logo
SA must take drastic action to avert US tariffs deadline and unblock investment

SA must take drastic action to avert US tariffs deadline and unblock investment

Daily Maverick18 hours ago
South Africa's strategy on striking a trade deal with the US must be based on what South Africa needs to raise economic growth; to develop domestic sectors critical to the world economy and what the US needs for economic growth that the US currently does not have; and unblocking obstacles to foreign investment in South Africa that undermines not only US investments, but other foreign investments as well.
South Africa will have to offer US President Donald Trump's administration concessions that will work for the US broadly, or for Trump specifically, to secure a tariff deal. South Africa must proactively offer the US opportunities. Countries like Vietnam, India and Indonesia proactively did so.
The questions South Africa must ask in its tariff negotiations with the US are what does the US have that South Africa lacks and is critical to South Africa's economic growth; and what does South Africa have that is essential to US economic growth?
South Africa is seeking to fend off a looming 30% US tariff on its products, and the deadline is 1 August. In May, a 25% import tax on car parts came into force in the US. This was on top of a 25% import tax on cars, which came into effect in April. These two automotive tariffs hit South Africa's car manufacturing industry. In June, the US doubled tariffs on foreign steel and aluminium imports to 50%.
Before the BRICS+ Summit two weeks ago, US President Donald Trump said the US would impose an additional 10% tariff on any countries aligning themselves with the 'Anti-American policies' of BRICS+. 'There will be no exceptions to this policy,' Trump said.
South Africa is a member of the 10-nation BRICS+ group. Early this year, Trump threatened a '100% tariff' on 'hostile' BRICS+ countries that support a common currency to rival the US dollar. South Africa is in real danger of being caught in Trump's anti-BRICS+ war.
On Tuesday, US lawmakers advanced a bill that would sanction leaders of the ANC over 'corruption or human rights abuses'. The US House Committee on Foreign Affairs voted 34-16 to send the 'US-South Africa Bilateral Relations Review Act' to the full House of Representatives, where it could be subject to a vote. The measure would need to pass both the House and the Senate before it could be signed into law.
'America abandoned'
The bill was introduced in April by Ronny Jackson, a Republican congressman who said that 'South Africa made its choice when they abandoned America and our allies and sided with communists and terrorists'.
With a 1 August deadline looming for South Africa to strike a trade deal with the US, and the US now targeting ANC leaders with sanctions for their 'anti-American' stances, securing a tariff deal by 1 August appears nigh on impossible. One option is for South Africa to ask for an extension of the deadline.
South Africa urgently needs to establish a task team, like Japan, to conduct a fast-paced negotiation. South Africa's strategy must be to have South African business leaders who trade with the US leading a negotiation task team, supported by government officials. ANC officials must not be part of these negotiations as the US is gunning for many ANC figures.
Trump has made energy a key part of the US negotiations. South Africa has an energy crisis — which is undermining foreign investment, business creation, economic growth and therefore job creation, poverty reduction and inequality reduction.
The US is the world's largest liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporter. South Africa has rightly offered to buy liquefied natural gas from the US over a 10-year period as part of proposals to secure a trade deal.
In President Cyril Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump, the Presidency said that importing 75 to 100 million cubic metres of LNG from the US would 'unlock approximately $900-million to $1.2-billion in trade per annum and $9-billion to $12-billion for 10 years based on applicable price'.
South Africa would import between 75-100 petajoules, roughly 75 to 100 million cubic metres, of LNG per year from the US.
