Russia says it continued development of nuclear missiles during moratorium on deployment, World News
"When the moratorium was announced, we made it clear that it applied only to deployment, and did not mention any halt to (research and development) activities," RIA news agency quoted Ryabkov as telling state-run Rossiya-1 state broadcaster in an interview.
"So this time was used to develop the appropriate systems and to build a fairly substantial arsenal in this area. As I understand it, we now possess it," RIA cited Ryabkov as saying.
Earlier this month, Russia said it was lifting what it called a unilateral moratorium on deploying intermediate-range missiles, saying this was a forced response to moves by the US and its allies.
The ground-based shorter-range and intermediate-range treaty, signed by the Soviet Union and the United States in 1987 was seen at the time as a sign of easing tensions between the rival superpowers. But over time, it unravelled as relations deteriorated.
The United States withdrew from the treaty in 2019 during Donald Trump's first presidency, citing alleged violations that Russia denied.
[[nid:721204]]
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
11 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump mocks Goldman CEO, says bank made bad call on tariffs
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A research note on Aug 10 by Goldman economists that said the impact of the president's tariffs on consumer prices was just starting to be felt. WASHINGTON – US President Donald Trump assailed Goldman Sachs Group Inc chief executive officer David Solomon, saying the bank made a 'bad prediction' about the impact of Mr Trump's sweeping tariff agenda on markets and consumer costs. 'David Solomon and Goldman Sachs refuse to give credit where credit is due,' the president said on his social-media platform on Aug 12. 'They made a bad prediction a long time ago on both the Market repercussion and the Tariffs themselves, and they were wrong, just like they are wrong about so much else.' Mr Trump didn't specify why he was upset with the bank, but his remarks follow a research note on Aug 10 by Goldman economists that said the impact of the president's tariffs on consumer prices was just starting to be felt. Consumers in the US have absorbed an estimated 22 per cent of tariff costs through June, but their share will rise to 67 per cent if the latest tariffs follow the pattern of levies in previous years, according to a note by researchers led by Mr Jan Hatzius, the bank's chief economist. 'I think that David should go out and get himself a new Economist or, maybe, he ought to just focus on being a DJ, and not bother running a major Financial Institution,' Mr Trump added in his post, referencing Mr Solomon's hobby as a disc jockey, which he put on pause after earlier criticism over his handling of the bank's strategy. A spokesperson for New York-based Goldman Sachs declined to comment on the president's remarks. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Sengkang-Punggol LRT line back to full service: SBS Transit World US trade team will meet Chinese officials in two or three months, Bessent says Singapore From survivable to liveable: The making of a green city Asia DPM Gan kicks off India visit in Mumbai as Singapore firms ink investment agreements Multimedia World Photography Day: Celebrating the art of image-making World Ukraine, sidelined in Trump-Putin summit, fights Russian grab for more territory Opinion Singpass use in dating apps raises difficult questions Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story Mr Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro also criticised Goldman in an interview later on Aug 12 on Bloomberg Television. 'The only entity which has less respect in terms of their data than the BLS these days is Goldman Sachs,' Mr Navarro said, comparing the bank unfavourably with the Bureau of Labour Statistics. Mr Trump fired and replaced the head of the federal agency after revisions to jobs data showed a weakening US labour market. The latest broadside follows Mr Trump's criticisms of some of Wall Street's biggest lenders, accusing them of debanking clients for political reasons. The president has publicly lambasted JPMorgan Chase & Co and Bank of America Corp with claims they've refused clients on such grounds, allegations the banks deny. Despite those tensions, the sector stands to benefit more broadly from the president's deregulation agenda and expectations for lower capital requirements. It's also been less than two weeks since the president met with Mr Solomon at the White House to discuss his bank's potential role in plans for an initial public offering of government-held mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The president's post came after data released earlier on Aug 12 showed underlying inflation picked up in July, though prices of goods rose at a more muted pace, tempering concerns about tariff-driven price pressures and raising expectations for a Federal Reserve rate cut in September. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Why surrendering a key eastern region would be hard for Ukraine
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox An aerial shot of Donbas, whose industrial cities have stood as a shield protecting Ukraine. KYIV - After President Donald Trump announced that he would meet with President Vladimir Putin of Russia on Aug 15, the American leader suggested that the end of the war would involve 'some swopping of territories' between Russia and Ukraine. It is not clear what, if any, occupied territory Russia would be prepared to give up as part of a swop. But Russia wants Ukraine to unilaterally withdraw from the entire eastern region known as the Donbas, according to European officials who have spoken with Trump administration officials about their discussions with Mr Putin. Ukrainian officials say they will not hand over land for a vague promise of peace that they would not trust Russia to abide by. That stance reflects not just fundamental principles of territorial sovereignty, but also military, humanitarian and political considerations that make a surrender of the Donbas hard to imagine for Ukrainians. Here is a look at the Donbas, whose industrial cities have stood as a shield protecting Ukraine, one that thousands of Ukrainians have fought and died to sustain. Military significance The Donbas region shaped some of the most brutal battles of World War II and continues to define the fiercely contested front today. In the current war, in places such as Bakhmut and Avdiivka, Ukrainians held the line for years, forcing the Russians to pay a high price for every mile they moved forward. The two cities are the only major ones that the Russians have taken since the first year of the war. The cities still under Ukrainian control are connected by one road running north to south, forming a defensive line that prevents Russian forces from sweeping across the country. