First-time buyers in Dublin now locked out of Help-to-Buy scheme, warns Savills
Homes in Dublin are now beyond the reach of
first-time buyers
using the Government's
Help-to-Buy scheme
, estate agents
Savills
have warned.
The property group says the average price of a new home in the capital is now €562,000 overall, citing Central Statistics Office figures. Among first-time buyers, it is €515,000.
That is beyond the upper price limit of €500,000 that qualifies buyers for Help-to-Buy. The Government scheme allows people claim back
income tax
and Dirt paid over the previous four tax years up to a maximum of €30,000 or 10 per cent of the property's price.
'This means more and more new homes are simply out of reach under the current help-to-buy limit,' Mark Reynolds, managing director of Savills Ireland.
READ MORE
It says the help-to-buy scheme threshold should be aligned with inflation by increasing it from its current €500,000 cap to at least €621,000, reflecting the 24.2 per cent rise in inflation since 2017 and ensuring the scheme 'remains effective'.
In its
pre-budget submission
, Savills also says the Government should reduce commercial stamp duty from 7.5 per cent to 2 per cent. The group warns that persistently high transaction costs are dampening investment in the commercial property sector.
A reduction in stamp duty would 'stimulate investment in office, retail, and logistics assets and support FDI', it says.
Mr Reynolds said bringing commercial stamp duty back to 2 per cent, as it was between 2011 and 2017, 'would send a strong signal that Ireland remains a competitive, investor-friendly location'.
'At a time when international capital is more selective, cost matters – and so does confidence,' he said. 'This is about restoring Ireland's competitiveness for investment and ensuring we have the modern offices, retail, and logistics spaces needed to support economic growth and jobs.'
Savills also outlines additional priority measures that it says are required to remove structural barriers to housing delivery.
These include expanding Uisce Éireann's statutory remit to 'enable the proactive delivery' of water and wastewater infrastructure 'rather than focusing solely on regulatory compliance'.
'This should be supported by increased capital funding to ensure timely and co-ordinated infrastructure delivery essential to meeting Ireland's housing needs,' it says.
Among other recommendations is a call to fast-track the Shannon to Dublin water pipeline to secure long-term water supply for the Greater Dublin Area.
Savills further calls on the Government to update construction labour forecasts in line with the 50,000-unit housing target and invest in construction skills pathways, including guarantees that apprenticeships are completed within four years.
It notes there are approximately 62,000 fewer construction workers in the Irish workforce today than there were at the peak in 2007 – a reduction of around 26 per cent.
'We believe this is a fundamental issue that warrants immediate attention,' it says, echoing comments in the quarterly economic commentary published by the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) earlier this week.
'Without action to expand and retain construction talent, we risk setting targets that are unachievable in practice.'
Finally, the group is pushing for investment in enhanced housing market data services, including funding for real-time data systems to support better decision-making by policymakers and industry.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Tesla parts ways with top executive and fixer for Elon Musk
One of Elon Musk's top lieutenants has left his job at Tesla amid plunging sales and a pivot to autonomous driving, artificial intelligence and robotics. Omead Afshar, who was promoted to run sales and operations in North America and Europe last year, has left his role, according to two people familiar with the decision. Jenna Ferrua, director of North American human resources, has also departed from the company, they said. Tesla, Mr Afshar and Ms Ferrua did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Bloomberg first reported the moves. Mr Afshar's departure comes at a difficult time for Tesla as its sales and earnings decline. It has suffered from a lack of new models, increased competition — in particular in China — and a consumer backlash against Mr Musk's right-wing political activism in Europe and support of US President Donald Trump. READ MORE Tesla's worldwide electric vehicle deliveries fell 13 per cent in the first quarter, and its net income plunged 71 per cent. That prompted Mr Musk to promise to 'allocat[e] far more of my time to Tesla' and reduce the time he spends in Washington. His so-called Department of Government Efficiency has been controversially slashing government jobs and spending. Musk has since left his government role and publicly clashed with the president. [ Tesla's European sales fall for fifth consecutive month Opens in new window ] However, Tesla has been unable to reverse the trend, with sales in the UK and Europe declining 28 per cent in May, the fifth month in a row. The electric vehicle maker will next week report global delivery numbers for the second quarter, with analysts forecasting another double-digit fall. Mr Afshar has worked for Tesla since 2017, starting in the office of the chief executive, before overseeing the construction of its vast 'Giga Texas' manufacturing plant in Austin from 2020. IATA Director General Willie Walsh on airline profits, air fares and why the Dublin Airport passenger cap makes Ireland a laughing stock Listen | 35:56 He has been described as 'firefighter' and 'executioner' for the world's richest man, being moved across Mr Musk's various companies to solve tough problems and conduct mass lay-offs, the Financial Times has previously reported. In late 2022, he was part of the 'transition team' that fired more than 7,500 people at Twitter — now rebranded as X — and was given the nickname 'the Elon whisperer' by colleagues because of his ability to read the mood of the mercurial billionaire. Last year, he helped undertake a 10 per cent reduction in Tesla's workforce, shedding about 14,000 jobs. It was not clear if Mr Afshar will be reassigned to another part of Musk's empire after leaving Tesla. Mr Musk is conducting a broader overhaul of the electric vehicle maker, betting its future on autonomous driving powered by artificial intelligence and a humanoid robot called Optimus. Last week, Tesla started a pilot programme of self-driving robotaxis in Austin that it says will eventually lead to owners being able to rent their cars out via a ride hailing app when not in use. However, the technology is under investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration after multiple crashes in bad conditions such as mist or sun glare. Tesla relies solely on cameras mounted on its vehicles, while rivals like Google's Waymo driverless taxis use more expensive radar and lidar sensors. - Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
What's stopping us converting Dublin's O'Connell St into a residential neighbourhood?
