High-street slot machines reap record takings as councils call for power to curb spread
Overall, betting and gaming revenues – excluding the National Lottery – reached £11.5bn in the year to March 2024, a 3.5% annual increase and the highest figure on record, according to statistics from the Gambling Commission that corrected previous figures.
Of these, so-called adult gaming centres (AGCs) – high street slot machine arcades –grew takings by 11% to £623m thanks to a flurry of new openings by the sector's major players, Merkur and Admiral.
AGCs are disproportionately located in the poorest areas and offer some of the most addictive machines, according to several studies.
The shops, the majority of which now offer 24-hour play, have come under increased scrutiny following high-profile instances of vulnerable people being exploited.
A Guardian investigation revealed how AGC operators have exploited planning and licensing loopholes and deployed aggressive tactics to flood UK high streets with 24 hour slots venues.
Expansion by firms such as Merkur and Admiral helped boost the number of slot machines on British high streets by 7% to 74,523 – an all-time high since the Commission started recording the figures in 2008.
Of that total, takings from B3 machines, which offer a £2 spin every 2.5 seconds with a maximum jackpot of £500, jumped by the most, up by nearly 16% to £463m.
Each of the 14,155 B3 machines in Great Britain now takes an average of more than £32,700 a year, similar to the UK average salary.
The government recently put on hold plans to allow AGCs to install more of the B3 machines.
But a group of Labour MPs, including Dawn Butler, Beccy Cooper, Andrew Pakes and Sarah Coombes, as well as Greater Manchester's mayor, Andy Burnham, want the government to go further by making it easier for local authorities to stop new AGCs from opening or obtaining 24-hour licences.
'These are high-stakes gambling venues, often open around the clock, targeting some of the most vulnerable in our communities,' said Burnham.
'It's unacceptable that councils have so little power to regulate them despite repeated concerns from charities and local residents.'
Burnham is working with a group of more than 30 local authorities, led by Brent council, that want to overturn the 'aim to permit' rule, a hangover from the 2005 Gambling Act that means licensing authorities have to lean towards allowing new gambling venues to open.
In practice, this means operators are very likely to win licensing battles with local authorities, even in the face of vehement local opposition.
Cooper, a Labour MP and public health consultant, said there was an 'urgent need for powers to help local authorities limit gambling premises'.
Joseph Cullis, president of Bacta, the AGC trade body, said scrapping the rule 'would create legal uncertainty and put legitimate local businesses at risk', adding that it didn't mean automatic approval.
Earlier this year, the Guardian highlighted the concentration of 24-hour venues in Peterborough. Pakes, the MP for the city, said: 'There's nothing more symbolic of the decline of the high street than the rapid uncontrolled growth of AGCs.
'How do local communities get control over high streets and stop that uncontrolled growth? Part of that is getting planning and licensing reforms.'
Cullis said Bacta's members offered 'safe, low-stake entertainment in well-regulated, supervised, alcohol-free environments'.
He added: 'These Gambling Commission figures reflect the ongoing recovery of our sector following the pandemic, market realignment after B2 [fixed odds betting terminal] machine stake changes, and the continued investment our members are making in venues, staff and safer gambling measures.'
A white paper on devolution in England contains proposals that would allow councils more leeway against the 'aim to permit' rule, allowing them to 'complement […] existing powers in relation to gambling outlets to refuse or place conditions on premises' licences'.
It states: 'The government's view is that councillors, working with local people, need to be able to tackle and address these priorities.'
However, this would only apply to England and campaigners fear the proposal might not make it into the final legislation.
The Gambling Commission figures also revealed an increase of £345m in the amount of money lost to online slot machines, with the rise of 11% also outstripping the broader sector and delivering an all-time high of £3.56bn.
Both online and land-based slot machines consistently rank among the most addictive gambling products, according to multiple studies.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Rutland County Council leader survives no confidence vote
The leader of Rutland County Council has survived a confidence vote held during a special meeting of the Waller, a Liberal Democrat who has led the council since elections in 2023, was the subject of a vote of no confidence brought by the Conservative vote came amid an uncertain future for the authority, with upcoming local government changes potentially threatening its existence.A total of eight councillors voted in favour of the motion of no confidence at Tuesday's meeting, while 14 voted against and two members abstained. 'Continuity and stability' An overhaul of local government proposed by Labour could see smaller district councils merged with county councils to create single bodies, known as unitary authorities, representing populations of about 500, only has a population of about 40,000, meaning it could lose its independent status if the changes are issue has been the subject of a number of public meetings, some arranged by Rutland and Stamford's Conservative MP Alicia told the meeting she is in "further discussions" with neighbouring councils about what their plans are and how it would affect Rutland. County councillor Lucy Stephenson, who brought the no-confidence motion, said she and her colleagues were "using our constitutional rights to speak out".She said Waller "has persisted in her position" without consulting constituents, and called for Rutland residents to have a say in the county's future."Local government reorganisation will impact how our services are designed and delivered," she said."The independence of Rutland could be lost - it must not be confused with devolution."As well as discussing the future of the county, councillors clashed over how they felt the leader was running denied ignoring residents, but said the decision on the county's future was out of their hands, and said she had to base her actions on advice from council defended her record, claiming her Lib Dem-led administration had improved the authority's finances to a point where they may be able to freeze council tax for the first time in a told the meeting residents would be best served by her remaining in position."Negotiations with our neighbours are continuing, and so at this delicate time it would be an advantage for Rutland to have continuity and stability," she said."Make no mistake, the white paper and subsequent bill gives neither Rutland councillors nor Rutland residents any say as to what happens to us."The decision and the power lies with ministers - all any of us can do is to try and influence that decision."
