UPS told California man his son's guitar was destroyed in a wildfire — and then he found it for sale online
UPS actually offered several explanations for why the guitar didn't arrive, including a claim that it was destroyed in the recent Southern California wildfires, but Diaz was unconvinced.
Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how
I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast)
Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10)
"I just had an intuition that the guitar was stolen and that it wasn't damaged and destroyed," Diaz, who lives in Hayward, California, shared with ABC7 News.
His hunch paid off. After searching online, Diaz spotted the exact guitar for sale on Guitar Center's website, identified by its unique serial number. Adam Hulsey, who sold the guitar to Diaz, immediately 'snatched it up' before Diaz made the roughly seven-hour round trip to Bakersfield to retrieve it.
"It was 3.5 hours to get up there and it was 4 hours to get back," said Diaz. 'Was it worth it? Yeah, it was absolutely worth it.'
When this dedicated dad couldn't get UPS to own up to its mistake, Hulsey and Diaz contacted ABC7's investigative unit, 7 On Your Side. Reporter Melanie Woodrow reached out to a UPS security supervisor, who claimed the guitar had been stolen but said the company couldn't reimburse Hulsey for more than the insured value.
After additional conversations, UPS eventually agreed to revisit the case.
Diaz ordered the Dean Dime Slime guitar — a signature model from 'Dimebag' Darrell Abbott, former guitar player for the metal band Pantera — from Hulsey, who manages a small shop called Adam's Guitar Addict in Denison, Texas. Hulsey reportedly shipped three guitars that Diaz had purchased at the same time, but only two arrived.
When Hulsey contacted UPS to track down the missing guitar, he got a series of conflicting stories.
"Burned up in a California wildfire, fell off a truck, fell off a train. So many different stories," said Hulsey.
UPS eventually told Hulsey the package was severely damaged during shipping and was discarded. The shipping company did send Hulsey some compensation, but only based on the declared value at the time of shipping, which wasn't enough.
After recovering the guitar, which now has a dent and a visible scratch on the back, Diaz and Hulsey filed a police report and contacted UPS again, but the call reportedly didn't go well.
"UPS was kind of — 'hey why are you calling with this tracking number, this is already a closed case. The guitar was damaged and destroyed,' and I told them on the phone — well, that's so funny that the guitar was damaged and destroyed because I just bought it from Guitar Center and I have it in my car with me,' said Diaz.
Now, with the help of 7 On Your Side, the lime green electric guitar is where it belongs — in the hands of Damian Diaz, Tony's 16-year-old son.
"It's a nice guitar. I like its tone a lot," said the boy as he played his new guitar in front of the ABC7 camera crew.
In a statement to ABC7, a UPS representative said, "We strive to provide excellent service. We've been in contact with the customer and have resolved the situation." Hulsey and Diaz confirmed that they received a larger refund and were finally satisfied with UPS' response.
But the question remains: why were Hulsey and Diaz given so many different explanations? According to UPS, a 'casualty code' was assigned to the shipment and it's possible that customer service representatives didn't understand what the code meant.
Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it
When a package goes missing during shipping, who's on the hook depends on the situation and whether the item was insured.
In general:
The shipper (in this case, Hulsey) is responsible for getting the item to the buyer. If a package is lost or damaged in transit, the seller typically must refund or replace it, regardless of whether the loss was their fault.
The carrier (like UPS) is liable up to the amount declared or insured at shipping time. If the item wasn't properly insured, reimbursement may be limited.
This means the buyer may be out of luck when packages are lost or stolen, unless the item is insured or purchased through a platform with strong buyer protections.
So, what can you do to protect yourself when making expensive purchases online? Here are a few tips to safeguard your valuable items, as well as your wallet:
Insure high-value items for their full replacement cost. Don't underreport the value just to save on shipping.
Pay attention to your package's tracking. If the tracking stops or the status seems stuck, contact the seller immediately. The seller can then contact the shipper to get to the bottom of the delayed or missing shipment.
Save receipts and documentation. If you need to report a missing package, you'll need proof of value and proof of shipping.
Make sure you buy through reputable platforms that offer protection if something goes wrong during shipment.
When shipping, request a signature confirmation on expensive items to prevent theft after delivery.
