
How accurate is the movie ‘Conclave' on electing a new pope?
Fans of the Oscar-nominated movie, 'Conclave', which is about a papal election, might think they have a head start on what's to come. But how faithful is the movie to the real thing?
Conclave tells the story of Cardinal Thomas Lawrence, dean of the College of Cardinals, played by actor Ralph Fiennes. Lawrence is tasked with leading a papal election or conclave after the pope dies. As the conclave continues, secrets and scandals emerge involving cardinals in the running to be pope.
PolitiFact's occasional MovieFact feature reports on the accuracy of nonfiction films, typically comparing their details with historical events. 'Conclave' is fictional, but we decided to examine what the movie gets right and wrong about the real process for choosing the next pope.
'Conclave' sticks close to the logistics of a real papal election, but takes more liberties with how its characters participate in one. As dean, Cardinal Lawrence makes decisions that would not be permissible in a real-life conclave.
The movie 'does a fair job' of depicting conclave procedures, said B. Kevin Brown, Gonzaga University religious studies lecturer. But Brown had some notes. Referring to the sets and costumes, Brown said some cardinals wore Roman collars that 'are not entirely correct', and the Mass held before the conclave appeared to have no altar, a raised structure used for ceremonies. Some of its storylines have no public precedent in the Catholic Church's history.
We compared movie scenes with conclaves and cardinals' real-life controversies.
After a pope dies, the College of Cardinals assumes governance of the Catholic Church. These cardinals, chosen by popes, serve countries around the world. Only cardinals under the age of 80 can be electors.
The conclave that begins on May 7 will have 133 electors from 71 countries. Two more electors are eligible but will not participate for health reasons.
Before the conclave, cardinals gather for meetings called 'general congregations' where they discuss the Catholic Church's priorities. The conclave takes place at the Sistine Chapel in Vatican City, as the film showed.
The balloting shown in the film is largely accurate, based on the process outlined by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops: Electors vote by secret ballot, walk up to a chalice – which is a large goblet – say a prayer and drop their ballots in the chalice. They conduct four rounds of balloting per day until a candidate receives a two-thirds majority. Ballots are burned after each round with chemicals that produce coloured smoke to signify whether a pope has been chosen – black smoke means no one has been elected and white smoke means the Church has a new pope.
In the movie, it takes the cardinal electors three days to elect a pope. That's consistent with recent history; Brown said conclaves in the past 100 years have lasted three to four days. According to a History.com article, 'no conclave has lasted longer than a week' since 1831.
The movie shows Cardinal Lawrence communicating with Monsignor Raymond O'Malley (played by Brian F O'Byrne), asking him to check into things such as the pope's final meeting with Cardinal Joseph Tremblay (John Lithgow), and medical history of Cardinal Vincent Benitez (Carlos Diehz). After the cardinals feel tremors in the Sistine Chapel, O'Malley later tells Lawrence there has been an explosion in the Piazza Barberini, a large plaza in Rome.
Brown said receiving information about events happening outside the conclave 'would violate the rules of the conclave'.
Cardinal electors are sequestered throughout a conclave, and have no access to phones, television or other ways to be in contact with the public.
In the movie, Benitez, described as the archbishop of Kabul, Afghanistan, makes a surprise entrance. He was selected as a cardinal 'in pectore' – or in secret – by the pope who died. Senior cardinals debate whether Benitez should be allowed to join the conclave, and Cardinal Lawrence ultimately decides he is 'legally a cardinal' and 'has a right to take part in the election'.
In a real conclave, it would be impossible for a cardinal whose identity was not revealed before the death of the pope who appointed him to join the conclave.
Canon law, the Catholic Church's system of laws and regulations, says a pope can select a person to be a cardinal and keep that person's identity secret. As long as the cardinal's identity is not revealed, the cardinal in pectore is not bound to carry out cardinal duties but also does not possess cardinal rights, such as participating in a conclave.
'This may be done, as the movie suggests, for safety reasons in situations where the cardinal's appointment may put him at risk due to the political situation where he resides,' Brown said.
If a cardinal in pectore did not have his appointment made public before the death of a pope, Brown said, the cardinal's status would expire and 'he is no longer considered a cardinal, even if the name of the cardinal is discovered in the will of the pope or some other writing after his death.'