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World US trade team will meet Chinese officials in two or three months, Bessent says Singapore From survivable to liveable: The making of a green city Asia DPM Gan kicks off India visit in Mumbai as Singapore firms ink investment agreements World Ukraine, sidelined in Trump-Putin summit, fights Russian grab for more territory Asia South Korea's former first lady arrested after court issues warrant, Yonhap reports Opinion Singpass use in dating apps raises difficult questions Singapore Man who stalked woman blasted by judge on appeal for asking scandalous questions in court Singapore SG60: Many hands behind Singapore's success story Giving up any of those cities 'would effectively mean the collapse of this entire defensive line', said Mr Serhii Kuzan, the chair of the Ukrainian Security and Cooperation Centre. Handing over the region would also give Russia control of fortifications that Ukraine spent tens of millions of dollars constructing, as well as vital railway infrastructure and land rich in minerals and coal. Beyond the dense industrial cities lies wide, open terrain that is a gateway to Ukraine's heartland. Surrendering the Donbas without a fight would position Russian forces to renew their attacks and push to the west, according to the Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based research group. Humanitarian issues A humanitarian disaster could follow a Russian takeover of the region if hundreds of thousands of people were forced to flee their homes or risk suffering under occupation. Media organisations, human rights organisations and UN investigators have documented widespread and systematic human rights abuses in Russian-occupied territories, including arbitrary detention, torture, ill treatment and enforced disappearances. More than 200,000 civilians live in the Ukrainian-controlled corner of the Donetsk region, part of the Donbas. Out of 1,298 settlements in the region, 847 are occupied by Russian forces, including 447 that have been occupied since Russia annexed Crimea and sent troops into eastern Ukraine in 2014. The Russians control about two-thirds of the region in all. Ms Kateryna Arisoy, who is originally from Bakhmut and runs a charity dedicated to helping others escape fighting, said people living under occupation faced a grim future, including severe abuse for those who oppose the occupation authorities. 'I say that there is no life in the occupied territories – people there are simply surviving,' she said. Political reality While neither the White House nor the Kremlin has publicly put forward a specific proposal regarding 'land swops', the quick rejection of the idea by President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine reflected an underlying reality often missed in the West, said Mr Yaroslav Hrytsak, a Ukrainian historian. Ukrainian identity, he said, centres on the principle 'nothing about us without us' – a core concept that dates to the Cossacks. 'If you want to resolve some Ukrainian issue without Ukrainians, in a sense, it's denying Ukrainian identity, which is very central to Ukrainians, especially now,' he said. That helps explain why Mr Zelensky, despite his sagging poll numbers, has found broad support for his rejection of any land swop. He has noted that he has no authority under the country's Constitution to bargain away parts of the country. More than three-quarters of Ukrainians oppose trading land for a promise of peace. Crucially, inside the military, 'that figure is much, much higher', said Mr Kuzan, of the Ukrainian Security and Cooperation Centre. 'The units, brigades and commanders we have been in contact with since 2014 are categorically opposed to Putin's ultimatum,' he said. Despite all the obstacles, Mr Hrytsak, the historian, did not rule out a grand bargain. But he said it would have to include something as sweeping as an agreement by Russia to leave all of southern Ukraine. And even that might not be enough, he said. Ukrainians see the territories as more than just land. 'First and foremost, people live there,' Ms Arisoy said. 'I also lived in a city that is now destroyed and occupied, and therefore I do not see it as just a piece of land.' NYTIMES
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Putin holds call with North Korea's Kim, discusses US-Russia talks, Kremlin says
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Mr Kim and Mr Putin discussed the development in the countries' ties under a strategic partnership agreement signed in 2024. MOSCOW - President Vladimir Putin held a phone call with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un and updated him on planned talks the Russian leader will hold with US President Donald Trump in Alaska this week, the Kremlin said on Aug 12. North Korea's state news agency KCNA later reported the two leaders' call without mentioning the meeting scheduled on Aug 15 between Mr Putin and Mr Trump . Mr Kim and Mr Putin discussed the development in the countries' ties under a strategic partnership agreement signed in 2024 "confirming their will to strengthen cooperation in the future," KCNA said. Mr Putin expressed appreciation for North Korea's help in "liberating" the Kursk region in western Russia in the war against Ukraine and "the bravery, heroism and self-sacrificing spirit displayed by service personnel of the Korean People's Army," it said.
