Family who turned down six emergency accommodation offers lose court bid against Clare Co Council
Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger ruled that Clare Co Council had lawfully discharged its statutory duties in relation to the provision of emergency accommodation to the family, including seven children.
Advertisement
The judge further stated that the family are not entitled to require the Council to offer them emergency accommodation from housing stock earmarked for social housing.
Martina Sherlock Mongans and her seven children, who are members of the Travelling Community had brought proceedings against Clare Co Council, the Minister for Housing, Ireland and Attorney General asserting that they should be allocated emergency accommodation in a three bedroom house which is part of the Council's social housing stock.
The family now live in a single room in a relative's house.
'Undoubtedly the situation in which they are currently living in one room in a relation's house is appalling. However, where I have found that the Council acted reasonably and lawfully in the six separate offers of emergency accommodation made to them, I cannot find their circumstances to be so exceptional as to merit a departure from the normal rules or an interference by this court in the exercise of the Council's discretion,' the judge said.
Advertisement
The family were evicted from their rented Council house in Lahinch, Co Clare in July 2024 and were deemed homeless by Clare Co Council with hotel accommodation arranged for a number of weeks from July 31st, 2024.
The judge, setting out the background to the case said that since August 2024, six different own door accommodations have been offered as emergency accommodation and had been refused for various reasons including concerns about safety, suitability and distance from the children's schools.
Ms Justice Bolger said it is surprising that this 'entirely unsatisfactory arrangement prevails in preference to the six houses offered to the family,' but she said perhaps this is indicative of how strongly the family feel about the conditions and location of each of the houses offered.
The judge said the family had not established any cause of action or grounds for leave against the State parties.
Advertisement
Ms Justice Bolger said the family wanted accommodation in either Ennistymon or Lahinch, largely because of one of their children's educational needs.
The judge said she was satisfied that Clare Co Council assessed the particular needs of the family in a manner that was reasonable, rational and lawful in offering them six of the accommodations.
Ireland
George Nkencho inquest to hear from up to 60 witne...
Read More
The judge said that in effect the family had asserted a right to emergency accommodation in a house that the Council has earmarked for social housing on the basis of exceptional circumstances in which they are currently living.
The family's refusal of six separate offers of reasonable own door accommodation, even though they considered them to be unsuitable for their family's needs had the consequence that the family are no longer homeless within the meaning of the Housing Act, the judge noted.
Advertisement
The family the judge said are not entitled to require the Council to offer them emergency accommodation from housing stock earmarked for social housing
"The family are living and extremely difficult circumstances and no one could be anything but sympathetic and concerned at that. However they do not have rights over and above what is provided for in legislation or any enhanced rights to determine subjectively what is or is not a reasonable accommodation for them,' the judge said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
RNLI crew makes no apologies for saving lives in English Channel
Lifeboat crew members who are called out to migrants crossing the Channel in small boats have told the BBC they make no apologies for saving lives at RNLI has faced accusations that it is acting as a "taxi service" for people trying to enter the UK its members said they will react to any incident they are asked to by the Coastguard and will go to the aid of anyone in trouble on or in the year, lifeboat crews responded 114 times to small boats - representing just over 1% of their total call-outs across the UK and Ireland. The charity said it has saved the lives of 58 migrants, including children. Paula Lain, who works as a management consultant when she's not volunteering for the RNLI, said: "When our pager goes, we're not thinking anything political. "We're all thinking about people. We're actively compassionate. That's what drives us beyond any moral or civic responsibility. "When we're tasked, we don't know what we're going to be tasked to. We're there to help people in their most distressing times." The RNLI has released harrowing images of an incident in which 19 people had to be pulled from the sea after the dinghy they were in capsized. It said it wants to provide an insight into the reality facing its volunteer images show the crew throwing what are called horse shoes – effectively mini life jackets – into the sea. But on seeing the lifeboat, many of those in the water decide to swim directly to it, and they are hauled on collapse with exhaustion, others need immediate medical attention. The lifeboat already had 68 people on board from an earlier incident. Everyone rescued by the RNLI in this incident in August 2023 survived - but six people pulled from the water by other vessels who responded to the emergency lost their crew members said they have faced accusations that they are facilitating illegal volunteer Dan Sinclair says what they see in the Channel has a profound impact on them. He recalls one recent rescue, telling the BBC: "There was a little girl on that boat. "When we took that little girl - who was probably four years old - off that boat, she looked at me straight in the eye and she said 'Thank you. I love you.'"You can see more about the rescue on the new series of 'Saving Lives at Sea' on BBC Two on Thursday at 20:00 BST and on iPlayer.
