NATO agrees Hague summit statement with 5% defence spending goal, diplomats say
BRUSSELS -NATO countries agreed a statement on Sunday for their upcoming summit that sets a goal of 5% of GDP for annual defence and security-related spending by 2035, overcoming objections from Spain, diplomats said.
The statement has the green light from all 32 NATO members, diplomats said, but will only become official when it is approved by leaders including U.S. President Donald Trump at their summit in The Hague on Wednesday.
Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez had blocked an earlier version of the text, saying that committing to a 5% target would be unreasonable and counterproductive. Spain spent 1.24% of GDP on defence in 2024, according to NATO estimates
Diplomats overcame Sanchez's objections by adjusting the text on the spending pledge, changing the language from "we commit" to "allies commit", diplomats said. That allowed Sanchez to claim the commitment would not apply to Spain.
"We fully respect the legitimate desire of other countries to increase their defence investment, but we are not going to do so," Sanchez said in an address on Spanish television Sunday.
NATO operates by consensus so all of its 32 members have to approve a statement for it to be adopted.
NATO officials argue that big defence spending increases are needed to counter a growing threat from Russia and to allow Europe to take on more responsibility for its own security as the United States shifts its military focus to China.
The alliance's current defence spending target is 2% of GDP but Trump insisted it should rise to 5% - although he suggested on Friday that target should not apply to the United States.
Under a plan by NATO boss Mark Rutte, countries would reach 5% of GDP by boosting their core defence spending goal from 2% to 3.5% and spending a further 1.5% on related items like adapting roads and bridges for military vehicles and cyber security.
Rutte had originally proposed countries meet the new target by 2032 but the deadline in the final text is 2035, according to diplomats. There will also be a review of the target in 2029.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
3 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Russia-Ukraine conflict: Donald Trump eyes three-way meeting with Putin, Zelensky
U.S. President Donald Trump said Wednesday he would seek a three-way meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky and Vladimir Putin immediately after his Alaska summit with the Russian leader aimed at ending the three-year war in Ukraine. Mr. Trump spoke after what he described as a "very good" call with European leaders, including Mr. Zelensky -- even as Russian forces made their biggest advance into the Ukrainian president's country in more than a year. "If the first one goes okay, we'll have a quick second one," Mr. Trump told reporters as he was questioned about the face-to-face in the Alaskan city of Anchorage with his Russian counterpart, set for Friday. "I would like to do it almost immediately, and we'll have a quick second meeting between President Putin and President Zelensky and myself, if they'd like to have me there." The high-stakes summit comes with Mr. Trump struggling to broker an end to the conflict, and Mr. Zelensky and his European allies earlier urged the Republican to push for a ceasefire. The stepped-up Russian offensive, and the fact Mr. Zelensky has not been invited to Anchorage, have heightened fears that Trump and Putin could strike a deal that forces painful concessions from Ukraine. The U.S. leader promised dozens of times during his 2024 election campaign to end the conflict on his first day in office but has made scant progress towards securing a peace deal. He threatened "secondary sanctions" on Russia's trading partners over its invasion of Ukraine but his deadline for action came and went last week with no measures announced. - 'Severe consequences' - Mr. Trump warned Wednesday that he would take a follow-up meeting off the table if he felt Putin was acting in bad faith. "There may be no second meeting because, if I feel that it's not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we are not going to have a second meeting," Mr. Trump said. According to an AFP analysis of battlefield data from the U.S.-based Institute for the Study of War, Russian forces made their biggest 24-hour advance into Ukraine in more than a year on Tuesday. As the war rages on in eastern Ukraine, Mr. Zelensky flew to Berlin and joined Chancellor Friedrich Merz on an online call with other European leaders, and the NATO and European Union chiefs, in which they talked to Trump and urged a united stance against Russia. The consensus was for Mr. Trump to secure a ceasefire, and Mr. Trump said Russia would face "severe consequences" if it didn't halt its offensive. But Mr. Zelensky also voiced doubt about Moscow's intentions, saying: "I have told my colleagues -- the U.S. president and our European friends -- that Mr. Putin definitely does not want peace." Mr. Trump on Monday played down the possibility of a breakthrough in Alaska but said he expected "constructive conversations" with Mr. Putin. "This is really a feel-out meeting a little bit," Mr. Trump said. But he added that eventually "there'll be some swapping, there'll be some changes in land". Merz said Ukraine is ready to negotiate "on territorial issues" but stressed that legal recognition of Russian occupations "would not be up for debate". After the call, European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen said Europe, the United States and NATO had "strengthened the common ground for Ukraine" while NATO head Mark Rutte declared: "The ball is now in Putin's court." - 'Wool over our eyes' - The Russian foreign ministry had earlier branded the frantic round of diplomacy "politically and practically insignificant" and an attempt at "sabotaging" US and Russian efforts to end the conflict. Despite the upbeat comments by European leaders, Russia's offensive in eastern Ukraine was gaining speed and seizing ground Wednesday. Russia has made rapid advances this week in a narrow but important section of the front line in Ukraine. The AFP data analysis showed that the Russian army took or claimed 110 square kilometers (42.5 square miles) on August 12 compared to the previous day. It was the most since late May 2024. Ukrainian soldiers in Kramatorsk, an eastern city about 20 kilometers (12 miles) from the front, said they had low expectations for Trump's meeting with Putin. Artem, a 30-year-old serviceman, said the war would likely continue for "a long time." "Putin is massing an army, his army is growing, he is stockpiling weapons, he is pulling the wool over our eyes."
