logo
What's it like to deal with brutal US tariffs? Ask Malaysia

What's it like to deal with brutal US tariffs? Ask Malaysia

Straits Times14 hours ago
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
The upheaval has been a wake-up call for Malaysia, a nation of more than 35 million people that is rethinking how to power its future economic growth.
KUALA LUMPUR – It's become a familiar strategy in South-east Asia. Companies from China, coveting the American market but blocked by tariffs, do an end run.
They pour into a country, opening factories and filling supply chains. They invest billions of dollars and create jobs and business opportunities. The local economy prospers.
President Donald Trump wants to stop that trade. On Aug 1 he unveiled a new layer of tariffs – set at a global rate of 40 per cent – on all goods that move through a third country before they get to the United States. The tariffs are aimed at stopping transshipment, a practice the administration says has allowed Chinese-made goods to skirt punitive tariffs.
The policy landed with a thunderbolt in South-east Asia, where Chinese investment has helped the economies of poorer neighbors grow more quickly. A crackdown on transshipment will be an economic blow.
It also complicates the supply chain in South-east Asia, which depends heavily on Chinese raw materials and components. From Vietnam to Cambodia to Indonesia, officials and executives are rushing to assess the consequences.
The new tariffs raise hard questions for countries that have long used Chinese components to make the final products they ship to the United States. Does the Trump administration, which has yet to detail how it would enforce the new transshipment tariffs, want to tax it all?
One country offers a case study others could follow for what to do next: Malaysia.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Singapore launches review of economic strategy to stay ahead of global shifts
Singapore A look at the five committees reviewing Singapore's economic strategy
Opinion Keeping it alive: How Chinese opera in Singapore is adapting to the age of TikTok
Life Glamping in Mandai: Is a luxury stay at Colugo Camp worth the $550 price tag?
Sport World Aquatics C'ships in S'pore deemed a success by athletes, fans and officials
Singapore Strong S'pore-Australia ties underpinned by bonds that are continually renewed: President Tharman
World Trump says he will 'substantially' raise tariffs on India over Russian oil purchases
Over the past decade, Malaysia rose to become one of the world's biggest makers of solar panels. Ten companies, most of them Chinese, shoveled US$15 billion (S$19.3 billion) into factories around the country, creating tens of thousands of jobs.
Then, under President Joe Biden, the United States put tariffs on solar equipment coming from Malaysia of as much as 250 per cent. Today, just two solar panel makers remain and one of them has ceased much of its production.
The upheaval has been a wake-up call for Malaysia, a nation of more than 35 million people that is rethinking how to power its future economic growth.
'We're trying to think about ourselves not just as recipients of investment, but actually creators of technology,' said Mr Liew Chin Tong, the deputy minister of investment, trade and industry.
'We want to think of ourselves not as a production site, but also as a consumer site with a sizable middle class.'
Officials in Malaysia, who had been trying to work out a trade deal, had said they were ready to work with the Trump administration to stop companies from passing off Chinese-made goods as their own.
But they learned on Aug 1 they would be hit with a base tariff of 19 per cent. An additional 40 per cent would be added for any goods deemed to have originated in China. Those are set to take effect this week.
The country finds itself caught squarely between the United States and China.
Malaysia believes that Chinese solar companies can play an important role in its attempts to increase renewable power sources. Its goal over the next five years is for half the country's energy consumption to use clean sources like solar power.
Warehouses are stuffed with solar equipment that can no longer be exported to the United States, and the government wants companies to sell it to local solar farms.
One challenge for Malaysia is that it still needs China's solar industry on its side. More than 75 per cent of the solar panels that Malaysia uses locally are imported from China, where prices are much cheaper because of Beijing's industrial policies that encourage exports.
Longer term, Malaysia wants the Chinese companies to restart their mothballed factories to make solar panels for the domestic market.
More than any other region, South-east Asia has felt the brunt of the trade war between the United States and China that began in earnest during Mr Trump's first presidency.
South-east Asian countries profited as Chinese and global multinationals relocated their factories out of China to avoid Mr Trump's first-term tariffs.
For Malaysia, the aim now is to blunt the collateral damage from the battle between the world's two largest economies.
'I don't like to see us just having to choose between US and China,' said Mr Liew, adding 'I want to see us strengthening ourselves.'
Both superpowers have loomed large in Malaysia. American tech companies Nvidia, Intel and Texas Instruments built huge facilities to make semiconductors, seeing the country as a good location to hedge against the risks of doing business in China.
Over five decades, more than 600 American companies have invested in Malaysia, said Ms Siobhan Das , CEO of the American Malaysian Chamber of Commerce.
Chinese investment, meanwhile, has shaped Malaysia's manufacturing sector, and China has ranked as one of the top investors in the country for the past decade.
Malaysia's imports from China have nearly doubled over the past decade, according to Mr Lee Heng Guie , executive director of the Socio-Economic Research Center, a Malaysian think tank.
It was also about a decade ago when Chinese solar companies began to invest in factories in Malaysia. The factories made everything for export to the United States and other major markets like Europe.
'We knew we could not compete with the Chinese companies in the long run,' said Ms Lisa Ong, CEO at Malaysian Solar Resources, a solar company that shut its panel production facilities in 2013.
After six years, the company found it was being outperformed on price and production capacity. Today it has switched its focus to building solar farms and importing panels from China.
After the Biden administration initiated an investigation into unfair practices by Chinese solar companies in Malaysia, Cambodia, Vietnam and Thailand, Chinese companies began to slow some of their operations.
The investigation led to steep tariffs on a handful of Chinese solar companies operating in these countries, and prompted most of them to abandon their factories in Malaysia.
The only Chinese company still making some solar panels in Malaysia is Longi, an industry giant. When it opened its third Malaysian factory on the outskirts of Kuala Lumpur in 2023, it heralded the opening as a 'pivotal moment in Longi's global endeavors'. Its executives boasted of creating 900 jobs and promised to increase the openings to 2,000.
Instead of expanding, Longi has shut down several production lines at the facility. Today, much of the space at Longi's plant is unused. On one weekday in July , the parking lot was less than half full. Longi declined to comment for this article.
Longi has met with Malaysian officials to discuss how to support more of the local supply chain, according to Mr Justin Sim , the president of the Malaysian Photovoltaic and Sustainable Energy Industry Association.
He is pressing the government to rebuild a domestic solar panel industry by harnessing the knowledge of Chinese companies like Longi.
'All the Chinese companies came here when there was not really any capacity or interest in building the local market,' Mr Sim said. 'And then they all went bust or left because they were hit with tariffs from the US and Europe.'
Ms Ong of Malaysian Solar Resources said she would not rule out her company going back to solar panel manufacturing, especially after the Chinese government announced plans to scale back subsidies to companies. Still, she is hesitant, citing the intense competitiveness of Chinese firms.
'I'm worried and a bit concerned about our future,' she said. 'Many Chinese nationals are migrating to Malaysia and they are a lot more industrious than many of us.' NYTIMES
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thailand's monitor lizards tipped as next big ‘economic animal' in luxury leather
Thailand's monitor lizards tipped as next big ‘economic animal' in luxury leather

