What happens next in Texas redistricting and for Democrats facing civil arrest warrants
Texas Republicans are scheduled to reconvene Tuesday after they voted to issue civil arrest warrants for Democrats who fled the state to stop a GOP-led redistricting effort.
The Texas House on Monday authorized the warrants for dozens of Democratic lawmakers who didn't appear and denied the Texas House a quorum necessary to move forward with redistricting. The warrants empowered state troopers to arrest the absent Democrats and bring them to the Capitol.
But the Democrats who left the state fled to Illinois, New York and Massachusetts, three Democratic-led states outside Texas law enforcement's authority without local officials' cooperation.
'That's why in this case and in previous recent quorum breaks, they have left the state to escape the jurisdiction of the marshals and other arresting officers in the state,' Sarah Chen, a voting rights attorney with the Texas Civil Rights Project, told CNN.
And since the Democrats aren't breaking any criminal or state laws, Chen said, it wouldn't be possible for officials to seek the lawmakers' extradition from the states they're holed up in.
'Any sort of work with other states or federal law enforcement would be more of like calling in a favor rather than any sort of legal obligation,' she said.
One of the Texas lawmakers who fled to New York, state Rep. Jolanda Jones, said Monday that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott was 'trying to get soundbites' by threatening arrests of the absent legislators. 'Subpoenas from Texas don't work in New York, so he's going come and get us how?'
Monday's action 'is just the procedure of what you do when people walk out,' said Andrew Cates, a lawyer in Texas who specializes in legislative and political law. 'No one is scared of it' if they've left the state.
'They haven't broken any laws that anyone knows of, so extradition is not going to work,' he added.
The state House is currently scheduled to meet at 2 p.m. EDT (1 p.m. CDT). It doesn't appear that the House will have enough lawmakers present to reach the two-thirds attendance needed for quorum.
Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows said he had signed civil warrants for the Democratic lawmakers who fled the state. The speaker told reporters that House Republicans will work with the Texas Department of Public Safety 'to locate members.' He said one Democrat had announced a fundraiser Tuesday in Austin.
'I've sent that fundraising letter to DPS and said they should be invited to attend, as well. We'll see how that goes forward,' he said.
Abbott said in a statement he had ordered DPS 'to locate, arrest, and return to the House chamber any member who has abandoned their duty to Texans.'
'This order will remain in effect until all missing Democrat House members are accounted for and brought to the Texas Capitol,' he said.
The House Democrats' decision to flee the state and deny majority Republicans a quorum comes as the state's legislature seeks to redraw the Texas congressional districts to make five seats more favorable for the GOP. Doing so would improve the party's chances of holding onto control of the US House, where they now have a three-seat majority, next November.
As he presided in the House on Monday, Burrows said he would do 'everything in my power to establish quorum and move this body forward by any and all means available to this office.'
'To those who are absent: Return now,' he said. 'Show the courage to face the issues you were elected to solve. Come back and fulfill your duty, because this House will not sit quietly while you obstruct the work of the people. The people of Texas are watching, and so is the nation, and if you choose to continue down this road, you should know, there will be consequences.'
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said he would do 'everything in my power' to force Democrats back to Austin.
'It's imperative that they be swiftly arrested, punished, and face the full force of the law for turning their backs on the people of Texas,' Paxton said in a statement.
Republicans tried a similar tactic to force an end to Democrats' 2021 quorum break — that one a failed attempt to block restrictive new voting laws. The House sergeant-at-arms sent the warrants to those Democrats, deputized law enforcement to find them and even dropped paperwork off at some members' homes, though no arrests were made.
The Texas Supreme Court ruled in 2021 that the House does have the authority physically compel the attendance of absent members.
In the wake of that 2021 quorum break, the Texas House also adopted new rules that allow for $500-per-day fines for those who are absent. Lawmakers cannot use their campaign or official funds to cover their own fines. Those new rules have not yet been tested in state court, Chen said.
Cates noted the fine for absenteeism has not been enshrined in state law. If a lawmaker refused to pay, he said: 'How do you enforce it?'
Abbott issued warnings about potential bribery charges – and suggested he will seek to remove the absent Democrats from office and replace them – in a Fox News interview Monday.
'I believe they have forfeited their seats in the state legislature because they're not doing the job they were elected to do,' he said.
The GOP's threats, and civil warrants, were not a surprise to Democrats who said they knew the consequences when they left the state.
'If law enforcement arrests me, I will go peacefully. But I am doing this because I'm fighting for my constituents,' state Rep. James Talarico told CNN.
CNN's David Wright, Devan Cole and Fredreka Schouten contributed to this report.