It's not bad people who destroy cities, it's bad incentives. Bear this economic rule in mind when digesting the State's welcome initiative to save Dublin city , which was unveiled this week. 'Saving the city' might sound dramatic, but without significant remedial action, Dublin as an attractive, lived-in and innovative capital is over. We know that parts of the city are falling down, blighted by dereliction, vacancy and a general feeling of decay. The capital city of one of the richest countries in the world looks so dilapidated because it is not profitable to build homes there. If we change the incentive structure to make it profitable, improvements will follow. Great cities die without care – as many Americans know. Cities are built from the bottom up, not top-down. Unless citizens are given an opportunity to participate in regeneration, big government initiatives will fail when initial investment is not supported by ongoing incremental spending. From now on, it must be cheaper and more profitable to build, renovate and restore in the city than anywhere else in the country. This means using the tax system to create incentives in specific areas and even specific streets. Once the incentive – and this means the price – is right, builders will respond and invest enthusiastically. The Dublin City Taskforce has unveiled a blueprint to rejuvenate the capital's centre , calling for €750 million to €1 billion in new investment and identifying 'Ten Big Moves' to restore safety, vibrancy and liveability in the capital. While these proposals are all urgently needed, the real prize is to get investment money flowing into the capital on a daily basis. READ MORE The source of this investment should be the €150 billion of ordinary Irish people's savings that is sitting on deposit in the banking system, doing nothing. In the same way as living creatures require a constant flow of blood pumped by the heart, cities need a constant flow of money, incentivised by constant profitable opportunity. The domestic banking system could be the source of this investment. [ Dublin is fifth most expensive capital in Europe for living costs Opens in new window ] The traditional role of the banking system is to recycle savings of those who don't want to spend and make that money available to those who want to invest. Unfortunately, the Irish banking system acts more like a safe-deposit box in which savings are parked and not used profitably in the economy, despite the average of only 0.13 per cent interest earned. A special savings vehicle targeted at refurbishing old buildings with a tax break would liberate 10s of millions of euro into the centre of the city. Any successful redevelopment of Dublin city must incorporate a tax scheme to coax that money out of the deposits and into private residential building. The best example of reinforcing tax programmes were the urban renewal efforts of the 1990s, where huge swathes of derelict Dublin were rebuilt, and thousands of apartments were constructed in the city. It was tax-efficient to buy and live in these properties, which benefited from generous tax breaks for mortgage-holders, which made it a no-brainer to live in the city as opposed to the suburbs. Temple Bar was a good if uneven example of the success of such directed tax schemes. The new plan for the city, which proposes a special purpose vehicle – a fancy term for an independent State body – looks to be based on a similar tax structure, which is promising. Overall, this Government initiative is positive, but to make it work effectively and to tie it in with an ongoing financing requirement from the private sector, there must be a little more financial and fiscal creativity. As well as encouraging people to move into the city, it is essential to dissuade owners from hoarding or allowing buildings to become derelict Once it makes financial sense to live in the city, people will do so. People – not police – make a city safe. People police their own streets. Empty streets are dangerous streets, lively streets are safe streets, and the more people who live in an area, the more they look after their own patch. This is called having a stake in the place, and residents have a greater stake than passersby. Of course we need more gardaí on the streets, but the real game-changer is locals turning a street into a neighbourhood. For example, there are officially no residents on O'Connell Street, not one. Yet over the shops is ample space for living. What is stopping builders from converting O'Connell Street into a residential street? Incentives again. Make it tax-efficient to refurbish and tax-efficient to buy these flats, and people will come. [ Ruby Eastwood: Why would anyone choose to live in a city as ridiculous as Dublin? Opens in new window ] I've personal experience. In the early 1990s, on an average salary (IR£16,000 a year), I bought a flat on Parliament Street, in a building that was the first residential owner-occupier initiative on that street in more than 100 years. The small first-time developer was