logo
I have walked amongst Scotland's largest gulls - they are a menace

I have walked amongst Scotland's largest gulls - they are a menace

They are big​ too. Very big, probably the biggest in Scotland, and with their size comes with equally large beaks, and that is where the problem lies.
Have anything edible about your person at that time of the morning then you really are in trouble.
For gulls, like some of us humans, seem to have forgotten all about their traditional diet of healthy fish discarded over the side of a trawler, and now prefer fast food – and more of it the better.
And you can see their point in a way. Why would you want a measly fish straight out of the sea, when you can gorge on plump ones wrapped in batter and served with chips.
However, it is not a laughing matter really, as there are increasing examples of people getting hurt by the hungry birds up and down the country.
Now the problem (again) has been raised at Holyrood with former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross warning that Scots risk losing their lives over the 'growing problem' of 'dominating' gulls if action is not taken to stop them.
That is quite the claim but at least had evidence to back it up.
In the chamber, Mr Ross spoke of gull horror stories including one woman who fell outside her house as a result of a gull attack, broke her leg, went to hospital and then, upon her return, was attacked again.
It is high time that irresponsible campervan users are taxed off the NC500
Alan Simpson: The new £144m electric rail line without enough trains
Alan Simpson: Giving CalMac contract is right - now give them better ships
Alan Simpson: Scotland's tourism sector needs to be heard before it's too late
The debate was led by Mr Ross after he submitted a motion stating that the parliament should note concern around the reported changes to the approach taken for granting licences to control gulls in recent years by NatureScot.
He argued that this has led to fewer licences being approved.
A total of 2,041 licences were granted in 2023, however this figure fell to 505 in 2024.
He told the chamber there is a 'clear conflict' in the Scottish Government body Nature Scot between conserving and preserving bird numbers and controlling the applications to regulate bird numbers.
Mr Ross also criticised NatureScot and the Scottish Government for being on the side of seagulls and not humans during a sometimes heated debate at Holyrood.
The Former Scottish Conservative leader said: 'Currently they are clearly conflicted between conserving and preserving bird numbers and also being the agency that looks at and deliberates on applications to control birds.
'It is not possible any more for Nature Scot to do those dual roles'.
Mr Ross pointed that NatureScot keep a record of bird deaths or injury but not take any record of people injured.
He said communities and businesses in his own constituency of Moray, Nairn and Inverness have had significant problems with gulls in recent years, but that many communities across Scotland also experience similar problems.
He also said the gulls are causing 'mental health issues' as their constant screeching torments the general public.
'They are a menace,' he emphasised to parliament.
Mr Ross said he is not ignoring that people are encouraging gulls by feeding them and he accepted that was 'part of the problem'.
Gulls 'dominating areas' are also seeing a reduction of other smaller birds, he argued.
Mr Ross called on more 'robust action' from the Scottish Government and NatureScot to protect humans and businesses from 'the menace of dangerous gulls'.
It is hard to argue with Mr Ross on this one as we can all probably recall being menaced by seagulls at one point or another in recent times.
His point about smaller birds being driven from some areas is also true, as I can vouch from my own garden, which can suddenly become full of gulls, particularly when people put bread out.
Of course, this is always well intentioned as it put out for smaller birds who cannot get a look in as everything is hoovered up by the aggressive gulls.
I live a good 30-odd miles from the coast too, proving that the problem with gulls is not confined to seaside communities.
Residents and businesses in the former fishing port of Nairn on the Moray Firth believe gulls have become a serious problem.
Alan Simpson: Build more houses for rural Scots, not tax second home owners
Alan Simpson: NatureScot may be threatening a rare mussel it should be protecting
Alan Simpson: Forcing landowners to sell to locals is not the best solution
We thought the good times would last forever. We were wrong. What next for Aberdeen?
A survey by Nairn Business Improvement District (Bid) last year received 85 reports of gull attacks.
Manager Lucy Harding told the BBC: 'That was quite worrying. It is an issue I regularly get reports on, of people being attacked for food particularly.'
Gulls, like other birds, are protected by law and Scotland's nature body, NatureScot, has strict rules around how they are controlled.
A licence is needed for the removal of nests and eggs from the roofs of buildings in areas where gulls are deemed to be a nuisance.
But Ms Harding said it was now harder to obtain the necessary paperwork.
Nairn Bid has put in place other measures to discourage gulls from nesting in the town, including reflective devices designed to scare birds away from rooftops.
Gulls are a coastal species, but they have been drawn into towns and cities due to the plentiful places to build nests, a lack of predators - and lots of opportunities to find food.
In their natural habitats - the coast and farmland - the birds eat carrion, seeds, fruits, young birds, eggs, small mammals, insects and fish.
NatureScot issued 2,633 nest removal licences across Scotland in 2023, and 1,601 in 2024.
It said it understood gulls could sometimes cause problems in towns and cities, but at the same time populations of the birds were facing 'serious declines'.
NatureScot said it would continue to issue licenses where gulls were causing a health and safety issue.
RSPB Scotland say that people and gulls could coexist if the right action was taken.
Numbers of herring gulls, a species people are most likely to encounter in urban areas, have fallen by 48% in Scotland since the 1980s, according to RSPB Scotland.
Clearly the answer then is not just mass culling of gulls, but it is fair to say that more robust action needs to be taken before somebody does get seriously hurt.
But the answer ultimately lies with all of us and the amount of food that we just casually throw away, which then attracts gulls.
We all need to look at our own behaviour and stop blaming the gulls, however menacing they are, for everything.
Ultimately, we are the problem and therefore we are the solution too.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Welfare state is being treated not as a shared good, but as a burden
Welfare state is being treated not as a shared good, but as a burden

