
‘PhD wallah', voices for minorities & a Right-wing surprise: Meet JNU's new student union leaders
AISA's Nitish Kumar, popularly known as 'PhD wallah' among students, won the post of JNUSU president with 1,702 votes. The 26-year-old is a third-year PhD scholar at the Centre for Political Studies. He belongs to the Other Backward Classes (OBC) community and hails from a farming family in Sheikhpura, Bihar. Speaking to ThePrint, Kumar said his early experiences and lack of opportunities shaped his political journey. 'Since there was no education and infrastructure in my village, I have been living outside since the age of 7,' he said.
New Delhi: The closely contested Jawaharlal Nehru University Students' Union Election (JNUSU) saw the Left alliance—All India Students Association (AISA) and Democratic Students' Federation (DSF)—retain the top three posts. It also marked a comeback for the Right with the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) securing the joint secretary post.
At JNU, he began his political career by joining AISA in 2021. Among the key issues he has put forward is the university's deteriorating infrastructure. 'The first thing I want to fix is all the ACs in the library to give respite to students in this heat. Wherever there is an infrastructure problem, in hostels, classrooms, we will make it our priority in the first month,' Kumar told ThePrint.
He also vowed to intensify the push for the restoration of the JNU Entrance Examination (JNUEE), a longstanding demand of many student groups.
Reacting to the ABVP's victory, Kumar said, 'I want to appeal to them not to repeat the mistake they made in 2015-16, when they propelled a campaign of 'Shut Down JNU'. If they try anything like that again, the students who have elected them will throw them out instantly.'
Asked about the split in the Left forces ahead of the election, Kumar said, 'For about 10 years, from 2016 onward, we fought against the fascists from ABVP as a United Left front, making an anti-fascist alliance.'
'However, ahead of these elections, the SFI did not understand the meaning of fascism. According to them, fascism has not arrived in the Modi-Shah BJP. We in AISA firmly believe that fascism has already arrived,' he added.
A split in the United Left alliance this year led to the AISA and DSF fighting elections together, while the All India Students' Federation (AISF), Students' Federation of India (SFI), Birsa Ambedkar Phule Students' Association (BAPSA) and Progressive Students' Association (PSA) allied together.
Manisha—Vice-President, JNUSU
DSF's Manisha, who goes only by one name, was elected Vice-President with 1,150 votes. A third-year PhD scholar in Chinese Studies, Manisha hails from Bhawar village in Haryana's Sonipat district.
Coming from a Dalit background, she has been a staunch advocate for student rights and social justice. 'I have no hesitation in saying that I am a Dalit,' she told ThePrint.
On assuming office, Manisha said, 'The first thing I will work on is the rollback of library and lab fund cuts and addressing infrastructure issues.'
She also took a strong stance against what she called the 'tahansahi farman' (dictatorial order) of the JNU administration imposing hefty fines of Rs 10,000 or Rs 20,000 on protesting students. 'We will reject these anti-student measures,' she said.
Munteha Fatima—General Secretary, JNUSU
Munteha Fatima, 28, also from DSF, secured the general secretary post with 1,520 votes, marking another significant win for the Left.
'As a woman, and once in office, my priority will be to make sure that the campus feels safe, day and night. I will work to strengthen the deprivation points for female research scholars and strive to make JNU a sexual harassment-free space,' Fatima, a PhD scholar in West Asian Studies, said.
Her commitment to minority rights is also central to her agenda. 'I come from a Muslim Community, and therefore it is my duty to ensure that minorities on campus feel safe, respected and free from discrimination,' she added. Fatima hails from Patna, Bihar.
Vaibhav Meen—Joint Secretary, JNUSU
In a surprising twist, ABVP's Vaibhav Meena was elected JNUSU joint secretary, securing 1,005 votes, defeating AISA's Naresh Kumar by a narrow margin of 85 votes.
Hailing from Karauli, Rajasthan, Meena is a research scholar in Hindi literature.
Speaking to ThePrint, Meena said, 'My focus will be to resolve campus issues, especially hostel problems and fellowship delays. Along with these, we will also work to promote nationalism on the campus.'
While ABVP did not win the top posts, their presence in the central panel is seen as a formidable challenge to the Left, particularly the Right-wing party has won its first post on the central panel since 2015.
