
Leaked report shows 10,000 gap in probation staff
According to a government study compiled last year, some 17,170 full-time staff were needed to deal with sentence management in September 2023.This was prior to the government releasing tens of thousands of offenders early to create more space in overcrowded prisons - creating even more work for the probation service.According to a sentence management activity review by His Majesty's Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS), there are only 7,236 members of staff in this specific role - around 10,000 fewer than needed.The BBC understands the findings were compiled through staff surveys, analysis of timesheets, and monitoring how employees work on a daily basis.Probation: 'Too few staff, with too little experience, managing too many offenders'In response to the report's findings, a probation officer told the BBC: "These jobs are the bread and butter of probation, and the situation in terms of staffing is considerably worse than is being thought, especially at a time when the pressure on us is immense."It's infuriating when some of us are being told it's our fault we're not doing enough and that we need to up our game, but actually the workload is sky high."Probation staff say the early release scheme known as SDS40 has dramatically increased their workload. Between 10 September 2024 and the end of March this year, 26,456 people were released under the scheme.The staff say failing to monitor released inmates could lead to a surge in reoffending and others going off the official radar, meaning they are completely unsupervised.In February this year, Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood pledged to recruit 1,300 probation officers by April 2026. At that time, the MoJ said officers had been "asked to do too much for too long" and "burdened with high workloads" - meaning they were unable to pay enough attention to offenders posing the greatest risk.In some cases, this led to "missed warning signs" where offenders went on to commit serious offences such as murder, the MoJ said.The probation caseload - the number of offenders staff are looking after - was 241,540 at the end of March 2025 - an increase of 9% over a decade. Staff may have multiple appointments with each offender in a week."Someone is going to get seriously hurt because when you're stressed and overworked you can't get everything right - it's just human nature - and that's why they need thousands of more staff because it could be dangerous otherwise," another probation officer said."They [ministers] are trying to give the impression it's all OK and they're pumping in staff, but they're nowhere near close to filling the gaps. And it can take a year or more to train someone properly."Last year's annual report from HM Inspectorate of Probation cited "chronic under-staffing" and the "knock-on impact on workloads" as key issues of concern.In March 2025, there were 21,022 full-time probation staff in England and Wales - an increase of 610 on the previous year. Sentence management staff are part of the wider cohort of probation staff.One probation officer described the workload as "non-stop", and increasing until "you simply can't cope", adding: "It's just overwhelming."Many of the recommendations made in the Independent Sentencing Review earlier this year are expected to be put before parliament next month. They include more offenders being managed in the community, instead of serving jail time. This will again increase the probation workload.In response to the findings, the MoJ told the BBC that pressure on the probation service "has placed too great a burden on our hardworking staff".A spokesperson said they had recently announced a £700m increase in funding by 2028, as well as recruiting more trainee probation officers."We are also investing in new technology that reduces the administrative burden on staff time so they can focus on working with offenders and protecting the public," they added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
10 minutes ago
- BBC News
Westbury man caught driving 100mph 'no match' for police dog
A man who was caught driving at more than 100mph, including on blind bends and into oncoming traffic, has been jailed for a year after being detained by a police Kibblewhite, of Castle View in Westbury, Wiltshire, also tried to flee officers on foot during the pursuit in Bathampton on 10 31-year-old drove round the back of a warehouse and got out to run, but "was no match for police dog Stan", said PC Layton of Wiltshire Police, who described Kibblewhite's actions as "incredibly reckless".He was sentenced at Swindon Magistrates Court on 20 August after pleading guilty to multiple driving offences. The chase began at about 10:15 BST on Bradford Road in the direction of Bradford on Avon, said refusing to stop, Kibblewhite was followed. Officers briefly lost sight of him until they spotted a huge dust cloud in a roadside there said the vehicle had been driven round the back of a large warehouse, where Kibblewhite was seen walking away, then running when he saw in an empty horsebox by Stan, he tried to flee but was detained by the dog before being arrested, during which he racially abused an officer. PC Layton said: "Kibblewhite's driving was incredibly reckless and dangerous, putting numerous lives at risk as he attempted to escape justice."After he fled his vehicle he tried to hide, but he was no match for police dog Stan."Kibblewhite pleaded guilty to dangerous driving, driving without a licence, driving without insurance, failing to stop for police, failing to provide a specimen for analysis and racially aggravated public order.


