The nation created by Jinnah
Listen to article
Led by great leaders, envisioned and created by Jinnah, and carried forward by the Muslim community — youth, men and women alike — this nation was built through sacrifice, selflessness and relentless efforts. Resilient, patriotic and high in spirit, it cannot bear the evil eye.
The freedom of Pakistan embarked on a new era, ushering in economic, political and social perspectives, and enabling the practice of religion freely. It presented enormous opportunities for the public and the state to strive for the nation's progress. Like an enchanting story, the people inclined themselves towards making their vibrant culture even more beautiful with its unique traits of love and kindness.
No external power can now diminish the worth and mettle of its people. This was proved 77 years ago when Jinnah declared, "There is no power on Earth that can undo Pakistan."
Stanley Wolpert, in his book, Jinnah of Pakistan, beautifully writes in honour of our Quaid: "Few individuals significantly alter the course of history. Fewer still modify the map of the world. Hardly anyone can be credited with making a nation."
Quaid-e-Azam, the architect of the nation, launched the freedom movement and raised Indian Muslims to the height of glory, which was to be preserved in the Land of Pure for all times to come. Not only Muslims but Hindus too were dear to him. Hence, he was called the ambassador of Hindu-Muslim Unity — a unity seen when the Indian National Congress and the All India Muslim League came together on one platform for the Lucknow Pact of 1916.
In his early career, he advocated for Hindus and Muslims to live together and flourish peacefully on the subcontinent. But time became so turbulent that the unity once epitomised at the Lucknow Pact was never witnessed again. Over the years, the rift between Hindus and Muslims widened, ultimately leading to the partition.
Nevertheless, after the partition, the animosity between Hindus and Muslims escalated, resulting in three wars and several skirmishes. More recently, this has culminated in events like Operation Sindoor and its reaction, Operation Bunyan al-Marsoos. Panic ensues on both sides.
Tragically, 77 years have passed since the partition, and in the meantime, both nations have remained at daggers drawn, with less positivity and increasing negativity in their ties. This belligerence seems to be a continuum of the past hostility, when both nations lived together despite diverse cultures and beliefs. The differences between the two nations were rightly envisioned in the Two-Nation Theory — a fact that remains undeniable.
Kashmir, meanwhile, has long been the main cause of fluctuating relations between the two countries. The integrity, stability and sovereignty of the region have been chained by constant conflict, resulting in chaos and hatred. The surge in belligerence continues, especially with India's verbal attacks after a superpower-brokered ceasefire.
Listening to PM Modi's fake stance and watching Indian media coverage reveals humiliation and degradation directed at Pakistan. The blame game and misinformation by Indian media remain on the rise, leading its public through bias and hatred against Pakistan.
India cannot win this game through ill will and misinformation to gain public favour. Victory lies in strong and sincere efforts — something our armed forces have demonstrated with their patriotism and valour, surprising their counterparts. In this regard, the armed forces deserve a grand salute for making the nation proud of their bravery. May these protectors always stand tall in the face of adversity!