Kartikay Chaturvedi is an intern who graduated from ThePrint School of Journalism.
(Edited by Sanya Mathur)
Also Read: How Left student leaders from JNU & Allahabad University have emerged as key members of Team Priyanka

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
33 minutes ago
- Time of India
Explained: China's monopoly on rare earth minerals spooking the world; what does it mean for India & what is it doing?
China's firm grip on rare earths, essential components in the production of phones, automobiles and missiles, is giving a headache to countries world over, including India. (AI image) China's firm grip and worldwide monopoly on rare earth metals, essential components in the production of phones, automobiles and missiles, is giving a headache to countries world over, including India. Despite mounting pressure from countries including the US, EU and India, China remains steadfast in its stance regarding export limitations of these critical rare earths. Recent reports have highlighted increasing worries within the Indian automotive sector regarding the limited availability of rare earth magnets. These components are essential for electric vehicles and certain parts in conventional internal combustion engine vehicles. Furthermore, India's industrial sectors have expressed apprehension over China's decision to restrict rare earth exports, particularly germanium. This plays a vital role in the production of semiconductors, fibre optic cables and solar panels. Critical minerals and metals, including cobalt, copper, lithium, nickel and rare earth elements, are fundamental components in manufacturing environmentally friendly energy solutions, from wind power installations to battery-powered automobiles. What's China's hold on rare earths? China has established control over critical mineral deposits worldwide. Rare earth minerals comprise a collection of 17 metallic elements. While these elements are found across various countries, extracting them is expensive and environmentally damaging, resulting in substantial pollution. The International Energy Agency reports that whilst China produces 61 % of globally mined rare earths, it dominates 92% of worldwide production output. Following Premier Li Qiang's decree implementing export controls on rare earths, China has reportedly intensified these restrictions after US President Donald Trump levied 146% tariffs on Chinese exports. Recently Trump said that Chinese President Xi Jinping has allowed some rare earths to flow to the US. In a recent column in TOI, Tanmay Kumarr Baid & Pranay Kotasthane of Takshashila Institution argued that by restricting shipments, Beijing is lifting prices worldwide and incentivising countries to set up processing elsewhere. 'Once the capital is sunk into new refining in the rest of the world, even a later U‑turn by China cannot quickly claw these customers back,' they said. However, experts Ajit Ranade and Shardul Manurkar believe that China's rare-earth dominance is not a fragile or accidental monopoly, it is a product of deep, deliberate, and sustained strategy. 'Attempts to counter this dominance must acknowledge the scale of the challenge,' they say. Also Read | Move away from China: Shein & Reliance aim selling 'Made in India' clothes abroad; to list India-made clothes on US, UK websites How much does it impact India? The Indian automobile sector continues to face challenges as China maintains restrictions on critical rare earth magnet supplies, even though nine parts manufacturers received endorsements for their import requests from the Chinese embassy. The flow of supplies remains halted, pending approval from China's commerce ministry. These magnets play a crucial role in the production of electric vehicles and are essential for various automotive components, including gear mechanisms and drive trains. The Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers delivered a presentation to Indian government officials on May 28, urging immediate dialogue between India and China to expedite stalled approvals and simplify the complex procedures. The automotive industry body emphasised the need for bilateral discussions to address these regulatory challenges, according to a Bloomberg report. Saurabh Agarwal, Partner & Automotive Tax Leader, EY India says, 'The recent actions by China have significantly disrupted global supply chains, particularly through their increasing export control over critical commodities. This underscores the urgent need for India, and indeed any nation, to foster a self-sustaining economy. We must prioritize developing our own critical mineral resources and building an end-to-end domestic supply chain, especially as the world shifts towards greater self-reliance. ' 'Given the current trajectory of our growing economy, it's imperative that the government introduces a Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme specifically for rare earth magnets and critical mineral recycling. This will be crucial in the mid-term for establishing a robust domestic supply chain,' he tells TOI. 