CEO trusted by Jay-Z, Google exec says 'conflict' is the key to success: 'It's OK to disagree'
That's according to marketer, entrepreneur and music executive Steve Stoute, who counts Jay-Z, McDonalds, the New York Knicks and Google's Lorraine Twohill among the many big names that have relied on his expertise. In an interview with The New York Times, Stoute said that "there's something wrong" if a business has "no conflict."
"Getting people comfortable around challenge in a respectful way is a very important value," he said. "What I'm trying to do is have people embrace the idea that it's OK to disagree."
The 54-year-old encourages healthy conflict within his teams by keeping it top-of-mind. Because video conferencing software like Zoom "allows you to avoid conflict," Stoute said he makes sure to talk about its importance the same way he would talk about any other part of running a business.
"The same way I talk about bonuses or health care or wins or losses, we talk about conflict," he said. "If tension gets overlooked, then the company will not reach its full potential."
Indeed, Stoute's thoughts on conflict are backed by experts. Robert Bordone, the founder and former director of the Harvard Negotiation and Mediation Clinical Program, told CNBC Make It earlier this year that it is better to embrace conflicts and learn to navigate them rather than to avoid them entirely.
"The work of being conflict resilient is entering into a landscape that doesn't have a script because it's motivated by a sense of curiosity about something of the other person," he said.
Having a conflict or a disagreement is different from having a fight. Kurt Gray, a social psychology professor at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, told CNBC Make It that the best approach is to think of a disagreement as a conversation rather than as "a chance to score points or try to make the other person look stupid."
Gray recommended taking the time to understand the other person's motivation and learning how they came to their conclusion before explaining why you disagree.
"Establishing a connection with someone, seeing them as a fellow human being, I think it goes a long way," Gray said.
,
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
McDonald's CEO Breaks His Silence on Losing Low-Income Customers
McDonald's has long been known as an inexpensive fast food option that appealed to low-income customers and families across the United States. However, it sounds like that status is a little bit at risk. For decades, McDonald's has looked to cater to budget-conscious consumers with its value meals, dollar menu, and regular specials and deals to go along with its everyday low prices. McDonald's has also made some major changes in recent months to help cater to lower-income customers. However, it sounds like the chain is gradually losing those customers, which is a major problem given how important that group has been for the fast food chain over the years. McDonald's Targeted Budget-Conscious Customers In recent months, McDonald's has made several changes to its menu and offerings in an attempt to cater to lower-income customers. Last summer, it launched its $5 Meal Deal. Then, the fast food chain followed that up by rolling out the McValue menu earlier this year, including its Buy One, Add One for $1 deal as well as the new Daily Double deal. Perhaps the most successful attempt to target budget-conscious customers came just last month when McDonald's successfully re-launced the Snack Wrap. The item was so popular that it even led to a lettuce shortage in some McDonald's locations due to the unprecedented demand. Despite all of these moves, however, the company has not been able to successfully bring in lower-income customers. McDonald's CEO Addresses the Issue While McDonald's has clealry tried to target low-income customers in recent months, the fast food chain faces a pretty major problem as those efforts have been largely unsuccessful. During an earnings call last week, McDonald's CEO Chris Kempczinski admitted that the company has been continually losing low-income customers while gaining middle and high-income customers. 'The U.S. remained challenging as visits across the industry by low-income consumers once again declined by double digits versus the prior year period,' Kempczinski said via The Street. 'Reengaging the low-income consumer is critical as they typically visit our restaurants more frequently than middle- and high-income consumers.' Kempczinski speculated about the reason for the loss of lower-income customers, pointing out that that these low-income customers are facing a challenging and uncertain economy. 'With the low-income consumer, despite improvements in wage gains, real incomes are down,' said Kempczinski. 'That absolutely is going to put pressure on visits into the QSR industry. Second thing is there is a lot of anxiety and unease with that low-income consumer. I think we could all speculate the reasons for that, probably tariffs and the impact that that might have, questions around employment situation.' We'll have to see whether or not McDonald's can reverse this trend in the coming months. But it's clearly a major problem as one of the company's core customer groups is disappearing. McDonald's CEO Breaks His Silence on Losing Low-Income Customers first appeared on Men's Journal on Aug 10, 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
McDonald's Stock Outlook: Is Wall Street Bullish or Bearish?