Evil eyes off! This is the nation of Jinnah, who created Pakistan on the principles of Unity, Faith and Discipline. Therefore, the nation stands by these principles and abides by international law. Though it might be economically weak, it is rich in patriotic love and enthusiasm — because here lives the nation created by Jinnah.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
9 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Importance of the Pezeshkian's visit to Pakistan
A couple of days ago, Islamabad hosted Dr Masoud Pezeshkian, the honourable President of Iran, and his accompanying delegation. This was Dr Pezeshkian's first official visit to Pakistan. In April 2024, the then President Ebrahim Raisi made a three-day trip to Pakistan, receiving a warm welcome from the people and officials of the country. Shortly after Raisi's visit to Pakistan, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif travelled to Tehran to pay his respects and attend the memorial ceremony for the late President Raisi. A year later, in May of this year, Sharif visited Tehran once again to express his appreciation on Iran's stance regarding the India-Pakistan conflict. Pezeshkian's recent visit was also at the invitation of Shehbaz Sharif and, in effect, a reciprocal response to Sharif's trip to Tehran. Thus, within less than two years, top officials from Iran and Pakistan have travelled to each other's countries four times in addition to their frequent meetings on the sidelines of major regional and international summits. These repeated meetings reflect the close ties between the two countries and underscore the importance of their relationship, particularly in the current context where the need to expand cooperation is being felt more than ever. Iran-Pakistan relations have enjoyed relative stability in recent decades, and visits and meetings between their officials have become a common occurrence. However, what added extra significance to the President's recent trip were the unique political circumstances and regional and global developments that have unfolded in recent months. The outbreak of war between India and Pakistan in May 2025, both nuclear-armed nations, placed the region in an extremely sensitive situation. Although the war was short-lived and lasted no more than four days, its consequences still linger for both countries and the broader region and world. Ongoing war in the occupied territories and the genocide in Gaza have also deeply impacted international politics. In this regard, the stances of Islamic countries, especially Iran and Pakistan, carry considerable weight. Both Tehran and Islamabad have taken firm, united positions, emphasizing full support for the Palestinian cause. Another issue is the tariff war initiated by Trump against many countries, which has drawn in most nations to some extent. Pakistan has not been spared, facing threats from Trump's policies. Most significantly, the recent 12-day imposed war launched by the Zionist regime against Iran has left wide-ranging effects on the region and fundamentally altered the geopolitics of the region and the Islamic world. Pakistan's stance as one of the most important and populous Muslim nations and a nuclear power holds particular importance. The President's visit to Pakistan came at a time when the country's stance regarding the 12-day imposed war was under intense scrutiny in Iran. Given that the Iran-Israel conflict erupted shortly after the India-Pakistan war, Pakistan's governmental and public reaction could have heavily influenced the Islamic Republic's position toward the India-Pakistan conflict. Available evidence suggests that Pakistan was satisfied with Iran's position. Shehbaz Sharif's visit to Tehran immediately after the India-Pakistan conflict — aimed at thanking Iran and other supporters — clearly attests to this. Islamabad's officials expressed appreciation for Iran's foreign minister's trip to both Pakistan and India and Iran's efforts to mediate between the two sides. Additionally, the Pakistani public's sensitivity toward the Palestinian issue and their strong aversion to the Zionist regime's criminal acts in Gaza significantly contributed to their support for Iran. There is also a growing concern in Pakistan about illegal joint actions by the Zionist regime and the US against Iran's nuclear facilities, and a possibility that similar actions could one day be taken against other countries as well. All these factors led to Islamabad's broad and firm support for Tehran and the unequivocal condemnation of Israeli and US aggression. This condemnation was strongly voiced in the UN Security Council by Pakistan's permanent representative. Pakistan, as a non-permanent member and rotating president of the Security Council at the time, explicitly labelled the bombing of nuclear facilities as illegal. Furthermore, Islamabad supported dialogue and negotiation and endorsed Iran's right to nuclear knowledge. Simultaneously, inside Pakistan, there was comprehensive support from the army and political figures to the extent that Pakistan's Parliament passed a resolution in support of Iran against Israeli aggression. All of this indicates that Pakistan, as a neighbour and fellow Muslim country, strongly supported the Islamic Republic of Iran. Thus, the Iranian President's visit could be seen as a reciprocal response to Shehbaz Sharif's appreciative visit to Tehran. For decades, Iran-Pakistan relations have been influenced by security issues, particularly regarding the condition of their shared borders. In past visits by Pakistani prime ministers and military chiefs to Tehran and vice versa, a recurring theme has been upgrading border security to border economics. Over the years, both sides have developed mechanisms to enhance coordination in combating terrorism. As outlined in the President's itinerary, boosting economic and trade relations between the two nations was a major goal of the current trip. Considering the economic structures and capacities of Iran and Pakistan, there was broad consensus that their economic cooperation potential far exceeds current levels. On a larger scale, one crucial issue Tehran and Islamabad should consider is tapping into regional economic capacities. One such opportunity is connecting Pakistan to Turkey and Europe via Iran. Both Tehran and Islamabad can capitalize on the improved recent relations between Pakistan and Turkey. Additionally, interest from traders in operating through Chabahar port and its proximity to Gwadar port presents an opportunity to transform these two potentially rival ports into complementary nodes along Pakistan's trade route to Europe. All of this depends on the economic outlooks of Iran and Pakistan: whether they aim to use each other's economic potential and act as partners and complements. There is an ocean of untapped capacities in both countries, and activating them requires serious political will from both sides. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Israel bars Jerusalem's top Muslim cleric from Al-Aqsa
OCCUPIED JERUSALEM: Israeli authorities have banned Jerusalem's top Muslim cleric from entering the Al-Aqsa Mosque compound for six months over a recent sermon, his attorney told AFP on Wednesday. Muhammad Ahmad Hussein, the grand mufti of Jerusalem, will be prevented from entering the holy site in the Israeli-annexed Old City until January 2026, according to lawyer Khaldoun Najem. Najem said Israeli police 'did not interrogate' or held a hearing for the mufti prior to their decision. Contacted by AFP, police did not immediately comment. Hussein's lawyer said that the ban was due to a Friday sermon the mufti gave at Al-Aqsa — Islam's third-holiest site and a Palestinian national symbol — in late July, 'which contained nothing inappropriate'.
