logo
Finland and Lithuania set to produce anti-personnel mines, officials say

Finland and Lithuania set to produce anti-personnel mines, officials say

Straits Times09-07-2025
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
Lithuanian Defence Vice-Minister Karolis Aleksa speaks during an interview with Reuters, at the Ministry of National Defense, in Vilnius, Lithuania, July 1, 2025. REUTERS/Kuba Stezycki/File Photo
VILNIUS/HELSINKI/TALLINN - Lithuania and Finland look set to start domestic production of anti-personnel landmines next year to supply themselves and Ukraine because of what they see as the military threat from Russia, officials from the two NATO member states told Reuters.
The two countries, which border Russia, have announced their intention to pull out of the Ottawa Convention banning the use of such mines, and the officials said production could be launched once the six-month withdrawal process is completed.
Three other NATO and European Union states - Poland, Latvia and Estonia - are also quitting the treaty, citing rising security concerns about Russia because of its war in Ukraine.
Those three countries have not announced plans to start producing anti-personnel mines, but officials in Poland and Latvia have indicated they could start production quickly if needed and Estonia sees it as a possible option in the future.
Ukraine has also announced it is withdrawing from the 1997 Ottawa treaty, so that it can defend itself better against Russia, which is not a party to the treaty. Each side has accused the other of using anti-personnel mines during the war.
The moves in Finland and Lithuania towards starting production of such mines underline mounting concern in Europe that Russia's military ambitions may go beyond Ukraine and follow pledges by NATO states to increase defence spending, in line with demands by U.S. President Donald Trump.
"We are going to spend hundreds of millions of euros on anti-tank mines, but also on anti-personnel mines. It will be a significant amount," Lithuanian Deputy Defence Minister Karolis Aleksa told Reuters.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Singapore to hire 1,000 new educators annually in the next few years, up from 700
Business Temasek reports $45 billion rise in net portfolio value to $434 billion
Singapore Pritam's appeal against conviction, sentence over lying to Parliament set for Nov 4
Asia Why Japan and South Korea are on different paths in the latest US trade salvo
Singapore Female primary school teacher allegedly committed sex acts with underage male student
Opinion Hyper-competitive classrooms feed the corporate world's narcissist pipeline
Singapore Man charged after he allegedly threw glass bottle at bus window, injuring passenger
Singapore Police officer taken to hospital after motorcycle accident on PIE
Tens of thousands of anti-personnel landmines, or more, will be ordered, he said.
"Our national industry will be one of the sources. Our industry can make these", said Aleksa, whose country has a 274-km (170-mile) border with Russia and a 679-km border with Belarus, Russia's close ally.
Once production is established, Lithuania will be in a position to supply others including Ukraine, said Vincas Jurgutis, head of Lithuania's defence industry association.
Russia's Defence Ministry did not respond to a request for comment by Reuters.
'DUTY TO SUPPORT UKRAINE'
Finland has, at 1,340 km, a longer border with Russia than any other NATO state.
"Finland must, for security of supply, have its own (anti-landmines) production," Finnish parliament defence committee chair Heikki Autto told Reuters. "They are a highly effective and very cost-efficient weapons system."
Finland could also supply landmines to Ukraine, he said.
"It is not only right and our duty to support Ukraine, it is also important for Finland's own security," Autto said.
Helsinki had more than 1 million anti-personnel landmines before joining the Ottawa treaty in 2011, he said.
Finnish defence companies Nammo Lapua, Insta and Raikka told the parliamentary defence committee they would be interested in producing the mines. Another, Forcit Explosives, said it was ready to discuss possibilities with the military.
The companies declined comment to Reuters. The Finnish military was not immediately available for comment.
Asked about Finland quitting the Ottawa treaty, Russia's ambassador to Helsinki said in April that the decision would create risks only for residents of Finland because its military planned to mine only Finnish territory.
SIX-MONTH PROCESS
Anti-personnel mines explode when triggered by contact, vibration or a tripwire, and can maim civilians as well as combatants. Many stay in the ground long after conflicts end.
Anti-mine campaigners have criticised the countries that are leaving the Ottawa Convention and say that reintroducing anti-personnel mine production could be expensive and take a long time to fully operational.
Asked whether Latvia would start producing anti-personnel mines, its defence ministry did not commit to starting such production but said: "The Latvian military industry has the necessary capabilities and the metalworking sector is highly advanced."
Estonia has no immediate plans to purchase anti-personnel mines, Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur said. "For now, it's an option in the back pocket," he told Reuters.
PGZ S.A., Poland's state-owned defence conglomerate, told Reuters it would be ready to produce millions of them if needed.
ZSP Niewiadów, a private Polish munitions manufacturer, has said it plans to restart large-scale production of the mines in 2027, and that it is investing in new facilities.
The five NATO countries that plan to quit the Ottawa treaty say they will not create minefields in peacetime but will store the mines for swift deployment if they feel threatened.
Poland has designated zones that could be mined within days if needed, as part of future military fortifications along the eastern frontier, between rows of reinforced concrete obstacles, a government source told Reuters.
The countries' governments say any minefields must be marked, so that they can be cleared after a conflict. They regard such munitions as a deterrence.
"When we have them in storage, that is the best guarantee that they will never have to be used," Autto said. REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Prabowo's political rivals among over 1,000 granted clemency before Indonesia's Independence Day
Prabowo's political rivals among over 1,000 granted clemency before Indonesia's Independence Day