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Prince no more? How William could strip Andrew of his title
The mechanisms open to a future King William to go further are more extensive than is generally reported. He has the option to decline to invite his uncle to his future Coronation. It would be headline news, but there is a precedent: the Duke of Windsor was excluded from both George VI and Elizabeth II's in the rather different circumstances of living in exile after abdication. A king can, in certain circumstances, remove the Order of the Garter, which is in the monarch's personal gift. Parliament has greater powers – it can remove the Dukedom via legislation. A private members' bill to 'give the Monarch powers to remove titles', mooted in 2022 after the people of York argued they did not want to be associated with the Duke, fell flat. But a government bill to do the same job would doubtless fare much better. Should another attempt, with the heft of the government behind it, be more successful, Prince Andrew's name could eventually be struck off the Roll of the Peerage where it is currently listed under 'York'. In any case, the disgrace now associated with Prince Andrew makes it all but certain that his Dukedom will fall into abeyance when he dies. Upon his death, the title the Duke of York will revert to the Crown. It would customarily be bestowed on the monarch's second son, where the time is right. But a grown-up Prince Louis is far more likely to become Duke of Edinburgh. In agreement with the Palace, Prince Andrew has already stopped using the style of His Royal Highness. But that can be removed via Letters Patent – an ornate but relatively straightforward document issued on the advice of ministers and signed by the king. One such Letters Patent, issued by George V in 1917, decreed that 'the children of any Sovereign of the United Kingdom and the children of the sons of any such Sovereign and the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales' shall be called Prince or Princess, with the HRH style. Thus Prince Andrew, the son of a monarch when he was born, is a Prince. But, should it be considered necessary, a new Letters Patent could change that, too. But, says a source, such a 'big deal' would best happen through legislation. 'If there was a serious move to take [a title] away, particularly at that level, you do it through both houses [of Parliament],' they added. None of this, one source emphasises, can be done at the whim of a king; the government is required to take action. But whether it is King Charles acting out of necessity in the near future or his son deciding to lance the boil in years to come, the combined brains of Buckingham Palace and Downing Street could find a way. 'Is it likely at this point?' one source says. 'No. But is it possible? Yes.' One way for this to come to a head now, suggests Wilson, would be if MPs raise questions about Prince Andrew's time as a trade ambassador, in the context of examining potential misuse of public funds. Any serious findings would mean 'Charles could act in the best interests of preserving the monarchy'. 'The Royal family is in a fragile state,' he adds. 'Arguably in worse shape than during the Abdication when at least the problem got solved fast. 'Here we have seen a terrible shredding process going on, which downgrades our principal institution and sooner or later will render it an international laughing-stock unless something is done, quickly.' For a Royal family on their summer holidays, renewed headlines about the Duke of York could not be less welcome. The conversations over the Balmoral breakfast table could get interesting.
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Glasner believes Crystal Palace will win appeal and play in Europa League
Oliver Glasner has said he is confident Crystal Palace will win their appeal at the court of arbitration for sport (Cas) this week and be reinstated to play in the Europa League. Palace are seeking to overturn Uefa's decision to demote them to the Conference League for breaking multi-club ownership rules, with the appeal to take place in Lausanne on Friday. The decision is expected to be revealed by Cas on Monday, the day after Glasner's FA Cup holders face Premier League champions Liverpool in the Community Shield at Wembley. 'We don't have any influence on the decision from Uefa, we don't have any influence on the decision from Cas, so it just makes no sense that we're thinking about it,' Glasner told Sky on Tuesday. 'We focus on what we have to do on the pitch, how to create this spirit in the group, this togetherness, this commitment, and this is what we are doing day by day. We're waiting for the final decision, we're still confident that the appeal will be successful and that we will play in the Europa League. But in the end, on 11 August, we will know the final decision – then we will start to prepare for Europe.' Palace, who confirmed last month that the New York Jets owner, Woody Johnson, completed his purchase of John Textor's 43% stake, are understood to believe they have a strong chance of winning the appeal. They are expected to present evidence that they insist proves Uefa's deadline to change their ownership structure so they complied with its rules was not 1 March but rather 30 April, as well as pointing out that Textor's departure has removed the barrier to their participation. The American owns French club Lyon, who have also qualified for next season's Europa League. It is understood that Textor will not be part of the Palace delegation that travels to Switzerland for the Cas hearing. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion Nottingham Forest, who qualified for the Conference League after finishing seventh in the Premier League, would stand to be promoted to the Europa League if Palace's appeal fails. On Monday, Palace were drawn to play against the losers of the Europa League qualifier between Norway's Fredrikstad or Midtjylland of Denmark in the Conference League playoff, with the first leg scheduled to take place at Selhurst Park on 21 August. An article on the club's official website detailing their potential opponents was deleted not long after being published, while Palace's X account also removed a message about the draw.
