logo
More countries plan to recognise state of Palestine at UN General Assembly

More countries plan to recognise state of Palestine at UN General Assembly

Irish Times2 days ago
Palestine
is set to gain recognition from
France
, the
UK
,
Canada
and six other countries during the 80th session of the
United Nations
General Assembly in September.
Thursday's
US state department decision to sanction Palestinian officials,
denying them visas to attend, could make these countries more determined to advance recognition.
Palestine has been recognised by 147 of the United Nations' 193 members, but has been accorded observer status rather than UN membership.
Membership
has been vetoed by the US
, one of the five permanent members of the Security Council – along with France, the UK, China, and Russia – which must approve applications.
READ MORE
The move for recognition began on November 15th, 1988, when the Palestine National Council, the parliament-in-exile, issued a declaration of independence.
[
Israeli strikes and gunfire kill dozens of Palestinians in Gaza
Opens in new window
]
Written by national poet Mahmoud Darwish, the declaration called for a state in East Jerusalem, the
West Bank
and
Gaza
. This amounted to a shift in policy, as the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) had dropped its aspiration for a state in the whole of Palestine. The PLO opted instead for a mini-state in the territories occupied by Israel in 1967.
Israel was ordered to withdraw from the territories by the security council in November 1967 but failed to comply.
Palestine was instantly recognised by 13 countries, including Algeria, Malaysia, Morocco, Turkey, Yemen and Somalia.
On December 15th, 1988, the UN General Assembly acknowledged the declaration of independence and recognised Palestine rather than the PLO as representing Palestinians within the UN system.
By the end of the year, Palestine was recognised by 81 countries from Asia, Africa, the non-aligned group and eastern Europe. In October 2014, Sweden became the first European Union member to recognise Palestine.
Nato countries that recognise Palestine, July 31st, 2025
Among the countries recognising Palestine last year were Ireland, Spain and Norway.
France, the UK, Andora, Canada, Finland, Luxembourg, New Zealand, Portugal, San Marino and Malta are set to recognise Palestine this year.
Australia has refused to set a time, while Germany and Italy do not intend to extend recognition. France has issued no conditions, while the UK and Canada have done so.
Prime minister Keir Starmer has said the UK will recognise Palestine unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in the conflict with Hamas, allow substantive humanitarian aid into Gaza, declare no annexation of the West Bank and commit to the two-state solution involving a Palestinian state next to Israel.
G20 countries that recognise Palestine, July 31st, 2025
He said Hamas 'must release all the hostages, sign up to a ceasefire, accept that they will play no role in the government of Gaza, and disarm'.
In return for recognition, Canadian prime minister Mark Carney called for reform of the West Bank-based Palestinian Authority, a commitment to hold elections in 2026 and the exclusion of Hamas from politics.
The addition of France and Britain would mean that – minus the US – Palestine is recognised as a state by four of the five permanent UN Security Council members.
The US has criticised the spate of recognitions which have been, at least in part, driven by Israel's attack on Gaza and long-term refusal to engage in meaningful negotiations on the two-state solution.
US president Donald Trump has dismissed France's stance and accused others of rewarding Hamas by granting recognition. 'I'm not in that camp, to be honest,' he said.
The conflict began when 1,200 Israelis were killed and 250 abducted by Hamas on October 7th, 2023. Israel's army has since killed more than 60,000 and wounded 45,870, driven 90 per cent of Gazans from their homes, and laid waste to the strip.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NI community projects fear closure after US and UK funding reportedly pulled from peace organisation
NI community projects fear closure after US and UK funding reportedly pulled from peace organisation

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

NI community projects fear closure after US and UK funding reportedly pulled from peace organisation