Valued at a market cap of $217.2 billion, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is a global leader in the quick-service restaurant industry. The company operates and franchises restaurants under the McDonald's brand, offering a variety of food and beverages across the U.S. and international markets. Shares of the Chicago, Illinois-based company have underperformed the broader market over the past 52 weeks. MCD stock has returned 13.6% over this time frame, while the broader S&P 500 Index ($SPX) has rallied 19.3%. Moreover, shares of McDonald's are up nearly 5% on a YTD basis, compared to SPX's 8.4% gain. More News from Barchart This High-Yield (7%) Dividend Stock Is Down Significantly in 2025. Should You Buy the Dip? Dear CoreWeave Stock Fans, Mark Your Calendars for August 14 Tesla Is Axing Its Dojo Supercomputer Plans. What Does That Mean for TSLA Stock Here? Our exclusive Barchart Brief newsletter is your FREE midday guide to what's moving stocks, sectors, and investor sentiment - delivered right when you need the info most. Subscribe today! Focusing more closely, the fast-food giant stock has also lagged behind the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund's (XLY) 28.7% increase over the past 52 weeks. McDonald's shares rose nearly 3% on Aug. 6 after Q2 2025 results beat expectations, with adjusted EPS of $3.19 and revenue of $6.8 billion. Global same-store sales grew 3.8%, above the expected, driven by strong demand in the U.S. and international markets, along with a 5.6% jump in its developmental licensed segment. Affordable meal bundles, promotions like the $5 meal deal and 'Minecraft' Happy Meals, and new menu items such as McCrispy Chicken Strips helped attract budget-conscious diners and boost traffic. For the fiscal year ending in December 2025, analysts expect MCD's EPS to grow 5.2% year-over-year to $12.33. The company's earnings surprise history is promising. It beat or met the consensus estimates in the last four quarters. Among the 33 analysts covering the stock, the consensus rating is a 'Moderate Buy.' That's based on 14 'Strong Buy' ratings, one 'Moderate Buy,' 17 'Holds,' and one 'Strong Sell.' This configuration is less bullish than three months ago, with 17 'Strong Buy' ratings on the stock. On Aug. 7, Piper Sandler raised its price target on McDonald's to $325 with a 'Neutral" rating, citing solid quarterly results and management's reaffirmed outlook for accelerating U.S. sales in the year's second half. As of writing, the stock is trading below the mean price target of $337.07. The Street-high price target of $373 implies a potential upside of 22.6% from the current price levels. On the date of publication, Sohini Mondal did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
17 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why the Best Deals for RIA Sellers May Not Have the Highest Price Tags
You can find original article here Wealthmanagement. Subscribe to our free daily Wealthmanagement newsletter. When Shari Greco Reiches and her team finalized the deal to sell the $1.2 billion registered investment advisor she co-founded in 2005, they didn't choose the highest offer, but she believes they chose the best one. 'All of them were high, but some were a little higher,' she said of the buyers who bid for Rappaport Reiches Capital Management. 'But this was my baby. I wasn't going to go with a firm just because they were going to give 10% more—you want what's best for your staff and your clients.' After more than 20 Zoom calls with prospective buyers, Reiches, her team and hired consultants narrowed the list down to four firms. From there, EP Wealth emerged as offering the right mix of full firm integration, additional services for clients and career paths for its 13 staff members and two founders, including Reiches and David Rappaport, who became partners and regional directors. 'They weren't even on our initial shortlist,' Reiches said of EP Wealth. 'But you have to be open-minded. This was not retirement; it was the next chapter. So we wanted to know what our staff roles would be and what their comp would be—we didn't want any surprises, and we wanted them to be happy.' The sale of the Skokie, Ill.-based RIA was about a year in the making. It included taking a succession planning program held by Charles Schwab, interviewing multiple consultants and attorneys to find the right partners, and doing extensive due diligence on the final offers. 'Everyone we interviewed was impressive,' Reiches said. 