logo
First Sembawang North BTO flats to be launched in July

First Sembawang North BTO flats to be launched in July

Business Times06-07-2025
[SINGAPORE] The first batch of Housing & Development Board (HDB) Build-To-Order (BTO) flats in the new Sembawang North neighbourhood will be launched in July this year.
The development, Sembawang Beacon, will comprise 775 flats ranging from two-room flexi to five-room as well as 3Gen flats. The project will have a waiting time of about three years, said HDB in a statement on Sunday (Jul 6).
The flats form part of about 5,500 BTO units to be offered in the upcoming BTO sales exercise. Other projects to be offered include those in Bukit Merah, Bukit Panjang, Clementi, Tampines, Toa Payoh and Woodlands.
The new project is located near amenities and public transport nodes, including a neighbourhood park, Sembawang MRT station and the Sembawang Mart, which houses a supermarket, food court and retail shops.
HDB is also planning new amenities in the area, such as a neighbourhood centre, a one-hectare park with playgrounds and fitness stations, as well as an extensive network of cycling paths and walkways.
Analysts expect healthy demand for the project. Lee Sze Teck, senior director of data analytics at Huttons Asia, noted: 'It has been five years since the last BTO launch in Sembawang. This BTO is less than 10 minutes' walk from Sembawang MRT station, and there are several primary schools nearby.'
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights
Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond.
Sign Up
Sign Up
He estimated that the application rate for a four-room flat could range between three and four times, with prices potentially starting from S$300,000 – possibly making Sembawang Beacon the 'most affordable project' in the July BTO exercise.
However, compared to the last BTO project in the area, Sembawang Beacon is located further away from key amenities, which may affect its 'overall appeal', said Eugene Lim, key executive officer at ERA Singapore.
The last BTO project, Sun Sails, was launched in November 2020 and drew reasonable subscription rates among first-timers, at three times for three-roomers, 3.7 times for four-roomers, and 4.6 times for five-room flats, he noted.
Still, looking beyond location, Lim said Sembawang Beacon could see 'reasonable interest', given its affordable price point and shorter construction timeline. 'Taking cue from the last BTO launch, we expect the five-room flats to see stronger demand compared to other flat types.'
Both Lim and Lee expect the project to be classified as Standard flats, given its distance from the city centre and the MRT station.
The agency noted that the design of Sembawang Beacon was inspired by the area's maritime identity and colonial architecture. For instance, the residential blocks and drop-off porches feature white facades outlined by bold black frames, drawing inspiration from the nearby black-and-white bungalows.
Spanning 53 hectares, the new Sembawang North housing estate is expected to yield close to 10,000 new homes, comprising about 8,000 BTO flats and 2,000 private housing units.
It is located not far from Sembawang Shipyard, which was previously a British naval base, and in its vicinity is a cluster of black-and-white bungalows, currently managed by the Singapore Land Authority.
A portion of the land parcel, along Admiralty Road West, is currently occupied by foreign workers dormitories, operated by dormitory management company Vobis Enterprise.
The new Sembawang North housing estate was first announced in October 2024. HDB said: 'When fully developed, homes in Sembawang North will be well-served by a comprehensive range of amenities, green spaces and public transport.'
Minister for National Development Chee Hong Tat said in a social media post that HDB and NParks are working with other agencies to 'ensure that residents can enjoy convenient access to various amenities, lush green spaces, and well-connected public transport nodes'.
Separately, a nearby executive condominium site along Sembawang Road was launched for tender in May 2025 under the government land sales programme. The site, which can yield about 265 homes, is expected to garner strong interest from developers, given the lack of supply of executive condo units in the north. The tender closes on Sep 11.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Celebrating 60 years of nation building, 25 years of our Expand journey
Celebrating 60 years of nation building, 25 years of our Expand journey

