logo
Commanders await D.C. Council's stadium vote after sometimes heated hearing

Commanders await D.C. Council's stadium vote after sometimes heated hearing

New York Times31-07-2025
WASHINGTON — If the D.C. Council's vote on the Washington Commanders' proposed new stadium is a fait accompli, one would hate to see what a less certain process looks like.
Over two days, as the Council contemplated its Friday vote on a proposed 65,000-seat stadium for the Commanders, there was discussion — sometimes heated — about parking. About unions. About the Metrorail. More about parking. About jobs, whether union or non-union, and how much they would pay. About how much the Commanders would pay if their promise to construct 5,000 to 6,000 affordable housing units is delayed, or isn't realized. About the Commanders' stadium being LEED certified when it's completed, as are many NFL stadiums. About protecting the nearby Anacostia River. About hotels. Still more about parking.
Advertisement
'I just want to make sure the public never loses sight of what we're getting,' D.C. mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) said afterward. 'It's a really good deal.'
The Council heard more than 18 hours of testimony over two days from a cross-section of the city's working classes, its elites, its longtime football fans, the mayor, Commanders' president Mark Clouse and more than 500 other interested parties.
At the end, the sense remained that Council chairman Phil Mendelson (D) has the minimum eight votes needed from the 12 current council members to pass the legislation. If the measure passes Friday, a second vote will be needed in mid-September; that vote would require nine yes votes, after Ward 8 councilman-elect Trayon White is sworn in.
Asked if she thinks she and the city have the votes, Bowser said, 'Yes.'
'We were very pleased with the session,' Bowser said. 'We got some good questions out, got to answer them publicly, directly. We feel pretty good about it.'
The Commanders are committing $2.7 billion toward the stadium, which would be built at the site of crumbling RFK Stadium, the team's home during its glory years. The franchise would also be the master developer of an entertainment district and other mixed-use facilities on two parcels of land. The city is committing a little more than $1 billion toward stadium infrastructure costs and the construction of two garages totaling 8,000 parking spaces.
'We will be good partners to the city — not just now, but for decades to come — and we welcome continued engagement to be fair, responsible, and aligned with the District's long-term goals,' Clouse said in his prepared testimony. 'This can and will be a true catalyst of growth that will support and benefit ongoing budget discussions well into the future.'
The Commanders made several financial concessions to the city last week, after the Council sought changes to the deal. The team will now give the city an estimated $260 million in parking revenue from non-stadium event days, an estimated $248 million — 10 percent — of the sales taxes on food and beverages sold at Commanders' games, another $112 million in parking taxes and $54 million in sales taxes on all merchandise sold at the stadium, for a total of $674 million over 30 years.
D.C. City Council Chair Phil Mendelson announced the multiple concessions the city has gotten from the Commanders as part of the revised agreement between the team and city that will officially be voted on by the Council on Aug. 1, as reported yesterday in @TheAthletic. Details: pic.twitter.com/tiyCe2wmrl
— David Aldridge (@davidaldridgedc) July 24, 2025
The Commanders sent a letter to the Council late Tuesday detailing further commitments, including $50 million of investments over the next 30 years 'prioritizing businesses and residents in Wards 5, 7, and 8,' which border or are near the proposed stadium site.
That total includes $20 million for a Commanders Youth Academy, which will focus, according to the letter, 'on educational success and youth sports located in Ward 7.'
The other promised investments include:
The remaining $13 million could be invested in projects and initiatives at the Council's discretion.
Clouse said the Commanders would work with local partners to get a new grocery store constructed in Ward 7.
Bowser engaged in sharp exchanges with at-large councilmember Robert White, who said Tuesday that he is still uncommitted on the project. White said he wants assurances that current residents living near the stadium site will not be priced out of their neighborhoods after new hotels, restaurants and other high-end buildings drive up property taxes in the area.