Straits Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Prabowo's political rivals among over 1,000 granted clemency before Indonesia's Independence Day

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox JAKARTA – Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto granted clemency to two high-profile political rivals, in a gesture of national reconciliation ahead of Independence Day on Aug 17 that included amnesty for more than 1,000 people. Relief for former Trade Minister Thomas Trikasih Lembong and senior opposition official Hasto Kristiyanto was announced July 31 alongside the mass amnesty, which included people jailed under controversial laws covering presidential insult and non-violent treason. Mr Lembong, a prominent critic of Mr Prabowo during the 2024 election campaign, was a key adviser to rival candidate Anies Baswedan. Mr Hasto, meanwhile, serves as secretary-general of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle, known as PDI-P, the only major party outside Mr Prabowo's ruling coalition and the largest bloc in Parliament. The move could ease political tensions with the PDI-P, whose chair Megawati Soekarnoputri has so far withheld public support for Mr Prabowo. Their legal relief – abolition for Mr Lembong and amnesty for Mr Hasto – was approved by parliament on July 31, after receiving the presidential letters. They were both convicted recently in separate graft cases. Law Minister Supratman Andi Agtas said during a press conference late on July 31 that the decision was grounded in legal review and framed it as a unifying act. Under Indonesia's constitution, the president has the authority to grant amnesty and abolition, subject to parliamentary approval. Mr Lembong's legal team described the move as a constitutional correction of a flawed legal process. Mr Hasto's lawyers said in a text message they are awaiting a formal presidential decree. Bloomberg

Gaza hunger presents Trump with moral test familiar to past presidents
Gaza hunger presents Trump with moral test familiar to past presidents

Straits Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Gaza hunger presents Trump with moral test familiar to past presidents