The US production of aluminium has been declining for decades, leaving the country's auto industry reliant on imports. Canada is the largest supplier of primary aluminium to the US, accounting for 75% of the material consumed there, according to the US Aluminum Association.
Aluminium is a lightweight and effective conductor of electricity, making it useful in many transportation and energy systems applications. Aluminium is one of 50 'critical minerals' identified by the US Geological Survey.
In 2021, South Africa produced about 720,000 tons of refined aluminium, becoming the largest aluminium -producing country in Africa, according to Aluminium Federation of South Africa CEO Muzi Manzi, who added that 'a large proportion of the primary metal produced is used in the local market as remelt ingots to produce castings and powders, with the rest of the metal destined for exports'.
Metal of choice
Aluminium is the metal of choice in both internal combustion engines and electric vehicles because of its lightweight properties, which allows vehicles to be fuel efficient, and is a key metal in the green value chain. Aluminium is also used in packaging because it is a more environment -friendly option than many other materials.
Aluminium is also used to make buildings green, and is used in the manufacturing of 'green' window and door frames, because of the material's ability to balance internal climate conditions. It is a key part of renewable energy projects, such as solar or wind power infrastructure and inputs.
Aluminium can be recycled and South Africa needs to develop a local aluminium recycling and processing industry. South Africa can offer the US aluminium — which would serve the interests of the US.
In 2022, South Africa was the 27th largest crude steel producer globally, according to the World Steel Association, but South Africa's steel production has declined in the past few years. State Capture, lack of pragmatic industrial policies, and increased competition from cheap Chinese state-subsidised steel has undermined the industry.
South Africa's steel industry has to a large extent failed to adapt to technological advances — steel producers around the world have moved towards more low-carbon, energy-efficient production, while South Africa's production is still using apartheid-era manufacturing processes, such as old blast furnace technology.
State, infrastructure and policy failure because of corruption, incompetence and ideological policies have undermined South Africa's economic sectors, including aluminium and steel production and exports.
According to a document from the Presidency, South Africa has proposed a duty-free quota of 385 million kilogrammes for steel per year and 132 million kilogrammes of aluminium per year to the US.
The US desperately needs critical minerals and rare earth elements, which are dominated by China. South African can offer the US access to both critical minerals and rare earths.
South Africa's Expropriation Law, which makes provision for expropriation without compensation, must be withdrawn. Contrary to popular arguments that the expropriation without compensation law will not lead to mass expropriation, property rights involve not only land, but also intellectual property, pensions and the shares and bonds of locals and foreigners, including US citizens.
South Africa must also cancel the current Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) model that gives slices of local and foreign companies to politically connected 'political capitalists', and replace BEE with alternative empowerment models, such as the employment of youth, building of public infrastructure, transferring technology and skills, supporting STEM subjects (Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths) at black schools, and giving opportunities to manufacturing SMEs. DM
This is an extract from Professor William Gumede's talk at the recent Inclusive Society Institute webinar on 'Building US-Africa relations under the Trump administration and its nexus with China'.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sudan's war is an economic disaster: here's how bad it could get
Sudan's war is an economic disaster: here's how bad it could get

