Meta just hired the co-creator of ChatGPT in an escalating AI talent war with OpenAI
CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced Zhao's appointment on Friday in a social media post, and called him a "pioneer" in the field who has already driven several major AI breakthroughs.
Zhao previously helped build GPT-4 and led synthetic data efforts at OpenAI. According to the post, Zhao will now work directly with Zuckerberg and Meta's newly appointed chief AI officer, Alexandr Wang, the founder and CEO of Scale AI.
The new hire comes during Zuckerberg's multibillion-dollar AI spending spree, including a $15 billion investment in Scale AI and the creation of Meta Superintelligence Labs, a new division focused on foundational models and next-gen research.
In addition to Zhao, the company has lured away the three researchers who built OpenAI's Zurich office — Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Xiaohua Zhai — all of whom previously also worked at Google's DeepMind. The Superintelligence Labs team is now comprised of a lineup of names previously seen with OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google.
But the war for AI talent is far from over.
Databricks VP Naveen Rao likened the competition to "looking for LeBron James," estimating that fewer than 1,000 people worldwide can build frontier AI models.
Companies without the cash for massive pay packages are turning to hackathons and computing power as incentives. Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas said a Meta researcher he tried to poach told him to ask again when the company has "10,000 H100s."
AI tech workers have previously told Business Insider that Meta's Mark Zuckerberg has been emailing prospects directly and even hosting AI researchers at his home, while OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has made personal calls to potential hires.
Tech company executives have mixed feelings about Meta's poaching efforts.
"Meta right now are not at the frontier, maybe they'll they'll manage to get back on there," said Demis Hassabis, the CEO of Google DeepMind, on an episode of the "Lex Fridman Podcast," which aired on Friday.
"It's probably rational what they're doing from their perspective because they're behind and they need to do something," Hassabis added.
During a July 18 episode of the podcast "Uncapped with Jack Altman," OpenAI CEO Sam Altman criticised some of Meta's "giant offers" to his company's employees, and called the strategy "crazy."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business of Fashion
an hour ago
- Business of Fashion
Introducing The Brain of Fashion
When I first started writing The Business of Fashion in 2007 as a blog and occasional newsletter, it was simply a place for me to explore an industry that had always fascinated me. At the time, blogs and newsletters like mine were completely new to the fashion industry. At 6am London time, mine was the only fashion newsletter in your inbox. I was lucky to have been in the right place, at the right time. Soon, digital and social media would transform fashion and BoF would earn its place as the leading global resource for fashion professionals around the world. I learned a very important lesson from this little digital experiment: never be complacent. When breakthrough technologies emerge, rather than reject them, it is important to understand how you might use them. We are at another one of those technological inflection points now. The way people consume business analysis and information is changing, with the rise of new AI tools like ChatGPT. This is changing the expectations of our readers who increasingly expect clear, direct and accurate answers to specific research questions — delivered quickly and reliably. Today, we're excited to invite our BoF Professional community to test a new AI-driven research tool developed in partnership with — designed to help you engage even more deeply with BoF's award-winning journalism. The Brain of Fashion is our new generative AI tool, trained on BoF's archive of more than 45,000 articles, reports, case studies and profiles. It is designed to help you make faster, smarter decisions by answering your questions about the fashion, luxury and beauty industries with speed, relevance and depth. So how is this different from other more generalist AI tools on the market? Because The Brain of Fashion is trained exclusively on BoF's verified, fact-checked reporting, you can trust that the information provided is more accurate. Our answers link directly to the original BoF articles underlying each response, so you can dig deeper in your research. That said, The Brain of Fashion is launching in beta mode because as with all new technologies, we will need to continue to test and refine it in the coming months. Your feedback will play an essential role in how we take The Brain of Fashion forward. As a BoF Professional member, you can start exploring The Brain of Fashion and submitting your research requests today. We look forward to hearing your feedback, Imran Amed, Founder and Editor-in-Chief Use of Artificial Intelligence: We offer The Brain of Fashion to provide information from the BoF content library to answer your questions. This tool is powered by third party AI systems. We cannot guarantee the completeness and accuracy of the information provided. BoF and its affiliates are not liable for any actions taken based on such information.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Snap (SNAP) Q2 Earnings: What To Expect