Straits Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Thailand's monitor lizards tipped as next big ‘economic animal' in luxury leather

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The Thai government has moved to allow the commercial breeding of the reptiles, which are native to the region. BANGKOK - Thailand's Asian water monitors are being championed as a new 'economic animal', poised to enter the lucrative 7.6 billion baht (S$302 million) leather market. The move follows a government decision that allows for the commercial breeding of the reptiles, which are native to the region. The Kasikorn Research Centre reports that the government's Wildlife Preservation and Protection Committee has approved a scheme for licensed individuals to breed the monitors, with breeding pairs costing just 500 baht each from the Department of National Parks. This initiative aims to unlock the commercial potential of the animals in three key areas: leather, medicinal products, and meat. The monitor lizard's hide is expected to command a higher price than traditional cow or buffalo leather, with a single square metre fetching between 4,200 and 14,000 baht. This could significantly boost Thailand's processed leather export market, which was valued at around 7.5 billion baht in 2024. A major selling point for the new industry is the monitor lizard's environmental credentials. Unlike cattle and buffalo, these reptiles do not produce methane gas during digestion. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Asia Philippines, India shore up ties amid China tensions, US tariff risks Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan Singapore Beauty industry consumers hit by 464% rise in prepayment losses in first half of 2025 Singapore Over 5,900 vape products found in car at Woodlands Checkpoint Singapore 13 taken to hospital after accident involving SBS buses, car in Tampines This difference could reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 3.4 million tonnes per animal per year, potentially giving monitor lizard leather a significantly lower carbon footprint than other animal hides. The report also highlights the varied international regulations surrounding the trade of monitor lizards and their products:

BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news
BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news

Straits Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The two-door electric cars that launched the BlueSG car-sharing service in 2017 are no longer in production. SINGAPORE – The need for a robust software to power the service and for better vehicles has been cited by former BlueSG insiders as two possible reasons behind the electric car-sharing service winding down operations on Aug 8 and relaunching in 2026. BlueSG said it was doing so to upgrade its platform, which includes enhanced technology and a refreshed fleet, to make the service more reliable and efficient. The software manages the vehicle fleet, works with the user database and handles payments. BlueSG switched to its current software in late 2023 from another one that was used before the car-sharing service was sold in 2021 to Goldbell, a Singapore-owned company known for commercial and industrial vehicle leasing. This was because the rights to use the previous software expired, Mr Ng Lee Kwang, a BlueSG board director between 2021 and 2023, told The Straits Times. The new software drew user complaints on issues such as car bookings and payments. Mr Franck Vitte, who founded BlueSG in 2017 and served as its managing director until October 2021, when it was sold, told ST on Aug 5 that the software needed by the car-sharing service is complex to develop and difficult to run reliably. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Asia Philippines, India shore up ties amid China tensions, US tariff risks Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan Singapore Beauty industry consumers hit by 464% rise in prepayment losses in first half of 2025 Singapore Over 5,900 vape products found in car at Woodlands Checkpoint Singapore 13 taken to hospital after accident involving SBS buses, car in Tampines He said that while it is possible to continue the service and make the switch to a new software platform when it is ready, the company's decision to take a pause in this way would allow it to focus on developing the planned changes and not be distracted by correcting bugs. He also suspects that the developers may have realised that a thorough rework of the foundations, rather than patching fixes to the software, is needed to ensure that the system will operate smoothly. Even though there are ready-made, off-the-shelf software solutions, adapting them to the specific requirement of BlueSG will take a lot of work, Mr Vitte said. This includes handling Electronic Road Pricing (ERP) charges, parking fee payments and having access to the call centre from the smartphone app. The two-door electric cars that launched the BlueSG car-sharing service in 2017 are no longer in production and some of the replacement parts are difficult to source. Mr Ng said there is a need for newer electric cars that can be charged up faster and have longer operating range, so that the cars can be used more frequently to generate more revenue and boost profitability. This comes as BlueSG posted a net loss of $31.1 million between January 2023 and March 2024, based on its latest publicly available financial statements. This is more than two times the $11.4 million net loss the company incurred in the financial year ended December 2022, according to statements filed with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority. The company attributed the losses to the heavy investments made over the years, which were part of its strategy to achieve its growth plans. It is a marked change of fortune for the firm, which had posted a $1.8 million profit in the financial year ended December 2021. BlueSG is Singapore's first electric-only car-sharing service. Its launch in 2017 was supported by the Land Transport Authority and the Economic Development Board. The car-sharing service has two types of electric vehicles in its fleet: a compact two-door hatchback, a specially built model for BlueSG that entered service in 2017, and the Opel Corsa-e, a larger, four-door hatchback, which was introduced in 2022. BlueSG's revenue leapt to $21.1 million in 2021, from $14.3 million in 2020. Revenue continued to rise steadily to $23 million for the 12 months ended December 2022, and to $24.6 million in the January 2023 to March 2024 period. No financial statement was filed for the 2023 financial year. Responding to ST's queries, BlueSG chief executive Keith Kee said the figures must be viewed in the context of the company's 'deliberate, front-loaded investment strategy'. He added that the company has invested about $70 million over the past years in building up BlueSG. 'We committed to scaling the business in a way that it would support long-term growth, and made a conscious decision to invest ahead of the curve, fully aware that it required upfront capital commitment,' said Mr Kee. In its 2021 announcement about its plans for BlueSG, Goldbell said it planned to invest more than $70 million over five years to grow the car-sharing service's fleet and back-end technologies to boost operational efficiencies and customer experience. Goldbell also aspired to take BlueSG to other cities in the Asia-Pacific. The car-sharing company said its relaunch in 2026 will see an upgraded platform, a refreshed car fleet and more locations for users to rent and return cars. The company is also laying off an undisclosed number of staff. The latest available financial statement, which is for the January 2023 to March 2024 period, showed that BlueSG's costs came to $40.3 million – 46 per cent more than the $27.6 million incurred in the January to December 2022 period. This was due to factors such as the cost of insurance, maintenance and storage of its electric vehicle fleet, which came up to a combined $9.3 million, 42.9 per cent more than 2022's figure of $6.5 million. BlueSG said it has a fleet of 'almost 1,000 electric vehicles' and more than 1,500 charging points. Since it was acquired by Goldbell, its subscriber base has grown from 140,000 to more than 250,000, but it declined to say how many users are active. BlueSG is unique among car-sharing services in Singapore because the hired car does not have to be returned to the same location from where the vehicle was rented out. Using the service involves signing up as a member and booking a car over a smartphone app. The app also unlocks and starts the car. The service is charged on a per-minute basis, instead of larger 30-minute or hourly blocks, which are more common.

