The Fed keeps interest rates steady as Powell warns that economic uncertainty is 'extremely elevated'
Photo: Kevin Dietsch (Getty Images)
The Federal Reserve said Wednesday that it would keep interest rates steady at 4.25-4.5%, as the central bank continues to work to balance persistent inflation concerns with signs of a slowing U.S. economy.
While inflation has cooled from its 2022 highs, recent data hasn't provided sufficient assurance to begin reducing rates once again. But the Fed's message was a little different this time around, warning of rising risks of both higher unemployment and inflation and raising the possibility of a stagflationary scenario.
'Although swings in net exports have affected the data, recent indicators suggest that economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace,' the Fed said in a statement. 'The unemployment rate has stabilized at a low level in recent months, and labor market conditions remain solid. Inflation remains somewhat elevated.'
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said in his own remarksthat the central bank remains committed to price stability and full employment — saying he wanted to prevent a one-time increase in the price level from becoming an continuing inflation problem.
He said the risks of higher unemployment and inflation have risen, and the current policy stance leaves the Fed 'well positioned' to address economic developments 'in a timely way.'
U.S. stock prices fell Wednesday, but the Dow was able to cling to slight gains after the widely anticipated move. The S&P 500 fell 0.5% in the 15 minutes after the release, and U.S. Treasury yields extended their fall.
The Fed's decision came against a backdrop of slowing economic growth and still-sticky inflation. The U.S. economy contracted by 0.3% in the first quarter of 2025, while the labor market showed resilience with 177,000 jobs added in April — a figure that only modestly exceeded expectations.
Core inflation, measured by the Fed's preferred metric, the Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, continues to hover above the 2% target, reinforcing the Fed's cautious stance.
'The economy itself is in solid shape,' Powell said. He added, though, to some laughs from reporters that 'my gut tells me that uncertainty about the path of the economy is extremely elevated.'
Part of that is because of the sweeping set of tariffs President Donald Trump announced in early April, including a 145% duty on Chinese imports. While the Fed doesn't directly weigh in on or set fiscal or trade policy, such developments will affect inflation dynamics going forward — and further complicate the Fed's task.
Powell addressed tariffs in his press conference, saying the central bank will continue to 'wait and see and watch' as the tariff policies change over the coming weeks and months. He said the Fed was comfortable in its policy stance and can move quickly when appropriate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
19 minutes ago
- Axios
The U.S.-China leverage game
Negotiations usually boil down to leverage — specifically, who has more of it. In the U.S.- China talks underway Monday in London, the question of who has the upper hand boils down to macro- versus micro-economics. The big picture: A slew of data out of China shows the massive cost that U.S. tariffs impose on the Chinese economy, reflecting both underlying economic weakness and what the nation stands to lose if no trade peace is reached. The U.S., meanwhile, has had a run of perfectly solid macroeconomic data, but has much to lose if China continues throttling supplies of rare earth minerals and other specific goods that U.S. industries desperately need. State of play: All is not well for the fundamentals of China's economy, and plunging trade with the U.S. exacerbated those problems. Chinese exports to the U.S. fell 34.5% in May from a year ago, according to Chinese National Bureau of Statistics data out Monday. Its imports from the U.S. also fell, by 18%. Consumer prices fell for the fourth consecutive month, the bureau said, while producer prices fell the most in nearly two years. The mix of moribund export activity and falling prices compounds the nation's challenges grappling with a property bust and debt overhang. Yes, but: That might make Chinese negotiators eager to make a deal. After all, the nation's leadership views maintaining stable economic conditions and good living standards as crucial for their own hold on power, and collapsing exports to the U.S. undermine that goal. But they have plenty of leverage of their own, tied to U.S. reliance on very specific Chinese exports. Reality check: China's power in this standoff is tied to its ability to restrict exports of rare earth minerals, certain electronics, and pharmaceuticals. By throttling a handful of export categories, China can potentially exact damage on the U.S. economy that's far larger than the dollar value of the lost trade flows. Adam Posen, president of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, argued in an influential essay this spring that this means China has "escalation dominance," the power to escalate or de-escalate according to its goals. What they're saying: "The United States gets vital goods from China that cannot be replaced any time soon or made at home at anything less than prohibitive cost," Posen wrote in Foreign Affairs. In the event of aggressive escalation, he wrote, the U.S. "will face shortages of critical inputs ranging from basic ingredients of most pharmaceuticals to inexpensive semiconductors used in cars and home appliances to critical minerals for industrial processes including weapons production." The intrigue: The Wall Street Journal reported Monday morning that President Trump has authorized his negotiating team to loosen export restrictions on jet engines and other products as part of the talks, citing people familiar.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