For Diaz and Hulsey, it took persistence, a long road trip and an investigative news team to resolve what should have been a routine delivery. And while they're happy the guitar has been given to its rightful owner — blemishes and all — this story is a cautionary tale for anyone shipping or receiving valuable items.
Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead
How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement
Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now
Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week.
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Five injured after driver crashes into downtown UPS store in Santa Fe
Five people were injured after a driver crashed into the front window of a Santa Fe UPS store Monday afternoon. Four of the injured were taken to an area hospital, and one declined transport for medical attention, Santa Fe police Deputy Chief Ben Valdez said. One person sustained what Valdez referred to as "serious injuries" to their legs, but none of the injuries was life-threatening, he said. The crash occurred shortly after 3 p.m. Monday at the UPS store on North Guadalupe Street in the downtown area, he said. The driver — a woman in a Tesla — was not injured. Valdez said police did not observe any signs the driver was impaired. The store was closed Monday after the crash, with paper, debris and shards of glass littering the floor of the shop. Caution tape was strung across a vehicle-sized hole through the glass storefront. Santa Fean Damian Horne, 66, said he was talking on the phone and walking around the corner of the building when he heard what sounded like an explosion 10 feet away. "I looked in, and it was carnage," he said. "The car had gone straight through the plate glass window, and destroyed the counter they had there. ... It was not only completely inside the store — it was almost completely through it." Horne — who is a former public defender as well as a combat veteran who served in the Iraq War — said he and another veteran ran into the building to render aid to the handful of people who were injured in the crash. He said several women were injured inside the store, one of them with fallen cabinets on top of her and another sprawled over the hood of the car with injuries to her feet and legs. "It was like a mortar had landed at UPS," Horne said. "People are screaming and yelling, and there's bleeding going on." Santa Fe police and paramedics then arrived and quickly took over rendering aid to the injured, he said. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
FedEx, UPS, DHL executives to face fresh scrutiny in India antitrust case
By Aditya Kalra NEW DELHI (Reuters) -Top India executives of FedEx, UPS, Aramex and DHL are set to be cross-examined in coming weeks by a book publishers' group which accused them of price collusion, a new twist in an antitrust probe that cleared the courier companies of wrongdoing last year, a document shows. Allowing a complainant to interrogate companies is not common in Indian antitrust cases. It means the final findings of the antitrust investigation could change and create new challenges for the courier majors, and the case will be prolonged by several months, antitrust lawyers and government sources said. Many foreign and domestic companies are bullish about the Indian courier and parcel delivery market, which is expected to grow 11% a year to $14.3 billion by 2030, bolstered by a boom in online shopping, research firm Mordor Intelligence says. In December, Reuters reported the Competition Commission of India (CCI) found "no evidence" of courier firms sharing commercial information amongst themselves. The 2022 cartel case, whose details remain confidential in line with rules, was triggered when the Federation of Indian Publishers alleged collusion on prices and discounts by delivery firms. The CCI has now found merit in a complaint by the publishers' group which argued it must be allowed to cross-examine the delivery company executives as investigators only relied on oral submissions to give the companies a clean chit. The federation "has demonstrated sufficient cause establishing necessity and expediency of conducting such cross-examination," the CCI noted in a May 28 internal order that was reviewed by Reuters. The order said the executives to be questioned were Subhasish Chakraborty, Managing Director of India's DTDC Express; R.S. Subramanian, Managing Director of DHL Express India; Suvendu Choudhury, a vice president of FedEx in India; Percy Avari, general manager of Aramex in India, and Abbas Panju, India managing director of UPS Express. None of the executives responded to requests for comment. DHL said in a statement it operates in full compliance with all laws and is "cooperating fully with the CCI", but could not comment on specifics. The CCI, as well as other companies - DTDC, U.S.-based FedEx and UPS, and Dubai's Aramex did not respond to Reuters queries. The Federation of Indian Publishers also did not respond. It represents many Indian publishers like and Rupa Publications, as well as some foreign groups like Pan Macmillan. 