Dollar falls, euro gains after Merz elected German chancellor
NEW YORK (Reuters) - The dollar fell broadly on Tuesday on worries that U.S. President Donald Trump's touted trade deals have yet to materialize, while the euro extended gains after the German parliament elected conservative leader Friedrich Merz as chancellor.
Investors are waiting for details on trade deals the Trump administration has said it is negotiating with other countries, including China. Trump indicated on Sunday that some deals would be announced this week.
"The market is getting nervous that we're starting to eat away at the schedule since the 90-day tariff reprieve without anything meaningful being announced," said Eugene Epstein, head of structuring for North America at Moneycorp.
"There's a lot of good sentiment but because of a distinct lack of formal substance that I've seen, I think the market is starting to get uneasy again."
The dollar was last down 0.86% at 142.445 Japanese yen . The Taiwanese dollar pared gains following a record rally against the greenback amid market disquiet over Trump's tariffs. The currency was last down 2.6% at 29.931 per dollar.
The Canadian dollar strengthened after Prime Minister Mark Carney bluntly told Trump during a White House visit on Tuesday that Canada would never be for sale. The Canadian dollar strengthened 0.39% versus the greenback to C$1.38 per dollar.
The euro extended gains after Merz secured the votes needed to become German chancellor following a humiliating and unprecedented defeat on the first attempt. The single currency was last up 0.50% to $1.1371.
The Commerce Department reported on Tuesday the U.S. trade deficit widened 14% to a record $140.5 billion in March as businesses boosted imports ahead of Trump's tariffs.
Against the Swiss franc, the dollar gave up earlier gains to edge down 0.09% to 0.82145 franc. Swiss National Bank Chairman Martin Schlegel said the SNB is ready to intervene in currency markets and cut interest rates even below zero to prevent inflation falling below its price stability target.
Markets are focused on Wednesday's Federal Reserve policy meeting, in which the U.S. central bank is expected to hold rates steady.
Fed Chairman Jerome Powell is unlikely to provide clear guidance on how the central bank plans to respond to U.S. import tariffs, Macquarie analysts led by Thierry Wizman wrote in an investor note.
"If traders wish to believe that the Fed will come to the rescue of the world tomorrow and assuage the recent rise in policy uncertainty and political uncertainty with a signal of overt 'dovishness,' they should think again," the analysts wrote.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elevance Health (NYSE:ELV) Is Reinvesting At Lower Rates Of Return
If we want to find a stock that could multiply over the long term, what are the underlying trends we should look for? Amongst other things, we'll want to see two things; firstly, a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and secondly, an expansion in the company's amount of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. Having said that, from a first glance at Elevance Health (NYSE:ELV) we aren't jumping out of our chairs at how returns are trending, but let's have a deeper look. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)? For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. To calculate this metric for Elevance Health, this is the formula: Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities) 0.11 = US$8.7b ÷ (US$122b - US$44b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2025). So, Elevance Health has an ROCE of 11%. By itself that's a normal return on capital and it's in line with the industry's average returns of 11%. See our latest analysis for Elevance Health In the above chart we have measured Elevance Health's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Elevance Health for free. What Does the ROCE Trend For Elevance Health Tell Us? In terms of Elevance Health's historical ROCE movements, the trend isn't fantastic. Around five years ago the returns on capital were 14%, but since then they've fallen to 11%. Although, given both revenue and the amount of assets employed in the business have increased, it could suggest the company is investing in growth, and the extra capital has led to a short-term reduction in ROCE. And if the increased capital generates additional returns, the business, and thus shareholders, will benefit in the long run. The Bottom Line While returns have fallen for Elevance Health in recent times, we're encouraged to see that sales are growing and that the business is reinvesting in its operations. These trends are starting to be recognized by investors since the stock has delivered a 16% gain to shareholders who've held over the last five years. Therefore we'd recommend looking further into this stock to confirm if it has the makings of a good investment. Elevance Health could be trading at an attractive price in other respects, so you might find our on our platform quite valuable. For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Axios