This happened in real life: Pope John Paul II selected four cardinals in pectore, revealing only three, from China, Ukraine and Latvia, before he died. The other cardinal's appointment expired when John Paul II died in 2005.
Cardinals would try to learn about scandals before the conclave, but rumours happen.
In the movie, Cardinal Joshua Adeyemi (played by Lucian Msamati) and Tremblay emerge as frontrunners to become pope during the balloting, but their ambitions are quashed as Lawrence brings findings about their past to light. Adeyemi had a secret relationship and possibly fathered a child, and Tremblay was accused of simony, or what Brown said involves the 'sale of an office'.
In practice, cardinals try to snuff out controversies and scandals before the election.
'There is certainly politicking that takes place and the cardinals will do their best to be sure that no cardinal associated with scandal is elected,' Brown said. 'However, it is likely that the cardinals would do their best to identify any scent of scandal before the conclave begins.'
For example, in real life, Cardinal Angelo Becciu resigned his cardinal rights and privileges in 2020 and was convicted of financial crimes in 2023; he claimed he could still vote in the 2025 conclave because Francis did not bar him from participating. Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Roman Curia's secretary of state, revealed two letters from Francis saying that Cardinal Becciu could not take part in the conclave, according to reports in Italian media.
This happened during general congregation, Brown said, when cardinals are not sequestered.
It is 'not unheard of for cardinals to try to raise doubts about a candidate who they oppose', he said.
It happened to Francis – then known as Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio.
As Francis gained momentum during the 2013 conclave, 'rumours began to circulate that he had only one lung,' Brown said. Francis recounted the episode in an interview for a book published in 2024. When a cardinal asked Francis if the rumour was true, he said he had part of his lung removed after a respiratory infection more than 50 years before.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Qatar Tribune
29-07-2025
- Qatar Tribune
Israeli settler kills West Bank activist who worked on Oscar-winning film
Agencies An Israeli settler has shot and killed Palestinian activist and teacher Awdah Hathaleen in a village near Hebron in the occupied West Bank, local officials and journalists said. Hathaleen was well known for his activism, including helping the creators of the Oscar-winning film No Other Land, which documents Israeli settler and soldier attacks on the Palestinian community of Masafer Yatta. He 'was shot dead by settlers … during their attack on the village of Umm al-Khair', in Masafer Yatta, the Palestinian Authority's Ministry of Education wrote on social media late on Monday. The two filmmakers behind No Other Land – Israeli journalist Yuval Abraham and Palestinian journalist Basel Adra – also confirmed that the activist was shot and killed. 'My dear friend Awdah was slaughtered this evening,' Adra wrote on social media. 'He was standing in front of the community centre in his village when a settler fired a bullet that pierced his chest and took his life,' he said. 'This is how Israel erases us — one life at a time.' Co-director Abraham described Hathaleen as 'a remarkable activist who helped us film No Other Land in Masafer Yatta'. Abraham also posted a video of the incident and said that 'residents identified Yinon Levi, sanctioned by the EU and US, as the shooter'. 'This is him in the video firing like crazy,' Abraham said. Israeli police acknowledged that they were investigating an 'incident near Carmel [al-Karmil]', an illegal Israeli settlement neighbouring Umm al-Khair. 'An Israeli citizen was detained at the scene and then arrested by police for questioning,' a police statement said.