BBC News
10 minutes ago
- BBC News
Peterborough home closed over repeated anti-social behaviour
A city property has been shut by the police following repeated reports of anti-social behaviour.A closure order was served at 56 Swale Avenue, Gunthorpe, Peterborough, after a successful application to magistrates by police and the housing association Cross Keys Homes (CKH), which described it as "an unacceptable situation".The three-month order prevents people entering the property, unless they are from CKH or the emergency it is a criminal offence which could mean three months in prison, a fine, or both. 'Reassurance' PC Albie Monteiro, from Peterborough North Neighbourhood Policing Team, said: "We will not tolerate anti-social behaviour in Gunthorpe."This closure order has been issued to safeguard local residents who have endured ongoing anti-social behaviour linked to this property."We remain committed to working closely with our communities and I hope this action offers reassurance to residents."A spokesperson for Cross Keys Homes, said: "We do not tolerate anti-social behaviour in our homes or communities and use every legal route available to us to tackle it."We are grateful for the support of the police using their additional powers to help resolve this unacceptable situation."We will continue to work with the police and other agencies to support the community in all similar cases." Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


BreakingNews.ie
10 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Noel Clarke set to learn outcome of libel claim against Guardian publisher
Actor Noel Clarke is set to discover whether he has been successful in his High Court libel claim against the publisher of the Guardian on Friday. Clarke, 49, is suing Guardian News and Media (GNM) over seven articles and a podcast, including an article in April 2021 that said 20 women who knew him professionally had come forward with allegations of misconduct. Advertisement Clarke denies the allegations, while GNM is defending its reporting as being both true and in the public interest. Noel Clarke is set to discover whether his High Court libel claim has been successful. Photo: Jordan Pettitt/PA. A trial earlier this year heard from multiple witnesses who made accusations against Clarke, including that he had allegedly shared nude photographs of them without their consent, groped them, and asked them to look at him when he was exposed. Barristers for Clarke told the court that there is a conspiracy of people with financial and personal grudges against him who engineered his downfall because they could not bear to see him receive a Bafta award. Mrs Justice Steyn is set to hand down her ruling at 10.30am on Friday. Advertisement The trial of the libel claim was held from early March to early April at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Clarke, who has previously appeared in TV shows including Doctor Who, Auf Wiedersehen, Pet and Bulletproof, gave evidence over several days. At one stage, he appeared visibly emotional as he claimed the publisher had 'smashed my life'. He said: 'They have smashed my life for four years with this rubbish, this nonsense. Four years.' Advertisement He continued: 'I did not do this, I would not do this. I have got children. This is not true.' He later said that while he was 'a flawed guy', he added: 'The reason I stand here four years later is I am not what they have branded me.' Philip Williams, representing the actor, said that his client was a 'casualty' of a media 'purge' following the emergence of the MeToo movement. He continued that Clarke was made a 'scapegoat' and was an 'easy target' because he was at the height of his success when the media industry 'zealously sought to correct itself'. Advertisement The barrister also criticised the Guardian's investigation, saying the newspaper 'manifestly failed to do its job properly'.Mr Williams asked the court to find the claim successful, saying the Guardian's reporting has caused serious harm to Clarke's career, with 'continuing hostile reactions online and in public discourse'. Gavin Millar KC, for GNM, said there is 'not a shred of evidence' to support Clarke's claim of a conspiracy, describing it as 'nonsensical and rather desperate speculation'. He said Clarke has a 'very clear motive to lie' because he 'stands to lose a great deal'. In written submissions, Mr Millar said Clarke 'used his power to prey on and harass female colleagues' over a period of 15 years. Advertisement He said: 'This was a careful and thorough investigation conducted conscientiously by Guardian journalists who were aware of the potential pitfalls. 'They received information from a wide range of sources with direct evidence of misconduct and in each case carefully considered and tested the information they were given, electing to publish only such information as they believed was credible.'