A number of community and peacebuilding projects supported by the International Fund for Ireland (IFI) fear they will close due to the reported loss of vital funding from the US . It also emerged this week that the UK government had pulled a promised £1 million , citing budgetary pressures. However, multiple organisations told The Irish Times their 'bigger concern' was the halting of the US contribution to the peacebuilding and reconciliation body. The IFI said it had received financial support from 'a range of international donors including the US government' and was seeking clarity and support from its US partners. READ MORE The peacebuilding organisation was established by the British and Irish governments in 1986 to promote economic and social development and bring together nationalist, unionist and cross-Border communities. Since then, the IFI has spent €974 million supporting more than 6,000 projects, including efforts to remove peace walls and to prevent young people from being recruited or attacked by paramilitaries. The US government has traditionally been the IFI's largest funder. According to the IFI's accounts, its donations last year came from two sources, €2.5 million from the US and €5.5 million from the Irish Government. USAid, which administers foreign aid for the US government, was closed by president Donald Trump earlier this year. [ Senator George Mitchell: Northern Ireland's peace must evolve. And if it is here to stay it must be shared Opens in new window ] In February, Donald Trump's administration cut USAid jobs. Photographer: Pete Kiehart/Bloomberg via Getty Images It is not yet clear precisely how this will impact the IFI, but groups which deliver its projects in Ireland fear their funding will not be renewed at the end of this financial year. 'Since Donald Trump removed the USAid ... they've been more or less telling us we don't have any funding,' said a representative of one community organisation, who asked to remain anonymous so as not to jeopardise their contract. 'We've been told we should look for other funding if we want to keep the project going.' Conal McFeely, of Creggan Enterprises, which has previously received IFI funding, said: 'We've been told the reason the IFI are now considering withdrawing is because they've been choked of this funding from USAid, and they're out telling groups they're not going to continue their funding'. Emphasising the 'highly significant' role the body had played, he said it was 'instrumental in bedding down the peace here and attempting to contain and settle the conflict. They're a key player'. But he said 'a number of programmes, particularly in the Derry area, including here in Creggan, have been informed it's likely their programmes will not be funded beyond the current term, and they've been told to consider winding the projects down. 'There is a complete lack of alternative funders willing to take a risk ... lots of those initiatives will unfortunately fall by the wayside,' he added. Mr McFeely added it was 'extremely disappointing' the UK government was 'withholding its last [£1 million] phase of funding, and that will have a detrimental impact on the ground here in terms of marginalised communities that are still dealing with the fallout from the conflict. 'If the Irish Government is still prepared to put in money, why is the British government not matching that money? It's scandalous,' he said. In a statement, the IFI said that it 'has received financial support from a range of international donors including the US government, the European Union, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and the UK. 'We are grateful for the long-standing support from all our partners, including the bipartisan support under various US administrations,' it said. 'We are continuing to engage with our US partners to seek clarity around support from the US government which will play a key role in the delivery of the IFI's programmes into the future.' It said all projects currently funded by the IFI 'remain unaffected and their funding is secure as per their letters of offer'. 'Support from the US and others remains critical in our ability to deliver peace and reconciliation initiatives in Northern Ireland and the southern border counties,' the body said.

US to deploy two nuclear submarines in response to 'highly provocative' comments from Russia
US to deploy two nuclear submarines in response to 'highly provocative' comments from Russia

The Journal

time8 hours ago

  • The Journal

US to deploy two nuclear submarines in response to 'highly provocative' comments from Russia

LAST UPDATE | 3 hrs ago US PRESIDENT DONALD Trump has said he ordered that two nuclear submarines be deployed in response to 'highly provocative' comments by a senior Russian official. Trump did not say whether he meant nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed submarines. He also did not elaborate on the locations, which are kept secret by the US military. The United States and Russia control the vast majority of the world's nuclear weaponry, and Washington keeps nuclear-armed submarines on patrol as part of its so-called nuclear triad of land, sea and air-launched weapons. 'Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev…, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' Trump did not refer specifically to what Medvedev had said to prompt the highly unusual public display of nuclear sabre-rattling. On Monday, Medvedev harshly criticised Trump's threat of new sanctions against Russia over the continuing invasion of Ukraine. Advertisement Accusing Trump of 'playing the ultimatum game,' he posted on X that Trump 'should remember' that Russia is a formidable force. 'Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country,' the Russian official said. Medvedev is currently deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council and a vocal proponent of President Vladimir Putin's war in Ukraine – and generally antagonistic relations with the West. He served one term as president between 2008-2012, effectively acting as a placeholder for Putin, who was able to circumvent constitutional term limits and remain in de facto power. - © AFP 2025 Want to know more about what's happening in Ukraine and why? Check out our FactCheck Knowledge Bank for essential reads and guides to finding good information online. Visit Knowledge Bank

Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines to be moved closer to Russia
Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines to be moved closer to Russia

Irish Daily Mirror

time9 hours ago

  • Irish Daily Mirror

Donald Trump orders nuclear submarines to be moved closer to Russia

US President Donald Trump has reportedly ordered for nuclear submarines to be moved closer to Russia following statements made by the country's former president. In a Truth Social post on Friday, Trump called out ex-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev after what he described as 'highly provocative' and 'foolish and inflammatory' statements, saying that he had ordered two nuclear submarines to "appropriate regions" closer to Russia, reports The Mirror. "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, who is now the Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Mr Trump said. Deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev (Image: Alexey NIKOLSKY / Sputnik / AFP) "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances. Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Mr Trump and Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, traded taunts in recent days after the US President said on Tuesday that Russia had 10 days to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine or be hit, along with its oil, with higher tariffs. Medvedev accused Mr Trump of engaging in a "game of ultimatums" and said Russia still possessed Soviet-era nuclear strike capabilities after the Republican told the former president to "watch his words". The war of words emerged after Mr Trump reportedly undid months of denying or limiting aid to Ukraine as he aimed to broker a peace between Kyiv and Moscow. Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news from the Irish Mirror direct to your inbox: Sign up here. The Irish Mirror's Crime Writers Michael O'Toole and Paul Healy are writing a new weekly newsletter called Crime Ireland. Click here to sign up and get it delivered to your inbox every week

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store