Business Times

time7 hours ago

  • Business Times

Celebrating 60 years of nation building, 25 years of our Expand journey

SINCE its founding in 2000, Expand Construction has grown in tandem with Singapore's continued transformation, rising from a one-man startup into one of the nation's leading homegrown names in the built environment. Its progress reflects the country's own bold and forward-looking development. At the heart of Expand's growth is a distinctive planning model structured around 15-year cycles, known internally as 'GSS'. The first cycle (2000 to 2015) focused on Growth, Strength and Sustainability, echoing Singapore's priorities during that period of nation-building. The current cycle, spanning 2016 to 2030, is centred on becoming Great, enabling Succession and achieving Stability. This approach has enabled Expand to contribute meaningfully to Singapore's changing landscape while preparing for the future. 2000-2015: Expand's first 15-year cycle of GSS 2000-2005: Growth From a humble start to a foothold in the industry Started by Von Lee as a one-man operation in 2000, Expand Construction entered the built environment sector at a time when Singapore's older HDB estates were being refreshed under the government's main upgrading programme (MUP). Expand was able to contribute to this key national initiative, helping to upgrade the homes and lives of Singaporeans while gaining a foothold in the industry. Survival hinged on hard work, calculated risks, and winning tenders by outbidding the lowest bidder, a bold move that paid off. These early years were about proving Expand's ability to deliver, no matter the odds. 2006-2010: Strength A period of proving capability and earning trust In the 2000s, Singapore set out to create a new kind of urban green space, and Gardens by the Bay would become a landmark project that would reshape the Marina Bay skyline and reflect the country's focus on innovation and sustainability. At the heart of this landmark development were the towering Supertrees, which would go on to become one of Singapore's most recognisable symbols. LionGrove Supertrees. It was during this pivotal period that Expand, focused on building trust and a solid track record, earned the opportunity to contribute to the national vision. Guided by the values of continual pursuit of excellence and consistently earning the trust and support of clients, consultants, sub-contractors, and suppliers, the company secured two milestone projects: the Supertrees and the Energy Centre at Gardens by the Bay. These were defining moments that elevated Expand's profile. 2011-2015: Sustainability Turning experience into systems built to last In the early 2010s, Singapore ramped up the development of HDB Build-To-Order (BTO) flats to meet rising demand for public housing. This national effort required dependable contractors who could deliver large-scale projects efficiently while maintaining high standards. Fernvale Vines was awarded the HDB Construction Award 2024. It was against this backdrop that Expand took a significant step forward. As the company matured, so did its ambitions. It launched a new vision: 'To be a World-class Builder, with World-class Professionals.' In 2011, the company achieved A1 status under the CW01 Building category and clinched its first HDB BTO contract in Punggol West worth S$157.6 million. By 2013, it had begun systematically building a strong internal talent pool, positioning itself for long-term resilience. Expand was awarded the BCA Construction Excellence Award 2013. 2016-2030: Expand's second 15-year cycle of GSS 2016-2020: Great Defined by values, strengthened by safety When Covid-19 hit in 2020, Singapore's construction sector was among the hardest hit. Projects were halted, timelines disrupted, and some contractors were unable to carry on. In the midst of this uncertainty, Expand stepped up to complete a housing project that had been left unfulfilled by another contractor. Going above and beyond to deliver under challenging conditions, the company was recognised with a Resilience Award from HDB for its efforts. Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum. This commitment to responsibility reflected a broader vision that had been set in motion years earlier. The next chapter for Expand was not only about growing in size, but about becoming a 'Great' company defined by values and a deep commitment to safety. The company introduced a new safety slogan: 'Nothing is more urgent or important than working safely'. Hillock Eco-bridge. In 2018, Expand also made its first major foray into infrastructure with a S$101.8 million project at Changi Naval Base. The experience and systems built during that phase enabled the company to respond effectively during the pandemic. Launching of Von Lee Yong Miang's SUTD Bursary on Oct 10, 2019. 2021-2025: Succession Shaping the next generation of leadership As Singapore entered a period of leadership transition in the early 2020s, Expand too began preparing its next generation of leaders. Succession planning took centre stage, with senior leaders mentoring upcoming talent to ensure continuity and preserve the company's core values. Punggol Waterway Sunrise II was awarded the HDB Resilience Award 2024. At the same time, the team worked tirelessly to navigate pandemic aftershocks, supply chain disruptions and labour constraints. By 2023, the foundations for leadership renewal were firmly in place. Singtel Waterfront Theatre. In 2024, Expand began operating on a dual-engine model to keep its building arm strong while expanding its infrastructure capabilities. The milestone achievement of CW02 A1 Civil status in December 2024 marked a new level of capability for the firm. Expand also began investing in AI and digital tools to further strengthen its readiness for the future. Minister of State Dinesh and MOM officers site visit to NS Square on June 16, 2025. 2026-2030: Stability Securing the next chapter with confidence As Singapore continues to plan for long-term resilience in a fast-changing world, Expand is also looking ahead too. The years ahead will focus on strengthening leadership continuity and ensuring long-term stability. Construction of NS Square @Marina Bay, target to complete in 2027. As the company transitions into the hands of its second-generation leadership, it is sharpening its capabilities in AI, robotics and computational construction methods. The goal is to future-proof the business while remaining steady, sustainable and people-centred.

