Former New Hampshire Gov. Sununu won't run for Senate in 2026
Former New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu said he will not run for U.S. Senate, despite scoring President Donald Trump's endorsement.
Sununu — who served four terms as the state's governor before declining to seek a fifth —
made the announcement
Monday on The Pulse of NH's 'Good Morning NH' radio show. Sununu had been viewed as a frontrunner for the 2026 Senate race since Democratic Sen.
Jeanne Shaheen
announced she would not seek reelection.
'I really thought about it,' he said to The Pulse of NH's Jack Heath. 'I actually talked to the White House this morning. I talked to Tim Scott. Thanked him for all their support and confidence and all that, but I don't have to be the candidate, and I'm not going to be the candidate.'
Sununu's remarks follow Trump backing the Republican's potential run over the weekend.
'He came to my office, came to the Oval Office, and met with Chris Sununu, and I support him fully. I hope he runs,' Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday. 'He's been very nice to me over the last year or so, but no, I hope he runs. I think he'll win that seat.'
Trump's support came as a surprise given how he and Sununu have clashed over the years. Sununu has
previously criticized Trump's rhetoric
, backing Nikki Haley in the 2024 Republican primary. However, he quickly threw his support behind Trump after he became the presumptive nominee.
Scott Brown, a former Massachusetts GOP senator and U.S. ambassador, who is weighing a potential run, praised Sununu on Tuesday. Brown was the Republican nominee for the New Hampshire Senate seat in 2014.
'@ChrisSununu and the entire Sununu family are patriots who have made our state a better place - looking forward to seeing what's next for him and working alongside him for New Hampshire's future,' Brown said in
an X post
Tuesday, referring to Sununu's announcement.
Democratic Rep.
Chris Pappas
launched a campaign
for Shaheen's Senate seat last week, seeking to maintain Democrats' grasp of the seat.
With a Senate run out of the picture, Sununu said he would continue his work in the private sector for now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
18 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Iran's top diplomat says talks with US 'complicated' by American strike on nuclear sites
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — Iran's top diplomat said the possibility of new negotiations with the United States on his country's nuclear program has been 'complicated' by the American attack on three of the sites, which he conceded caused 'serious damage." The U.S. was one of the parties to the 2015 nuclear deal in which Iran agreed to limits on its uranium enrichment program in exchange for sanctions relief and other benefits. That deal unraveled after U.S. President Donald Trump pulled the U.S. out unilaterally during his first term. Trump has suggested he is interested in new talks with Iran, and said that the two sides would meet next week. In an interview on Iranian state television broadcast late Thursday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi left open the possibility that his country would again enter talks on its nuclear program, but suggested it would not be anytime soon. 'No agreement has been made for resuming the negotiations,' he said. 'No time has been set, no promise has been made, and we haven't even talked about restarting the talks.' The American decision to intervene militarily 'made it more complicated and more difficult' for talks on Iran's nuclear program, Araghchi said. Israel attacked Iran on June 13, targeting its nuclear sites, defense systems, high-ranking military officials and atomic scientists in relentless attacks. In 12 days of strikes, Israel said it killed some 30 Iranian commanders and hit eight nuclear-related facilities and more than 720 military infrastructure sites. More than 1,000 people were killed, including at least 417 civilians, according to the Washington-based Human Rights Activists group. Iran fired more than 550 ballistic missiles at Israel, most of which were intercepted but those that got through caused damage in many areas and killed 28 people. The U.S. stepped in on Sunday to hit Iran's three most important strikes with a wave of cruise missiles and bunker-buster bombs dropped by B-2 bombers, designed to penetrate deep into the ground to damage the heavily-fortified targets. Iran, in retaliation, fired missiles at a U.S. base in Qatar on Monday but caused no known casualties. Trump said the American attacks 'completely and fully obliterated' Iran's nuclear program, though Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on Thursday accused the U.S. president of exaggerating the damage, saying the strikes did not 'achieve anything significant.' There has been speculation that Iran moved much of its highly-enriched uranium before the strikes, something that it told the U.N. nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, that it planned to do. Even if that turns out to be true, IAEA Director Rafael Grossi told Radio France International that the damage done to the Fordo site, which was built into a mountain, 'is very, very, very considerable.' Among other things, he said, centrifuges are 'quite precise machines' and it's 'not possible' that the concussion from multiple 30,000-pound bombs would not have caused 'important physical damage.' 'These centrifuges are no longer operational,' he said. Araghchi himself acknowledged that 'the level of damage is high, and it's serious damage.'