See Full Web Article
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
IndyCar pushes back on DHS use of racing imagery
IndyCar pushed back on recent Department of Homeland Security (DHS) use of racing imagery in connection with a state partnership to house detainees in Indiana. 'We were unaware of plans to incorporate our imagery as part of yesterday's announcement. Consistent with our approach to public policy and political issues, we are communicating our preference that our [intellectual property] not be utilized moving forward in relation to this matter,' IndyCar said in an emailed statement to The Hill on Wednesday. In a post on the social platform X Tuesday, DHS posted a picture of a vehicle that looks like those used in IndyCar racing branded with the initials for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) next to a prison. The Hill reached out to DHS for comment. DHS announced Tuesday it had signed another state partnership to house detainees in Indiana. It comes after Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz' and will increase ICE space to detain migrants. The extra bed space, dubbed the 'Speedway Slammer' in reference to Indiana racetracks, is in an existing prison located around 65 miles north of Indianapolis. 'COMING SOON to Indiana: The Speedway Slammer. Today, we're announcing a new partnership with the state of Indiana to expand detention bed space by 1,000 beds,' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said in a statement. 'Thanks to [GOP] Governor [Mike] Braun for his partnership to help remove the worst of the worst out of our country. If you are in America illegally, you could find yourself in Indiana's Speedway Slammer. Avoid arrest and self deport now using the CBP Home App.'
The Hill
12 minutes ago
- The Hill
Mamdani holds double-digit lead over Cuomo in DDHQ average
New York City Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani leads former Gov. Andrew Cuomo by 13 points in Decision Desk HQ's recently formed average tracking the race. The average, made up of a mix of independent and campaign-associated polls, shows Mamdani ahead in the five-candidate field with 38.1 percent as of the most recent polling, followed by Cuomo, who is running an independent campaign after losing the Democratic primary, with 25 percent. Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa is in third with 15 percent, followed closely by incumbent Mayor Eric Adams, who is also pursuing an independent campaign, with 11.5 percent. Independent Jim Walden, a former assistant U.S. attorney, trails well behind in last with just over 1 percent. Mamdani has been in the process of coalescing Democratic support behind his candidacy after his upset win in the primary in June over Cuomo. Some top Democratic leaders have withheld their endorsement for Mamdani despite him being the Democratic nominee, and polling has shown Mamdani with less support than what would normally be expected for the Democratic nominee for mayor in the heavily Democratic city. But Mamdani's support has been ticking up, while Cuomo's support has been dropping. Mamdani has also picked up endorsements from New York Democrats like Reps. Jerry Nadler and Adriano Espaillat, the latter of whom backed Cuomo in the primary. The other candidates in the race have expressed concern about the possibility of splitting the vote among them in November and allowing Mamdani to win the general election. Cuomo has suggested that the candidates should unify behind whichever candidate is in the strongest position to face Mamdani in September. But Adams and Sliwa, who have consistently trailed Cuomo in polling for second place, have been adamant that they will not drop out.
Miami Herald
12 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Was dropping atomic bombs on Japan justified? 80 years later, views have changed
American public opinion toward the atomic bombing of Japan has changed significantly over time. The latest poll from the Pew Research Center reveals that less than half of Americans currently view the bombings as justified, marking a notable drop from earlier years. The survey was conducted ahead of the 80th anniversary of the bombings of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The two nuclear blasts killed around 200,000 people, many of whom were children, and left survivors with debilitating side effects, including higher rates of cancer and chronic illness. The attacks — which took place on Aug. 6 and Aug. 9, 1945 — were quickly followed by Japan's surrender to the U.S., which brought an end to World War II. They also signaled the dawn of the nuclear age, sparking a worldwide arms race that has led at least nine countries to develop atomic arsenals. In the recent Pew survey, 35% of respondents said the bombings were justified, while a slightly smaller share, 31%, said they were not justified. An additional 33% said they were not sure. The results appear to follow a trend of declining support for the nuclear attacks. In 1945 — in the immediate aftermath of the bombings — a Gallup poll found the vast majority of Americans, 85%, approved of the U.S. decision to drop the newly invented weapons on Japanese cities. Many years later, in 1990, another Gallup survey revealed that a much smaller share of respondents, 53%, approved of the attacks. And, in four subsequent Gallup surveys conducted between 1991 and 2005, approval fluctuated between 53% and 59%. In 2015 — on the 70th anniversary of the bombings — a Pew poll found 56% of Americans believed the attack was justified, while 34% said it was not. However, this survey did not include a 'not sure' option, unlike the most recent one. The latest survey — which sampled 5,044 U.S. adults June 2-8 — also revealed noticeable differences in views based on gender, partisanship and generational lines. For example, 51% of men said the bombings were justified, while just 20% of women said the same. Similarly, 51% of Republicans and those who lean Republican said the attacks were justified, while just 23% of Democrats and Democrat-leaning respondents said the same. Older Americans were also more likely than their younger counterparts to approve of the U.S. bombings. Nearly half of those 65 and older, 48%, said they were justified, while just 27% of 18- to 29-year-olds agreed. The poll — which has a margin of error of 1.6 percentage points — also asked respondents whether they believe the development of nuclear weapons has made the world more or less safe. The vast majority, 69%, said the creation of atomic weapons has made the world less safe. Just 10% said it's made the global community more safe, and 21% said they were not sure. When asked if nuclear weapons made the U.S. in specific safer, 47% said no and 26% said yes. Republicans were more likely than Democrats to say both that the development of nuclear weapons has made the world and the U.S. more safe.