'But just because they are a great firm doesn't mean they are the right fit. ... You can't be just focused on the numbers; you have to look at the full picture.' Not focusing on the numbers may be easier said than done for RIAs looking to sell. According to industry players, valuations are at record highs, and most predict continued frothiness barring a major market setback. That is also why, according to the experts, firms such as Reiches, which are looking to be acquired but also keep growing, need to consider every deal carefully and not just target the highest bid. Beyond the Sticker Price Valuations are coming in at 15x to as high as 22x earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation, according to M&A experts. But often, those high multiples aren't what advisors ultimately see at earn out, and the type of due diligence that Rieches and team underwent may point firms to lower bids in the hope of better long-term math. Jessica Polito, founder and principal of Turkey Hill Management, said the multiples cited in the marketplace are 'meaningless without context.' They are most often only achieved if a firm achieves very ambitious growth rates, she said. 'Talk of those multiples is driving some of the unrealistic expectations in the market,' she said. 'You can get into the high teens if you retain all of your revenue and then grow a lot over a two- or three-year time period, which just doesn't happen much.' She said sellers should focus on the guaranteed payments, not the high end of the multiple. 'Unless you are already growing rapidly, anything on top of that guaranteed payment is found money,' she said. John Orsini, a director at consultancy and M&A shop Marshberry, said buyers are extremely diligent when it comes to offers, but they may also be prone to 'flex up' in price when they identify a firm that fits a specific need. 'Even though this year we are expecting close to 400 transactions, it's still a generally illiquid market,' Orsini said. 'For instance, if you are looking for something in the Western suburbs of Chicago, there might be a handful of transactions that happen in a year, and if that's a gap in your offering, you're going to bid that up.' David DeVoe, CEO and founder of DeVoe & Associates, noted that high valuations will likely continue barring major market disruptions. In the firm's recent survey of some of the industry's most active acquirers, 85% expect valuations to hold steady over the next six months, with the remaining 15% being evenly split between a slight uptick or a modest decline. 'The highest valuations being paid are rational for those particular buyers,' DeVoe said via email. 'Many of these consolidators have developed the capabilities to drive acquired firms' organic growth and increase their margins. These key value drivers, plus the historic valuation arbitrage between what they can buy firms at versus what the next PE sponsor will value them at, yields the business case for extremely high valuations.' Proceed with Caution DeVoe said sellers should always pay close attention to the deal's structure, not just the price tags. 'The old joke is 'I will pay you any valuation you want ... as long as I get to choose the terms,'" he said. 'Sellers need to be thoughtful about their goals and ensure they are getting good advice. The deal structure can undermine a perceived high valuation. And the wrong buyer will make a seller's life—and their clients' and staff's lives—miserable.' He also pointed out what happened in late 2007 and 2008, when the financial crisis took out markets and 'both valuations and M&A activity dropped dramatically.' 'More importantly,' he said, 'many unqualified and sub-par acquirers were washed out of the market.' For now, the risks in today's market are more about execution and integration, or what DeVoe calls 'misalignment.' 'If firms overpay and can't integrate, operate or grow the acquired business effectively, the whole thesis breaks down,' he said. 'And in a rising cost or slower-growth environment, that gets harder to hide.' Orsini of Marshberry said buyers also conduct due diligence, often focusing on a firm's ability to show consistent organic growth. 'There is absolutely risk to these buyers for paying too much, but that is why the quality of these diligence teams across the buyer space is so high,' he said. 'The amount of rigor that they are putting into the diligence and the questions they are asking gives me confidence.' Even so, Orsini said there can be risk when diligence is 'abbreviated' to get deals through the pipeline. But for now, the offers will likely keep coming for sellers to evaluate and decide on their needs. 'We can't predict where the market will go, but we still have a conversation or two a month with a new private equity-backed acquirer,' he said. 'As long as new capital is flowing, with demand outpacing supply, valuations will remain strong for quality firms.' Reiches, in the meantime, recommends sellers stay engaged and diligent throughout the entire sales process. She took her own deal down to the wire, flying the team out to California to meet with EP Wealth before signing. 'They were joking with us about all the questions we were asking about our staff,' Reiches said. 'The money is good, but you have to make sure it's the right setup for you and your clients. No question is silly. Surprises may come along the way. But you keep asking and asking and asking.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
