A 'mature,' 18+ circus is setting up shop in St. Cloud
However, Cirque Italia is ratcheting up the horror angle with "Paranormal Cirque," a new production heading to St. Cloud in May.
The group says the "mature" performance combines theater, (animal-free) circus, and cabaret "with a new European-style flare."
Cirque Italia says its paranormal showcase features innovative horror performances geared toward a "mature audience," with spectacles that include the Wheel of Death, magic, acrobatics, and monstrous creatures.
The run in St. Cloud begins May 23 and runs through May 26 under a white and black big top tent in the parking lot of the Crossroads Mall at 4101 West Division St.
Tickets start at $10. Any attendees under 18 must be accompanied by a parent or guardian.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Alex Jones' Infowars assets will be sold to pay over $1B in debts to Sandy Hook families: judge
Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones will have to sell his Infowars' assets to pay more than $1 billion he owes to the families of victims of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, according to a Texas court ruling. A court-appointed receiver will be responsible for taking over and selling the assets of Infowars to pay off Jones' debts to Sandy Hook families, according to an order signed by Judge Maya Guerra Gamble in Austin on Wednesday. The order has the potential to shut Jones out of his studio in the coming days — forcing the conspiracy theorist to fork over the company's property, recording equipment, and brand name, the filing indicated. 3 A court-appointed receiver will be responsible for taking over and selling the assets of Infowars to pay off Jones's debts to Sandy Hook families. AP His debts amount to a whopping $1,288,139,555, according to court documents. The Wednesday ruling appeared to restart an effort by The Onion to buy Infowars and its assets to turn the platform into a parody site. 'We're working on it,' Ben Collins, chief executive of The Onion, said in a social media post Wednesday. Last year, the satirical outlet won a bankruptcy auction for Infowars, backed by Sandy Hook families. But a federal bankruptcy judge halted the sale in December of last year, criticizing the bidding process as flawed. 3 On his daily show on Thursday, Jones blasted the court order as improper, claiming he already has another studio set up in the event Infowars is shut down. AP On his daily show on Thursday, Jones blasted the court order as improper, claiming he already has another studio set up in the event Infowars is shut down. 'People want to hear this show,' said Jones, who is based in Austin. 'I will continue on with the network. They can harass me forever. … And they won't get me off the air,' he said. Relatives of the victims of the Sandy Hook shooting sued Jones in Connecticut Superior Court in 2018 after he spread the baseless claim that the massacre was a fabricated pretext to take Americans' guns. He was found guilty in 2022 for defamation after his false claims that the 2012 massacre, which killed 26 people, including 20 children, was a hoax. 3 The order also appeared to restart an effort by The Onion to buy Infowars and its assets to turn the platform into a parody site. Getty Images Mentally ill killer Adam Lanza, 20, used a Bushmaster AR-15-style rifle in his rampage, leading to widespread debate about gun control in the country. Lanza committed suicide after the massacre. Everytown for Gun Safety, a nonprofit committed to ending gun violence that was founded after the Sandy Hook shooting, previously said it would advertise on a relaunched version of the site under The Onion if the sale of the platform went through. 'Today's order brings us a critically important step closer to achieving the goal that the Connecticut families have spent years fighting for: holding Alex Jones accountable for years of harm,' Christopher Mattei, one of the lawyers for the families, said in a statement to the New York Times. A contact for Jones' attorney was not immediately available for comment. With Post wires
San Francisco Chronicle
4 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
I used AI to make this song. The results, and its implications, startled me
Earlier this month, a band called the Velvet Sundown surpassed 1 million monthly listeners on Spotify. Its profile features two albums, some gauzy cover art and a genre-appropriate backstory. The music was credible, the branding effective and the effect convincing. Only afterward did we learn the truth: There was no band. Every note, lyric, image and faux-autobiographical gesture was the work of generative artificial intelligence. The project was presented as human, then rebranded as 'synthetic music guided by human creative direction,' a soft euphemism for automation. Whatever creative intentions, aesthetic sensibilities or prompting skills that may have guided the project, the resulting songs still arose from full substitution because no embodied musical practice took place. No performance, no skill-based interaction with the medium, no causal chain running through human hands in the act of making. We are in the process of crossing a threshold. AI systems trained on decades of creative labor now can plausibly simulate artistry, threatening to render the human creator redundant. Skills that once required years of practice are instantly mimicked by code. Musicians now face an existential question: Has their craft, refined through long hours of practice, collaboration and performance, already become obsolete? Listeners also face a paradox. A song moves you, but its 'singer' cannot feel. What, then, has