'RARE' CROSS-EXAMINATION Sending the case back to the CCI investigators could become an irritant for the logistics industry, which has faced scrutiny since 2015, when France levied a $735 million fine on 20 companies, including FedEx and DHL, for secretly colluding to increase prices. In India, cross-examination of companies by the complainant "is rare," said Gautam Shahi, a competition law partner at Indian law firm Dua Associates. "Such cross-examination may reveal new facts and the conclusions of the earlier investigation report may come into question. It may change the direction of the case," he said. The CCI investigations unit will now oversee the cross-examination proceedings in coming weeks and submit a report to top antitrust officials for a review, four sources familiar with the matter said. The Federation of Indian Publishers had alleged that courier companies acted together to determine charges, and also did not reduce the fuel surcharge they charged when jet fuel prices dropped. The 202-page investigation report shared with the companies privately last year, and seen by Reuters this week, notes that 36 notices were sent to 15 courier firms during 2023-24 to gather details of their businesses, with UPS submitting the most responses - 13. The CCI report concludes no email correspondence surfaced that showed "any collusive/concerted activities" among rivals. The Federation of Indian Publishers has also successfully argued it wants to point out several anomalies in the earlier recorded statements of company executives, which were ignored by investigators, noted the CCI order that allowed the cross-examination. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
FedEx, UPS, DHL executives to face fresh scrutiny in India antitrust case
By Aditya Kalra NEW DELHI (Reuters) -Top India executives of FedEx, UPS, Aramex and DHL are set to be cross-examined in coming weeks by a book publishers' group which accused them of price collusion, a new twist in an antitrust probe that cleared the courier companies of wrongdoing last year, a document shows. Allowing a complainant to interrogate companies is not common in Indian antitrust cases. It means the final findings of the antitrust investigation could change and create new challenges for the courier majors, and the case will be prolonged by several months, antitrust lawyers and government sources said. Many foreign and domestic companies are bullish about the Indian courier and parcel delivery market, which is expected to grow 11% a year to $14.3 billion by 2030, bolstered by a boom in online shopping, research firm Mordor Intelligence says. In December, Reuters reported the Competition Commission of India (CCI) found "no evidence" of courier firms sharing commercial information amongst themselves. The 2022 cartel case, whose details remain confidential in line with rules, was triggered when the Federation of Indian Publishers alleged collusion on prices and discounts by delivery firms. The CCI has now found merit in a complaint by the publishers' group which argued it must be allowed to cross-examine the delivery company executives as investigators only relied on oral submissions to give the companies a clean chit. The federation "has demonstrated sufficient cause establishing necessity and expediency of conducting such cross-examination," the CCI noted in a May 28 internal order that was reviewed by Reuters. The order said the executives to be questioned were Subhasish Chakraborty, Managing Director of India's DTDC Express; R.S. Subramanian, Managing Director of DHL Express India; Suvendu Choudhury, a vice president of FedEx in India; Percy Avari, general manager of Aramex in India, and Abbas Panju, India managing director of UPS Express. None of the executives responded to requests for comment. DHL said in a statement it operates in full compliance with all laws and is "cooperating fully with the CCI", but could not comment on specifics. The CCI, as well as other companies - DTDC, U.S.-based FedEx and UPS, and Dubai's Aramex did not respond to Reuters queries. The Federation of Indian Publishers also did not respond. It represents many Indian publishers like and Rupa Publications, as well as some foreign groups like Pan Macmillan. 'RARE' CROSS-EXAMINATION Sending the case back to the CCI investigators could become an irritant for the logistics industry, which has faced scrutiny since 2015, when France levied a $735 million fine on 20 companies, including FedEx and DHL, for secretly colluding to increase prices. In India, cross-examination of companies by the complainant "is rare," said Gautam Shahi, a competition law partner at Indian law firm Dua Associates. "Such cross-examination may reveal new facts and the conclusions of the earlier investigation report may come into question. It may change the direction of the case," he said. The CCI investigations unit will now oversee the cross-examination proceedings in coming weeks and submit a report to top antitrust officials for a review, four sources familiar with the matter said. The Federation of Indian Publishers had alleged that courier companies acted together to determine charges, and also did not reduce the fuel surcharge they charged when jet fuel prices dropped. The 202-page investigation report shared with the companies privately last year, and seen by Reuters this week, notes that 36 notices were sent to 15 courier firms during 2023-24 to gather details of their businesses, with UPS submitting the most responses - 13. The CCI report concludes no email correspondence surfaced that showed "any collusive/concerted activities" among rivals. The Federation of Indian Publishers has also successfully argued it wants to point out several anomalies in the earlier recorded statements of company executives, which were ignored by investigators, noted the CCI order that allowed the cross-examination. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data