
The McVulnerability Trap
In my psychology practice, when tears enter the room, they have a way of cutting through the noise—all of the defenses, all of the pretenses. A client's carefully constructed walls fall away, allowing something deep to emerge. I've seen this happen time and again, and it's why for years I saw crying as one of the purest forms of vulnerability—until I discovered crying TikTok.
The trend is exactly what you might expect: People post videos of themselves crying (or trying not to). Some of these videos are slickly produced; some feature moody music; many rack up hundreds of thousands of views. These displays of vulnerability are, of course, not restricted to TikTok (whose fate, under the new Trump administration, is uncertain). They can also be found on YouTube, Instagram, and other apps, part of a broader online aesthetic. Influencers and celebrities strip down to what can seem like the rawest version of themselves, selling the promise of 'real' emotional connection—and, not infrequently, products or their personal brand. In a post titled ' Reacting to My Sad and Lonely Videos,' the YouTube star Trisha Paytas watches old footage of herself sobbing and is moved to tears all over again; this sort of post shares space in her channel with clips in which she pitches her own merch. On Instagram, influencers toggle between montages of sadness and sponsored videos that show them cozily sipping fancy tea.
The weepy confessions are, ostensibly, gestures toward intimacy. They're meant to inspire empathy, to reassure viewers that influencers are just like them. But in fact, they're exercises in what I've come to call 'McVulnerability,' a synthetic version of vulnerability akin to fast food: mass-produced, easily accessible, sometimes tasty, but lacking in sustenance. True vulnerability can foster emotional closeness. McVulnerability offers only an illusion of it. And just as choosing fast food in favor of more nutritious options can, over time, result in harmful outcomes, consuming 'fast vulnerability' instead of engaging in bona fide human interaction can send people down an emotionally unhealthy path.
Not long ago in American culture, vulnerability was largely associated with weakness. To be vulnerable meant to be helpless or susceptible to harm. Then came Brené Brown, the social worker and research professor who, with her viral 2010 TED Talk, became one of the most prominent voices transforming the perception of vulnerability for a new audience. In her book Daring Greatly, Brown defined vulnerability as the 'birthplace of love, belonging, joy, courage, empathy, and creativity,' and as a crucial element in personal growth—a liberating message for people raised to suppress their feelings and show toughness.
This was well before the consumerist blending of therapy-speak and personal branding that has become commonplace on social media. It was four years before The Body Keeps the Score got the masses talking about trauma, and it was eight years before Nicole LePera launched the Holistic Psychologist on Instagram, today one of the platform's most popular therapy accounts. But in the past decade and a half, vulnerability's trajectory has come to mirror that of many psychological concepts—such as mindfulness, boundary-setting, and self-love—whose lines of insight have been tangled up with the attention economy and the free market.
McVulnerability is perhaps an inevitable outcome of what the sociologist Eva Illouz identifies as a modern-day landscape of 'emotional capitalism.' 'Never has the private self been so publicly performed and harnessed to the discourses and values of the economic and political spheres,' Illouz writes in her book Cold Intimacies. Emotional capitalism has 'realigned emotional cultures, making the economic self emotional and emotions more closely harnessed to instrumental action.' That is, not only does emotionality sell goods, but emotions themselves have also become commodities.
As people's vulnerability proxies—podcasters, celebrities, crying YouTubers—pour out their heart while shilling for their favorite cashmere brands, consumerism becomes unconsciously tethered to the viewing or listening experience. Studies have found that when people spend more time on social-media platforms, they are more likely to buy more things and to do so impulsively—especially when they feel emotionally connected to the content they watch. This is, perhaps, one of the more insidious effects of McVulnerability: It helps encourage a self-perpetuating cycle of materialism and loneliness, in which one inevitably spawns the other.
Yet McVulnerability's practitioners are also offering supply to satisfy a real emotional demand. As Derek Thompson wrote earlier this month in The Atlantic, more and more Americans are retreating from in-person social interactions, turning instead to smartphones and other devices in search of intimacy. Yes, they may be communicating with friends and family. But they are also spending a lot of time 'with' people they don't know at all.
Read: 'Close Friends,' for a monthly fee
The rise of momfluencers serves as a perfect example. Many new mothers find themselves isolated and exhausted as they make the transition into parenthood. Maybe their families live across the country, or their friends are too busy to stop by. Starved for community, they might be struggling to find people with whom they can sit down and say, This sucks. On social media, they find influencers sharing tearful confessions about mom guilt or mom rage. But these posts aren't a substitute for actual community and support. Once the isolated moms put down their phone, they're just as alone as they were before.
Not all of the vulnerability shared online is devoid of authenticity. It can be genuinely helpful when someone describes their personal trials publicly, such as a survivor of abuse who shares their story, galvanizing others to seek safety. Vulnerability caught on video can also offer a powerful glimpse into the gravity of collective tragedy. An emotional clip about losing a home to wildfires can, for instance, bring to life the human cost of crisis in a way that headlines and statistics cannot. And of course, some parents who share their difficult experiences online do provide a valuable service, offering validation and practical insights (on, say, postpartum depression) that aren't always accessible elsewhere.
