
Ministers in talks over welfare concessions as Labour rebellion grows
Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner said talks between backbenchers and Government were 'ongoing' on Wednesday night as Downing Street seeks to head off what would be Sir Keir Starmer's first Commons defeat.
It came as six more Labour MPs added their names to an amendment that would halt the legislation in its tracks, arguing disabled people have not been properly consulted and further scrutiny of the changes is needed.
The new signatories include the Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee chairman Toby Perkins, Stoke-on-Trent Central MP Gareth Snell, Newcastle upon Tyne MP Mary Glindon and Tamworth MP Sarah Edwards.
North Ayrshire and Arran MP Irene Campbell and Colchester MP Pam Cox, both of whom won their seats in the party's 2024 landslide election victory, have also added their names.
The new names takes the total number of Labour backbenchers supporting the so-called 'reasoned amendment,' tabled by Treasury Select Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hiller, to 126.
The Prime Minister has insisted the reforms are set for a Commons vote on Tuesday as planned, but ministers are locked in talks with backbenchers about the possibility of making changes to soften the impact of the Bill as a major revolt looms.
Asked what concessions could be offered to convince rebels to back the Government, Ms Rayner sought to reassure backbenchers that they would not be expected to betray the party's traditional values.
'I'm not going to get into that on your show tonight,' she said in an interview on ITV's Peston programme.
'Those discussions are ongoing around making sure that the welfare reforms that we're bringing in support people into work who need that, and we're putting a huge amount of investment into doing that, but also protecting the most vulnerable.'
She acknowledged that 'a lot of people are very scared about these changes' but added: 'I haven't changed my Labour values and we're not expecting our benches to do anything that isn't in check with them.
'What we want to do is support people, and that is the crucial bit around these reforms of what Labour are trying to achieve, and we're discussing that with our MPs.'
The plans restrict eligibility for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability payment in England, and limit the sickness-related element of universal credit. The Government hopes the changes will get more people back into work and save up to £5 billion a year.
Existing claimants will be given a 13-week phase-out period of financial support, a move seen as a bid to head off opposition by aiming to soften the impact of the changes.
But the fact so many Labour MPs are prepared to put their names to the 'reasoned amendment' calling for a change of course shows how entrenched the opposition remains.
One backbencher preparing to vote against the Bill told the PA news agency: 'A lot of people have been saying they're upset about this for months. To leave it until a few days before the vote, it's not a very good way of running the country.
'It's not very grown up.'
They said that minor concessions would not be enough, warning: 'I don't think you can tinker with this. They need to go back to the drawing board.'
According to the Government's impact assessment, the welfare reforms as a whole could push an extra 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, into relative poverty.
Asked whether she thought there were hundreds of thousands of people claiming disability benefits who were not disabled, Ms Rayner said: 'No, what we're saying though is that the welfare system has to be able to have longevity.'
Earlier on Wednesday, Sir Keir defended his leadership against accusations he had misjudged the mood in his party, insisting he is 'comfortable with reading the room'.
At a press conference at the Nato summit in The Hague, the Prime Minister said: 'Is it tough going? Are there plenty of people and noises off? Yes, of course, there always are, there always have been, there always will be.
'But the important thing is to focus on the change that we want to bring about.'
Later on Wednesday, armed forces minister Luke Pollard echoed the Deputy Prime Minister, telling Sky News's Politics Hub show that 'of course' the Government was in talks about possibly making changes.
'Of course we are, and I think there's a concern that's very valid and real for lots of my colleagues. They're not doing this to cause trouble or be argumentative,' he said.
'They're doing it because they have a genuine, heartfelt concern about some of the impacts. '
He said some of the reforms would be supported across the party but 'where there is concerns… those discussions will continue until the vote and beyond.'
Speaking to BBC Newsnight, Mr Pollard said the Government had 'between now and Tuesday to listen to those concerns' and 'to address them' before making the case for reform in the Commons debate next week.
Asked whether the Government would listen to calls for it to change course over planned cuts to Pip, he said: 'I think that's for many colleagues where the real concern is.'
The Daily Telegraph reported that the Prime Minister was prepared to back down on the welfare Bill with Number 10 considering tabling its own amendment to the legislation on Tuesday.
Options being considered include a commitment to speed up payment of support to help people back into work and offering assurances that reviews of policies in this area will be published, according to the paper.
Meanwhile, The Times reported some MPs opposed to the plans had blamed Sir Keir's chief of staff Morgan McSweeney and suggested the time had come for 'regime change' in Downing Street.
Other senior Labour figures outside Parliament, including Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan, have publicly expressed their opposition to the plans.