IOL News

time9 minutes ago

  • IOL News

Sudan's war is an economic disaster: here's how bad it could get

People walk past destroyed vehicles on the grounds of a hospital in Sudan's capital Khartoum in April 2025. Image: AFP In the two years of civil war in Sudan the country has lost more than 50% of it's economy. Image: AFP Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading My research applies economy-wide models to understand how conflict affects national development. In a recent study, my colleagues and I used this approach to answer the question: what will happen to Sudan's economy and poverty levels if the war continues through 2025? To assess the economic impact of the conflict, we used a Social Accounting Matrix multiplier model. This is a tool that captures how shocks affect different sectors and other agents of the economy, such as firms, government and households. Based on our modelling, the answer is devastating: the conflict could shrink the size of Sudan's economy by over 40% from 2022 levels, plunging millions more into poverty. We modelled two scenarios to capture the potential trajectories of Sudan's economy. The extreme scenario assumes a sharp initial collapse, with a 29.5% contraction in the size of the economy in 2023 and 12.2% in 2024, followed by a 7% decline in 2025, reflecting some stabilisation over time. The moderate scenario, based on World Bank projections, applies a 20.1% contraction in 2023 and a 15.1% drop in 2024, also followed by a 7% reduction in 2025, indicating a slower but more prolonged deterioration. We estimated the annual figures and report only the aggregate impacts through 2025 for clarity. We found that if the conflict endures, the value of Sudan's economy will contract by up to 42% from US$56.3 billion in 2022 (pre-conflict) to US$32.4 billion by the end of 2025. The backbone of livelihoods – agriculture – will be crippled. And the social fabric of the country will continue to fray. How we did it Our Social Accounting Matrix multiplier model used data from various national and international sources to show the impact of conflict on the value of the economy, its sectors and household welfare. We connected this to government and World Bank data to reflect Sudan's current conditions. This allowed us to simulate how conflict-driven disruptions affect the value of the economy, its sectors and household welfare. What we found Under the extreme scenario, we found: Gross domestic product collapse : Gross domestic product (GDP) measures the total value of all goods and services produced in a country within a year. It's a key indicator of economic health. We found that the value of Sudan's economy could contract by up to 42%. This means the country would be producing less than 60% of what it did before the conflict. This would affect incomes, jobs, government revenues and public services. The industrial sector – heavily concentrated in Khartoum – would be hardest hit, with output shrinking by over 50%. The value of services like education, health, transport and trade would fall by 40%, and agriculture by more than 35%. Job losses : nearly 4.6 million jobs – about half of all employment – could disappear. Urban areas and non-farm sectors would be worst affected, with over 700,000 farming jobs at risk. Incomes plummet : household incomes would decline across all groups – rich and poor, rural and urban – by up to 42%. Rural and less-educated households suffer the most. Poverty spikes : up to 7.5 million more people could fall into poverty, adding to the 61.1% poverty level in 2022. In rural areas, the poverty rate could jump by 32.5 percentage points from the already high rural poverty rate pre-conflict (67.6% of the rural population). Women, especially in rural communities, are hit particularly hard. Urban poverty, which was at 48.8% pre-conflict, increases by 11.6 percentage points. The agrifood system – which includes farming, food processing, trade and food services – would lose a third of its value under the extreme scenario. Why these findings matter Sudan was already in a fragile state before the war. It was reeling from decades of underinvestment, international sanctions and institutional breakdown. The war has reversed hard-won gains in poverty reduction. It is also dismantling key productive sectors – from agriculture to manufacturing – which will be essential for recovery once the conflict ends. Every month of continued fighting adds to the damage and raises the cost of rebuilding. Our projections already show major economic collapse, yet they don't include the full extent of the damage. This includes losses in the informal economy or the strain on household coping strategies. The real situation could be even worse than what the data suggests. What needs to be done First and foremost, peace is essential. Without an end to the fighting, recovery will be impossible. Second, even as conflict continues, urgent action is needed to stabilise livelihoods. This means: supporting agriculture in areas that remain relatively safe. Food production must be sustained to prevent famine. restoring critical services where possible – particularly transport, trade and retail – to keep local economies functioning protecting the most vulnerable, such as women in rural areas and the elderly, through expanded social protection and targeted cash assistance. Third, prepare for recovery. The international community – donors, development banks and NGOs – must begin laying the groundwork for post-conflict reconstruction now. This includes investment in public infrastructure, rebuilding institutions and re-integrating displaced populations. The bottom line Sudan's war is more than a political crisis. It is an economic catastrophe unfolding in real time. One that is deepening poverty, destroying livelihoods and erasing years of progress. Our research provides hard numbers to describe what Sudanese families are already experiencing every day. The country's economy is bleeding. Without a shift in the trajectory of the conflict, recovery could take decades – if it happens at all. | The Conversation Khalid Siddig is Senior Research Fellow and Program Leader for the Sudan Strategy Support Program, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

ActionSA introduces performance tracker and discusses Mettler's future
ActionSA introduces performance tracker and discusses Mettler's future