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Images of malnourished Palestinians in the war-ravaged enclave have disturbed US President Donald Trump enough to take action. WASHINGTON – As the Gaza Strip tips into famine and images of starving children trigger new demands for action, US President Donald Trump faces a test all too familiar to his predecessors. Time after time, American presidents have found themselves watching suffering in faraway countries with the knowledge that they could act to save innocent lives. Images of death and misery in places such as the Balkans, Rwanda, Darfur and Syria, to name a few, haunted their consciences – sometimes moving them to act, but often leading to excuses. The desperation in Gaza has emerged as such a test for Mr Trump. By his own account, images of malnourished Palestinians in the war-ravaged enclave have disturbed him enough to take action. 'I mean, some of those kids are – that's real starvation stuff,' Mr Trump said in Scotland on July 28. 'I see it, and you can't fake it. So we're going to be even more involved.' It was unclear what Mr Trump meant by getting 'more involved'. Days earlier, he had withdrawn his special envoy, Steve Witkoff, from talks between Israel and Hamas in pursuit of a ceasefire to end the war in Gaza. Mr Witkoff travelled to Israel on July 31 to discuss Gaza , and Israeli news outlets reported that he might even visit a food distribution centre in the territory. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump modifies reciprocal tariffs ahead of deadline; rate on Singapore likely to remain at 10% Singapore 'For one last time, let's go home': Tears, laughs as last scheduled Jetstar Asia flight touches down Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights Business More new homes are coming up in northern Singapore Business OCBC Q2 profit drops 7% to $1.82b as interest rates fall, to pay lower interim dividend Asia Thailand seeks neutral venue for border talks with Cambodia Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family' Mr Witkoff's change of plans comes as aid groups say hunger in Gaza is reaching crisis levels. One UN-affiliated group said in a report this week that a worst-case famine scenario is unfolding, and Gaza health officials say that dozens of Palestinians, including children, have died of starvation in recent weeks. Those grim facts have been driven home by gut-wrenching images of skeletal toddlers and people fighting for food. Israeli officials reject responsibility for food shortages in Gaza, which they say are exaggerated and caused by Hamas. 'There is no policy of starvation in Gaza, and there is no starvation in Gaza,' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. Hamas 'robs, steals this humanitarian aid and then accuses Israel of not supplying it', he added. But Hamas denies that, and Israeli military officials privately say they have found no evidence that Hamas systematically steals aid. Such protests have not defused global anger. France announced this week that it would recognise an independent Palestinian state at the United Nations in September , and Britain said it would follow suit if Israel did not agree to a ceasefire with Hamas . And in Washington this week, one of Mr Trump's fiercest Republican allies in Congress, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, condemned Israel's actions in Gaza as 'genocide'. Mr Trump has few good options. The United States supplies Israel, its close partner, with billions in annual military aid. Even if Hamas is the main obstacle to aid delivery, Mr Trump lacks influence over the militant group. His only real hope is to insist that Israel, which controls Gaza's borders, does more to clear roads and protect aid convoys. A long-term solution may require leveraging American aid to force Mr Netanyahu to accept a ceasefire on terms short of his long-time demands. Dr Stephen Wertheim, a senior fellow in the American Statecraft Programme at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the quandary is a familiar one for US presidents. 'President Trump's excuse-making over Gaza resonates with a long line of presidents who were pressured to address humanitarian catastrophes,' Dr Wertheim said. That pressure comes from a sense of moral duty in the country's DNA, dating as far back as John Winthrop's 1630 'City on a Hill' sermon, in which he told Puritan Massachusetts colonists that 'the eyes of all people are upon us'. As the United States grew in power and wealth, so did its sense of obligation to people in need everywhere. Before he became a free-market Republican president, Herbert Hoover ran a federal foreign aid programme that sent food to famine-stricken Soviet Russia in 1921. 'Whatever their politics, they shall be fed!' he declared. Cold War competition for global influence with the Soviet Union reinforced the instinct, on strategic grounds. Many conservatives argue that America is not a charity, and should help people abroad only when it advances the national interest. Mr Trump has made that argument explicit in his America-first foreign policy, his deep cuts to foreign aid spending and his dismantling of the US Agency for International Development. Displaced Palestinians waiting for food at a charity kitchen in Gaza City on July 23. PHOTO: SAHER ALGHORRA/NYTIMES Mr Stephen Pomper, the chief of policy at the International Crisis Group, noted that a president who preaches an America-first foreign policy has undermined an international system built over decades to prevent foreign atrocities. The United States 'looks increasingly like it rejects or is indifferent to the founding principles of the order that it helped create', he said. Still, the crisis in Gaza has echoes of past humanitarian crises that left presidents wringing their hands over how to respond. President Bill Clinton took office in 1993 as a champion of human rights and international institutions. But when machete-wielding Hutu militias started to slaughter ethnic Tutsi in Rwanda in 1994, he rejected calls for US action. Scarred by the deaths of 18 American soldiers on a peacekeeping mission in Somalia, Mr Clinton feared that even modest steps could escalate dangerously. Unchecked, Hutu killers carried out the genocide of an estimated 800,000 Tutsi. Mr Clinton later said he regretted not doing more to stop it. Mr Clinton also hesitated as Serbian forces slaughtered civilians in Bosnia-Herzegovina in the mid-1990s, rebuffing direct pleas from the likes of Elie Wiesel by saying the problem did not warrant risking American lives. The 1995 massacre of 8,000 men and boys at a UN-declared 'safe area' in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica finally moved Mr Clinton to act. A US-led bombing campaign against Serbian forces led to a peace deal credited with stabilising the region. Stopping mass killings in the Darfur region of Sudan in the early 2000s became a campaign for activists and celebrities, including Angelina Jolie and George Clooney. But even after the US State Department formally declared the atrocities there a 'genocide' in 2004, president George W. Bush refused calls to deploy US troops to stop it. He cited, among other things, concern about intervening 'in another Muslim country' at the time of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. By the time Mr Barack Obama became president, activists and scholars – fuelled by the American failure in Rwanda – had developed new legal theories to support cross-border intervention to protect victims of atrocities. Among them was Ms Samantha Power, an influential national security aide to Mr Obama, who helped engineer a 2011 presidential directive on the subject. 'Preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States,' it declared. Palestinians carry aid supplies which entered Gaza through Israel in Beit Lahia, northern Gaza, on July 27. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG Mr Obama put that idea into practice in 2011, when he ordered airstrikes in Libya against government forces preparing to crush a rebellion in the city of Benghazi. Mr Obama said he acted to avert 'a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world'. But that supposedly limited intervention expanded into a months-long Nato bombing campaign, and Libya collapsed into violent anarchy, leaving Mr Obama regretting the experience. So when he was pressured again to intervene in Syria's civil war against the country's brutal regime, he rejected pleas for airstrikes from top officials, including US Secretary of State John Kerry. Mr Obama did, however, order limited airstrikes in Syria in 2014 against Islamic State group fighters, in part to save thousands of Yazidi people trapped on a mountain in Iraq and at risk of genocidal massacre. 'Earlier this week, one Iraqi cried that there is no one coming to help,' Mr Obama said in an address to the nation. 'Well, today America is coming to help.' Gaza presents Mr Trump with an especially difficult case, as it did for former president Joe Biden. Mr Biden faced withering questions about his support for Israel's military campaign, and was shouted down at public events by protesters accusing him of complicity in genocide. But while Mr Biden often harangued Mr Netanyahu to allow more aid into Gaza – usually with limited and temporary results – he never risked a full break with the Israeli prime minister over the matter. One reason, Mr Biden's officials say, was intelligence showing that Hamas responded to signs of a potential split between the United States and Israel by hardening its negotiation position in ceasefire talks. Mr Biden felt enough of a responsibility – and also perhaps political vulnerability – that he resorted to dramatic displays of support for hungry Palestinians, sending military planes to airdrop supplies and ordering the construction of a US$230 million (S$299 million) pier to allow aid delivery by sea. Critics dismissed both measures as made-for-TV substitutes for putting decisive pressure on Mr Netanyahu. Ultimately, Dr Wertheim said, America's real problem in Gaza is itself. 'It's not that other parties are engaged in atrocities and the question is whether the United States will use its righteous power to stop,' he said. 'In this case, the issue is that the United States is complicit in Israel's conduct.' NYTIMES