Al Jazeera
29-07-2025
- Al Jazeera
Settler sanctions are theatre. Hathaleen's murder exposes the cover-up
On July 28, 2025, an Israeli settler shot Palestinian activist Awdah Hathaleen in the chest, causing injuries that later proved fatal. The attack was captured on video, and the shooter was identified as Yinon Levi, a settler previously sanctioned by the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States under the Biden administration. Hathaleen, aged 31, was a beloved activist and teacher from Masafer Yatta in the South Hebron Hills. He also played a supporting role in the Oscar-winning film No Other Land, which depicts the story of his village, subjected to relentless attacks from settlers and settler-aligned soldiers for decades. Hathaleen's killing is far from isolated. He is one of more than 1,000 Palestinians killed in the West Bank since the genocide in Gaza began in October 2023. This surge in violence coincides with a sharp rise in Palestinian land seizures and home demolitions. The Israeli government has used the genocide in Gaza as cover to accelerate its takeover plans for the West Bank. Just days before entering its three-month summer recess, the Israeli Knesset passed a non-binding motion to annex the entire territory. The Knesset's motion comes one year after the July 2024 International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling that Israel's ongoing occupation of the Palestinian territories it seized in 1967 is illegal and must end. The court ordered the Israeli regime to dismantle settlements, provide reparations and facilitate the return of displaced Palestinians, setting September 2025 as the deadline. In the months leading up to the ICJ ruling, countries including Australia, France, the UK and Canada announced sanctions on a handful of settlers and entities involved in the settlement enterprise. Hathaleen's killer, Yinon Levi, was among those sanctioned. Yet, as expected, travel bans and financial restrictions imposed by these countries have had no impact on the ground. Levi continued his attacks on Palestinians from his illegal settler outpost, operating under full army protection. Not only have these sanctions had no impact, but by singling out a few settlers rather than addressing the broader machinery of settler colonialism, they also allow the Israeli regime to escape accountability by presenting settler violence as an aberration rather than an extension of state policy. By deliberately distinguishing between 'extremist' settlers and the rest of the Israeli regime, states implement token measures that enable them to posture as defenders of international law while avoiding any confrontation with the regime itself. The reality is that Israel operates as a settlement enterprise, and its state policy has always been to expand its territory across all of Historical Palestine and beyond, as demonstrated by the occupation of parts of southern Syria and Lebanon over the last two years. Today, more than 700,000 settlers reside in the West Bank and East Jerusalem across more than 250 settlements and outposts, all of which violate international law and are sustained by state infrastructure, security forces and planning agencies. This expansion has been enabled by hollow measures such as the sanctioning of Levi, where targeting a few individuals serves only to shield the regime responsible for the very system they uphold. This political theatre is utterly absurd. One cannot meaningfully sanction settler violence while maintaining full diplomatic, economic and military support for a regime that is, by definition, a settler regime. The settler and the state are inseparable. To sanction one while legitimising the other is not accountability; it is complicity. Hathaleen's murder is not an anomaly but the direct outcome of this system, one that is protected, financed and excused by the same states that claim to oppose it. Such actions do not challenge the status quo; they entrench and normalise it. Breaking this cycle requires states to end their support for Israel's genocidal regime of settlement and occupation altogether, through comprehensive sanctions and real accountability that targets the system, not just its murderous foot soldiers. The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera's editorial stance.


Qatar Tribune
23-07-2025
- Qatar Tribune
Qatar Airways partners Hans Zimmer for a signature symphony
Tribune News Network Doha Qatar Airways has unveiled an iconic partnership with the multiple Oscar and Grammy award-winning composer Hans Zimmer to create a new sonic identity for the airline, featuring a signature sound that will elevate the passenger experience onboard and beyond. The exclusive score will be featured across Qatar Airways' onboard music and will also be released as a full musical album on major streaming platforms and the airline's official channels. This collaboration with the world-renowned composer reflects Qatar Airways' commitment to delivering memorable and emotionally resonant journeys. Qatar Airways Group Chief Executive Officer, Engr. Badr Mohammed Al Meer, said: 'At Qatar Airways, we aim to inspire the world with every new horizon and music plays a powerful role in shaping the emotional journey of our passengers, both in the air and on the ground. We are thrilled to partner with Hans Zimmer to compose our new signature music, exclusively for Qatar Airways. 'This bespoke soundscape will be more than just music; it will be a reflection of our brand's elegance and ambition. Our partnership with Hans Zimmer marks a bold new chapter in the Qatar Airways experience, one that deepens the emotional connection with our passengers and enhances every moment of their journey.' Hans Zimmer said: 'It's an honour to collaborate with Qatar Airways on this visionary project. Together, we're crafting a sonic experience that reflects the beauty of travel and the pioneering spirit that defines this world-class airline.' Qatar Airways is synonymous with excellence, and the creation of its new signature sound is part of its evolving brand identity. The airline channels its ethos of reimagining what is possible into its partnership with Hans Zimmer, to develop a soundscape that taps into the human experiences that are at the heart of every Qatar Airways journey. This initiative marks the debut of Qatar Airways' new audio identity and represents a long-term partnership between the airline and Hans Zimmer.