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

ActionSA introduces performance tracker and discusses Mettler's future

Tshwane Mayor Nasiphi Moya has reiterated that the multiparty coalition in the city remains stable, despite potential threats from the ANC to remove City Manager Johann Mettler, a move opposed by ActionSA. Image: Oupa Mokoena / Independent Newspapers ActionSA has taken a decision to desist from speaking out about potential threats to remove City of Tshwane municipal manager Johann Mettler, who has faced recent criticism from the ANC over the legitimacy of his 2022 appointment. Party national chairperson Michael Beaumont made this assertion during a media briefing in Pretoria on Tuesday, where the party launched the Tshwane mayor's performance tracker that shows how the city is performing under the leadership of ActionSA Mayor Nasiphi Moya. The controversy surrounding Mettler's appointment has been ongoing, with the ANC announcing plans to request a special council meeting to debate the validity of his appointment. The party has raised concerns about alleged irregularities in the selection panel's composition and questioned whether Mettler met the required minimum competency levels. Mettler's appointment has been surrounded by controversy following a letter from Gauteng MEC for Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs, Jacob Mamabolo, to Moya, inquiring about the integrity of the appointment process for a senior manager. Asked to clarify ActionSA's stance, Beaumont said the party will not engage further on the issue of threats to remove Mettler from his position. 'We ventilated our opinion on the issue. It is a matter of public record and particularly in light of our view that we should not invite unnecessary instability in the city that is starting to move forward for the first time in a long time. In our view this is a governance issue and we would like to draw a very big wall between governance and the party political issues,' he said. He had previously stated that ActionSA does not support Mettler's removal, citing that stability in senior city management is crucial to the formula that has begun to yield success. On a lighter vein, Beaumont responded to speculation about a potential motion of no confidence against Moya, saying that it is a trend in South Africa for people to start plotting a mayor's removal from day one. He taunted those planning the motion, saying: 'If you think the reaction to General (Nhlanhla) Mkhwanazi was big, I would like to consider carefully how the residents would respond to anyone who tries to remove this mayor. I wish that political party good luck with their idea.' Meanwhile, ActionSA leader Herman Mashaba said threats to remove Mettler will be handled by Moya in a proper and professional manner at the appropriate time. Beaumont explained that the Tshwane mayor's performance tracker is updated in real-time with data from the city, allowing residents to monitor the city's progress on the party's website. The ActionSA-initiated government tracker monitors key areas such as financial stability, infrastructure, economic revitalisation, safety and cleanliness, governance, and customer care. Moya said the tracker is going to take the city far and reiterated that the coalition is stable. 'There is a lot that we have been doing as the coalition partners. In case and when we have disagreements, which we have had, we have to find ways to resolve those,' she said. [email protected]

BRICS+ Series: Africa Embraces Financial Alternatives Through BRICS De-dollarisation
BRICS+ Series: Africa Embraces Financial Alternatives Through BRICS De-dollarisation

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

BRICS+ Series: Africa Embraces Financial Alternatives Through BRICS De-dollarisation