In Canada, ghosting job candidates could cost a company as much as $94,000
In Canada, ghosting job candidates could cost a company as much as $94,000

Straits Times

time34 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

In Canada, ghosting job candidates could cost a company as much as $94,000

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Similar legislation is currently under consideration in the Unite States, where almost two-thirds of job applicants have reported receiving no response after an interview. NEW YORK – After a job interview, many candidates never hear back about whether they got the job. Now, lawmakers in Ontario, Canada, are stepping in to stop that. Starting Jan 1, companies in Ontario with at least 25 employees will have to inform candidates about their application status within 45 days of a job interview. Employers also will have to disclose whether a vacancy is actively being filled and whether artificial intelligence is being used to screen and select candidates. Ontario's Labour Minister David Piccini told the Toronto Star in 2024, when the legislation was first introduced, that it is simply common courtesy to let applicants know when they do not get the job. Employers who fail to comply may be fined as much as C$100,000 (S$94,000), according to Mr Daryn Jeffries, an employment lawyer in Toronto, though first offences probably will result in warnings or lower fines. The move is part of a broader push to bring transparency to a hiring process many applicants say is broken – and one that may reshape how companies advertise jobs, manage candidate pipelines and use AI. Some employers warn the regulatory burden will increase costs. Almost two-thirds of job applicants in the United States have reported receiving no response after an interview, according to a July workplace report by hiring platform Greenhouse. And 27 per cent said they never heard back after a final-round interview. Similar legislation is currently under consideration in the US. A proposal in the New Jersey state legislature would fine employers up to US$5,000 (S$6,500) for repeatedly failing to give interviewed candidates a clear decision timeline. They also would have to remove job listings within two weeks of filling the role and disclose when they post ads for roles that do not exist, often referred to as a 'ghost job'. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. World Trump modifies reciprocal tariffs ahead of deadline; rate on Singapore likely to remain at 10% Singapore 'For one last time, let's go home': Tears, laughs as last scheduled Jetstar Asia flight touches down Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights Business More new homes are coming up in northern Singapore Business OCBC Q2 profit drops 7% to $1.82b as interest rates fall, to pay lower interim dividend Asia Thailand seeks neutral venue for border talks with Cambodia Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family' Companies often keep such listings to maintain a steady candidate pool for times they need to hire quickly, said human resources consultant Anessa Fike. State lawmakers in Kentucky and California have introduced bills to ban ghost jobs. While the Kentucky bill failed to gain traction, the California bill is currently under committee review. Roughly one in five listings posted on Greenhouse is a ghost job, according to December 2024 analysis. In Canada, roughly 14 per cent of job listings in the second quarter of 2025 fell into that category. Ms Fike said that ghosting is often a symptom of overwhelmed, understaffed recruiting teams. Many companies have downsized these teams in recent years, she said, leaving candidates in the dark. The prevalence of ghosting adds to a widespread disillusionment with the job search process, particularly among younger candidates, and that has led lawmakers to push for change. Mr Eric Thompson, 53, co-founded an advocacy group pushing for federal legislation after noticing how many friends were confronted with the same wall of silence after applying for jobs. Since he was laid off from a cyber-security start-up nine months ago, he has submitted – and meticulously tracked – more than 3,000 job applications. Of those, just five led to interviews and only 167 led to any sort of response, he said. 'If I'm applying for 40 jobs a week and half of them are ghosts, then I've wasted 20 hours of work a week,' Mr Thompson said. BLOOMBERG

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store