The National

time4 hours ago

  • The National

Welfare state is being treated not as a shared good, but as a burden

Supporters are told to welcome these as signs of pragmatism, but they reveal only a fake-it-till-you-make-it government clinging to the same austerity logic that's gutted public services for more than a decade. There's no strategy of principled adaptation, just damage control masquerading as radical policy-overhaul. READ MORE: Wes Streeting forced to admit Labour wants fewer people claiming PIP Like cynical venture capitalists who asset-strip football clubs, this government treats the welfare state not as a shared good but as a historical burden. Public support systems are remodelled with fewer seats, less atmosphere, and none of the legacy. Cuts are proposed, resisted, and delayed, but always within the logic of managed decline. First they tried to demolish the Kop end stand, now they promise only future fans will be excluded. Proclaiming progress, the luscious playing surface is narrowed and replaced with astroturf. Starmer and his front bench echo the language of 'toughness' while attacking the right to protest and doubling down on hostile-environment policies. Protesters are kettled, marches are banned, and dissent is criminalised by degrees. All this while far-right groups openly organise to infiltrate and co-opt Reform UK, talking of 'seizing control' and reshaping elections by 2030. READ MORE: Scottish Labour MP not 'proud' of Keir Starmer's first year in charge These are not fringe figures. They're part of a co-ordinated ecosystem of antisemitism, Islamophobia, authoritarianism and conspiracism – emboldened by silence and triangulation. Instead of calling it out, however, Labour's leadership seems content to play the same game: pinned in the six-yard box, offering managerial discipline while the far right runs rings around them and takes audacious pot-shots. Picture ex-Scotland manager Craig Levein's infamous 6-4-0 formation against the Czech Republic, but fielding only newly drafted players who might be loyal, but have no experience in big games. Those of us pushed to the margins – disabled people, migrants, Muslims, and working-class communities – know what happens when the centre tries to outflank the right. Rights are lost and protections evaporate. We vanish from the headlines, except when someone from a marginalised group sells their soul for a front-bench post to prop up the attack on their own team. More of us end up in poverty, detention, or despair. READ MORE: Home Office staff concerned over 'absurd ban on Palestine Action' Meanwhile, Number 10 parades like champions of Europe, running victory laps over a non-league economy. The fans are left with crumbling public services – akin to Manchester United fans getting drenched beneath Old Trafford's increasingly dilapidated roof. And though our elected manager and board point to victories of old, it's clear they're preparing to flog the stadium that is the UK to the highest bidder, while calling it progress. There's still time to fight this decline, but only if leaders stop hiding behind spreadsheets and rediscover the courage to name what we're up against: a political slide toward exclusion, authoritarianism, and resentment – selling the strongest players in the name of a squad rebuild. The public knows the difference between real change and stage-managed retreat. Delivering anything less than what's needed means not just losing the match, but the risk of relegation and surrendering the values on which the club's success was genuinely built. Ron Lumiere via email FOLLOWING Laura Webster's Saturday article on about Labour founding the welfare state, which has become a standard response by Labour hacks to every scenario: the Labour welfare state is a myth. The welfare state was agreed, with minor differences, by the wartime coalition. Bismarck had a welfare state in the 1870s and he was no socialist either; he wanted a race of supermen. The Brits had to acknowledge that the German soldier was fitter, taller and better educated, like the Channel Islands' children after German occupation. READ MORE: We investigate the state of the welfare state – read our new series England did not achieve public education till the 1870s, due to opposition by the controlling Church of England. The Church of Scotland had no wish to control public education in Scotland, which has been free since the reformation. Incidentally, Catholic education legislation was introduced at the turn of the last century by a Liberal government, not because they were sympathetic to Catholicism, but because the wanted to create divisions in Scotland. Incidentally, there are no 'Prodistent' schools in Scotland, merely non-denominational schools where Catholic and other-denomination pupils and teachers are more common than most people realise. It was a Liberal minister in World War One, Winston Churchill, who introduced free milk, because of the poorer state of the British working class compared to German wartime recruits. The architect of the welfare state was the Liberal Lord Beveridge. Lords Wilson and Callaghan introduced further austerity and pay freezes etc. Donald Anderson Glasgow IF Westminster taxed the rich cheats who threw money at Brexit so they could avoid the new EU laws on tax havens, they would bring in way more cash than they will get from hitting the poor and disabled. They could close the loopholes the government deliberately creates and make everyone pay their tax. Loopholes are actually government-created corruption. Labour could recover if they taxed the rich – as long as Israel doesn't mind, of course. Bill Robertson via email