Putin doubts potency of Trump's ultimatum to end the war, sources say
Putin doubts potency of Trump's ultimatum to end the war, sources say

Straits Times

time5 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Putin doubts potency of Trump's ultimatum to end the war, sources say

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Mr Trump, who in the past has praised Mr Putin, has lately expressed growing impatience with the Russian president. MOSCOW - Russian President Vladimir Putin is unlikely to bow to a sanctions ultimatum expiring on Aug 8 from US President Donald Trump, and retains the goal of capturing four regions of Ukraine in their entirety, sources close to the Kremlin told Reuters. Mr Trump has threatened to hit Russia with new sanctions and impose 100 per cent tariffs on countries that buy its oil - of which the biggest are China and India - unless Mr Putin agrees to a ceasefire in Russia's war in Ukraine. Mr Putin's determination to keep going is prompted by his belief that Russia is winning and by scepticism that yet more US sanctions will have much of an impact after successive waves of economic penalties during 3-1/2 years of war, according to three sources familiar with discussions in the Kremlin. The Russian leader does not want to anger Mr Trump, and he realises that he may be spurning a chance to improve relations with Washington and the West, but his war goals take precedence, two of the sources said. Mr Putin's goal is to fully capture the Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, which Russia has claimed as its own, and then to talk about a peace agreement, one of the sources said. 'If Putin were able to fully occupy those four regions which he has claimed for Russia he could claim that his war in Ukraine had reached his objectives,' said Mr James Rodgers, author of the forthcoming book 'The Return of Russia'. The current talks process, in which Russian and Ukrainian negotiators have met three times since May, was an attempt by Moscow to convince Mr Trump that Mr Putin was not rejecting peace, the first source said, adding that the talks were devoid of real substance apart from discussions on humanitarian exchanges. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels Asia Philippines, India shore up ties amid China tensions, US tariff risks Singapore 'She had a whole life ahead of her': Boyfriend mourns Yishun fatal crash victim Singapore Doctor hounded ex-girlfriend, threatened to share her intimate photos, abducted her off street Asia Trump's transactional foreign policy fuels 'US scepticism' in Taiwan Singapore Beauty industry consumers hit by 464% rise in prepayment losses in first half of 2025 Singapore Over 5,900 vape products found in car at Woodlands Checkpoint Singapore 13 taken to hospital after accident involving SBS buses, car in Tampines Russia says it is serious about agreeing a long-term peace in the negotiations but that the process is complicated because the two sides' stances are so far apart. Mr Putin last week described the talks as positive. Moscow's stated demands include a full Ukrainian withdrawal from the four regions and acceptance by Kyiv of neutral status and limits on the size of its military – demands rejected by Ukraine. In a sign that there may yet be an opportunity to strike a deal before the deadline, Mr Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to visit Russia this week, following an escalation in rhetoric between Mr Trump and Moscow over risks of nuclear war. On Aug 4, Russia said it was no longer bound by a moratorium on short- and medium-range nuclear missiles. The Kremlin did not respond to a request for comment for this story. All the sources spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation. Mr Trump, who in the past has praised Mr Putin and held out the prospect of lucrative business deals between their two countries, has lately expressed growing impatience with the Russian president. He has complained about what he called Mr Putin's 'bullshit' and described Russia's relentless bombing of Kyiv and other Ukrainian cities as 'disgusting'. The Kremlin has said it noted Mr Trump's statements but it has declined to respond to them. Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko last week called on the world to respond with 'maximum pressure' after the worst Russian air strike of the year killed 31 people in Kyiv , including five children, in what she called Russia's response to Mr Trump's deadline. 