In Canada, ghosting job candidates could cost a company as much as $94,000
Similar legislation is currently under consideration in the Unite States, where almost two-thirds of job applicants have reported receiving no response after an interview.
NEW YORK – After a job interview, many candidates never hear back about whether they got the job. Now, lawmakers in Ontario, Canada, are stepping in to stop that.
Starting Jan 1, companies in Ontario with at least 25 employees will have to inform candidates about their application status within 45 days of a job interview. Employers also will have to disclose whether a vacancy is actively being filled and whether artificial intelligence is being used to screen and select candidates.
Ontario's Labour Minister David Piccini told the Toronto Star in 2024, when the legislation was first introduced, that it is simply common courtesy to let applicants know when they do not get the job.
Employers who fail to comply may be fined as much as C$100,000 (S$94,000), according to Mr Daryn Jeffries, an employment lawyer in Toronto, though first offences probably will result in warnings or lower fines.
The move is part of a broader push to bring transparency to a hiring process many applicants say is broken – and one that may reshape how companies advertise jobs, manage candidate pipelines and use AI. Some employers warn the regulatory burden will increase costs.
Almost two-thirds of job applicants in the United States have reported receiving no response after an interview, according to a July workplace report by hiring platform Greenhouse. And 27 per cent said they never heard back after a final-round interview.
Similar legislation is currently under consideration in the US. A proposal in the New Jersey state legislature would fine employers up to US$5,000 (S$6,500) for repeatedly failing to give interviewed candidates a clear decision timeline. They also would have to remove job listings within two weeks of filling the role and disclose when they post ads for roles that do not exist, often referred to as a 'ghost job'.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
World Trump modifies reciprocal tariffs ahead of deadline; rate on Singapore likely to remain at 10%
Singapore 'For one last time, let's go home': Tears, laughs as last scheduled Jetstar Asia flight touches down
Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO
Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights
Business More new homes are coming up in northern Singapore
Business OCBC Q2 profit drops 7% to $1.82b as interest rates fall, to pay lower interim dividend
Asia Thailand seeks neutral venue for border talks with Cambodia
Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family'
Companies often keep such listings to maintain a steady candidate pool for times they need to hire quickly, said human resources consultant Anessa Fike.
State lawmakers in Kentucky and California have introduced bills to ban ghost jobs. While the Kentucky bill failed to gain traction, the California bill is currently under committee review.
Roughly one in five listings posted on Greenhouse is a ghost job, according to December 2024 analysis. In Canada, roughly 14 per cent of job listings in the second quarter of 2025 fell into that category.
Ms Fike said that ghosting is often a symptom of overwhelmed, understaffed recruiting teams. Many companies have downsized these teams in recent years, she said, leaving candidates in the dark.
The prevalence of ghosting adds to a widespread disillusionment with the job search process, particularly among younger candidates, and that has led lawmakers to push for change.
Mr Eric Thompson, 53, co-founded an advocacy group pushing for federal legislation after noticing how many friends were confronted with the same wall of silence after applying for jobs.
Since he was laid off from a cyber-security start-up nine months ago, he has submitted – and meticulously tracked – more than 3,000 job applications. Of those, just five led to interviews and only 167 led to any sort of response, he said.