'In the short run, we must leverage our diplomatic channels to engage with the Chinese government and resolve the immediate challenges around export control licenses. This is essential to prevent production stoppages in our industries,' he adds. Also Read | 'No longer any question..': Donald Trump says China's Xi Jinping has agreed to let rare earth minerals flow to US; sign of thawing tensions What India is doing India is currently negotiating with China regarding the procurement of permanent magnets made from rare earth minerals, whilst simultaneously exploring alternative supply channels for these vital components, according to commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal. The minister confirmed that the administration maintains regular communication with domestic industry stakeholders to accelerate the development of indigenous sources. "There is a concern... our embassy is in dialogue with them (China)... commerce and industry ministry is also working," Goyal said, adding that the government had already begun work on developing alternate sources. The minister addressed concerns regarding China's halt on permanent magnet exports to India, acknowledging its impact on the automotive sector, white goods and other industries. He mentioned that whilst some companies have submitted applications, they anticipate favourable responses for permanent magnet approvals. Additionally, the government is collaborating with Indian Rare Earths Ltd to accelerate domestic resource development, Goyal stated. When questioned about potential production-linked incentive schemes for magnets, Goyal confirmed discussions with the automotive industry and expressed confidence in finding a solution. He noted that ongoing dialogues with innovators and startups indicate their willingness to support funding requirements and price adjustments necessary to stimulate sector growth and expansion. Also Read | Economy in dire straits, India's Indus Waters Treaty blow: Can Pakistan avoid the 'begging bowl'? Regarding alternative solutions, the minister highlighted potential technological developments within India. Goyal emphasised the collaborative efforts between government, industry, startups and innovators. He acknowledged possible short-term challenges but expressed confidence in achieving success over medium to long-term periods. Goyal recently said that the world must acknowledge the dangers of critical minerals and their supply chains being concentrated in a few geographies, as this concentration could impede economic progress of countries. He said that India has initiated measures, including support for startups conducting research and development, to discover innovative and alternative solutions, he noted. This will help reduce "our over dependence and over reliance on certain critical minerals," Goyal said. Critical minerals like copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt and rare earth elements play a vital role in advancing clean energy technologies. These critical minerals are fundamental components in the manufacturing of wind turbines, electricity networks, electric vehicles and batteries. As countries worldwide accelerate their shift towards clean energy, the requirement for these essential minerals continues to rise. The government's initiative for recycling critical minerals, including copper, lithium, nickel, cobalt and rare earth elements, is approaching its conclusive phase, according to a mines ministry official's statement. The National Critical Mineral Mission (NCMM) has received Rs 1,500 crore in the Union budget for recycling critical minerals, Dinesh Mahur, Joint Secretary in the Mines Ministry has said. The government's earlier approval of the National Critical Mineral Mission, with a budget of Rs 16,300-crore and a total allocation of Rs 34,300 crore distributed across seven years, aims to boost self-sufficiency and expedite India's shift towards green energy. The mission, which seeks to encourage exploration of critical minerals domestically and in offshore regions, anticipates a substantial contribution of Rs 18,000 crore from public sector enterprises. The primary aims of this initiative include enhancing exploration activities, lessening dependence on imports, securing mineral deposits abroad, advancing processing technologies for these crucial minerals and establishing recycling mechanisms. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


News18
an hour ago
- News18
'Gratitude To Indian Navy': Chinese Embassy On Rescue Of Crew In Kerala Cargo Ship Fire
Last Updated: The Chinese Embassy in India expressed gratitude to the Indian Navy for the rescue of 22 crew members, including 14 Chinese nationals, after fire onboard MV Wan Hai 503. Spokesperson of the Chinese Embassy in India on Tuesday expressed gratitude to the Indian Navy for their 'prompt and professional rescue" operations onboard MV WAN HAI 503, which caught fire on June 9 while it was on passage from Colombo to Nhava Sheva. In an X post, Yu Jing mentioned that 14 of those onboard the Singapore-flagged container vessel were Chinese, including 6 from Taiwan. There were a total of 22 crew members onboard the vessel at the time of the incident. 'On June 9, MV Wan Hai 503 encountered onboard explosion and fire 44 nautical miles off Azhikkal, Kerala. Of the total 22 crew members on board, 14 are Chinese, including 6 from Taiwan," Jing wrote in the post. 'Our gratitude goes to the Indian Navy and the Mumbai Coast Guard for their prompt and professional rescue," she added. 