BreakingNews.ie
17 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Family who turned down six emergency accommodation offers lose court bid against Clare Co Council
A family who turned down six offers of houses by Clare Co Council have failed in their High Court bid to force the council to provide them with emergency accommodation. Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger ruled that Clare Co Council had lawfully discharged its statutory duties in relation to the provision of emergency accommodation to the family, including seven children. Advertisement The judge further stated that the family are not entitled to require the Council to offer them emergency accommodation from housing stock earmarked for social housing. Martina Sherlock Mongans and her seven children, who are members of the Travelling Community had brought proceedings against Clare Co Council, the Minister for Housing, Ireland and Attorney General asserting that they should be allocated emergency accommodation in a three bedroom house which is part of the Council's social housing stock. The family now live in a single room in a relative's house. 'Undoubtedly the situation in which they are currently living in one room in a relation's house is appalling. However, where I have found that the Council acted reasonably and lawfully in the six separate offers of emergency accommodation made to them, I cannot find their circumstances to be so exceptional as to merit a departure from the normal rules or an interference by this court in the exercise of the Council's discretion,' the judge said. Advertisement The family were evicted from their rented Council house in Lahinch, Co Clare in July 2024 and were deemed homeless by Clare Co Council with hotel accommodation arranged for a number of weeks from July 31st, 2024. The judge, setting out the background to the case said that since August 2024, six different own door accommodations have been offered as emergency accommodation and had been refused for various reasons including concerns about safety, suitability and distance from the children's schools. Ms Justice Bolger said it is surprising that this 'entirely unsatisfactory arrangement prevails in preference to the six houses offered to the family,' but she said perhaps this is indicative of how strongly the family feel about the conditions and location of each of the houses offered. The judge said the family had not established any cause of action or grounds for leave against the State parties. Advertisement Ms Justice Bolger said the family wanted accommodation in either Ennistymon or Lahinch, largely because of one of their children's educational needs. The judge said she was satisfied that Clare Co Council assessed the particular needs of the family in a manner that was reasonable, rational and lawful in offering them six of the accommodations. Ireland George Nkencho inquest to hear from up to 60 witne... Read More The judge said that in effect the family had asserted a right to emergency accommodation in a house that the Council has earmarked for social housing on the basis of exceptional circumstances in which they are currently living. The family's refusal of six separate offers of reasonable own door accommodation, even though they considered them to be unsuitable for their family's needs had the consequence that the family are no longer homeless within the meaning of the Housing Act, the judge noted. Advertisement The family the judge said are not entitled to require the Council to offer them emergency accommodation from housing stock earmarked for social housing "The family are living and extremely difficult circumstances and no one could be anything but sympathetic and concerned at that. However they do not have rights over and above what is provided for in legislation or any enhanced rights to determine subjectively what is or is not a reasonable accommodation for them,' the judge said.