moved you? The structure, the timbre, the rhetorical form? Or the knowledge that somewhere, behind the notes, another person is manipulating generative AI with whom you might be joined in experience? There is historical precedent for this. In the industrial era, machines hollowed out skilled labor. Weaving, typesetting and machining were all transformed into logistical problems that were, by and large, solved through automation. What disappeared was not only employment but a relationship between work and meaning. The rhythms of human labor were replaced by the monotonous hum of mechanical replication. Today's creative automation occurs on cloud servers. The new assembly line runs through graphics processing units and datasets on which a million songs become the raw template material for one more product. I've experienced this firsthand. Last year, I subscribed to Suno, an AI platform that generates music from text and audio prompts. Its marketing promises 'a future where anyone can make great music,' reframing skilled composition as a technical barrier waiting to be removed. My early experiments were forgettable. A prompt request for a Weimar-style cabaret polka returned a tune that sounded less like 'The Threepenny Opera' (1928), and more like elevator music for a mid-tier chain hotel in Leipzig, circa 2004. A Krautrock-inspired instrumental was more on point, but still nothing to write home about. Over time, however, Suno's responses improved dramatically. Then, in July, I decided to write a song combining the old way with the new generative tools. I uploaded lyric ideas (finished by ChatGPT) and a low-fi guitar recording from my phone to Suno. After several cycles, what came back startled me. The track, titled 'Ashes on the Heath,' didn't just resemble my idea; it felt like it was the idea, polished. The vocal delivery seemed emotionally real. It almost felt like a collaboration. [Listen to the song below.] Of course, the emotion wasn't real. Generative AI doesn't really collaborate. It doesn't know you or have feelings about strum patterns or drum fills. Most importantly, it doesn't make mistakes, which are integral to the process of real music. AI replicates genre conventions and timbral signatures. It does not live through them. It reproduces the statistical contours of prior performances while living nowhere inside them. It can only reconfigure forms once used to produce meaning. Generative AI is not magic; it's logistics. Platforms like Suno do not understand or feel music. They approximate its grammar. They rely on vast archives of recorded music, often pulled without permission or compensation. AI's 'cheap' outputs aren't cheap because the cost of making art has vanished. They're cheap because the cost for training is being invisibly offloaded onto past labor that was never compensated. They don't feel or resolve tension. They don't second-guess themselves. They produce form without the living content that once made form matter. Other audio tools based on machine learning — e.g., Izotope's noise reduction plug-in and Logic Pro's stem separation — have already become normalized in music production. But generative AI crosses a different line. It doesn't just assist the process. It threatens to supersede it entirely. The result could be substitution rather than enhancement. While some might argue that generative AI democratizes creativity, this framing obscures a deeper reality. These systems make possible the instantaneous imitation of creativity. Authorship too easily collapses into prompt-entry. It is more akin to configuration from a catalog. Yes, AI can and will enhance creative projects, making new outcomes possible. No, it will not mean the same thing if no human struggle threads it together. When I initially shared my AI-assisted track with a few friends, I withheld the fact that the vocals had been created by a machine. The reception was warm. Some listeners were moved to tears. Then I shared the track with some other friends, disclosing the AI vocals upfront. The reception was quite different. 'There's no tell in the vocal that it's a heartless construct sent by fascitarian tech overlords to extract phosphorus from the working class,' one wrote. 'So: 1) good job, and 2) ohmygodwhatishappening?' Another said simply, 'Nice track — but I draw a hard line on AI for music creation, and I'm sure you know why.' I do know why. Because music isn't just sound. It's a relationship based on tension, memory and embodiment. It's the moment in the take that no one planned, but everyone went with, or the phrasing that makes the line land. I don't think AI will erase human music. Music is social; it comes from bodies in time. But the economic logic is changing. A tireless synthetic co-worker, charging a modest monthly subscription fee and trained on the unpaid labor of artists whose livelihoods it now threatens — this is all new. The point is not to romanticize a pre-generative-AI past. It is to understand that the problem is not the tool but the system that deploys it to cheapen labor and consolidate cultural production on private platforms. The question is not only, 'Can AI make art?' but also, 'Who controls what counts as art and under what terms?' Platforms like Suno are not only generating songs. They are scripting the future conditions under which music will be made, circulated and valued. To what extent these systems serve as creative tools or substitutes for creativity will decide whether culture remains an open field of human meaning or a closed loop of recombinable parts. That decision is, in principle, ours to make. But the conditions for exercising that agency are eroding quickly.
