logo
Trump's 401(k) order offers retirement savers crypto, private assets, but also higher fees and more risk

Trump's 401(k) order offers retirement savers crypto, private assets, but also higher fees and more risk

Reuters3 days ago
NEW YORK, Aug 10 (Reuters) - The new White House order directing regulators to expand access to alternative investments in 401(k) plans, like crypto or privately owned companies adds a new layer of risk to the retirement portfolios for ordinary investors that they may not fully understand, investment professionals say.
"This is brand new; none of it has been stress-tested yet" in a market shock or long-term selloff, said Christopher Bailey, director of retirement, at Cerulli Associates, an asset management research firm. "There are liquidity concerns, issues around fees, among others."
While industry advocates and the Trump administration say investments in private equity, crypto or privately held companies like ChatGPT developer OpenAI or Elon Musk's SpaceX hold the promise of greater returns, critics say the investments are inherently riskier, lack the same disclosures and carry higher fees than traditional retirement plans.
"I don't think people are talking enough about the potential for higher fees," said Philitsa Hanson, head of product, equity and fund administration, Allvue Systems, a software and solutions provider for private asset managers. The executive order, she said, "raises more questions than answers. Someone will need to be very thoughtful about how these types of assets can be incorporated" into 401(k) plans.
Private equity and other alternative asset funds have increasingly been raising capital from wealthy individuals but are traditionally designed for institutional investors and typically include layers of fees. Private equity, for instance, has long had the "2 and 20" structure: managers collect a 2% overall fee, as well as 20% of any gains. In contrast, the mutual funds that today make up the lion's share of 401(k) plan assets offer fees that average a mere 0.26%, according to the Investment Company Institute.
Dmitriy Katsnelson, deputy chief investment officer at Wealthspire Advisors, which manages $30 billion for affluent and high net worth individuals and families, notes that if the executive order triggers a rapid and significant change in the menu of investment plans open to investors, that would reverse the trend of the last few decades.
"It's been all about cutting fees, doing no harm," Katsnelson said. "It's going to take a while for people to come up with a framework to make this work and think about the risks."
Alternative asset managers will likely need to come up with new products with lower fees, greater liquidity and more transparency if they want to tap into the trillions of dollars and 90 million investors in employer-sponsored retirement plans.
Jason Kephart, an analyst at Morningstar, said the fees for some alternative investments aren't clearly spelled out, some even have to be deciphered from footnotes.
They "might be even underrepresenting the actual cost to the end investor, and I have a hard time seeing how plan sponsors are going to get comfortable with that," he said.
"I think there is going to be more light shed on all these fees and exactly where they are and make it transparent."
Under the current system, investors can also monitor fluctuations in their portfolio's performance on a daily basis and understand precisely what is contributing to those results, Hanson said. That won't be so easy for investments that aren't traded on open exchanges.
"Private equity, private assets are the opposite," said Allvue's Hanson. "You're asking systems designed for daily trades to support illiquid and sometimes manually priced assets. There's a fundamental mismatch there.'
That creates an obligation on the part of asset managers and plan sponsors to increase their outreach and education efforts, suggests Cerulli's Bailey. A typical retirement fund investor "is not sitting there thinking about optimizing their portfolio" and considering the impact of adding private assets to the mix on their risk or potential return, he said.
Blackstone President and Chief Operating Officer Jon Gray recently told analysts that private assets are more appropriate for younger investors that have a longer investing horizon than for someone nearing retirement.
One test case for the legal risks of putting retirement nest eggs in private markets has played out at chipmaker Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab, where employees brought a lawsuit over two retirement plans that included investments in hedge funds, private equity and commodities.
An appeals court finally dismissed the complaint after seven years of court battles this year but lawyers at Debevoise & Plimpton said that asset managers and plan sponsors generally don't have the resources to manage multi-year litigation. Regulators will have to give the industry some legal protection from investor lawsuits to make good on Trump's plan, they said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's pick to head Bureau of Labor Statistics walks back his earlier plan to scrap monthly jobs reports
Trump's pick to head Bureau of Labor Statistics walks back his earlier plan to scrap monthly jobs reports

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

Trump's pick to head Bureau of Labor Statistics walks back his earlier plan to scrap monthly jobs reports

