Hiscox profits fall after £128m claims hit from LA wildfires
The wildfires, which raged in California during the first half of January, have been estimated by some to be the costliest natural disaster in US history.
Aki Hussain, group chief executive at Hiscox, branded it the 'largest wildfire insurance event in history', estimating earlier this year the loss to the sector could be as high as 40 billion dollars (£30.1 billion).
More than 16,200 structures were destroyed as flames ripped through Pacific Palisades, Malibu, Pasadena and Altadena areas of Los Angeles.
Estimates of the total economic loss from the firestorm have been estimated to surpass 250 billion dollars (£188 billion).
The wildfire claims saw half-year profits at Hiscox fall 2% to 276.6 million dollars (£208 million) in the six months to June 30.
On an underlying basis, pre-tax operating profits were 9% lower at 262 million dollars (£197 million).
Hiscox said despite the profit drop, it would increase its share buybacks by 100 million dollars (£75.2 million) and hike its interim dividend payout by 9.1%.
Mr Hussain said: 'Our balance sheet remains strong and we are achieving sustained and strong capital formation which underpins our increased return of capital to shareholders, through step-ups in ordinary dividends and buybacks, over the last two years.'
Shares jumped 8% after the half-year results.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
KEVIN O'LEARY: I spotted a crushing indicator for the US housing market... heed my advice if you want to survive the financial fallout
There was crushing news for shoppers in the US housing market this week. On Tuesday, a key measure of inflation rose at a faster rate than anticipated. The Consumer Price Index, which excludes volatile food and energy prices, was up 3.1 percent in July.
Finextra
8 hours ago
- Finextra
Deep Dive: Coinbase's Commerce Payments Protocol: How to Use It, Integrate It, and Win With It: By Sam Boboev
Coinbase and Shopify have teamed up to launch the Commerce Payments Protocol, an open onchain payments standard designed for real-world commerce. Announced in mid-2025, this protocol brings sophisticated multi-step payment flows (think escrow, authorizations, captures, refunds) onto the blockchain, while preserving crypto's core benefits of speed, low cost, and global reach. In plain terms, it bridges the promise of crypto with the nitty-gritty realities of everyday commerce. The protocol is live on Coinbase's Base network and open-source for all developers. It's already powering Shopify's new USDC payment option, rolling out to millions of Shopify merchants worldwide who can now seamlessly accept stablecoin payments on Base. This marks one of the first large-scale rollouts of crypto payments in mainstream online retail – without users needing to wrestle with volatility or clunky crypto addresses. So what exactly is this Commerce Payments Protocol? At its core, it's a set of smart contracts and APIs that replicate the 'authorize, then capture' dance of traditional payment networks, but onchain. Coinbase Commerce (Coinbase's merchant payments arm) has rebuilt its checkout on top of this protocol, making onchain payments more plug-and-play. The protocol is open-source, so any payment provider or platform can integrate it or even run their own instance. (Yes, Coinbase wants this to be a standard, not just their proprietary sauce.) By leveraging Base – Coinbase's Ethereum L2 – the protocol promises near-instant settlement (we're talking sub-second, ~200ms in optimal cases) with transaction fees around a penny. And because it's crypto, it works 24/7, across borders, no bank middlemen required. In short, Coinbase and Shopify just opened the door for stablecoins (like USDC) to move from crypto niche to everyday e-commerce. Why does this matter? Why does this matter? If you've been around the fintech block, you know crypto payments in theory have always been touted as faster, cheaper, and more global than card networks. Stablecoins alone hit $30 trillion in settlements last year – growing 3× year-over-year – showing huge demand for moving value onchain. But in practice, using crypto at the online checkout has been clunky at best. Aside from the famous Bitcoin pizza (15 years ago someone paid 10,000 BTC for two Papa John's pizzas), crypto commerce hasn't evolved much beyond one-off novelties. Why? Because buying a latte with crypto exposed you to price swings, manual address entry, and 'Did I send the right amount?' anxiety. Traditional online payments have decades of tooling to handle things like holds, partial captures, refunds, fraud checks – whereas crypto payments until now were basically 'send coin, hope it works out.' That's a non-starter for large-scale commerce. Enter the Commerce Payments Protocol. Coinbase's solution essentially mimics the credit card payment flow onchain. In traditional finance, when you pay online, there's often an authorization hold (funds reserved on your card) and later a capture (merchant actually takes the money) once the item is shipped. This two-step dance gives merchants and buyers flexibility – you can cancel an order before it ships, adjust for out-of-stock items, etc., and merchants only get charged fees on settled transactions. Until now, crypto lacked this nuance. The new protocol brings that same authorize-and-capture model to crypto payments, using smart contracts as the