SG60: Property valuation amid growing real estate sophistication
SG60: Property valuation amid growing real estate sophistication

Business Times

timea day ago

  • Business Times

SG60: Property valuation amid growing real estate sophistication

THE SG60 Singapore real estate market is a mature one, marked by a large number of buyers and sellers, landlords and tenants, financiers, lawyers, appraisers and brokers; considerable data transparency; and a breadth of options across all real estate types. Reflecting growing sophistication, public housing now includes standard, plus and prime, and the public-private hybrid executive condo. Similarly, private housing covers apartments and condominiums, landed terrace, semi-detached, detached, bungalows and the hybrid strata landed. New asset types emerge from time to time: real estate investment trusts (Reits) where real estate and financial markets intersect, fractionalised real estate using cryptocurrency, data centres to support the new economy, high-specification buildings for biotech companies, student housing, foreign workers dormitories, co-living, co-working spaces, and so on. Against such a backdrop, valuing this array of real estate assets becomes increasingly complex. Property valuations underpin many household and commercial transactions, such as how much banks lend money for a house purchase and the extent to which CPF Ordinary Account balances can be used. They are the basis for gauging a chunk of a company's net asset value (NAV). Valuations also act as a 'check' against overpaying for corporate real estate acquisitions. For example, a Reit buying an asset often uses the formal valuation of the asset as the benchmark to determine the acquisition price and secure shareholder approval. Likewise, a valuation provides a guide to the 'right' price for the disposal of an asset in the books. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Tuesday, 12 pm Property Insights Get an exclusive analysis of real estate and property news in Singapore and beyond. Sign Up Sign Up 'Open source' policy Singapore has an 'open source' policy when it comes to property transactions. There is a free public database of prices from public agencies such as the Housing and Development Board (HDB) and the Urban Redevelopment Authority (URA). For the past three years from 2022 to 2024, the total volume of both HDB and private homes sold averaged well over 40,000 units per annum. It is not difficult to interpolate or extrapolate from this rich data set to gauge what a typical property might be worth. Portals such as Edge or SRX also offer free property 'valuations' driven by artificial intelligence (AI). But these 'lay' approaches to valuation typically work well with what are often called 'conventional' properties – HDB resale flats, apartments and condominiums – where the drivers of value are generally well understood, the market is sizeable and data is plentiful. But, there are a host of properties that characterise the SG60 real estate market that will not be easily analysed in the same way. Take a simple example: The value of strata shops in a mall is a function of its micro location (what level is it on, and what direction does it face?), its neighbours (is it near a popular supermarket?), its size (there is such a thing as a discount for large units), and its shape (regular shaped shop units are easier to fit out with little wastage). For such a property, there are generally fewer comparable transactions. Whatever data exists will not easily yield insights into its 'correct' value because of the varied factors that can influence how market participants perceive their worth. The more specialised the property – think a cement plant in Jurong, your neighbourhood petrol station or the Singapore Flyer – the more difficult the valuation assignment. Enter the property valuer. Laymen can claim to be 'experts', especially in residential property valuation – since most of us own or live in one and will inevitably hold an opinion on its value. But, the property valuer is licensed by the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (Iras) and undergoes formal tertiary training comprising a three or four-year university course in real estate or its equivalent. Such a course typically covers four pillars of foundational real estate knowledge – law, building technology, urban planning and economics – that collectively underpin the theory and practice of valuation. Beyond academics, the aspiring valuer must be a member of the Singapore Institute of Surveyors and Valuers (SISV), the sole body representing valuation professionals with a history spanning 40 years, before being eligible for licensing. SISV members are subject to the institute's regulations and disciplinary protocols to act professionally and ethically, in accordance with its practice standards. Because the value of a property is often the subject of ubiquitous coffee-shop talk, the true importance and complexity of valuation is often underappreciated, more so in the context of the growing sophistication of the SG60 property market. Here are some examples. In October 2024, a 60-year leasehold site tender at Media Circle in one-north was not awarded because the sole bid of S$461 per square foot per gross floor area (psf GFA), by a Frasers-led consortium, was deemed too low. Media reports had indicated that analysts preliminarily assessed the land at between S$650 and S$1,100 psf GFA. The gap is significant but, arguably, a big part of the divergence can be explained by the zoning of this parcel for long-stay service apartments (or 'SA2' in URA's parlance), a 'pilot housing typology for occupants seeking long-term rental accommodation' of three months or more. Strata subdivision for individual unit sale – which would enable the developer to get his money back earlier – is also not permitted. The valuation challenge in this case is the novel nature of this typology that currently has no direct benchmarks to go by, and that requires perhaps a different operating model compared to conventional service apartments and hotels. Such cases can only be properly analysed by experienced professional valuers, although