Next to those videos, it's not hard to see the ways in which McVulnerability, melodramatic and consumption-driven, merely masquerades as a chance to connect. McVulnerability offers a fleeting, convenient, and comfortable digital experience, allowing the people who consume it to skirt past the complications of being in a relationship with another person—although for some viewers, truth be told, that might be part of the appeal.
In my years as a therapist, I've seen a trend among some of my younger clients: They prefer the controlled environment of the internet—the polish of YouTube, the ephemeral nature of TikTok—to the tender awkwardness of making new friends. Instead of reaching out to a peer, they'll turn to the comfort of their phone and spend time with their preferred influencers. At a talk in 2023, the psychotherapist Esther Perel touched on this impulse while discussing what she calls 'artificial intimacy' —pseudo-experiences of emotional closeness that mimic connection but lack depth. These 'digitally facilitated connections,' she said, risk 'lowering our expectations of intimacy between humans' and leave us 'unprepared and unable to tolerate the inevitable unpredictabilities of human nature, love, and life.' I understand where my young clients are coming from: Putting yourself out there is uncomfortable. But for the reasons Perel articulated, I also worry that by relying mostly on social media to encounter other humans, they're forfeiting opportunities to develop the skills that could help them thrive in the flesh-and-blood world.
One of my psychology mentors has a point she repeats often: 'Vulnerability is generous.' It can be easier to project invulnerability, to pretend we don't believe strongly in an issue, to act as if we don't want. But being vulnerable—exposing ourselves via the unfiltered messiness of life—is one of the biggest emotional risks we can take, and one of the greatest gifts we can offer another person. When you choose to be vulnerable, you are essentially saying: I'm going to stand here as my full self, and I invite you to do the same.
McVulnerability, from whichever angle you look at it, is the opposite of generous. It doesn't require risk. It may pretend to give, but ultimately, it takes. And it leaves most of its consumers hungry for what they're craving: human connection—the real thing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Spain's The Frank Barton Company Unveils Plans To Expand Animated Preschool YouTube Hit ‘Pim Pam Pino'
EXCLUSIVE: Madrid-based The Frank Barton Company has revealed it is working on a second season of preschool animated series Pim Pam Pino, which has proven a hit on YouTube, and is looking for further distribution partners. Since its launch on YouTube in Spanish and English at the end of 2024, the show has drawn 70,000 subscribers worldwide, and generated 55 million views. More from Deadline DeAPlaneta Teams With China's Alpha Group To Relaunch Animated Polar Bear Character 'Bernard' Andy Serkis & T'Nia Miller Leading Voice Cast Of Joeri Christiaen Animated Special 'A Lamb's Stew' 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More The Frank Barton Company's commitment to further developing the in-house original series marks a turning point for the animation and special effects boutique, known for its high-end campaigns for global brands. Founded in 2008 as a collective, the company has built its reputation in the animated advertising, working with agencies and advertisers across Europe and further afield, but Pim Pam Pino is born out of the team's desire to create something more lasting. 'For every ad campaign, we had to build a brand-new universe from scratch—only to see it disappear once the job was done. We wanted to create something that could last, something of our own,' says Ursula García, Executive Producer and Co-Director at The Frank Barton Company. 'That's how Pim Pam Pino was born: as a space where we could tell our own stories, at our own pace.' The 3D animation series, which was conceived and produced without external funding, takes inspiration from wooden toys and manipulative materials, creates an immersive world designed for children aged from zero to five-years-old. Rather than focusing on lead characters, the show is built around a collection of wooden pieces— such as cats on vacuum cleaners, flying piglets, geometric shape – which are used to tell new stories each time, much like a child reaching into a toy box. Each episode introduces learning moments, giving lessons around subjects such as counting, exploring emotions, or discovering animals, which are animated to original songs or traditional melodies reimagined using mostly wooden instruments.. 'Our goal with Pim Pam Pino is to offer a respectful, screen-based learning experience that echoes the tactile richness of real-world play,' said Walter Belenky, Creative Director of the show. 'The slow pacing, warm tones, and thoughtful music are all designed to support healthy cognitive and emotional development in young children.' Members of the The Frank Barton Company team will be at Annecy International Animation Film Festival next week for meeting its plans for the 52-episode Season Two and distribution possibilities. Best of Deadline 'Knives Out 3': Everything We Know About The Second Rian Johnson Sequel Everything We Know About 'Stranger Things' Season 5 So Far 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Who Is Sam Burns' Wife? Caroline's Relationship History
