For ‘creamy layer' exclusion, Govt looks at proposal on ‘equivalence' across govt organisations, pvt sector, universities
It is learnt that the proposal has been prepared following consultations among the ministries of Social Justice and Empowerment, Education, Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT), Legal Affairs, Labour and Employment, Public Enterprises, NITI Aayog and National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC).
Following the landmark Indra Sawhney vs Union Of India ruling, also known as the Mandal verdict, by the Supreme Court in 1992, the concept of 'creamy layer' within the OBCs was introduced in the reservation policy. The 'creamy layer' criteria for those not in government jobs, set at Rs 1 lakh per annum in 1993, was revised in 2004, 2008, 2013. In 2017, the income ceiling was revised to Rs 8 lakh per annum and has remained so ever since.
The 'creamy layer' specifies groups among OBCs such as persons occupying constitutional posts; Group-A/Class-I officers of All India Services, Central services and state services; Group-B/Class-II services of Centre and state; employees of PSUs; officers of armed forces; professionals and those from trade and industry; property owners; and an income/wealth test.
While 'equivalence' in some Central PSUs was decided in 2017, it remained pending for the private sector as well as universities, educational institutions and different organisations of state governments.
The OBCs of the 'non-creamy' layer are granted 27 per cent reservation in Central government recruitments as well as in admissions to educational institutions, based on the Mandal Commission recommendations. In state governments, this reservation percentage varies. In absence of such equivalence, there was difficulty in issuing caste certificates to OBCs.
Sources said since the salary of teaching staff of universities, such as assistant professors, associate professors and professors, typically starts from Level 10 and above, which is equivalent to or higher than Group-A posts in the government, there is a proposal that these posts be categorised as 'creamy layer'. This means their children cannot avail benefits of OBC reservation. In the private sector, given the vast gamut of categories of posts and pay and perquisites, it has been noted that it is difficult to establish the equivalence. It is proposed that this can be determined based on the income/wealth criteria.
For Central/state autonomous bodies and Central/state statutory organisations, sources said it is proposed to establish equivalence with the list of Central government officials, depending on their level/group/pay scale, as the case may be, because they also adopt the pay scales of respective categories in Central and state governments. Similarly, non-teaching staff of universities are proposed to be placed as creamy layer depending on their level/group/pay scale as the case may be.
For state PSUs, it is proposed that as in the case of equivalence in Central PSUs in 2017, all executive level positions, including board-level executives as well as below board-level executives holding managerial positions, are to be treated as under the 'creamy layer' category. However, in their case, a rider has been proposed that those executives whose income is within Rs 8 lakh, which is presently the limit for private persons, will not be categorised as 'creamy layer'.
For government-aided institutions, it is proposed that as they generally follow the service conditions and pay scales of the respective Central or state government, the staff in aided institutions may be placed under appropriate categories based on the equivalence of their post and service conditions and pay scales/level. Sources said a large number of cases are pending before the Supreme Court and various High Courts regarding the ambiguity and, therefore, clarity is a must.
'The proposal entails empowerment of OBCs by way of their coverage which will widen the employment opportunities for OBCs,' a top source said, adding that 'by widening the scope of opportunities for OBCs in employment, it will support Atmanirbhar Bharat.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
15 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Sebi bans DHFL's Kapil Wadhawan, Dheeraj Wadhawan from securities market
Markets regulator Sebi on Tuesday barred Dewan Housing Finance Ltd's former CMD Kapil Wadhawan, ex-director Dheeraj Wadhawan, and four others from the securities markets for up to five years for committing financial irregularities, diverting funds, and fabricating books. The others who have been prohibited by Sebi are -- Rakesh Wadhawan, who was non-executive chairman, Sarang Wadhawan, a former non-executive director, Harshil Mehta, joint managing director & CEO, and Santosh Sharma, a former CFO. Sebi also fined the six individuals Rs 120 crore. Kapil Wadhawan and Dheeraj Wadhawan have each been restrained from the securities markets for five years, while Rakesh Wadhawan and Sarang Wadhawan face a four-year ban, and Harshil Mehta and Santosh Sharma have been prohibited for three years, according to the Sebi order. During these periods, they cannot access the securities market, deal in securities in any manner, or hold any role such as director or key managerial personnel in listed companies, registered intermediaries, or public companies intending to raise funds from the market. Kapil Wadhawan and Dheeraj Wadhawan have each been fined Rs 27 crore, while Rakesh Wadhawan and Sarang Wadhawan face penalties of Rs 20.75 crore each. Harshil Mehta has been fined Rs 11.75 crore, and Santosh Sharma faces a total penalty of Rs 12.75 crore. In its 181-page order, Sebi noted that since 2006, DHFL, along with its promoters, directors, and key managerial personnel, have engaged and participated in an "egregiously fraudulent scheme" to divert funds to "Bandra Book Entities" (BBEs) linked to the promoters. By March 31, 2019, DHFL's loans to BBEs stood at Rs 14,040.50 crore. The BBEs were directly or indirectly connected to Kapil, Dheeraj Rakesh and Sarang, it added. As per the order, promoters issued huge unsecured loans to these entities despite their lack of assets or business, bypassing all due diligence, and falsely recording them as retail housing loans. The regulator found that the fraud operated in several steps. First, large unsecured loans were extended to these BBEs even though they had no net worth, assets, or cash flows to justify such exposure. Second, all standard loan appraisal processes were deliberately bypassed. Third, these weak intercorporate loans to related parties were misrepresented as retail housing loans, creating a false impression of the company's financial health for investors and other stakeholders. "To effect this elaborate deception, a fake virtual branch ('Bandra branch') and previously closed retail loan accounts were employed, alongside three different accounting software, camouflaging the BBE loans as retail housing loans. In the initial years, well over 30 per cent of all loans of DHFL were to these BBEs," Sebi noted. Despite the BBEs not making interest or principal payments, DHFL booked fictitious interest income, which allowed it to show increasing profits instead of losses between FY 2007-08 and FY 2015-16. These misleading financials misled shareholders and distorted DHFL's share price. According to Sebi, the main orchestrators of the fraudulent scheme were Kapil Wadhawan and his brother Dheeraj Wadhawan. Rakesh and Sarang Wadhawan were also involved through their roles on DHFL's board. The investigation found that loans worth Rs 5,662.44 crore were disbursed to 39 BBEs, of which 40 per cent was subsequently routed to 48 other entities connected to the promoters. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