Social network Snapchat (NYSE: SNAP) will be announcing earnings results this Tuesday after market hours. Here's what investors should know. Snap beat analysts' revenue expectations by 1.3% last quarter, reporting revenues of $1.36 billion, up 14.1% year on year. It was a strong quarter for the company, with a solid beat of analysts' EBITDA estimates and solid growth in its users. It reported 460 million daily active users, up 9% year on year. Is Snap a buy or sell going into earnings? Read our full analysis here, it's free. This quarter, analysts are expecting Snap's revenue to grow 9.1% year on year to $1.35 billion, slowing from the 15.8% increase it recorded in the same quarter last year. Adjusted earnings are expected to come in at $0.02 per share. The majority of analysts covering the company have reconfirmed their estimates over the last 30 days, suggesting they anticipate the business to stay the course heading into earnings. Snap has missed Wall Street's revenue estimates twice over the last two years. Looking at Snap's peers in the consumer internet segment, some have already reported their Q2 results, giving us a hint as to what we can expect. Reddit delivered year-on-year revenue growth of 77.7%, beating analysts' expectations by 17.2%, and Meta reported revenues up 21.6%, topping estimates by 6%. Reddit traded up 16.9% following the results while Meta was also up 11.2%. Read our full analysis of Reddit's results here and Meta's results here. Investors in the consumer internet segment have had steady hands going into earnings, with share prices flat over the last month. Snap is down 1.8% during the same time and is heading into earnings with an average analyst price target of $9.88 (compared to the current share price of $9.02). Here at StockStory, we certainly understand the potential of thematic investing. Diverse winners from Microsoft (MSFT) to Alphabet (GOOG), Coca-Cola (KO) to Monster Beverage (MNST) could all have been identified as promising growth stories with a megatrend driving the growth. So, in that spirit, we've identified a relatively under-the-radar profitable growth stock benefiting from the rise of AI, available to you FREE via this link. StockStory is growing and hiring equity analyst and marketing roles. Are you a 0 to 1 builder passionate about the markets and AI? See the open roles here. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
AI search pushing an already weakened media ecosystem to the brink
Generative artificial intelligence assistants like ChatGPT are cutting into traditional online search traffic, depriving news sites of visitors and impacting the advertising revenue they desperately need, in a crushing blow to an industry already fighting for survival. "The next three or four years will be incredibly challenging for publishers everywhere. No one is immune from the AI summaries storm gathering on the horizon," warned Matt Karolian, vice president of research and development at Boston Globe Media. "Publishers need to build their own shelters or risk being swept away." While data remains limited, a recent Pew Research Center study reveals that AI-generated summaries now appearing regularly in Google searches discourage users from clicking through to source articles. When AI summaries are present, users click on suggested links half as often compared to traditional searches. This represents a devastating loss of visitors for online media sites that depend on traffic for both advertising revenue and subscription conversions. According to Northeastern University professor John Wihbey, these trends "will accelerate, and pretty soon we will have an entirely different web." The dominance of tech giants like Google and Meta had already slashed online media advertising revenue, forcing publishers to pivot toward paid subscriptions. But Wihbey noted that subscriptions also depend on traffic, and paying subscribers alone aren't sufficient to support major media organizations. - Limited lifelines - The Boston Globe group has begun seeing subscribers sign up through ChatGPT, offering a new touchpoint with potential readers, Karolian said. However, "these remain incredibly modest compared to other platforms, including even smaller search engines." Other AI-powered tools like Perplexity are generating even fewer new subscriptions, he added. To survive what many see as an inevitable shift, media companies are increasingly adopting GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) -- a technique that replaces traditional SEO (Search Engine Optimization). This involves providing AI models with clearly labeled content, good structure, comprehensible text, and strong presence on social networks and forums like Reddit that get crawled by AI companies. But a fundamental question remains: "Should you allow OpenAI crawlers to basically crawl your website and your content?" asks Thomas Peham, CEO of optimization startup OtterlyAI. Burned by aggressive data collection from major AI companies, many news publishers have chosen to fight back by blocking AI crawlers from accessing their content. "We just need to ensure that companies using our content are paying fair market value," argued Danielle Coffey, who heads the News/Media Alliance trade organization. Some progress has been made on this front. Licensing agreements have emerged between major players, such as the New York Times and Amazon, Google and Associated Press, and Mistral and Agence France-Presse, among others. But the issue is far from resolved, as several major legal battles are underway, most notably the New York Times' blockbuster lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. - Let them crawl - Publishers face a dilemma: blocking AI crawlers protects their content but reduces exposure to potential new readers. Faced with this challenge, "media leaders are increasingly choosing to reopen access," Peham observed. Yet even with open access, success isn't guaranteed. According to OtterlyAI data, media outlets represent just 29 percent of citations offered by ChatGPT, trailing corporate websites at 36 percent. And while Google search has traditionally privileged sources recognized as reliable, "we don't see this with ChatGPT," Peham noted. The stakes extend beyond business models. According to the Reuters Institute's 2025 Digital News Report, about 15 percent of people under 25 now use generative AI to get their news. Given ongoing questions about AI sourcing and reliability, this trend risks confusing readers about information origins and credibility -- much like social media did before it. "At some point, someone has to do the reporting," Karolian said. "Without original journalism, none of these AI platforms would have anything to summarize." Perhaps with this in mind, Google is already developing partnerships with news organizations to feed its generative AI features, suggesting potential paths forward. "I think the platforms will realize how much they need the press," predicted Wihbey -- though whether that realization comes soon enough to save struggling newsrooms remains an open question. tu/arp/jgc