the level of the final bid vests solely in the developer who, for whatever reason, may prefer to bid at a premium or discount to the value arrived at by the valuer. It is commonly asserted that valuers interpret the market and do not make the market. In other words, they are price takers, and not price setters. Underlying this assertion is the premise that markets are generally efficient, and that buyers and sellers, taken as a collective, behave rationally. So, if there is a large body of bona fide transactions supporting, say, property prices at a particular level, the valuer's role is to 'let the market speak'. Take another example. Commercial properties are being transacted at a gross rental yield of 3 per cent (that is, gross rent as a percentage of value) – which may just about cover interest cost, including spreads, and, therefore, appear low, considering the risks that accompany real estate investment. Why then do market participants accept this level of yield? They are certainly not uninformed or ignorant. There could be various reasons, including the 'Singapore premium' arising from all the oft-cited strengths of Singapore's economy, the robust local currency, the history of upward trending prices over the long term, and so on. Whatever the reasons, that 3 per cent yield is widely believed to be the appropriate 'market' rate and sets the benchmark for how similar properties ought to be valued. But to be defensible, valuations need to be grounded on 'comparables', which are past transactions of similar properties. This process often gives rise to the divergence between what is known as the 'private' market and 'public' market. This is perhaps best illustrated by the hefty discount that asset-heavy listed property companies are trading as a percentage of the company's NAV. The property company's NAV itself is often assessed by the valuation of that company's real estate. The idea is that if the NAV is, say, $1 billion, then the market capitalisation of that company should not deviate sharply from the NAV. This is because rather than trading in the company's shares at undervalued prices, shareholders can be better served by winding up the company, selling off the assets (at or close to valuation) and distributing the net sales proceeds – that is, effectively the NAV – to them. In practice, private and public markets sometimes diverge quite significantly, again for a host of reasons, such as management's (in)ability to grow the business, shareholder fights, high debt levels which may raise the risk of default, and a lack of liquidity. But one main reason is that NAV is anchored historically, that is, valuation is based on past transactions, and is typically done once or twice a year for financial reporting purposes, and therefore tend to adjust much more slowly. By contrast, stock prices are forward-looking and public markets are generally far more efficient, rapidly reacting (or some might say, overreacting) to market 'noise'. Valuation extends not just to capital values or prices, but also to rentals. There's been some public discussion of high rentals for clinics and beloved food and beverage stores. These rentals have been blamed for retail closures and driving costs higher for ordinary people. One executive from a very large landlord has responded recently with a very thoughtful LinkedIn piece on why such perceptions may not do justice to the reality on the ground. For public rental tenders, the routine use of price-quality (PQ) criteria in tender evaluation helps to mitigate the effects of pure price competition. To bring in a valuation perspective to this matter, in the case of clinics, a single high rental bid does not represent the market as a whole. These 'outliers' do occur from time to time and could represent a wide range of possibilities: temporary exuberance, some commercial advantage accruing to the winning bid not recognised by the rest of the market, enormous competitive pressures, and so on. A valuer asked to appraise such properties would arrive at values which are more aligned with the general market, rather than figures which deviate hugely from investor expectations. Of course, for parties transacting a deal, the valuation of the property – be it for sale or purchase, taxation, or an initial public offering – is best seen as a guide rather than the correct 'answer' to how much the property is worth. Breathtaking technological advances in large language models raise the question if valuers will be collateral damage from the all-conquering AI wave. Even complexity cannot be a bulwark against the AI tsunami. Deep implications But for now, the licensed property valuer's training, nous, and judgement set him apart. Just as important, his affiliation with SISV – with its standards of professional practice and ethical conduct – enables him to extend his role beyond the layman's approach of interpolating or extrapolating publicly available data on property prices. He applies his knowledge and experience to a wide variety of situations – increasingly novel and challenging – that have implications on marital choices, childbearing, household wealth, business decisions and public policy options. The writer is first vice-president, valuation & general practice division, Singapore Institute of Surveyors and Valuers

Wealth Wise - Public resale flat prices rise at slower pace in second quarter of 2025
Wealth Wise - Public resale flat prices rise at slower pace in second quarter of 2025

CNA

time3 days ago

  • CNA

Wealth Wise - Public resale flat prices rise at slower pace in second quarter of 2025

According to flash estimates from HDB, prices for public resale flats rose at a slower pace of 0.9 per cent in the second quarter of 2025. It marks the third consecutive quarter of moderating price growth, and is the lowest quarter-on-quarter growth since Q2, 2020. The resale price index for Q2 2025 eased from 1.6 per cent in the previous quarter and 2.6 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2024. Lance Alexander and Daniel Martin learn more from Eugene Lim, Key Executive Officer, ERA Singapore

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store