'President Trump wants to stop the killing, which is why he is selling American-made weapons to Nato members and threatening Putin with biting tariffs and sanctions if he does not agree to a ceasefire,' White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in response to a request for comment. Forces advance The first source said Mr Putin was privately concerned about the recent deterioration of US ties. Mr Putin still retains the hope that Russia can again befriend America and trade with the West, and 'he is worried' about Mr Trump's irritation, this person said. But with Moscow's forces advancing on the battlefield and Ukraine under heavy military pressure, Mr Putin does not believe now is the time to end the war, the source said, adding that neither the Russian people nor the army would understand if he stops now. Mr Rodgers, the author, said Mr Putin has invested his political reputation and legacy in the war in Ukraine. 'We know from his previous writings and statements that he sees himself as part of a strong tradition of standing up to the West and the rest of world to defend Russia's interests,' he said. The Kremlin leader values the relationship with Mr Trump and does not want to anger him, however, 'he simply has a top priority - Putin cannot afford to end the war just because Trump wants it,' the second Russian source said. A third person familiar with Kremlin thinking also said Russia wanted to take all four regions and did not see the logic in stopping at a time of battlefield gains during Russia's summer offensive. Ukraine has suffered some of its biggest territorial losses of 2025 in the past three months, including 502sq km in July, according to Black Bird Group, a Finland-based military analysis centre. In total, Russia has occupied around a fifth of Ukraine. Russia's military General Staff has told Mr Putin that the Ukrainian front will crumble in two or three months, the first person said. However, Russia's recent gains remain relatively minor in purely territorial terms, with only 5,000sq km of Ukraine taken since the start of 2024, less than 1 per cent of the country's overall territory, according to a June report from the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank. Ukrainian and Western military sources, acknowledge that Russia is making gains, but only gradually and with heavy casualties. Russian war bloggers say Moscow's forces have been bogged down during its current summer offensive in areas where the terrain and dense urban landscape favoured Ukraine, but assess that other areas should be faster to take. 'He's made threats before' Mr Trump's sanctions threat was 'painful and unpleasant,' but not a catastrophe, the second source said. The third source said there was a feeling in Moscow that 'there's not much more that they can do to us'. It was also not clear if Mr Trump would follow through on his ultimatum, this person said, adding that 'he's made threats before' and then not acted, or changed his mind. The source also said it was hard to imagine that China would stop buying Russian oil on instructions from Mr Trump, and that his actions risked backfiring by driving oil prices higher. As a consequence of previous rounds of sanctions, Russian oil and gas exporters have taken big hits to their revenues, and foreign direct investment in the country fell by 63 per cent in 2024, according to UN trade data. Around US$300 billion (S$386.72 billion) of central bank assets have been frozen in foreign jurisdictions. But Russia's ability to wage war has been unimpeded, thanks in part to ammunition supplies from North Korea and imports from China of dual-use components that have sustained a massive rise in weapons production. The Kremlin has repeatedly said that Russia has some 'immunity' to sanctions. Mr Trump has acknowledged Russia's skill in skirting the measures. 'They're wily characters and they're pretty good at avoiding sanctions, so we'll see what happens,' he told reporters at the weekend, when asked what his response would be if Russia did not agree to a ceasefire. The first Russian source noted that Mr Putin, in pursuing the conflict, was turning his back on a US offer made in March that Washington, in return for his agreement to a full ceasefire, would remove US sanctions, recognise Russian possession of Crimea - annexed from Ukraine in 2014 - and acknowledge de facto Russian control of the territory captured by its forces since 2022. The source called the offer a 'fantastic chance,' but said stopping a war was much more difficult than starting it. REUTERS

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store