After vowing ‘90 deals in 90 days,' the White House's rhetoric runs into reality
Donald Trump clearly wants the public to believe he recently struck a trade deal with China. The president did not actually reach such an agreement, but he's leaned into his fictional narrative with great enthusiasm lately. Last Thursday, for example, the Republican published an item to his social media platform, noting that he'd spoken to Chinese President Xi Jinping about 'the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal.' Soon after, during an Oval Office event, he again touted the same 'trade deal.' A day later, Trump posted a follow-up item, announcing the members of a delegation who would travel to London to meet with Chinese officials about 'the Trade Deal.' The bad news is that the 'trade deal' in question does not exist, no matter how many times the American president pretends otherwise. The good news is that administration officials will actually have some discussions with their Chinese counterparts. NBC News reported: Senior U.S. and Chinese officials will meet in London on Monday in an effort to de-escalate the bitter trade dispute between the world's two biggest economies that has roiled the global economy, with China's restrictions on critical minerals high on the agenda. About a month ago, Trump announced what he characterized as a 'deal' with China, but the closer one looked at the details, the more the truth came into focus. Georgetown University professor Abraham Newman wrote a great piece for MSNBC that explained, "While the U.S. did avoid a major economic calamity, this is not a deal. The U.S. blinked. ... Far from some diplomatic coup, the U.S. climb down reflects the economic risks of maintaining such high tariffs.' The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal came to the same conclusion, noting, '[T]he China deal is more surrender than Trump victory.' Complicating matters, while the White House and Beijing reached a tentative agreement that paused the two countries' tit-for-tat tariffs, both countries have since accused each other of violating the agreement. All of which brings to mind Peter Navarro, the White House's top trade adviser, who boasted in April, 'We're going to run 90 deals in 90 days.' Navarro added that such a plan 'is possible' in part because 'the boss is going to be the chief negotiator.' Roughly two months later, the grand total currently stands at zero. Generous observers might be inclined to give Trump credit for striking a deal with the U.K., but as The Washington Post's Dana Milbank summarized in his latest column, that deal is really more of a 'vaguely phrased framework with Britain that still hasn't been made public.' What's more, a new Politico report added that a month after the agreement was announced, the U.S.-U.K. duties 'remain in place' and 'there is still no clear timeline for when they'll lift.' Or to put it another way, two-thirds of the way into the '90 deals in 90 days' vow, the White House appears to be 90 deals short. Undeterred, Navarro returned to Fox Business late last week, where he was asked when the public should expect to see some breakthroughs. 'We will have deals,' Navarro said. 'It takes time. Usually, it takes months and years. In this administration, it's gonna take more like days.' On average, the typical timeframe for a U.S. trade deal is roughly 30 months. That didn't deter Navarro from pushing the '90 deals in 90 days' talking point in April, and it apparently didn't stop him from claiming again last week that Team Trump will produce amazing results in a matter of days. The White House's top trade adviser should be going out of his way right now to lower expectations after already having set an impossibly high bar. For reasons unknown, Navarro is doing the opposite, setting up the Trump administration for additional failure. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Warner Bros. Discovery Stock Surges Pre-Market, Planning Two-Way Split
Warner Bros Discovery (NASDAQ:WBD) is popping in early trading Monday, jumping nearly 8% to $10.60 as of 9:11 a.m. ET after unveiling a tax-free split into two pure-play businessesStreaming & Studios and Global Networksaiming to unlock shareholder value by mid-2026. In the newly branded Streaming & Studios arm, Warner Bros. Television, Motion Picture Group, DC Studios, HBO and HBO Max will sit alongside TV and film libraries under CEO David Zaslav's leadership. The standalone Global Networks entity, led by CFO Gunnar Wiedenfels, will encompass CNN, TNT Sports, Discovery's free-to-air channels across Europe, Discovery+, Bleacher Report and other premier entertainment, sports and news brands. The mid-2026 separation, structured as a tax-free distribution, follows mounting investor pressure for simpler, focused operations and echoes similar media breakups this year. Monday's announcement pushed WBD shares to their highest close since April, outperforming the S&P 500's flat session. Analysts at Bank of America had flagged a potential split as upside for WBD, reiterating a Buy rating and $14 price targetimplying roughly 43% upsidewhile Jefferies in a separate note highlighted that streamlined cost structures and clearer growth trajectories for each unit could drive multiple expansion. Trading volume spiked 35% above the 30-day average, underscoring renewed investor interest. In its press release, Warner Bros. Discovery said the carve-out will enhance strategic flexibility, accelerate capital allocation and sharpen each business's competitive edge, pointing to improved decision-making and tailored investment in content and distribution. Why It Matters: By separating capital-intensive streaming operations from higher-margin networks, Warner Bros. Discovery aims to give investors direct exposure to distinct growth drivers and profit pools. This move could set a template for other legacy media companies wrestling with digital transition strains. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data