incentivised by tax breaks to buy the derelict building, and that made the refurbishment feasible. He built three flats above the ground-floor shop front. We were the only residents on Parliament Street, which was otherwise bleak and dilapidated. There were no shops or restaurants, and the roofs of many of these beautiful buildings were falling in. Lots of people thought it was mad to buy in the city, but it was much cheaper than renting in the suburbs. As a young owner, my monthly mortgage was dramatically reduced by a significant tax break. In the following few years we were followed by many more residents, and the same incentives allowed young people to buy and encouraged many young developers to take a risk and imagine a residential future over the shop for old, unloved buildings. It worked, and today Parliament Street, soon to be pedestrianised , is a wonderful place to live. Why not copy and paste this model in hundreds of city streets? As well as encouraging people to move into the city, it is essential to dissuade owners from hoarding or allowing buildings to become derelict. Again, incentives pave the way. Dereliction and vacant sites are the results of choices made by owners. It is time to put a draconian price on those choices. Urban policy should penalise bad behaviour such as presiding over dereliction, and reward good behaviour such as refurbishing old buildings. It's not that difficult, is it? We should start with vacant buildings. Recent figures from An Post's data company GeoDirectory estimate that 14,500 residential and commercial properties lie vacant across Dublin – 4,000 of which are in the city centre. There has been a marked deterioration since last year, and things are getting worse. The majority (63 per cent) of these properties have been unoccupied for one to two years, with a minority of about 23 per cent idle for more than four years. Between the canals, there are 4,082 vacant buildings. Half of them are commercial, roughly a third residential and the remainder mixed-use. The greatest concentration is in Dublin 2, home to 41 per cent of these vacant buildings, the vast majority (75 per cent) of which are commercial. D1's Victorian commercial districts (Parnell, Talbot, Capel and Dorset streets) account for more than half (610) of the vacant flats above commercial units. This column has suggested an amnesty for people who might own these properties but don't have the money or the legal clearance to refurbish them. The State could force them to sell by offering them a chance to avoid hefty penalties if they sell within a year. If not, tax them at source on other income and put the property on the market. The resulting glut of properties would force prices down, allowing responsible new owners who intend to build to buy at a bargain price. In no time the city would be transformed. We've done it before. Incentives work. Let's do it again.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Paschal Donohoe faces contest to stay on as Eurogroup chair
Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe faces a contest to secure a third term as president of the Eurogroup , with two other ministers putting their names forward for the position. Spanish economy minister Carlos Cuerpo and Lithuanian finance minister Rimantas Šadžius are the other two candidates standing in the Eurogroup election. The Eurogroup brings together the finance ministers from the 20 euro zone countries to co-ordinate economic policy, with the president tasked with chairing the meetings. Ministers had until Friday to put their name forward and an election will take place at the next Eurogroup meeting on July 7th. Mr Donohoe had previously indicated he would be running for a third term. READ MORE Mr Cuerpo and Mr Rimantas Šadžius had both been sounding out levels of support to stand against Mr Donohoe in recent weeks. Those in Mr Donohoe's camp are confident of having locked up the backing of more than a dozen capitals. Eleven votes will be needed to clinch the job. Over recent months Mr Donohoe has been busy shoring up support to stay on in the EU role. [ Donohoe 'grateful for strong support' to continue as Eurogroup president Opens in new window ] Mr Donohoe was first elected to the influential role in 2020, beating candidates from Spain and Luxembourg. He was re-elected unopposed in 2022 for a second term. The president, who chairs the meetings of finance ministers, holds the role for two-and-a half years. The longest serving Eurogroup chair was former Luxembourg prime minister and European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker, who was in the position from 2005 to 2013. Mr Donohoe previously said he had received a 'strong level of support' from finance counterparts in other countries, to remain on as Eurogroup chair. He had indicated he would be interested in a third term earlier this year. Many ministers whose parties sit in the same European grouping as Fine Gael, the centre-right European People's Party (EPP), are supportive of Mr Donohoe remaining in the job.