'We wish further search operations successful and the injured crew members speedy recovery," the spokesperson's X post read. On June 9, MV Wan Hai 503 encountered onboard explosion and fire 44 nautical miles off Azhikkal, Kerala. Of the total 22 crew members on board, 14 are Chinese, including 6 from Taiwan. Our gratitude goes to the Indian Navy @indiannavy and the Mumbai Coast Guard for their prompt… — Yu Jing (@ChinaSpox_India) June 10, 2025 The post comes amid sensitive ties between India and China, following the deadly Galwan Valley standoff between the militaries of both countries in 2020. On May 7, after India launched 'Operation Sindoor' targeting terror infrastructures in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK), India's Embassy in China rebuked the Chinese media outlet Global Times and withheld its social media handle in India for reporting that Pakistan's military shot down an Indian fighter jet. Nearly a week later, India categorically rejected China's attempts to rename places in Arunachal Pradesh and emphasised that such manoeuvres would not change the reality that Arunachal Pradesh was, is, and will always remain an integral and inalienable part of India. Meanwhile, coordinated firefighting operations continued through the night of June 9, following the maritime incident off Kerala's coast. The crew disembarked at Mangalore Port at 11.30 pm on Monday. Indian Coast Guard ships Sachet and Samudra Prahari remained engaged in firefighting efforts overnight, news agency PTI quoted a defence spokesperson as saying. A Coast Guard Dornier aircraft took off on Tuesday morning to conduct an aerial survey of the incident site, the spokesperson added.


Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Trump Accuses China Of Breaking Trade Agreement, Regrets Being "Mr Nice Guy" In Tariff Deal
President Donald Trump has publicly accused China of breaching its trade agreement with the United States, expressing regret over his decision to ease punitive tariffs that had severely impacted the Chinese economy. The accusation comes amid stalled negotiations and growing tensions between the world's two largest economies. In a lengthy post on his Truth Social platform, Trump detailed his reasoning behind the original trade deal, claiming he had intervened to prevent what he perceived as potential economic collapse in China. The President stated that his unprecedented 145 percent tariffs had made it "virtually impossible for China to trade into the United States marketplace," causing widespread factory closures and civil unrest. "Two weeks ago China was in grave economic danger! The very high Tariffs I set made it virtually impossible for China to TRADE into the United States marketplace which is, by far, number one in the World," Trump wrote, describing the severe impact of his trade policies on Chinese commerce. The President revealed that his decision to negotiate a deal was motivated by concern for China's deteriorating situation rather than American interests. "I saw what was happening and didn't like it, for them, not for us. I made a FAST DEAL with China in order to save them from what I thought was going to be a very bad situation," he explained. Trump's statement followed comments from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who informed Fox News that trade negotiations with China had reached an impasse. Bessent emphasized that meaningful progress would require direct engagement between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, highlighting the complexity of the ongoing discussions. The current trade dispute stems from earlier this month when the Trump administration agreed to reduce the 145 percent tariff to 30 percent, while China reciprocated by lowering its tariff rate on American goods from 125 percent to 10 percent. This mutual reduction was intended as a 90-day temporary measure to defuse escalating trade tensions. The agreement emerged from intensive negotiations in Geneva, Switzerland, marking the first high-level diplomatic talks between Washington and Beijing since Trump imposed his steep tariffs on Chinese imports. The discussions were characterized as marathon sessions aimed at preventing a full-scale trade war between the economic superpowers. However, Treasury Secretary Bessent noted that while the temporary deal succeeded in calming financial markets, it failed to address fundamental American concerns about China's state-controlled economic model. This underlying issue continues to complicate long-term trade relationship stability between the nations. Following the stalled China negotiations, the Trump administration has redirected its trade focus toward other significant partners, including Japan, India, and the European Union. This strategic shift suggests the administration is pursuing multiple trade fronts while China talks remain deadlocked. The trade dispute has also faced legal challenges, with a US trade court ruling Wednesday that President Trump exceeded his executive authority by imposing most tariffs on Chinese and other imports under emergency powers legislation. However, a federal appeals court quickly reinstated the tariffs within 24 hours, temporarily suspending the lower court's decision pending government appeal review. The appeals court has established specific deadlines for the legal proceedings, requiring plaintiffs to respond by June 5 and the Trump administration to file their response by June 9. This legal timeline adds another layer of complexity to the already challenging trade relationship between the United States and China.