I have walked amongst Scotland's largest gulls - they are a menace
I have walked amongst Scotland's largest gulls - they are a menace

The Herald Scotland

time6 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

I have walked amongst Scotland's largest gulls - they are a menace

They are big​ too. Very big, probably the biggest in Scotland, and with their size comes with equally large beaks, and that is where the problem lies. Have anything edible about your person at that time of the morning then you really are in trouble. For gulls, like some of us humans, seem to have forgotten all about their traditional diet of healthy fish discarded over the side of a trawler, and now prefer fast food – and more of it the better. And you can see their point in a way. Why would you want a measly fish straight out of the sea, when you can gorge on plump ones wrapped in batter and served with chips. However, it is not a laughing matter really, as there are increasing examples of people getting hurt by the hungry birds up and down the country. Now the problem (again) has been raised at Holyrood with former Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross warning that Scots risk losing their lives over the 'growing problem' of 'dominating' gulls if action is not taken to stop them. That is quite the claim but at least had evidence to back it up. In the chamber, Mr Ross spoke of gull horror stories including one woman who fell outside her house as a result of a gull attack, broke her leg, went to hospital and then, upon her return, was attacked again. It is high time that irresponsible campervan users are taxed off the NC500 Alan Simpson: The new £144m electric rail line without enough trains Alan Simpson: Giving CalMac contract is right - now give them better ships Alan Simpson: Scotland's tourism sector needs to be heard before it's too late The debate was led by Mr Ross after he submitted a motion stating that the parliament should note concern around the reported changes to the approach taken for granting licences to control gulls in recent years by NatureScot. He argued that this has led to fewer licences being approved. A total of 2,041 licences were granted in 2023, however this figure fell to 505 in 2024. He told the chamber there is a 'clear conflict' in the Scottish Government body Nature Scot between conserving and preserving bird numbers and controlling the applications to regulate bird numbers. Mr Ross also criticised NatureScot and the Scottish Government for being on the side of seagulls and not humans during a sometimes heated debate at Holyrood. The Former Scottish Conservative leader said: 'Currently they are clearly conflicted between conserving and preserving bird numbers and also being the agency that looks at and deliberates on applications to control birds. 'It is not possible any more for Nature Scot to do those dual roles'. Mr Ross pointed that NatureScot keep a record of bird deaths or injury but not take any record of people injured. He said communities and businesses in his own constituency of Moray, Nairn and Inverness have had significant problems with gulls in recent years, but that many communities across Scotland also experience similar problems. He also said the gulls are causing 'mental health issues' as their constant screeching torments the general public. 'They are a menace,' he emphasised to parliament. Mr Ross said he is not ignoring that people are encouraging gulls by feeding them and he accepted that was 'part of the problem'. Gulls 'dominating areas' are also seeing a reduction of other smaller birds, he argued. Mr Ross called on more 'robust action' from the Scottish Government and NatureScot to protect humans and businesses from 'the menace of dangerous gulls'. It is hard to argue with Mr Ross on this one as we can all probably recall being menaced by seagulls at one point or another in recent times. His point about smaller birds being driven from some areas is also true, as I can vouch from my own garden, which can suddenly become full of gulls, particularly when people put bread out. Of course, this is always well intentioned as it put out for smaller birds who cannot get a look in as everything is hoovered up by the aggressive gulls. I live a good 30-odd miles from the coast too, proving that the problem with gulls is not confined to seaside communities. Residents and businesses in the former fishing port of Nairn on the Moray Firth believe gulls have become a serious problem. Alan Simpson: Build more houses for rural Scots, not tax second home owners Alan Simpson: NatureScot may be threatening a rare mussel it should be protecting Alan Simpson: Forcing landowners to sell to locals is not the best solution We thought the good times would last forever. We were wrong. What next for Aberdeen? A survey by Nairn Business Improvement District (Bid) last year received 85 reports of gull attacks. Manager Lucy Harding told the BBC: 'That was quite worrying. It is an issue I regularly get reports on, of people being attacked for food particularly.' Gulls, like other birds, are protected by law and Scotland's nature body, NatureScot, has strict rules around how they are controlled. A licence is needed for the removal of nests and eggs from the roofs of buildings in areas where gulls are deemed to be a nuisance. But Ms Harding said it was now harder to obtain the necessary paperwork. Nairn Bid has put in place other measures to discourage gulls from nesting in the town, including reflective devices designed to scare birds away from rooftops. Gulls are a coastal species, but they have been drawn into towns and cities due to the plentiful places to build nests, a lack of predators - and lots of opportunities to find food. In their natural habitats - the coast and farmland - the birds eat carrion, seeds, fruits, young birds, eggs, small mammals, insects and fish. NatureScot issued 2,633 nest removal licences across Scotland in 2023, and 1,601 in 2024. It said it understood gulls could sometimes cause problems in towns and cities, but at the same time populations of the birds were facing 'serious declines'. NatureScot said it would continue to issue licenses where gulls were causing a health and safety issue. RSPB Scotland say that people and gulls could coexist if the right action was taken. Numbers of herring gulls, a species people are most likely to encounter in urban areas, have fallen by 48% in Scotland since the 1980s, according to RSPB Scotland. Clearly the answer then is not just mass culling of gulls, but it is fair to say that more robust action needs to be taken before somebody does get seriously hurt. But the answer ultimately lies with all of us and the amount of food that we just casually throw away, which then attracts gulls. We all need to look at our own behaviour and stop blaming the gulls, however menacing they are, for everything. Ultimately, we are the problem and therefore we are the solution too.