'If I'm applying for 40 jobs a week and half of them are ghosts, then I've wasted 20 hours of work a week,' Mr Thompson said. BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
29 minutes ago
- Straits Times
White House readies order to fine banks for dropping customers for political reasons, WSJ reports
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The order directs bank regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions might have violated the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The White House is preparing an executive order that would fine banks for dropping customers for political reasons, the Wall Street Journal reported on Aug 4. The order directs bank regulators to investigate whether any financial institutions might have violated the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, antitrust laws or consumer financial protection laws, the Journal reported citing a draft text of the order. The order, which could be signed as early as this week, provides for monetary penalties, consent decrees or other disciplinary measures against violators, the report added. The order also directs regulators to strike policies they have that might have contributed to banks dropping certain customers and requires the Small Business Administration to review the practices of banks that guarantee the agency's loans, the Journal said. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The White House did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. REUTERS
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Australia to buy 11 advanced warships from Japan: Defence minister
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox SYDNEY - Australia will upgrade its navy with 11 Mogami-class frigates built by Japan's Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Defence Minister Richard Marles said on Aug 5. Australia announced a major restructuring of its military in 2023, turning towards long-range strike capabilities to better respond to China's naval might. It is striving to expand its fleet of major warships from 11 to 26 over the next 10 years. 'This is clearly the biggest defence-industry agreement that has ever been struck between Japan and Australia,' he said, touting the US$6 billion (S$7.7 billion) deal. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries was awarded the tender over Germany's ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems. 'This decision was made based on what was the best capability for Australia,' Mr Marles said. 'We do have a very close strategic alignment with Japan.' Mogami-class warships are advanced stealth frigates equipped with a potent array of weapons. Mr Marles said they would replace Australia's ageing fleet of Anzac-class vessels, with the first Mogami-class ship to be in service by 2030. 'The Mogami-class frigate is the best frigate for Australia,' he said. 'It is a next-generation vessel. It is stealthy. It has 32 vertical launch cells capable of launching long-range missiles.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore launches review of economic strategy to stay ahead of global shifts Singapore A look at the five committees reviewing Singapore's economic strategy Opinion Keeping it alive: How Chinese opera in Singapore is adapting to the age of TikTok Life Glamping in Mandai: Is a luxury stay at Colugo Camp worth the $550 price tag? Sport World Aquatics C'ships in S'pore deemed a success by athletes, fans and officials Singapore Strong S'pore-Australia ties underpinned by bonds that are continually renewed: President Tharman World Trump says he will 'substantially' raise tariffs on India over Russian oil purchases Defence industry minister Pat Conroy said the frigates were capable of launching long-range Tomahawk cruise missiles. 'More lethal' 'The acquisition of these stealth frigates will make our navy a bigger navy, and a more lethal navy,' he said. The first three Mogami-class frigates will be built overseas, Mr Conroy said, with shipbuilding yards in Western Australia expected to produce the rest. Australia announced plans in 2021 to acquire US-designed nuclear-powered submarines, scrapping a years-long plan to develop non-nuclear subs from France. Under the tripartite Aukus pact with the United States and the United Kingdom, the Australian navy plans to acquire at least three Virginia-class submarines within 15 years. The Aukus submarine programme alone could cost the country up to US$235 billion over the next 30 years, according to Australian government forecasts, a price tag that has stoked criticism of the strategy. Major defence projects in Australia have long suffered from cost over-runs, government U-turns, policy changes and project plans that make more sense for local job creation than defence. Australia plans to gradually increase its defence spending to 2.4 per cent of gross domestic product – above the 2 per cent target set by its Nato allies, but well short of US demands for 3.5 per cent. AFP
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
What's it like to deal with brutal US tariffs? Ask Malaysia
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The upheaval has been a wake-up call for Malaysia, a nation of more than 35 million people that is rethinking how to power its future economic growth. KUALA LUMPUR – It's become a familiar strategy in South-east Asia. Companies from China, coveting the American market but blocked by tariffs, do an end run. They pour into a country, opening factories and filling supply chains. They invest billions of dollars and create jobs and business opportunities. The local economy prospers. President Donald Trump wants to stop that trade. On Aug 1 he unveiled a new layer of tariffs – set at a global rate of 40 per cent – on all goods that move through a third country before they get to the United States. The tariffs are aimed at stopping transshipment, a practice the administration says has allowed Chinese-made goods to skirt punitive tariffs. The policy landed with a thunderbolt in South-east Asia, where Chinese investment has helped the economies of poorer neighbors grow more quickly. A crackdown on transshipment will be an economic blow. It also complicates the supply chain in South-east Asia, which depends heavily on Chinese raw materials and components. From Vietnam to Cambodia to Indonesia, officials and executives are rushing to assess the consequences. The new tariffs raise hard questions for countries that have long used Chinese components to make the final products they ship to the United States. Does the Trump administration, which has yet to detail how it would enforce the new transshipment tariffs, want to tax it all? One country offers a case study others could follow for what to do next: Malaysia. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore launches review of economic strategy to stay ahead of global shifts Singapore A look at the five committees reviewing Singapore's economic strategy Opinion Keeping it alive: How Chinese opera in Singapore is adapting to the age of TikTok Life Glamping in Mandai: Is a luxury stay at Colugo Camp worth the $550 price tag? Sport World Aquatics C'ships in S'pore deemed a success by athletes, fans and officials Singapore Strong S'pore-Australia ties underpinned by bonds that are continually renewed: President Tharman World Trump says he will 'substantially' raise tariffs on India over Russian oil purchases Over the past decade, Malaysia rose to become one of the world's biggest makers of solar panels. Ten companies, most of them Chinese, shoveled US$15 billion (S$19.3 billion) into factories around the country, creating tens of thousands of jobs. Then, under President Joe Biden, the United States put tariffs on solar equipment coming from Malaysia of as much as 250 per cent. Today, just two solar panel makers remain and one of them has ceased much of its production. The upheaval has been a wake-up call for Malaysia, a nation of more than 35 million people that is rethinking how to power its future economic growth. 'We're trying to think about ourselves not just as recipients of investment, but actually creators of technology,' said Mr Liew Chin Tong, the deputy minister of investment, trade and industry. 'We want to think of ourselves not as a production site, but also as a consumer site with a sizable middle class.' Officials in Malaysia, who had been trying to work out a trade deal, had said they were ready to work with the Trump administration to stop companies from passing off Chinese-made goods as their own. But they learned on Aug 1 they would be hit with a base tariff of 19 per cent. An additional 40 per cent would be added for any goods deemed to have originated in China. Those are set to take effect this week. The country finds itself caught squarely between the United States and China. Malaysia believes that Chinese solar companies can play an important role in its attempts to increase renewable power sources. Its goal over the next five years is for half the country's energy consumption to use clean sources like solar power. Warehouses are stuffed with solar equipment that can no longer be exported to the United States, and the government wants companies to sell it to local solar farms. One challenge for Malaysia is that it still needs China's solar industry on its side. More than 75 per cent of the solar panels that Malaysia uses locally are imported from China, where prices are much cheaper because of Beijing's industrial policies that encourage exports. Longer term, Malaysia wants the Chinese companies to restart their mothballed factories to make solar panels for the domestic market. More than any other region, South-east Asia has felt the brunt of the trade war between the United States and China that began in earnest during Mr Trump's first presidency. South-east Asian countries profited as Chinese and global multinationals relocated their factories out of China to avoid Mr Trump's first-term tariffs. For Malaysia, the aim now is to blunt the collateral damage from the battle between the world's two largest economies. 'I don't like to see us just having to choose between US and China,' said Mr Liew, adding 'I want to see us strengthening ourselves.' Both superpowers have loomed large in Malaysia. American tech companies Nvidia, Intel and Texas Instruments built huge facilities to make semiconductors, seeing the country as a good location to hedge against the risks of doing business in China. Over five decades, more than 600 American companies have invested in Malaysia, said Ms Siobhan Das , CEO of the American Malaysian Chamber of Commerce. Chinese investment, meanwhile, has shaped Malaysia's manufacturing sector, and China has ranked as one of the top investors in the country for the past decade. Malaysia's imports from China have nearly doubled over the past decade, according to Mr Lee Heng Guie , executive director of the Socio-Economic Research Center, a Malaysian think tank. It was also about a decade ago when Chinese solar companies began to invest in factories in Malaysia. The factories made everything for export to the United States and other major markets like Europe. 'We knew we could not compete with the Chinese companies in the long run,' said Ms Lisa Ong, CEO at Malaysian Solar Resources, a solar company that shut its panel production facilities in 2013. After six years, the company found it was being outperformed on price and production capacity. Today it has switched its focus to building solar farms and importing panels from China. After the Biden administration initiated an investigation into unfair practices by Chinese solar companies in Malaysia, Cambodia, Vietnam and Thailand, Chinese companies began to slow some of their operations. The investigation led to steep tariffs on a handful of Chinese solar companies operating in these countries, and prompted most of them to abandon their factories in Malaysia. The only Chinese company still making some solar panels in Malaysia is Longi, an industry giant. When it opened its third Malaysian factory on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur in 2023, it heralded the opening as a 'pivotal moment in Longi's global endeavors'. Its executives boasted of creating 900 jobs and promised to increase the openings to 2,000. Instead of expanding, Longi has shut down several production lines at the facility. Today, much of the space at Longi's plant is unused. On one weekday in July , the parking lot was less than half full. Longi declined to comment for this article. Longi has met with Malaysian officials to discuss how to support more of the local supply chain, according to Mr Justin Sim , the president of the Malaysian Photovoltaic and Sustainable Energy Industry Association. He is pressing the government to rebuild a domestic solar panel industry by harnessing the knowledge of Chinese companies like Longi. 'All the Chinese companies came here when there was not really any capacity or interest in building the local market,' Mr Sim said. 'And then they all went bust or left because they were hit with tariffs from the US and Europe.' Ms Ong of Malaysian Solar Resources said she would not rule out her company going back to solar panel manufacturing, especially after the Chinese government announced plans to scale back subsidies to companies. Still, she is hesitant, citing the intense competitiveness of Chinese firms. 'I'm worried and a bit concerned about our future,' she said. 'Many Chinese nationals are migrating to Malaysia and they are a lot more industrious than many of us.' NYTIMES