Advertisement
'I do not believe we can, or should, pass a bill without a plan to protect the residents around RFK from displacement,' Robert White said, while sparring with both Clouse and Bowser. 'We are very clear on what we need to do to get the Commanders here, in terms of taxes, revenues and all that balance. But there are people who live around the site now whose tax dollars are going to be used to build a stadium that will price them out …whether they are renters or retirees.'
Robert White asked Bowser to commit to a housing preservation fund, out of revenue created by the stadium project, to help keep low-income renters and owners in their homes. Bowser noted that the city already has protections for all homeowners in the District from massive year-to-year increases in property taxes — no more than 10 percent in a given year for most homeowners, and no more than 2 percent for senior citizens.
White was not swayed.
'I mean, we're talking about the second-most gentrified jurisdiction in the nation, on a project that is absolutely going to make the cost of housing skyrocket,' White said.
Robert White was also critical of the team's decision to keep its headquarters in College Park, Md.
'It's like, 'let's go steady. We'll move in together, but I'm still gonna keep my place in College Park,'' White said.
Bowser said that she reached an understanding of sorts with Maryland's two U.S. senators, during the negotiations on the congressional bill giving control of the site back to the District, that the Commanders would remain in the state.
'I have had forthright conversations, and I know the Commanders have, with our partners in Maryland, our political partners in Maryland, and in Virginia,' Bowser said. 'We have made clear our desire to get our team, the Washington Commanders, in Washington. But we didn't make it a kind of free-for-all, of D.C. going into Maryland. Respectfully, councilmembers, I would ask you to help me keep that commitment.'
It's time to get through the window of opportunity before it closes.
On Friday, I'm asking for the DC Council's strong unified vote to help shift our economy, grow jobs and business opportunities, and bring our team home. pic.twitter.com/ahKaaTag4b
— Mayor Muriel Bowser (@MayorBowser) July 30, 2025
Both Clouse and Bowser said they would support the construction of a new firehouse on or near the new buildout to handle the increased commercial and residential activity.
In the letter, Clouse also said the Commanders will commit to 'developing a parking plan that does not preclude the construction of a new infill Metrorail station on or near Oklahoma Avenue, if it is deemed necessary at full build out of the RFK Campus.' Multiple people who testified Tuesday pointed to the need to enhance the existing Metrorail stop that served the original stadium site. The need to build at least one additional entranceway to the station has been a constant refrain from critics of the plan.
Advertisement
The Commanders also vowed to build and operate the new stadium to a 'LEED Platinum' standard, the highest level of certification, and committed to achieving a minimum of 'LEED Gold' (the second-highest level) for the accompanying mixed-use development.
Commanders owner Josh Harris indicated in April he would like to have 'RFK' be part of the new stadium's name, noting he wants to 'get as close to our heritage as we can.' Clouse took it a step further, writing in his letter to the Council that that the team will build the stadium and surrounding mixed-use development 'in a manner that honors the legacy of the late Senator Robert F. Kennedy, including opportunities to memorialize him and his good works in park names, private street names, or other respectful measures.'
Clouse also wrote that the team recognizes that working with the NWSL's Washington Spirit 'may result in a mutually beneficial relationship.' The Commanders are in early talks with the Spirit about potentially accommodating the soccer team at the new stadium, according to two people with knowledge of the discussions. The Spirit plays home games at Audi Field in D.C. and train at Inova Performance Complex in Leesburg, Va.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SoftBank and Trump may not be enough to save Intel
SoftBank and Trump may not be enough to save Intel

