Japan's economy minister Akazawa to head trade talks with US, FNN reports
By Leika Kihara and Makiko Yamazaki
TOKYO (Reuters) - Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba will nominate Economy Minister Ryosei Akazawa as trade negotiator with the United States, FNN television reported on Tuesday.
Akazawa, during a press conference, said he was not aware of the report and has not been approached by the prime minister on the matter.
The report emerged after Ishiba and U.S. President Donald Trump agreed to initiate bilateral discussions on tariffs in a telephone meeting on Monday.
Trump has designated Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer to oversee trade negotiations with Japan, Bessent said on social media.
"The fact the treasury secretary was appointed (to lead trade talks with Japan) may suggest the U.S. administration has a strong interest in areas he oversees," Akazawa said.
Bilateral discussions on exchange-rate moves will continue to be managed by Japan's finance minister and the U.S. treasury secretary, Japanese Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato said in a separate news conference on Tuesday.
Bessent's appointment as the head of U.S. trade talks with Japan has heightened speculation among some investors that Washington may pressure Tokyo to help weaken the dollar against the yen, as part of a deal to reduce U.S. tariffs on Japan.
A weaker dollar could enhance U.S. exports, while a firmer yen might help moderate rising import costs that have hurt Japanese consumers, some analysts say.
"Pressure from Trump, coupled with the Japanese government's intention to prop up the yen against the dollar, could have an influence on the likelihood of further interest rate hikes by the Bank of Japan," Yasunari Ueno, chief market economist at Mizuho Securities, wrote in a research note.
The BOJ raised interest rates to 0.5% in January and its officials have signaled their readiness to hike rates further if Japan makes progress toward durably achieving its 2% inflation target, or if the risk of excessively high inflation materialises.
In a meeting with key ministers to discuss Japan's approach on U.S. tariffs held earlier on Tuesday, Ishiba stressed the need to scrutinise investors' behaviour due to unstable movements in the global financial market, Akazawa said.
"I won't comment on the yen's recent rise, though in general, import prices fall when the yen strengthens," Akazawa said, when asked about the yen's recent rebound against the dollar.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
26 minutes ago
- USA Today
NATO commits to higher spending sought by Trump and mutual defense
While Trump got what he wanted at the brief NATO summit, his allies will be relieved he committed to the fundamental principle of collective defense. THE HAGUE, June 25 (Reuters) - NATO leaders on June 25 backed the big increase in defense spending that President Donald Trump had demanded, and restated their commitment to defend each other from attack. While Trump got what he wanted at the brief summit, tailor-made for him, his NATO allies will be relieved that he committed to the fundamental principle of collective defense after less clear-cut language on June 24. In a five-point statement, NATO endorsed a higher defence spending goal of 5% of GDP by 2035 - a response not only to Trump but also to Europeans' fears that Russia poses a growing threat to their security following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. More: Israel-Iran ceasefire seems to hold as Trump lands in Europe for NATO summit The 32 allies' brief communique added: "We reaffirm our ironclad commitment to collective defense as enshrined in Article 5 of the Washington Treaty – that an attack on one is an attack on all." Asked to clarify his own stance on Article 5, Trump said: "I stand with it. That's why I'm here. If I didn't stand with it, I wouldn't be here." Macron brings up trade war at NATO summit Trump had long demanded in no uncertain terms that for other countries step up their spending on defense to reduce NATO's heavy reliance on the U.S. Despite an appearance of general agreement, French President Emmanuel Macron raised the issue of the steep import tariffs threatened by Trump, and the damage they may do to transatlantic trade, as a barrier to increased defense spending. More: Can Trump pull off peace plans, trade deals at the G7? What to know about the summit "You cannot come to us as allies and ask that we spend more, tell us we will spend more at NATO - and do a trade war. It's an aberration," he told reporters. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who hosted the summit in his home city of The Hague, said NATO would emerge as a 'stronger, fairer and more lethal' alliance. He had earlier acknowledged that it was not easy for European countries and Canada to find the extra money, but said it was vital to do so. "There is absolute conviction with my colleagues at the table that, given this threat from the Russians, given the international security situation, there is no alternative," the former Dutch prime minister told reporters in his home city of The Hague. The new spending target - to be achieved over the next 10 years - is a jump worth hundreds of billions of dollars a year from the current goal of 2% of GDP, although it will be measured differently. Countries would spend 3.5% of GDP on core defence - such as troops and weapons - and 1.5% on broader defence-related measures such as cyber security, protecting pipelines and adapting roads and bridges to handle heavy military vehicles. All NATO members have backed a statement enshrining the target, although Spain declared it does not need to meet the goal and can meet its commitments by spending much less. More: Trump says US strike impaired Iran's nukes. What does Pentagon say? Live updates Rutte disputes that but accepted a diplomatic fudge with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez as part of his efforts to give Trump a diplomatic victory and make the summit go smoothly. Spain said on June 25 that it did not expect its stance to have any repercussions. Trump meets Zelenskyy after summit Rutte kept the summit and its final statement short and focused on the spending pledge to try to avert any friction with Trump. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had to settle for attending the pre-summit June 24 dinner rather than the main meeting on June 25, although he met Trump separately after the conference ended. The Kremlin on June 24 accused NATO of being on a path of rampant militarization and portraying Russia as a "fiend of hell" in order to justify its big increase in defense spending.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge blocks Trump from withholding EV charger infrastructure funds
A federal judge on Tuesday issued a ruling blocking the Trump administration from withholding funds for electric vehicle charger infrastructure from 14 states. U.S. District Judge Tana Lin said the government overstepped their Constitutional authority by refusing to disperse dollars attached to the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act passed by former President Biden. The initiative was created to help rid EV drivers of range anxiety, which is defined as the unease experienced by electric vehicle ('EV') drivers when they are unsure where the next charging station might be and whether their car's battery has sufficient charge to get them there. 'Congress appropriated $5 billion to fund a National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure ('NEVI') Formula Program, the purpose of which was—and still is— 'to strategically deploy electric vehicle charging infrastructure and to establish an interconnected network to facilitate data collection, access, and reliability,'' Lim's order. However, the U.S. Department of Transportation suspended the program in February and rescinded approval of state plans pending a review, according to Reuters. Under Lim's order, EV infrastructure plans will be restored in Arizona, California, Colorado, Delaware, Hawai'i, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington and Wisconsin. The ruling does not apply to Minnesota, the District of Columbia, and Vermont, which Lim said failed to prove immediate harm following the DOT decision. The Trump administration now has seven days to appeal the order before it goes into effect. The White House did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment on the matter. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Senate careens towards Friday tax vote
Senate Republicans are steaming toward a Friday initial vote on their big tax cuts bill, despite having a metric ton of work to do to finish the package. It's not totally inconceivable that negotiations continue past the vote to proceed to the bill and into the final amendment of the vote-a-rama — what's called a 'wraparound amendment' representing the final deal. There's plenty of outstanding business: Republicans are still wrangling over the bill's potential effects on rural hospitals and the state and local tax deduction. Some Republicans want a rural hospital fund of about $10 billion; others want as much as $100 billion, according to two people familiar with the debate. The parliamentarian has knocked out proposals to shift SNAP spending to states and sell public land — and while Republicans are rewriting them, they haven't been litigated yet. Republicans also haven't quite figured out how to handle an effort to stop state-level AI regulation. Still, optimists exist: 'We're on track,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said after meeting with senators. Senate Republicans are facing an acute time crunch, as they scramble to rewrite the bill after parliamentary rulings. Consider the SNAP provision: The parliamentarian struck down the proposal to shift some SNAP cots to states and has not reviewed the latest version. Once it's rewritten, Democrats will get the opportunity to challenge it again, a Democratic aide said. There's no hint yet of a breakthrough on SALT, though Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., predicted one will come soon — and that House Republicans will be able to swallow what the Senate comes up with. 'My first responsibility is that we pass it in the Senate and at the same time we want a bill that can pass the House,' Mullin said. 'We're just going to make it, hopefully, easy enough' for them to pass it. At the moment, it looks like Republicans could finish the bill sometime on Saturday. And Senate Majority Leader John Thune is bracing for the possibility that there 'could be' more than just Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., in opposition. 'We've got a lot of very independent-thinking senators who have reasons and things that they'd like to have in this bill that would make it stronger,' Thune said. 'When push comes to shove, you're looking at whether you're going to allow the perfect to be the enemy of the good.'