15 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Court takes cognisance against ABG Shipyard in ₹22,000 cr bank fraud case
A Rouse Avenue court has taken cognizance of a ₹22,000 crore alleged bank fraud and funds siphoning case against Surat, Gujarat-based ABG Shipyard Ltd, its former Director, Auditor, public servants, and subsidiary companies. It is alleged that ABG Shipyard Ltd transferred huge amounts of money to its related parties, and thereafter, adjustment entries were made. The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had filed a charge sheet, supplementary charge against 6 individuals and 17 companies and firms. The Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) Deepak Kumar, after taking cognizance, issued summons to the accused persons to appear before the court on the next date on August 22. CJM Deepak Kumar said, "I have perused the chargesheet and supplementary charge sheet alongwith the documents annexed with it, including the statements of the witnesses recorded under Section 161 CrPC and have considered the submissions made by the public prosecutor for the CBI and the Investigation Officer." The court said that there are clear and categorical findings in the final report and supplementary final report against the accused persons regarding the commission of offences for which they have been chargesheeted for the offences punishable under Section 120B/420/477A IPC and substantive offences thereof. "Accordingly, in view of the foregoing discussion and material available on record, I take cognizance," CJM Kumar ordered on August 11. The CBI had registered a case on August 25, 2020, on the complaint filed by the consortium of banks, including SBI. The case was registered against M/s ABG Shipyard Ltd, its former managing director Rishi Kamlesh Agarwal, Santhanam Muthuswamy), Ashwini Kumar, Sushil Kumar Aggarwal, Ravi Vimal Newatia, M/s ABG International Pvt Ltd, unknown public servants and unknown private persons alleging the commission of offences of cheating, criminal breach of trust, criminal conspiracy and abuse of official position thereby causing wrongful loss to the tune of Rs. 22,842 crore to the consortium of lending banks comprising of State Bank of India (SBI), erstwhile State Bank of Patiala (presently SBI), erstwhile State Bank of Travancore (presently SBI) etc, led by ICICI Bank. During the investigation, other accused were interrogated and arrayed in the supplementary charge sheet. It is stated that the Investigation has also revealed that the accounts were falsified and misrepresented by the accused persons in criminal conspiracy with each other and thereby defrauded the lender banks by presenting false figures before the lenders and shareholders. Investigation has pointed out that ABG Shipyard, in criminal conspiracy with its promoters, directors, and other key managerial persons, had availed credit facilities from the banks fraudulently. Thereafter, it dishonestly diverted a huge amount of bank funds with ulterior motives to its group concerns. Investigation has further alleged that ABG Shipyard had siphoned off funds for acquiring 14 residential flats in Mumbai for a consideration amount of Rs. 33.50 crores. These flats were purchased by an accused company which was under the control of Rishi Kamlesh Agarwal, Former MD of ABG Shipyard.
Indian Express
15 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Vehicles without a FASTag will no longer be allowed to enter Tirumala, temple management says
The Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD), which manages the Sri Venkateswara temple in Andhra Pradesh's Tirupati district, said that vehicles without a FASTag will no longer be allowed to enter Tirumala. Officials said the TTD is also considering allowing only electric vehicles entry into Tirumala in the future. Thousands of devotees visit Tirumala every day in private vehicles and taxis. 'Many individual car owners driving up to Tirumala may not have a FASTag for various reasons. We are issuing an advisory that they should get it before coming to Tirumala. If they do not have it, they should take the help of the facility at Alipiri,' an official said. The TTD said, 'In order to provide better safety standards, prevention of overcrowding and transparent services to the devotees arriving in various vehicles at the Alipiri check point, FASTag will be made mandatory for the vehicles entering Tirumala from August 15.' A facility that issues FASTags have been set up at the Alipiri checkpoint in collaboration with ICICI Bank, officials said. 'It is once again informed that the vehicles without FASTag will be allowed to enter Tirumala only after obtaining the FASTag facility here in the shortest possible time. Devotees are requested to cooperate, or they will not be allowed to enter Tirumala,' the TTD said. The announcement comes as the temple is witnessing over 90,000 devotees on some days, with the TTD finding it difficult not only to manage the pilgrims, but also the incoming traffic. The TTD is also preparing to implement stricter pollution control rules, and allow only battery-operated vehicles into Tirumala. The TTD is encouraging taxi operators to switch to EVs. On Tuesday, a devotee from Bengaluru, Chandra Shekhar, donated two battery buggies worth Rs 11 lakh to the TTD. The board, which has set up some EV charging stations, is in the process of setting up more, officials said. The TTD and the Andhra Pradesh State Transport Corporation are also switching to operating only electric buses to and from Tirumala and Tirupati. In efforts to achieve net zero emissions, the TTD is also allocating its lands at Tirumala and Tirupati to organisations like the New and Renewable Energy Development Corporation of Andhra Pradesh for the establishment of EV charging stations and battery swapping stations.