42 minutes ago
- Axios
America starts to feel the squeeze: What we know about tariffs and inflation
Consumers and businesses are feeling the pinch from President Trump's trade war, with costs soaring for grocery staples and critical materials. Why it matters: It's no longer anecdotal. The effects are difficult to ignore across key inflation indicators that might only get hotter in the months ahead. The big picture: Global tariffs are putting upward pressure on costs. U.S. businesses are bearing the brunt, contrary to White House hopes that foreign suppliers would take some of the hit. Between the lines: Import prices might cool if exporters around the globe were discounting goods to help ease the tariff burden for their U.S. buyers. But the opposite was the case last month: Import prices rose at the quickest pace this year, "casting further doubt on the 'foreigners will pay' talk from the administration," ING global economist James Knightley wrote this week. Threat level: Wholesale prices rose at the fastest pace in three years last month — higher costs that might be passed on to the consumer down the line. The data "points to pipeline inflation that's likely to spill into consumer prices in the months ahead," says Michelle Green, a former Labor Department economist, now at corporate planning firm Board. Fresh and dry vegetable prices rose by almost 40 percent alone last month, the largest spike since inflation took off in 2022. The intrigue: Mexico is a leading supplier of America's vegetables, imports now subject to 25% tariff rates — at least until the end of October.. The Trump administration exempted U.S.-bound goods covered under the U.S.-Canada-Mexico trade agreement from tariffs, though the Trump 1.0-era deal largely does not apply to agricultural goods. The Consumer Price Index this week showed evidence of some tariff-related price hikes, though less so than was evident in June. The latest: Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee warned this week that a wave of new tariff announcements for inputs, like semiconductors, as well as final goods could keep upward pressure on inflation. That would be a more bleak outcome than the one-and-done price hike some, including White House economists, predict. "I just want some more surety that that's not going to be a persistent inflation shock," Goolsbee said. Of note: Customs and Border Protection said late Friday that 50% steel and aluminum tariffs would be expanded to more than 400 other goods, effective Monday. What to watch: Persistent inflation could derail a series of interest rate cuts later this year expected by financial markets and demanded by Trump.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Will Trump's tariffs get 'tariffried' by the courts?
-- The Trump administration is bracing for a potential legal setback that could undermine its tariff strategy, analysts at Yardeni Research highlighted in a note this week. The firm stated that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., may soon rule that President Donald Trump lacks the legal authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Yardeni noted that concern was evident in an August 11 letter from two of the administration's top lawyers to the court clerk, filed after oral arguments on July 31, where judges reportedly pressed the government on the tariffs' legality. The letter warns that 'suddenly revoking the President's tariff authority under IEEPA would have catastrophic consequences for our national security, foreign policy, and economy,' adding it could 'lead to a 1929-style result.' While Yardeni said the conclusion 'may be exaggerated,' the fallout would still be 'messy,' with foreign governments potentially ignoring trade agreements and companies seeking tariff refunds from the Treasury. Trump has promoted tariffs as an 'External Revenue Service' to help cut the federal deficit. Customs duties hit a record $157 billion over the 12 months through July, and Trump has aimed for a base tariff of 10%-15% on all U.S. trading partners, potentially yielding over $500 billion annually. Losing the case could raise bond yields and pressure stocks due to renewed policy uncertainty, according to Yardeni. The firm cited Capital Alpha Partners' Jim Lucier, who expects a Federal Circuit decision by late August or September. A unanimous ruling against the administration could give the Supreme Court cover to avoid the case and decline a stay that would keep the tariffs in place. Related articles Will Trump's tariffs get 'tariffried' by the courts? Victoria's Secret Exposed: The Warning Sign Behind the Stock's 52% Collapse After soaring 149%, this stock is back in our AI's favor - & already +25% in July Sign in to access your portfolio