adjudicator. How does it work? The protocol introduces a non-custodial escrow contract that sits between the customer (payer) and merchant (receiver). When a buyer initiates a purchase, instead of immediately transferring tokens to the merchant, the buyer first signs a payment intent – basically a structured message saying 'I agree to pay X amount of USDC to merchant Y, using token Z from my wallet, before time T.' This signed intent is sent to an Operator service (more on that in a second), which then moves the funds into the escrow contract onchain (that's the authorize step). The money is now held securely in the smart contract, on behalf of the merchant. The merchant can later trigger a capture to finalize the sale – which moves the USDC (or whatever the merchant opted to receive) from escrow to the merchant's wallet. If something goes wrong or the order is canceled, the merchant (or even the buyer in some cases) can void the payment, releasing the funds back to the buyer from escrow instead. This escrow mechanism guarantees that merchants always get exactly the amount they requested, no more no less, and never past the agreed deadline. If a payment isn't captured in time, it simply expires and the buyer can reclaim their money. No more 'funds in limbo' scenarios – it's automated and atomic. Either the merchant is paid in full and happy, or the transaction reverses cleanly. Now, about that Operator role – this is a key innovation for usability. In crypto, executing any onchain action (like moving funds into escrow) requires paying gas fees. Traditionally, we expect payers to cover gas, but in normal e-commerce the merchant effectively covers transaction fees (you don't pay a fee to swipe your card; the merchant pays interchange). Asking customers to fiddle with gas or hold Ether would wreck conversion. So the Commerce Payments Protocol lets an Operator (like Coinbase) step in to handle the blockchain transaction on the payer's behalf. The Operator essentially sponsors the gas and orchestrates the payment flow via an API. In the Shopify case, Coinbase Commerce acts as the Operator for its merchants, meaning Shopify buyers enjoy a gasless checkout – they just sign the transaction intent and Coinbase's systems handle the onchain execution behind the scenes using Coinbase's Wallet API and gas reserves. Operators can charge a fee for this service (Coinbase likely charges a small percentage, similar to their existing 1% Commerce fee). Importantly, anyone can become an Operator – the protocol is permissionless in that regard. If you run a marketplace or a payments service, you could integrate the protocol and register your platform as an Operator in the smart contract (by calling registerOperator()), allowing you to facilitate payments for your users and potentially earn fees. Of course, letting an Operator 'drive' the transaction raises trust questions – what prevents a rogue operator from messing with payments? The protocol addresses this with a few clever safeguards. First, the buyer's signed payment intent includes a cryptographic hash of all the critical details (merchant address, amount, currency, deadlines, operator's address, etc.). If an operator tried to alter any of those (say, change the destination address or amount), the signature wouldn't match and the contract would reject it. In short, the operator cannot modify the payer's original intent. Second, operators can't stick their hands in the cookie jar or stall indefinitely – if an authorization expires without being captured, the buyer can unilaterally reclaim their funds from escrow. This kills any incentive for an operator to hold funds hostage. Third, each payment is bound to one specific operator; the operator's address is baked into the intent the buyer signs. Payments facilitated by different operators live in separate escrow 'buckets,' so a malicious or compromised operator can't affect someone else's payments. Combined, these measures mean you don't have to trust Coinbase (or any operator) blindly – the smart contract and signatures enforce honesty. The protocol truly lives onchain (Coinbase can't turn it off or alter it unilaterally), aligning with crypto's trust-minimization ethos. Disclaimer: Fintech Wrap Up aggregates publicly available information for informational purposes only. Portions of the content may be reproduced verbatim from the original source, and full credit is provided with a "Source: [Name]" attribution. All copyrights and trademarks remain the property of their respective owners. Fintech Wrap Up does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of the aggregated content; these are the responsibility of the original source providers. Links to the original sources may not always be included. For questions or concerns, please contact us at
Reuters
12 hours ago
- Reuters
EU push to protect digital rules holds up trade statement with US, FT reports
Aug 17 (Reuters) - The European Union is trying to prevent the United States from targeting the bloc's digital rules as both sides work through the final details of a delayed statement to formalise a trade deal reached last month, the Financial Times reported on Sunday. EU officials said disagreements over language relating to "non-tariff barriers", which the U.S. said include the digital rules, are among the reasons for the hold-up of the statement, the newspaper said. Reuters could not immediately verify the report.