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

SoftBank and Trump may not be enough to save Intel

Intel's (INTC) stock got a boost on Tuesday after SoftBank Group announced Monday that it would take a $2 billion stake in the struggling chipmaker. Shares of Intel climbed more than 8% in midday trading. The news followed a Bloomberg report last week that the Trump administration is considering taking up to a 10% stake in the company. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed in a CNBC interview Tuesday that the investment would involve the US government converting Intel's grants from the Biden-era CHIPS and Science Act — worth $10.9 billion — into an equity stake aimed at stabilizing the company's US manufacturing business. Bessent did not confirm the size of the stake the government would take. Intel has fallen behind in an industry it once dominated. Its manufacturing division is bleeding cash, just as its legacy computer chip segment forfeits market share to rivals Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) and Qualcomm (QCOM) in the PC space. Intel is also woefully behind AMD and Nvidia (NVDA) in the AI race. The company's market capitalization of $111 billion is less than half of its value in 2021. And CEO Lip-Bu Tan has been forced to lay off 15% of the company's workforce and shelve plans to build plants in Europe. But the troubled chipmaker is the only large-scale US-based leading-edge chip manufacturer, giving it geopolitical significance as the nation looks to reshore semiconductor production. Intel's problems, however, may be too big for either SoftBank or the Trump administration to solve on their own. Intel in need of direction Deutsche Bank analyst Ross Seymore said news of the US potentially taking a stake in Intel, combined with the SoftBank investment, shows that "[Tan] is taking bold actions to solidify Intel's financial and strategic positioning during its ongoing difficult transformation process." Tan became CEO in March after Intel's board ousted former CEO Pat Gelsinger late last year. But others on Wall Street expressed skepticism that those investments would be enough to save Intel from its decline, which resulted from years of missteps. Loop Capital analyst Gary Mobley wrote in a recent note to clients that the support from SoftBank and, potentially, the US government may be "akin to a lifeline with no secure anchor at the other end," because while Intel may be "finding new buyers of its primary equity capital," that may not guarantee it can find customers for its manufacturing business. Gelsinger established Intel's third-party chip manufacturing business, otherwise known as its Foundry, in 2021 as a means of competing with rival TSMC, which produces chips for companies including Nvidia, Apple (AAPL), AMD, and others. But so far, its Foundry business has been a disappointment, struggling to secure customers. While Intel has said it reached agreements to build chips for Amazon (AMZN) and Microsoft (MSFT), the company is still its own largest manufacturing client. Intel's plan includes building chips based on newer technologies, including its 18A and upcoming 14A node design processes, part of Gelsinger's plan for five process nodes in four years. But 18A, which was initially supposed to roll out in the first half of 2025, is now slated to debut in 2026. Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon was similarly critical of Intel's cash infusion in his own investor note, writing, "We do not believe that Intel's capability gap has anything to do with money." Rasgon also questioned whether the US taking a stake in Intel would be enough to complete the company's domestic manufacturing expansions. "Intel was originally supposed to get these CHIPS Act funds for free; giving up 10% of the company for them seems worse," he wrote in a note to clients. "And if the goal is to help Intel build substantial US capacity, $10.9B really isn't enough." Moor Insights and Strategy founder and chief analyst Patrick Moorhead told Yahoo Finance that while SoftBank's $2 billion investment and the prospect of a potential US stake are good things, the company would require as much as $40 billion to build out its next-generation 14A technology. Still, getting the US government involved, at least in the short term, could prove to be a boon for the company. "My short-term answer is that the US government is a kingmaker, and they just made Intel the king, and they are going to wrap policy around that to make Intel foundry successful," Moorhead said. If the government sticks with Intel for the long haul, though, Moorhead said it could further complicate the company's development problems, leading to a lack of innovation, inefficiencies, and growing costs. "My hope is that Intel gets back on its feet, it turns itself into a reputable, leading-edge foundry, and the government sells the stake," he said. Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at Email Daniel Howley at dhowley@ Follow him on X/Twitter at @DanielHowley. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

US appeals court puts the brakes on contested land transfer for Arizona copper mine
US appeals court puts the brakes on contested land transfer for Arizona copper mine

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US appeals court puts the brakes on contested land transfer for Arizona copper mine