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
The podcast that broke the internet
What to know about Taylor Swift's new era. President Donald Trump raises the stakes in his meeting with Russia's leader. And more towns are finding cancer-causing chemicals in their water systems. 👋 Hello! Rebecca Morin here. The vibes for Thursday: sunny, warm and newsy. But first: A centuries-old helmet on another planet? 🌎 Nope, it's just a rock on the surface of Mars that looks to have a pointed peak and a flared "brim." A new era ushered in From a broken heart to one fully restored, Taylor Swift's upcoming era, "The Life of a Showgirl,' will be fun, pop and upbeat − at least according to Travis Kelce, the mega-popstar's boyfriend. Swift made her highly anticipated debut as a guest on Kelce's "New Heights" podcast Wednesday. As the episode began, the singer's website updated with an album cover of her submerged in bathwater in a bedazzled corset, along with an Oct. 3 release date for her new 12-track album. When was the album made? Swift wrote, sang and produced "Showgirl" during the European leg of the Eras Tour, flying to Sweden to record. The album was produced by Swedish producers Max Martin and Shellback, along with Swift. The artwork represents the end of her nights on tour. 🎶 Highlights from Swift's interview. Trump's gambit It's like a game of chess. At least that's how President Donald Trump is describing his high-stakes, one-on-one meeting Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. In an interview with Fox News Radio on Thursday, Trump said he hopes the meeting with Russia's leader will lead to a second meeting with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy where the two sides can hammer out details for a peace deal. Trump will meet with Putin at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage. 👉 Trump said there's a '25% chance' the meeting could fail to advance peace talks. Ukraine's defense: Zelenskyy visited London on Thursday – one day before the Trump-Putin summit – to shore up European support for efforts to prevent any agreement that would carve up Ukraine. 👉 Trump has said a deal could include what he called a land swap. Real quick A Biden-Trump feud Just not the Biden and Trump you might be thinking of. First lady Melania Trump threatened Aug. 6 to sue Hunter Biden, the son of former President Joe Biden, for more than $1 billion if he doesn't retract the claim that she was introduced to her husband by convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Hunter Biden said Thursday that he had read the account in newspaper articles dating back to 2019. When asked during an interview whether he would like to apologize to the first lady for his comments, he said: 'F--- that. That's not going to happen.' 👉 What to know about Melania Trump's proposed legal action. What's in your water? More towns have 'forever chemicals' in their water systems, according to new data from the Environmental Protection Agency. A USA TODAY analysis of new test results the EPA released last week shows 839 water systems had yearly averages exceeding EPA limits for two types of forever chemicals. The latest data release showed some smaller communities had reported the most eye-popping concentrations in their drinking water. For example, in Nashville, North Carolina, a town of 6,000 east of Raleigh, the average of two samples taken last fall and this March was 86 times over the limit. 'Forever chemicals' risks: The chemicals, PFAS, or per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, increase the risk of certain types of cancer and other health problems. 👉 See which cities have 'forever chemicals.' A break from the news Rebecca Morin is a newsletter writer at USA TODAY. Got thoughts or feedback? Reach out to her at rdmorin@