Express Tribune
15 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Stories of terrorism
Listen to article I was once a graduate student in a Texas university and later for a brief period of time a PhD candidate here at the University of Houston. During lectures and discussion sessions in class, every time the issue of terrorism would come up, people sort of paid attention to what I had to say because the killing of Osama bin Laden had just happened a few years ago. And everyone knew that I was from Pakistan. The leading newspapers at the time dedicated an enormous amount of space to stories of terrorism, Taliban, Al Qaeda, and so forth mostly having a connection with Pakistan. While that reporting has died down with time, what has rather emerged recently is the most bizarre and direct connection that terrorism always has had with either the CIA or the FBI. I have written in this space back in March that the cult leader Charles Manson and the notorious Manson family murders had a CIA connection. The CIA wanted to understand the extent of how much a human being could be converted into a human robot, where it would follow the command to go and kill innocent people without thought or remorse. Theodore John Kaczynski aka Ted Kaczynski aka Unabomber went from being a Harvard genius to a terrorist that killed innocent people because of the extreme methods his mind was subjected to by the CIA as part of what was called Project MKUltra. We all know who the makers of Al Qaeda are and how Bin Laden was treated as a hero while he was fighting against the Soviets in Afghanistan. The 90s decade is very interesting. Sheikh Omar Abdul Rehman, the blind cleric who ran away from Egypt, indoctrinated young Muslims in New York and New Jersey areas, to attack America. Ramzi Yousaf and his friends executed a bomb attack targeting the World Trade Center on February 26, 1993. Two days later, in Texas, the FBI unleashed an attack against a religious cult known as Branch Davidians. At the end of the 51-day siege, the FBI ended up killing innocent people, including 21 children. This Waco siege made one former US soldier, a Gulf War veteran, extremely angry at the federal government for its tyrannical tendencies and actions against private citizens. His name was Timothy McVeigh. He decided to take revenge. Two years after the Waco debacle, McVeigh bombed a federal building in Oklahoma city, killing 168 people. This remains the deadliest act of domestic terror in US history. McVeigh was arrested, tried, and killed by lethal injection on June 11, 2001. That was three months before the most famous terrorist attack of our time. McVeigh's case was handled with sheer alacrity and the case was ended creating a foul smell of a cover-up. There was an accomplice of him, which was never identified or found. It has been 30 years since that deadly terrorist attack and no effort has resulted in unmasking his identity. There is a video of the actual bomb delivery when McVeigh and his accomplice were carrying out the attack. That video has never been shown. It wasn't even shown at the trial of McVeigh. It only makes common sense for an investigative agency to get to the bottom of the story and find all those involved in the most deadly domestic terrorist attack of the nation's history. And that is when it all starts to smell of a cover-up. The Epstein story smells of the same cover-up. The man is said to have killed himself in a jail cell and everything just was accepted on its face. Epstein's brother, however, hired a private investigation, which disagrees with the findings of the government that Epstein hanged himself in his jail cell awaiting trial. I guess we will never know the truth of so many of these things. But in every story of terrorism, people should only look at the CIA and FBI, not just to find the truth and safeguard the nation but also to ask, "Do you have something to do with this one too?"