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Department of Defense expands militarised zone along Texas border
The US Department of Defense is significantly expanding a militarised zone along the southern border in Texas, granting troops the authority to detain individuals for potential federal prosecution on charges of trespassing within a national defence area. The Air Force announced on Monday the annexation of a winding 250-mile (400-kilometre) stretch of the border. This expansion comes amid a broader buildup of military forces initiated under President Trump's declaration of a national emergency at the border. This newly designated national defence area, running along the Rio Grande, spans two Texas counties and borders cities including Brownsville and McAllen. It will be treated as an extension of Joint Base San Antonio. The Air Force has stated its readiness to immediately install warning signs prohibiting entry into the zone. The military strategy was pioneered in April along a 170-mile (275-kilometer) stretch of the border in New Mexico and expanded to a swath of western Texas in May. Hunters, hikers and humanitarian aid groups fear that they will no longer have access. In the newest national defense area, military responsibilities include 'enhanced detection and monitoring' and "temporarily detaining trespassers until they are transferred to the appropriate law enforcement authorities,' the Air Force said in a news release. At least three people have been directly detained by troops in New Mexico for processing by Border Patrol. More than 1,400 immigrants have been charged with incursions into the national defense areas, a criminal misdemeanor punishable by up to 18 months in prison. Court challenges to the charges have met with mixed results. The militarized border zone is a counterpoint to the deployment of roughly 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles following protests over Trump's stepped-up enforcement of immigration laws. The troop deployments are testing the limits of the Posse Comitatus Act, which prohibits the military from conducting civilian law enforcement on U.S. soil. Arrests at the border for illegal entry have decreased dramatically this year.
Axios
25 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive poll: Most voters back Iran strikes, but worry about attacks on U.S.
The U.S. attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities Saturday have left American voters with contradictory feelings, a new poll finds: A majority favored limited strikes, but nearly as many said they were worried about a widening war and Iran retaliating on U.S. soil. Meanwhile, most viewed the U.S. attacks as a success — and are likely to back similar military action as a result. Why it matters: The survey sheds light on Americans' nuanced views of war and rapidly evolving foreign policy. Republicans overwhelmingly approved of bombing Iran; sizable majorities of Democrats and independents did not. But once they were told the bombings only targeted Iran's uranium enrichment for its nuclear program, support increased in each group. The big picture:"When voters understand the strategic rationale behind the strikes, support increases," said pollster Ryan Tyson, head of the Tyson Group, which conducted the survey. It recently worked for Elon Musk's political committee when it supported President Trump's re-election. The broad support for military action that the survey found among Republicans and self-identified MAGA voters suggested that the divisions within Trump's base over Iran were more talk than reality. The poll also measured Trump's job performance, finding that 46% of Americans approve and 51% disapprove. Voters are deadlocked on his handling of foreign policy, but he's underwater by double digits when it comes to handling inflation. More concerns for Trump: There's persistent worry in the U.S. electorate about blowback from the bombings and the contagion of war. 75% of voters think that despite the Israel-Iran ceasefire, the conflict could escalate into a wider war. 46% think some sort of Iranian attack on U.S. soil is now likely. And 45% believe the strikes didn't make the U.S. safer, while just 36% said they did. The good news for Trump: By 50-33, voters would support airstrikes similar to those launched Saturday, a sign they see it as a success and a manageable risk. Two-thirds believe more U.S. attacks like last Saturday's are likely. 56% agree with the sentiment that military force is justified to stop a nuclear Iran. 55% believe that Iran's nuclear program was either "obliterated," to use Trump's words, or dealt a major setback. Just 25% thought it was barely affected or was unscathed. 62% said the strikes will have been worth it if Iran stops enriching uranium. The intrigue: The poll also reflected how Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza has been a drag on how U.S. voters view America's ally. By 2 percentage points, U.S. voters oppose the war in Gaza, the poll found. By 54-27%, they believe Israel has too much influence on American foreign policy. Voters are more inclined to arm Ukraine than Israel, the survey found. Ukraine's president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has solid favorability numbers as well, but Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's ratings are negative. Methodology: The Tyson Group's national survey of 1,027 U.S. voters was conducted online June 25-26. The survey has a margin of error of ±3.1 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. To analyze only the responses of those identifying as Republicans, an oversample was used to ensure the margin of error remained consistent. That did not affect the top-line results of the survey.
