logo
Trump tariffs: Nike says US trade policies could cost it $1bn

Trump tariffs: Nike says US trade policies could cost it $1bn

BBC News8 hours ago

Nike says US President Donald Trump's tariffs on key trading partners could add around $1bn (£730m) to it costs this year.Company executives also said the the sportwear giant would cut its reliance on producing goods in China to ease the impact of US trade policies.Last month, Nike said it would raise prices on some trainers and clothing in the US from early June, weeks after rival Adidas warned it would have to hike the cost of goods due to tariffs.Nike's shares jumped by more than 10% in extended trading after the firm forecast a smaller drop in first quarter revenue than many analysts had expected.
The company's earnings for the last three months also topped estimates, despite being its worst quarterly figures for more than three years.Nike announced fourth quarter revenue of $11.1bn - the lowest since the third quarter of 2022.Chief financial officer Matthew Friend said Nike would move some production from China, which was hit with the biggest tariff increases, to other countries in response to Trump's tariffs.China currently manufacturers 16% of Nike footwear that ends up in the US. Mr Friend said that figure would be cut to a "high single-digit percentage range" by the end of May 2026.Trump announced sweeping "Liberation Day" tariffs on most goods from countries around the world on 2 April.In April, he suspended most of those tariffs to allow for talks with the affected countries, with one top adviser promising "90 deals in 90 days". The move dropped tariffs to 10%, instead of the far higher rates that goods from many trading partners faced.
What tariffs has Trump announced and why?
The White House is now facing growing questions about what the president is planning to do about tariffs, as the 90-day pause is due to expire on 9 July.In remarks at the White House on Thursday, Trump maintained that talks were going well, pointing to an agreement reached with China and saying there was another "coming up with India, maybe".But he also warned "We're not going to make deals with everybody"."Some we're just going to send them a letter, say thank you very much. You're going to pay 25, 35, 45%. That's the easy way to do it," he said."My people don't want to do it that way. They want to do some of it, but they want to make more deals than I would do," he added.Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick later told Bloomberg that the agreement with China formalised terms laid out in trade talks, which included a commitment from Beijing to deliver rare earths minerals used in everything from planes to wind turbines.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has previously raised the possibility that Trump could extend the deadline, depending on how talks are going. On Thursday, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said both that the deadline was "not critical" and that Trump was prepared to present countries with "deals" that would set new tariff rates. The US and China announced an agreement earlier this month aimed at ensuring US supply to critical magnets and rare earths, after concerns about access had risked re-igniting trade tensions between the two economic superpowers.At the White House on Thursday, Trump said he had "signed" a deal with China without giving further details. "The administration and China agreed to an additional understanding for a framework to implement the Geneva agreement," a White House official said later.Trade between the two sides was nearly shut down after Trump raised tariffs and China hit back in a barrage of tariffs in April that had nearly shut down trade between the two countries. The US and China subsequently agreed to reduce - but not eliminate - those tariffs.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nike warns Trump tariffs could cost it nearly £730m
Nike warns Trump tariffs could cost it nearly £730m

Leader Live

time16 minutes ago

  • Leader Live

Nike warns Trump tariffs could cost it nearly £730m

The group said it was taking action to offset the hit, having recently warned it would raise prices on some trainers and clothing in the US to counter rising tariffs. Nike also said it would reduce supply from China to the US market to bring down costs. It currently makes around 16% of its footwear in China, which is then imported into the US, but is looking to reduce this to a 'high single-digit range' by the end of the current financial year. Bosses at the group said supply in China would be 'reallocated to other countries around the world'. Matt Friend, Nike's chief financial officer, said: 'These tariffs represent a new and meaningful cost headwind.' He said the cost impact would be about one billion US dollars (£727 million) if tariffs remain at current levels. Mr Friend added: 'We will optimise our sourcing mix and allocate production differently across countries to mitigate the new cost headwind into the United States, despite the current elevated tariffs for Chinese products imported into the United States. 'Manufacturing capacity and capability in China remains important to our global source base.' He also said the group was looking to 'minimise the overall impact to the consumer', although it confirmed it would start pushing through price hikes in the US starting from the autumn. Corporate costs could also be cut under plans to offset the expected cost hit. The comments came as Nike reported its worst quarterly earnings in more than three years, although the out-turn was better than feared on Wall Street, helping its US-listed shares lift overnight on Thursday. Chief executive Elliott Hill, who returned from retirement last year to take the helm, is leading a turnaround at the group. He said the group's results showing a 12% drop in fourth quarter revenues to 11.1 billion dollars (£8.1 billion) were 'not where we want them to be'. 'As we enter a new fiscal year, we are turning the page and the next step is aligning our teams to lead with sport through what we are calling the sport offense,' he said. Mr Friend also said the sales decline 'reflected the largest financial impact' of its revamp, adding 'we expect the headwinds to moderate from here'.