BRICS' de-dollarisation strategy aims to reshape Africa's financial landscape, potentially liberating the continent from dollar dependency and fostering economic independence. Image: / BRICS nations are accelerating de-dollarisation, reducing reliance on the US dollar in global trade and finance. This push for a new financial architecture, promoting local currencies and alternative payment systems, was spurred by the Ukraine conflict and Western sanctions. For example, over 80% of Russia-China trade in 2023 bypassed the dollar, using yuan and ruble. Launched in 2024, the BRICS Bridge Payment System offers an alternative to SWIFT, facilitating cross-border transactions in local currencies. By mid-2025, pilot testing was underway between China, Russia, and India, with South Africa and Egypt recently joining. This emerging system raises the question of whether it can free Africa from its long-standing reliance on the dollar. The dollar's costing Africa Africa's financial susceptibility to the US dollar is deeply rooted in both its structure and history. Over 60% of the continent's external debt is denominated in US dollars. In 2024, African nations spent an estimated $70 billion on debt servicing, a figure significantly inflated by rising US interest rates and a strong dollar, according to the African Development Bank. This substantial financial strain diverts crucial funds from vital sectors such as development, education, and healthcare. Furthermore, dollar dependency exacerbates external vulnerabilities, as evidenced by trade imbalances. Nigeria, Africa's largest oil producer, consistently struggles with dollar shortages, currency devaluations, and inflation. This is because while its oil exports are priced in dollars, the majority of its imported goods are also dollar-denominated, creating a persistent economic challenge. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ BRICS and the promise of monetary sovereignty African nations may regain monetary sovereignty through the de-dollarisation agenda. By trading in local currencies or a BRICS-backed settlement currency, they could mitigate exposure to dollar volatility. With intra-BRICS trade rapidly expanding to $422 billion in 2023, African BRICS members are well-positioned to leverage this transition. Several nations are increasingly adopting local currency trade to alleviate pressure on their foreign reserves. For example, Egypt entered a $2.5 billion bilateral currency swap agreement with China in late 2024, enabling it to use yuan for Chinese imports and thereby conserve its foreign exchange. Similarly, Ethiopia, grappling with persistent dollar shortages and a trade deficit exceeding $10 billion, is looking into conducting local currency trade with India, a significant exporter of pharmaceuticals and engineering products. As Africa's most industrialised economy, South Africa plays a crucial role in BRICS' financial integration initiatives. Its banking sector is currently testing cross-border settlements through the BRICS Bridge Payment System. By conducting a portion of its trade with China, Russia, and India in currencies other than the dollar, South Africa aims to protect itself from global monetary instability. A cautious road to financial independence De-dollarisation alone cannot solve all economic challenges. Many African currencies lack the necessary stability and liquidity for efficient trade, as seen with the persistent inflation and foreign exchange volatility of the Nigerian naira and Ethiopian birr amongst others. True monetary independence will remain elusive until domestic economies are strengthened and confidence in local institutions is re-established. To prevent a new form of dependency, African nations should prioritise diversifying their trade relationships, strengthening regional economic ties, and establishing strong financial governance. Building regional capacity BRICS provides African nations with significant leverage, offering them a crucial role in reshaping global financial regulations. To truly achieve liberation, however, African states must seize this opportunity to establish autonomous institutions. The African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), when integrated with BRICS mechanisms, can foster increased intra-African trade using local currencies. Furthermore, the Pan-African Payment and Settlement System (PAPSS) by the African Export-Import Bank, introduced in 2022, can work in conjunction with BRICS infrastructure to lessen the continent's reliance on the US dollar. Uganda and Nigeria are engaging with BRICS-related initiatives, signaling a shift away from dollar-denominated transactions. Uganda, while not a full BRICS member, signed a 2025 memorandum with India to investigate using the rupee for agro-processing imports, which would alleviate pressure on its dollar reserves. Nigeria is exploring membership in the BRICS Bank (NDB), aiming to access non-dollar loans that could finance energy infrastructure and mitigate foreign exchange risks. Liberation lies in leverage, not replacement BRICS' de-dollarisation strategy offers Africa a unique opportunity to redefine its position within the global financial system. It provides mechanisms, alternatives, and partnerships to lessen the dominance of the dollar. However, this strategy alone cannot secure Africa's financial independence. Achieving this liberation requires robust institutions, prudent macroeconomic policies, and unified regional cooperation. Instead of merely shifting its allegiance from Washington to Beijing, Africa must assert its independence. While BRICS can provide the framework, Africa itself must undertake the construction. Written By: Dr Iqbal Survé Past chairman of the BRICS Business Council and co-chairman of the BRICS Media Forum and the BRNN *Sesona Mdlokovana Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group African Specialist ** MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE ** Follow @brics_daily on X/Twitter & @brics_daily on Instagram for daily BRICS+ updates

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store