India.com
3 minutes ago
- India.com
Putin's U.S. Playbook: How Russian Leader Has Tested Every American President
New Delhi: Russian President Vladimir Putin approaches his upcoming summit in Alaska with U.S. President Donald Trump with a wealth of experience: 48 meetings with five American presidents over 25 years. Spanning Bill Clinton to Joe Biden, the interactions trace a journey from initial optimism to tense standoffs and highlight how Putin has courted, challenged and frustrated U.S. leaders. Clinton Era: 2000 Less than three months into his presidency, Putin hosted then American President Bill Clinton in Moscow. The Kremlin tour ended with a jazz performance. Clinton praised Russia's ratification of two arms control treaties and highlighted the nation's chance to grow under Putin while preserving freedom. Putin called the United States 'one of our main partners' and emphasised cooperation. Chechnya remained a sensitive issue after the apartment bombings in 1999, but early meetings showed hope for a constructive U.S.-Russia relationship. Bush Years: 2001-2008 After 9/11 attacks, Putin was first to call then U.S. President George W. Bush to offer support. The latter welcomed him to Crawford, Texas, and drove him to a ranch waterfall. Later meetings reflected growing unease as NATO expansion and Iraq tensions emerged. Bush hosted Putin in Maine for a fishing trip, where the Russian president caught the only fish, releasing it afterward. Their final encounter in Sochi focussed on European missile defense disagreements, ending with mutual acknowledgment of differences but preserving personal rapport. Obama Period: 2009-2016 As prime minister, Putin met President Obama in Moscow and Northern Ireland. Disagreements over Russia's 2008 invasion of Georgia and Syria were clear. At the 2013 G8 Summit, an awkward photo captured the growing frustration. By 2016, at the APEC Summit in Peru, exchanges lasted barely four minutes in the middle of allegation of U.S.-engineered coups and Crimea sanctions. Trump Era: 2018 Trump and Putin met in Helsinki for a highly publicised one-on-one. Despite controversies over election interference, the Russian leader expressed optimism about cooperation on global challenges. Trump publicly accepted Putin's denial of interference, drawing widespread attention. The two met six times during Trump's first term. Biden Era: 2021 Ex-President Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva as relations had reached a low point. The former addressed election interference, cyberattacks and troop buildups along Ukraine's border. The summit reset ties slightly, agreeing to reappoint ambassadors. Months later, Russia invaded Ukraine and it sparked Europe's largest conflict since World War II, a war Trump aims to end in the upcoming Alaska summit. From jazz concerts and fishing trips to sanctions and war, Putin's encounters with U.S. presidents reveal a leader adept at shaping diplomacy on his terms. Each meeting reflects his evolving strategy, from building partnerships to testing the limits of American patience.
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
Only a ‘bloody nose' to Russia can end Ukraine war: Former NATO military commander
Brussels, Aug 13 (UNI) Ahead of the upcoming Trump-Putin summit in Alaska, former NATO Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe, General Sir Richard Shirreff, has expressed doubts whether the summit will at all prove effective in ending the war, claiming that only a 'bloody nose' will force the Kremlin to end the conflict. "Russia has to recognise and Putin has to recognise that Zelenskyy is president of Ukraine, recognise the Ukrainian constitution and Ukraine's right to exist as a sovereign state. And that is only going to happen ... when Russia gets a really bloody nose. 'And for that to happen, we need to see some proper strategic thinking from NATO - from the president of the United States - that recognises that this is about transatlantic security,' he told BBC. He further advocated for Ukraine's membership into the NATO, stating that it was imperative to ending the war. "Even if Putin moves on or falls under a bus, we're probably likely to get somebody in place just as hard-line, just as ultra-nationalistic, and just as determined to press on (with Russia's takeover of Ukraine)," Shirreff said. "So, I think we have to recognise that European security means deterrence - a band of deterrent steel, as I've said many times - from the Baltic to the Black Sea, with Ukraine as a NATO member. 'Now, however far-fetched that may seem from where we are at the moment, that's the reality. ... Any sort of compromise now, any so-called freezing of conflict, is only going to continue to postpone it." Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has warned the US that it will not agree to any territorial concessions, nor accept a decision in which it has no part in, stating 'Talk about us, without us, it will not work.' He further criticised the US mediations in ending the three-year-long war, claiming that the diplomatic discussions led by Washington on the matter failed to address key Ukrainian demands, including security guarantees to prevent future Russian aggression and including Europe in negotiations and rehabilitate Putin. UNI ANV SSP