Sam Burns and his wife, Caroline Campbell, have been married for over five years, which has ignited curiosity among fans to learn more about their relationship timeline. He is a professional golfer, widely known for emerging victorious five times on the PGA Tour. While his golf career continues to grab attention, people have become equally interested in his personal life. So, here's all you need to know about his wife and their relationship. Who is Sam Burns' wife? Burns is married to Caroline Campbell. Campbell hails from Louisiana. According to her LinkedIn profile, she studied for a B.S. in Marketing with a concentration in Professional Sales at Louisiana State University. During her university years, she served as a marketing intern at Gremillion & Pou Integrated Marketing for three months. She later worked for companies such as Southern ICEE and Cyber Fission INC. in various roles. From 2018 to 2020, she pursued a Master of Arts in Counseling from Westminster Theological Seminary. Before that, she also served as the Director of Social Events at Delta Omega. Advertisement After dating for four years, Burns and Caroline got engaged on April 19, 2019, at a golf tournament. In December of the same year, they exchanged vows at Palmetto Bluff. Burns also took to Instagram to share special moments from their wedding. He captioned it, 'Married the woman of my dreams, and we couldn't be happier!' Since then, their relationship has remained strong, and they have been each other's constant support. For instance, Campbell often shows up to cheer for her beau at golf tournaments. She previously attended the 2021 and 2022 Valspar Championships, among other events. In 2024, the couple welcomed their firstborn, Bear. Sam Burns and Caroline's relationship history Burns and Campbell had known each other since they were kids, as they were both raised in Shreveport. At that time, they used to meet each other at church. However, their romance officially began at Louisiana State University, where they were both students. The post Who Is Sam Burns' Wife? Caroline's Relationship History appeared first on - Movie Trailers, TV & Streaming News, and More.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jared Leto accused of sexual misconduct and 'predatory, terrifying' behaviour by nine women
Oscar-winning American actor and Thirty Seconds From Mars frontman Jared Leto has been accused of sexual misconduct by nine women. In a report published by Air Mail, multiple women accused the 53-year-old star of Fight Club, Requiem For A Dream, Dallas Buyers Club and Suicide Squad of inappropriate behaviour. The allegations date back to the early 2000s, with one woman calling it 'an open secret' that he texted sexual remarks to teenage models. Allegations against Leto emerged last month, when DJ Allie Teilz shared an old Facebook post, written in 2012, on her Instagram Story. 'Youre [sic] not really in L.A. until Jared Leto tries to force himself on you backstage… In a kilt.. And a snow hat. I was assaulted and traumatized by this creep when I was 17,' she wrote. In separate story, she added: 'He knew my age and didn't care. What he did was predatory, terrifying and unacceptable.' One woman told the publication that in 2006, when she was 16-years-old, Leto approached her outside a Los Angeles café. She claimed Leto was sat with fellow actor Ashley Olsen – who was then 19 – and he had grabbed her arm. 'I looked down and it was Jared Leto,' she told Air Mail, adding: 'We had a quick conversation, and he got my number.' She went on to say that Leto called her home a few days later, recalling: 'I don't know if he was on drugs or what … It was the weirdest, grossest voice … [but] for me, it's Jared, you know?' 'And the conversations turned sexual,' she continued. 'He'd ask things like: 'Have you ever had a boyfriend? Have you ever sucked a dick?'' Model Laura La Rue came forward with similar claims, saying that when she was 16-years-old in 2008, she was at an event in a private residence in Beverly Hills where Leto was 'watching her so intensely'. 'He asked how old I was. I said, 'I'm 16. How old are you?'' La Rue told Air Mail. Leto, who was 36 at the time, then reportedly asked for her number. The two began an email correspondence, which resulted in her visiting Leto's home in April 2009, the outlet alleges. 'I remember him teasing me the whole time I was there,' La Rue said, adding: 'He was flirting with me. He'd lean in close, then pull away, like it was a game.' She described a separate visit when she was 17 years old, where she alleged Leto walked out of a room completely naked. 'He just walked out, dick out, like it was normal… I thought maybe this was just what adult men do,' she said. Another woman who spoke to the outlet said that she and Leto began texting while she was still underage. She alleged he would ask her inappropriate questions during her visits to his house, including 'Do any of the little boys you hang out with fuck you?' The woman alleged that once, when she was 18, Leto had 'suddenly pulled his penis out and started masturbating'. She told Air Mail: 'He walked over, grabbed my hand, and put it on him. He leaned in and said: 'I want you to spit on it.'' A representative of Leto has 'expressly denied' the multiple accusations reported in the Air Mail exposé, saying the claims were 'demonstrably false'. This is not the first time that Leto's behaviour has been questioned and called out. Similar claims were made in 2005, when The New York Post shared a story with the opening line: 'Jared Leto likes 'em young' after he had been spotted with Olsen and Lindsay Lohan. At the time, sources told the publication he had been 'aggressively pursuing many of the teen models shacked up at the Maritime Hotel'. In 2018, Metro reported on a Twitter post made by Dylan Sprouse, who is married to model Barbara Palvin. The post read: 'Yo @JaredLeto now that you've slid into the DMs of every female model aged 18–25, what would you say your success rate is?' Guardians Of The Galaxy and Superman director James Gunn replied to Sprouse's tweet at the time, saying: 'He starts at 18 on the internet?'