A U.S. appeals court has temporarily blocked the transfer of federal forest land in Arizona to a pair of international companies that plan to mine one of the largest copper deposits in North America. The transfer was scheduled for Tuesday. But a panel of judges with the 9th U.S. District Court of Appeals issued a temporary injunction late Monday in response to last-minute appeals by a Native American tribe and environmentalists. The land includes Oak Flat — an area used for centuries for religious ceremonies, prayer and gathering of medicinal plants by the San Carlos Apache people and other Native American tribes. The fight over Oak Flat has spanned two decades, with the latest legal wrangling centered on a required environmental review that was released by the U.S. Forest Service earlier this summer and an appraisal of the land to be mined by Resolution Copper about 60 miles (96 kilometers) east of Phoenix. Before the land exchange can happen, the plaintiffs argued that the federal government must prepare a comprehensive review that covers 'every aspect of the planned mine and all related infrastructure.' They said the government failed to consider the potential for a dam breach, pipeline failure and if there was an emergency plan for a tailings storage area. As for the appraisal, they said it doesn't account for the value of the copper deposits that are at least 5,000 feet (1,500 meters) below the surface. The appeals court plans to hear arguments on the merits of the case later this year. Opponents of the mine consider the court action a victory, saying prayers are paying off. 'This injunction comes in a desperate time of asking for miracles, all over the country and all over the world,' Wendsler Nosie Sr. of the group Apache Stronghold said in a statement shared on social media. Nosie, a former tribal chairman, described the land and water at Oak Flat as precious. Apache Stronghold, the San Carlos Apache Tribe and other plaintiffs having been fighting for years to save what tribal members call Chi'chil Bildagoteel. The area is dotted with oak groves and traditional plants the Apaches consider essential to their religion. 'We will continue praying that the court understands the grave injustice of trading our sacred grounds to foreign mining companies that seek to destroy Chí'chil Biłdagoteel to extract copper that will be exported overseas,' Tribal Chairman Terry Rambler said in statement. Resolution Copper — a subsidiary of international mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP — estimates the mine will generate $1 billion a year for Arizona's economy and create thousands of jobs. The project has support in the nearby community of Superior. Resolution Copper has said the project underwent an extensive review by the U.S. Forest Service that has included consultation with tribes that have ancestral ties to the land. 'The collaborative process has directly led to major changes to the mining plan to preserve and reduce potential impacts on tribal, social, environmental and cultural interests,' the company stated. The Forest Service has argued in court filings that it has no discretion because the land exchange was mandated by Congress when language was included in a must-pass national defense spending bill that was signed into law in 2014 by then-President Barack Obama. There have been unsuccessful legislative attempts in the years since to withdraw the Oak Flat area from mining activity. Solve the daily Crossword

DOD to offer new medal for personnel deployed to Southern Border
DOD to offer new medal for personnel deployed to Southern Border

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

DOD to offer new medal for personnel deployed to Southern Border

The Pentagon announced a new military decoration that will recognize service members stationed at the U.S.-Mexico border as part of the Trump administration's effort to bolster border security. A U.S. defense official confirmed to Military Times the veracity of a memorandum regarding the medal that began circulating online several days ago. 'Effective immediately, the Mexican Border Defense Medal (MBDM), is hereby established to recognize Service members deployed to the U.S. international border with Mexico for DoD support to United States Customs and Border Protection (CBP),' a memo uploaded to the Navy subreddit reads. Previously, service members collaborating with CBP were awarded the Armed Forces Service Medal, but the Mexican Border Defense Medal will take its place, according to the memo. Military personnel qualify for the medal if they have been 'permanently assigned, attached, or detailed to a unit that deployed' in support of a military operation supporting CBP within 100 nautical miles of the U.S.-Mexico border after Jan. 20, 2025, when President Trump assumed office. After chase, US Navy, Coast Guard intercept 1,296 pounds of cocaine Military personnel must have operated within Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California or the adjacent U.S. waters out to 24 nautical miles, the memo said. Service members and veterans can apply to have their Armed Forces Service Medal swapped out with the Mexican Border Defense Medal, but they are not allowed to possess both at once. Trump signed an executive order on Jan. 20 to deter the 'unlawful mass migration' of illegal aliens into the United States by deploying supplemental military personnel along the Southern Border, among other strategies. Over the last eight months, the administration has ramped up its border security mission. U.S. Northern Command established Joint Task Force-Southern Border on March 14, 2025, to lead immigration enforcement efforts. As of July 2, approximately 8,500 military personnel were attached to the task force. The administration has also deployed the U.S. Navy to intercept and halt the flow of illicit drugs into the country. On Aug. 11, U.S. Navy Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyer Sampson, along with the U.S. Coast Guard, intercepted 1,296 pounds of cocaine from a drug smuggling vessel. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store