The Guardian
19 hours ago
- The Guardian
Poem of the week: A Hundred Doors by Michael Longley
A Hundred Doors God! I'm lighting candles again, still The sentimental atheist, family Names a kind of prayer or poem, my muse Our Lady of a Hundred Doors. Supervised by a xenophobic Sacristan, I plant in dusty sand Names and faces that follow me As far as windows in the floor: Marble stumps aching through glass For their pagan temple, the warm Inwardness Praxiteles brought out. The intelligence of stone. The sacristan who picks my flame- Flowers and blows them out, only minutes Old, knows I am watching and he Doesn't care as he shortens my lives. Michael Longley was born in Belfast in 1939, and died on 22 January this year. This short obituary conveys something of the range of his achievements, and suggests the sociability that was an additional gift and a vital dimension of the vocation as he lived it. A Hundred Doors is the title of his 2011 collection dedicated to fellow Belfast poet, Frank Ormsby. Much of it is set in the west of Ireland townland, Carrigskeewaun, the ecological matrix of Longley's later work. In 2010, Longley estimated that a third of all his poems had been inspired by the townland and places nearby. Longley's regular stays in Carrigskeewaun were far from retreats into isolation. The poems grown there are as sociable as pastoral in spirit. Nature is cherished, but animals sighted and wildflowers identified open imaginative doors through which human individuals step, children, grandchildren, friends, always ready in the poet's mind for the conversations, or possibilities of conversation, that crystallise into poems. The title-poem of A Hundred Doors is exceptionally silent. On the Greek island of Paros, Panagia Ekatontapiliani (also known as the Church of the Hundred Doors) becomes in the poem an un-social space that encloses the speaker in his own solitude. The mood is abrasive from the start: 'God! I'm lighting candles again, still / The sentimental atheist.' The exclamation 'God!' here might be an ironical summoning of the Almighty as witness or the mild curse of everyday grumbling: either way, that 'still / The sentimental atheist' has a distancing, melancholy-humorous effect. It may even remind readers of the harsh honesty of the Welsh clergyman-poet RS Thomas: although Thomas wasn't an atheist he wrote plentifully of his relationship with God as an exchange of absences or disappointments. Longley in this Church of a Hundred Doors seeks the homing ritual of 'family names' that are themselves 'a kind of prayer or poem'. We're reminded of his particular art of poetic 'listing' – often combining mourner and celebrant. In A Hundred Doors he doesn't get far with naming names. The second stanza seems to begin with the slamming of a door as he finds himself 'Supervised / by a xenophobic sacristan'. There's no evidence in the poem that the intruder is 'xenophobic'. The term may have been comic exaggeration, but it seems in earnest, an expression of anger. At this point, A Hundred Doors resembles an eloquent contribution to that old poetic genre, the complaint. Complaints are often addressed to the person or object complained of, whether a betraying lover or an empty purse. The anger here at first is murmured by the speaker only to himself. This inoculates the tone against humour, and ensures that longing and hurt are predominant. The emotions are shared only when the poet looks through 'the windows in the floor' and sees 'marble stumps aching through glass / For their pagan temple, the warm / Inwardness Praxiteles brought out, / The intelligence of stone.' This restorative and beautifully balanced stanza refers to the remains of the Greek temple, possibly dedicated to Demeter, over which the church was built. The word 'stumps' evokes the hauntingly broken-armed statue of Hermes and the Infant Dionysus, attributed to Praxiteles and at the same time sets shivering another of those eco-connective threads in the collection, the moving handful of short war poems it contains, such as Citation, where the poet's father receives the Military Cross 'for conspicuous gallantry and devotion to duty'. His would be one of the names the poet wished to recall. The candles themselves become 'names and faces', following the poet as he kneels to 'the windows in the floor'. In the last stanza anger rises to the surface, and its effect is to draw the reader in as witness. Figurative power increases: the 'flame-flowers' suggest an instant of return to the townland, and a newly threatened pastoral, as the sacristan, knowing he's watched and not caring, 'blows them out, only minutes / Old'. Perhaps the sacristan symbolises Anthropocene man, maker of war on the environment, maker of wars that shatter civilian families, babies and children. The anger and even disgust at the casual inhumanity is a reminder that Longley was always a consummate poet of witness in the Belfast of the Troubles. The line-breaks are impeccable. In the penultimate line, the stress asserts plain fact: 'He knows I am watching.' The subsequent enjambment allows a heavy, angry stress to fall on the negative: 'and he / doesn't care as he shortens my lives.' It's impossible to stand outside this judgment, and not to understand it as a voiced demand on the conscience of contemporary hearers and readers. You can hear Longley read it here.