Trump's justice department sues entire bench of Maryland judges over order restricting deportations
Trump's justice department sues entire bench of Maryland judges over order restricting deportations

The Guardian

time18 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump's justice department sues entire bench of Maryland judges over order restricting deportations

Donald Trump's justice department has sued the federal judiciary in Maryland over an order that bars the government from deporting undocumented immigrants for at least one day after they file a legal challenge to their detention. Chad Gilmartin, a spokesperson for Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, said in a post on X on Wednesday: 'This is just the latest action by @AGPamBondi's DOJ to rein in unlawful judicial overreach.' The state's federal court issued an order last month aimed at managing a wave of lawsuits challenging the Trump administration's moves to swiftly deport undocumented migrants. Maryland's federal court was the site of one of the most contentious cases under Trump's deportation policy when Kilmar Ábrego García, a Salvadoran national, was deported and later sent back to the US after the supreme court ordered the administration to 'facilitate' his return. Ábrego García is currently facing federal charges of unlawfully trafficking undocumented immigrants. Last week, the supreme court also ruled that the administration can resume deporting migrants to countries they are not from without additional due process requirements. The Department of Justice lawsuit against Maryland's federal judges includes Paula Xinis, the judge overseeing Ábrego García's case. Xinis is considering whether to sanction government officials for their initial refusal to facilitate Ábrego García's release from custody. The legal back-and-forth is part of an ongoing battle between the Trump administration and the federal judiciary over primacy in immigration matters, with some legal experts describing the move as an attack on judicial independence. Government lawyers argue in the lawsuit that the action 'involves yet another regrettable example of the unlawful use of equitable powers to restrain the executive'. The complaint alleges that Maryland's chief judge, George Russell, issued an 'unlawful, antidemocratic' order granting a two-day stay of deportation to any detainee in immigration custody who files a petition alleging wrongful detention. But the move to sue an entire bench of federal judges in a single district illustrates pressure coming from the Trump administration on the judiciary to fall in line with the administration's policies. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion 'A sense of frustration and a desire for greater convenience do not give defendants license to flout the law,' justice department attorneys wrote. 'Nor does their status within the judicial branch.' But the lawsuit was quickly condemned by Wes Moore. 'After blatantly violating judicial orders, and directing personal attacks on individual judges, the White House is turning our Constitution on its head by suing judges themselves,' the governor of Maryland said in a statement. 'Make no mistake: this unprecedented action is a transparent effort to intimidate judges and usurp the power of the courts.'

Iran's top diplomat says talks with US 'complicated' by American strike on nuclear sites
Iran's top diplomat says talks with US 'complicated' by American strike on nuclear sites

The Independent

time23 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Iran's top diplomat says talks with US 'complicated' by American strike on nuclear sites

Iran 's top diplomat said the possibility of new negotiations with the United States on his country's nuclear program has been 'complicated' by the American attack on three of the sites, which he conceded caused 'serious damage." The U.S. was one of the parties to the 2015 nuclear deal in which Iran agreed to limits on its uranium enrichment program in exchange for sanctions relief and other benefits. That deal unraveled after U.S. President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out unilaterally during his first term. Trump has suggested he is interested in new talks with Iran, and said that the two sides would meet next week. In an interview on Iranian state television broadcast late Thursday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi left open the possibility that his country would again enter talks on its nuclear program, but suggested it would not be anytime soon. 'No agreement has been made for resuming the negotiations,' he said. 'No time has been set, no promise has been made, and we haven't even talked about restarting the talks.' The American decision to intervene militarily 'made it more complicated and more difficult' for talks on Iran's nuclear program, Araghchi said. Israel attacked Iran on June 13, targeting its nuclear sites, defense systems, high-ranking military officials and atomic scientists in relentless attacks. In 12 days of strikes, Israel said it killed some 30 Iranian commanders and hit eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. More than 1,000 people were killed, including at least 417 civilians, according to the Washington-based Human Rights Activists group. Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted but those that got through caused damage in many areas and killed 28 people. The U.S. stepped in on Sunday to hit Iran's three most important strikes with a wave of cruise missiles and bunker-buster bombs dropped by B-2 bombers, designed to penetrate deep into the ground to damage the heavily-fortified targets. Iran, in retaliation, fired missiles at a U.S. base in Qatar on Monday but caused no known casualties. Trump said the American attacks 'completely and fully obliterated' Iran's nuclear program, though Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday accused the U.S. president of exaggerating the damage, saying the strikes did not 'achieve anything significant.' There has been speculation that Iran moved much of its highly-enriched uranium before the strikes, something that it told the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, that it planned to do. Even if that turns out to be true, IAEA Director Rafael Grossi told Radio France International that the damage done to the Fordo site, which was built into a mountain, 'is very, very, very considerable.' Among other things, he said, centrifuges are 'quite precise machines' and it's 'not possible' that the concussion from multiple 30,000-pound bombs would not have caused 'important physical damage.' 'These centrifuges are no longer operational,' he said. Araghchi himself acknowledged that 'the level of damage is high, and it's serious damage.' He added that Iran had not yet decided upon whether to allow IAEA inspectors in to assess the damage, but that they would be kept out 'for the time being.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store