Meanwhile, the Tories seem unlikely to lend the Government their support, with leader Kemi Badenoch setting out conditions for doing so including a commitment to rule out tax rises in the autumn budget and further cut the benefits bill.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
24 minutes ago
- Telegraph
White House slaps down Britain over assisted dying ‘surrender'
The White House has accused Britain of 'state-sponsored suicide' over the passage of the Assisted Dying Bill. The US state department criticised parliament for passing the bill, which will make it legal for terminally ill people to end their lives. 'As the UK Parliament considers support for state-subsidised suicide, euphemistically called a bill for 'terminally ill adults' the United States reaffirms the sanctity of life,' the US bureau of democracy, human rights and labour said. 'The western world should stand for life, vitality and hope over surrender and death.' The Trump administration is proving increasingly willing to intervene in domestic British affairs, having previously admonished Sir Keir Starmer's government over threats to free speech. Last week the House of Commons voted narrowly to support Kim Leadbeater's assisted dying bill, and it will now be scrutinised in the House of Lords. The private member's bill was supported by 314 to 291 in the Commons, a majority of 23, paving the way for assisted dying services to be introduced by the end of the decade. Critics of the legislation have warned its safeguards are not strong enough and vulnerable people could be coerced or feel pressured into ending their lives early. The UK government is officially neutral on the bill, and MPs were given a free vote, which meant they did not have to vote along party lines. The bill is at odds with the values of Mr Trump's administration despite similar legislation existing in twelve US jurisdictions, including Washington, DC. While Mr Trump's position on assisted dying is not clear, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, two of the president's Supreme Court nominees, are both firm opponents of the act. Downing Street is thought to have been blindsided by the intervention, which was not raised with David Lammy, the foreign secretary, during his meeting with Mr Rubio last week. Sir Keir Starmer, a supporter of the legislation, said he will make assisted dying work, in a rebuke to his Health Secretary who claimed there was no budget for it. Asked whether the will of Parliament should be implemented and the budget found during his trip to The Hague the Prime Minister said: 'It is my responsibility to make sure the bill is workable, and that means workable in all its aspects. I'm confident we've done that preparation.' It is rare for the US state department, which is responsible for its foreign policy, to comment on laws of an allied country. Last month, The Telegraph revealed the US president dispatched officials to meet British pro-life activists over concerns their freedom of expression had been threatened. A five-person team from the bureau of democracy, human rights and labour spent days in the country and interviewed campaigners to feed back to the White House. Led by Samuel Samson, a senior adviser, they met with officials from the Foreign Office and challenged Ofcom on the Online Safety Act, which is thought to be a point of contention in the administration. Since then, the state department has also raised concerns over Lucy Connolly, the wife of a Conservative councillor, was jailed for 31 months in October after pleading guilty to a charge of inciting racial hatred. Campaigners flagged her case with Marco Rubio, the US secretary of state, whose department in turn said it was 'monitoring' the case.


Glasgow Times
33 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Calls for private jet tax as Prestwick Airport sees surge in flights
A new investigation published on Thursday by Oxfam Scotland revealed that there were 12,143 private flights in and out of Scottish airports in 2024, with the busiest being Edinburgh, Glasgow, Prestwick and Inverness. In Prestwick alone, the number of private flights rose from 1845 in 2023 to 2437 in 2024 – an increase of 32%. The investigation also found an "alarming" spike in private flights at Prestwick which coincided with a key golfing event. In July 2024, when The Open was held at the nearly Royal Troon Golf Club, private flights at Prestwick surged by 123%. A total of 453 private jets took off or landed that month (compared to the 203 average monthly flights in 2024), equivalent to 15 flights a day. Oxfam Scotland used data on departures and landings from the Civil Aviation Authority, looking specifically at aircraft over 2.73 tonnes and excluding those from aero-clubs. While there were 768 fewer flights in 2024 than the previous year, it is slightly more than the 10-year average. The charity said that if an Air Departure Tax (ADT) had been in place – and applied at the highest possible rate – it would have generated an extra £28.8 million in tax revenue for the Scottish Government. Oxfam Scotland has been campaigning for a private jet tax like the ADT to be introduced, set to at least 10 times the existing higher rate within the UK Air Passenger Duty. The Scottish Government has previously said it is committed to introducing an ADT and that it is open to introducing a higher tax on private jets. However, progress on introducing ADT in Scotland has been delayed by an ongoing stalemate between the Scottish and UK governments. The Scottish Government owns Prestwick Airport as well as Highlands and Islands Airports Limited (HIAL), which operates airports in Barra, Benbecula, Campbeltown, Dundee, Inverness, Islay, Kirkwall, Stornoway, Sumburgh, Tiree and Wick. 'All talk, no take off' Commenting on the report, Jamie Livingstone, head of Oxfam Scotland, said the Scottish Government should be "embarrass[ed] that Prestwick is being used "as a playground for the world's wealthiest polluters". He said: "For a government that's already scrapped a key climate target and diluted vital green policies, continuing to give ultra-wealth polluters an easy ride adds insult to injury. 