarms Beijing

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

BYD unleashes an EV industry reckoning that alarms Beijing

The Chinese government is trying to prevent price cuts by market leader BYD from turning into a vicious spiral. PHOTO: REUTERS BEIJING - The price war engulfing China's electric vehicle (EV) industry has sent share prices tumbling and prompted an unusual level of intervention from Beijing. The shakeout may just be getting started. For all the Chinese government's efforts to prevent price cuts by market leader BYD from turning into a vicious spiral, analysts say a combination of weaker demand and extreme overcapacity will slice into profits at the strongest brands and force feebler competitors to fold. Even after the number of EV makers starting shrinking for the first time in 2024, the industry is still using less than half its production capacity. Chinese authorities are trying to minimise the fallout, chiding the sector for 'rat race competition' and summoning heads of major brands to Beijing last week. Yet previous attempts to intervene have had little success. For the short term at least, investors are betting few automakers will escape unscathed: BYD, arguably the biggest winner from industry consolidation, has lost US$21.5 billion (S$27.7 billion) in market value since its shares peaked in late May. 'What you're seeing in China is disturbing, because there's a lack of demand and extreme price cutting,' said John Murphy, a senior automotive analyst at Bank of America Corp. Eventually there will be 'massive consolidation' to soak up the excess capacity, Mr Murphy said. For automakers, relentless discounting erodes profit margins, undermines brand value and forces even well-capitalised companies into unsustainable financial positions. Low-priced and low-quality products can seriously damage the international reputation of 'Made-in-China' cars, the People's Daily, an outlet controlled by the Communist Party, said. And that knock would come just as models from BYD to Geely, Zeekr and Xpeng start to collect accolades on the world stage. For consumers, price drops may seem beneficial but they mask deeper risks. Unpredictable pricing discourages long-term trust – already people are complaining on China's social media, wondering why they should buy a car now when it may be cheaper next week – while there's a chance automakers, as they cut costs to stay afloat, may reduce investment in quality, safety and after-sales service. Auto CEOs were told last week they must 'self-regulate' and shouldn't sell cars below cost or offer unreasonable price cuts, according to people familiar with the matter. The issue of zero-mileage cars also came up – where vehicles with no distance on their odometers are sold by dealers into the second-hand market, seen widely as a way for automakers to artificially inflate sales and clear inventory. Chinese automakers have been discounting a lot more aggressively than their foreign counterparts. Mr Murphy said US automakers should just get out. 'Tesla probably needs to be there to compete with those companies and understand what's going on, but there's a lot of risk there for them.' Others leave no room for doubt that BYD, China's No. 1 selling car brand, is the culprit. 'It's obvious to everyone that the biggest player is doing this,' Jochen Siebert, managing director at auto consultancy JSC Automotive, said. 'They want a monopoly where everybody else gives up.' BYD's aggressive tactics are raising concerns over the potential dumping of cars, dealership management issues and 'squeezing out suppliers,' he said. The pricing turmoil is also unfolding against a backdrop of significant overcapacity. The average production utilization rate in China's automotive industry was mere 49.5 per cent in 2024, data compiled by Shanghai-based Gasgoo Automotive Research Institute show. An April report by AlixPartners meanwhile highlights the intense competition that's starting to emerge among new energy vehicle makers, or companies that produce pure battery cars and plug-in hybrids. In 2024, the market saw its first ever consolidation among NEV-dedicated brands, with 16 exiting and 13 launching. Jiyue Auto shows how quickly things can change. A little over a year after launching its first car, the automaker jointly backed by big names Zhejiang Geely Holding Group and technology giant Baidu, began to scale down production and seek fresh funds. It's a dilemma for all carmakers, but especially smaller ones. 'If you don't follow suit once a leading company makes a price move, you might lose the chance to stay at the table,' AlixPartners consultant Zhang Yichao said. He added that China's low capacity utilization rate, which is 'fundamentally fueling' the competition, is now even under more pressure from export uncertainties. While the push to find an outlet for excess production is thrusting more Chinese brands to export, international markets can only offer some relief. 'The US market is completely closed and Japan and Korea may close very soon if they see an invasion of Chinese carmakers,' Mr Siebert said. 'Russia, which was the biggest export market last year, is now becoming very difficult. I also don't see South-east Asia as an opportunity anymore.' The pressure of cost cutting has also led analysts to express concern over supply chain finance risks. A price cut demand by BYD to one of its suppliers late in 2024 attracted scrutiny around how the car giant may be using supply chain financing to mask its ballooning debt. A report by accounting consultancy GMT Research put BYD's true net debt at closer to 323 billion yuan (S$57.9 billion), compared with the 27.7 billion yuan officially on its books as of the end of June 2024. The pain is also bleeding into China's dealdership network. Dealership groups in two provinces have gone out of business since April, both of them ones that were selling BYD cars. Beijing's meeting with automakers last week wasn't the first attempt at a ceasefire. Two years ago, in mid 2023, 16 major automakers, including Tesla Inc., BYD and Geely signed a pact, witnessed by the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers, to avoid 'abnormal pricing.' Within days though, CAAM deleted one of the four commitments, saying that a reference to pricing in the pledge was inappropriate and in breach of a principle enshrined in the nation's antitrust laws. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store