President Donald Trump 's pick to head the Bureau of Labor Statistics, who previously proposed scrapping monthly jobs reports, is now backing off that idea, according to a report. Trump tapped EJ Antoni, the chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, for the role after firing the agency's last commissioner following her release of a poor July jobs report. Antoni proposed suspending the release of the monthly jobs reports in an August 4 Fox Business interview, one week before he was nominated to be the next BLS commissioner. He has since walked back on that proposal, CNN reported. Antoni will continue to issue monthly jobs numbers if confirmed, Heritage Foundation economist Stephen Moore told CNN Tuesday. It's not immediately clear what may have changed his mind. The Independent has reached out to the Heritage Foundation for more information. Moore called Antoni's proposal a 'bad idea' and added the pair discussed the matter. 'He's backed off that,' Moore said. 'We're going to continue to do monthly numbers.' In his Fox Business interview, Antoni slammed the agency for having unreliable data. 'How on earth are businesses supposed to plan – or how is the Fed supposed to conduct monetary policy – when they don't know how many jobs are being added or lost in our economy? It's a serious problem that needs to be fixed immediately," he said. Antoni then suggested releasing data quarterly rather than monthly. "Until it is corrected, the BLS should suspend issuing the monthly job reports but keep publishing the more accurate, though less timely, quarterly data," he continued. Antoni appeared on Fox News days after Trump fired former agency commissioner Erika McEntarfer and criticized the jobs report as inaccurate, which showed the economy added only 73,000 jobs in July. The agency also revised down the reports for May and June, revealing a combined 258,000 fewer jobs than initially reported. The president fumed about the latest figures, even claiming on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' last week that 'the numbers were rigged.' When announcing the nomination on Monday, Trump said in a Truth Social post that he believes Antoni 'will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE.' Asked on Tuesday if the Bureau of Labor Statistics will continue to issue monthly reports, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'I believe that is the plan, and that's the hope, and that these monthly reports will be data that the American people can trust.'

CoreWeave revenue beats estimates on AI boom but shares fall on bigger loss
CoreWeave revenue beats estimates on AI boom but shares fall on bigger loss

Reuters

time2 minutes ago

  • Reuters

CoreWeave revenue beats estimates on AI boom but shares fall on bigger loss

Aug 12 (Reuters) - CoreWeave (CRWV.O), opens new tab easily topped quarterly revenue estimates on Tuesday as the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence tools boosted demand for its cloud services, but a bigger-than-expected net loss sent its shares slumping 10% after the bell. The company currently operates 33 AI data centers across the U.S. and Europe and offers access to backer Nvidia's (NVDA.O), opens new tab chips, which are highly coveted by enterprises to train and run large AI models amid intense competition. CoreWeave reported revenue backlog of $30.1 billion as of end of June, compared with $25.9 billion on March 31. "Demand is humming, but it is the cost of growth that tempered the stock down in aftermarket trading," said Michael Ashley Schulman of Running Point Capital Advisors. Operating expenses jumped to $1.19 billion in the second quarter, from $317.7 million a year earlier. The company posted a net loss of $290.5 million, compared with analysts' average estimate of $190.6 million, according to data compiled by LSEG. "We are scaling rapidly as we look to meet the unprecedented demand for AI," CEO Michael Intrator said in the earnings statement. Investors have also focused on the company's reliance on a few big customers. "The backlog surge to $30B+ suggests demand visibility well beyond 2025, but the concentration in mega-customers like OpenAI means those relationships remain both the crown jewel and the single point of failure," said eMarketer analyst Jeremy Goldman. Meanwhile, CoreWeave executives reiterated the benefits of its $9 billion all-stock deal for crypto miner Core Scientific (CORZ.O), opens new tab. The deal, announced in July, is facing opposition. Core Scientific's largest shareholder, Two Seas Capital, has said it would vote against the sale. CoreWeave reported second-quarter revenue of $1.21 billion, beating estimates of $1.08 billion. The Livingston, New Jersey-based company raised its annual revenue forecast to be between $5.15 billion and $5.35 billion. It had previously projected annual revenue of $4.9 billion to $5.1 billion. Shares of the company, which reaffirmed its annual capital expenditure projection, were trading at $133.71. They have gained nearly three-fold since the IPO in March.

Demand for power set to surge in the next 18 months. Here's what it could mean for your bill
Demand for power set to surge in the next 18 months. Here's what it could mean for your bill

The Independent

time31 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Demand for power set to surge in the next 18 months. Here's what it could mean for your bill

U.S. consumers may see their energy bills continue to rise, following a surge in demand for power over the next 18 months. According to a new report from the Energy Information Administration, the demand is largely fueled by data centers – some of which power online use of AI. The EIA's Short-Term Energy Outlook, released Tuesday, forecasts an increase in U.S. annual electricity consumption in both 2025 and 2026, which will surpass the all-time high reached in 2024. 'We expect electricity sales to the commercial sector to rise by 3.0 percent in 2025 and 4.5 percent in 2026, driven largely by more demand from data centers,' the EIA forecast states. Electricity sales to industrial consumers, meanwhile, will rise by 2.0 percent in 2025 and 3.5 percent in 2026. The surges are likely to mean continuing increases in electricity bills across the country. The EIA analysis predicted that retail electricity prices for households will increase by 4 percent in 2025 when compared to 2024. However, the report also notes that this is not unusual, as prices have increased by about 5 percent on average each year since the pandemic. According to previous reports by the EIA, U.S. consumers spent an average of about $1,760 on electricity expenditures in 2023, with an increase of around 13 percent possible by 2026. At the time, the EIA noted that forecasts for retail electricity price increases differ across the country, with residential electricity prices in the Pacific, Middle Atlantic, and New England census divisions—regions where consumers already pay much more per kilowatt-hour for electricity— would likely increase more than the national average. By comparison, residential electricity prices in areas with relatively low electricity prices may not increase as much, the administration said. The figures are in contrast to previous energy use, which, according to the administration, was 'essentially flat for nearly two decades.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store