'The First Minister says he backs landing a fair tax on pollution-spewing private jets, but so far, it's all talk, no take-off. It's time he stopped circling the issue and finally land this fair tax on those polluting Scotland's skies.' Becky Kenton-Lake, Stop Climate Chaos Scotland coalition manager, said: 'People in Scotland want our political leaders to invest in fast and fair climate action. "A Private Jet Tax would help hold the biggest polluters accountable and raise vital funds to protect us all from the damage they're causing. "Ministers have the chance to lead boldly, and Scotland is counting on them to deliver.' Meanwhile, the Scottish Greens, which have long campaigned for a private jet tax, called on the Scottish Government to "show clear leadership" and to introduce the tax at airports it owns. Ross Greer MSPScottish Greens MSP Ross Greer said: 'An obscene amount of wealth is being hoarded by a tiny number of elites who fly across the globe in their climate-wrecking private jets. 'These jets have a huge impact on our environment, and while their super-rich occupants fly between their golf courses and superyachts, it's Scottish taxpayers left paying to clean up their mess." Greer pointed towards data quoted by Oxfam Scotland which shows that private jet use is 20 times more polluting than regular commercial flights, as he said a private jet tax would "keep the super-rich and their destructive toys on the ground". He continued: 'We've waited for years for the Scottish and UK Governments to deliver the devolution of ADT in Scotland, as they agreed to do over a decade ago. 'Delays to the devolution of ADT aren't a get out of jail free card for the Scottish Government. They can introduce a charge on private jets at the dozen airports they own right now, raising cash for public services and taking action to tackle the climate emergency.' Greer reiterated calls for the Scottish Government to introduce the charge at the airports it owns during First Minister's Questions on Thursday. John Swinney told him: "I've already stated that I'm interested in the suggestion of higher tax rates on private jet flights." He added that the Scottish Government is continuing to "explore all options for implementing air departure tax", in a way which does not disproportionately affect communities in the Highlands and Islands. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: "As has previously been set out, ministers are open to the suggestion of higher rates of Air Departure Tax on private jet flights. "This will form part of the review of rates and bands undertaken prior to implementation."

The National
36 minutes ago
- The National
Commons committee sets out 'concerns' over arms exports to Israel
The International Development Committee sent an eight-page letter to Jonathan Reynolds and Foreign Secretary David Lammy over the decision to exempt components for F-35 fighter jets from suspended arms exports to Israel. The committee raised fears that those weapons components could be used in attacks by Israel on aid workers and humanitarian infrastructure on Gaza. Chair Sarah Champion, Labour MP for Rotherham, wrote: 'As the Committee identified in its report, there are a number of avenues for accountability in response to violations of IHL (international humanitarian law), including the suspension of arms export licences. READ MORE: Patrick Harvie and Angus Robertson face-off over Israel divestment 'I remain concerned that there is a real risk that weapon components, manufactured in the UK, could be used in attacks, including those on aid workers or humanitarian infrastructure.' The MP noted that Foreign Office minister Stephen Doughty previously claimed that stopping F-35 exports to Israel would require the 'entire programme' to be suspended as it is 'highly integrated'. However, Champion insisted it was 'fundamental' that the UK Government adheres to international law. 'I am concerned by the decision to exempt F-35 components from the suspension of arms export licences, given your assessment that there are 'clear risks' of serious violations of IHL by Israel in Gaza,' she wrote. The MP then noted the UK's obligations under the Genocide Convention, asking if ministers accepted that the duty to prevent genocide has been triggered. She asked: 'If so, at what point was this duty triggered? If not, why not?' Champion also noted the UK Government's obligations under the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) which states that it is 'strictly prohibited' for a state transferring arms where the transfer would 'violate its relevant international obligations under international agreements to which it is a Party'. Exports are also banned if the arms 'would be used in the commission of genocide, crimes against humanity, grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions of 1949, attacks directed against civilian objects or civilians protected as such, or other war crimes,' Champion added. The MP put several questions to ministers, including if it accepts exporting F-35 components is incompatible with its international legal obligations, and if it accepts Israel is using the components to commit war crimes. Another question asks: 'What legal authority does the Government rely upon to support its position that a positive contribution to peace and security is to be balanced against a clear risk of the arms being used to commit serious violations of IHL/IHRL?' READ MORE: YouGov poll predicts result in every Scottish seat – see the full map Champion asked the ministers to reply by July 11. The UK Government has been contacted for comment. It comes as a legal challenge over the UK's arms exports to Israel is currently underway. We told in January how the Labour Government refused to review Israel's access to F-35 parts exported from the UK despite evidence that the planes have been used to bomb 'safe zones' in Gaza. In September 2024, Labour blocked around 30 of 350 UK arms export licences to Israel after accepting that there existed a 'clear risk that they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law'. However, parts for F-35 fighter jets were specifically excluded – despite media confirmation that the jets had been used by Israel to bomb the Al-Mawasi humanitarian zone in Gaza in July 2024.