Anas Sarwar opens door to ending Scotland-England tax divergence in dig at SNP 'performance'
Anas Sarwar opens door to ending Scotland-England tax divergence in dig at SNP 'performance'

Scotsman

time7 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Anas Sarwar opens door to ending Scotland-England tax divergence in dig at SNP 'performance'

The Scottish Labour leader has hit out at the SNP's tax strategy. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has suggested he would move to end the tax divergence with the rest of the UK if he becomes first minister. Mr Sarwar has accused SNP ministers of 'government by performance' over their higher tax regime for the super-rich, but risks being faced with less money to spend on public services if he does cut tax. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scotland's higher earners pay more income tax than the rest of the UK. Photo: Gareth Fuller/PA Wire The Scottish Government's top rate of tax - 45 per cent - comes in at earnings of £75,001, while those reaching £125,140 face a 48 per cent levy. In the rest of the UK, the top rate of tax is 45 per cent and only comes in when earnings reach £125,140. Speaking to the Scottish Sun on Sunday, Mr Sarwar said: 'Any government with analysis showing 90 per cent of what it says it's going to raise is actually going to be lost due to behavioural change, and they still go ahead, is not a serious grown-up government. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'That is government by performance. They think they are playing a game, but they are actually playing with people's lives and livelihoods.' Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar. Picture: Jane Barlow/PA Wire | Jane Barlow/PA Wire Mr Sarwar's position could anger trade unions who have welcomed higher earners being targeted for tax increases. Unions have called for his Labour colleagues at Westminster to introduce a wealth tax, which could then be adopted by the Scottish Government. The Scottish Labour leader said: 'You have to have a much more honest conversation about what is actually happening in Scotland. We don't have the breadth of that so-called super wealth to do the things we need to do to fix our economy. 'That can only come from attracting investment, private and public, and also foreign direct investment, and it means having a growth-first agenda.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Concerns have been raised over whether the higher tax rates for the super-rich in Scotland have brought in more funding for Holyrood. Research by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), published last year found the Scottish Government's strategy of increasing the top rate of income tax 'may have reduced revenues', but warned 'significant uncertainty remains'. READ MORE: SNP ministers urged to hike taxes on wealthy ahead of Scottish Budget Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A spokesman for SNP Finance Secretary Shona Robison said: 'In Scotland, people on lower incomes pay less and we ask those on higher incomes to pay a bit more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store