Hakeem Jeffries takes his 'sweet time' holding the floor to delay Trump's tax bill
Jeffries held the House floor for more than eight hours Thursday, taking his 'sweet time' with a marathon floor speech that delayed passage of Republicans' massive tax and spending cuts legislation and gave his minority party a lengthy spotlight to excoriate what he called an 'immoral' bill.
As Democratic leader, Jeffries can speak for as long as he wants during debate on legislation — hence its nickname on Capitol Hill, the 'magic minute,' that lasts as long as leaders are speaking.
He began the speech at 4:53 a.m. EDT, and was on pace to break the record set by then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., in 2021, when he was the GOP leader. McCarthy spoke for 8 hours, 32 minutes when he angrily criticized Democrats' 'Build Back Better' legislation, breaking a record set by Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., when she spoke about immigration for 8 hours, 7 minutes in 2018.
'I feel an obligation, Mr. Speaker, to stand on this House floor and take my sweet time,' Jeffries said as he opened.
The speech pushed a final vote on Republican President Donald Trump's tax bill, initially expected in the early morning, into the daylight hours. The New York Democrat used the time to criticize the bill's health care and food aid cuts, tax breaks for the wealthy and rollbacks to renewable energy programs, among other parts of the bill that Democrats decry.
He also killed time by riffing on hip-hop, King George III and his own life story, among other diversions. He called out Republicans who have voiced concerns about the bill, read stories from people concerned about their health care from those GOP lawmakers' districts and praised his own members, some of whom sat behind him and cheered, clapped, laughed and joined hands.
'This reckless Republican budget is an immoral document, and that is why I stand here on the floor of the House of Representatives with my colleagues in the House Democratic caucus to stand up and push back against it with everything we have,' Jeffries said.
Jeffries sneaked small bites of food and drank liquids to boost his energy, but did not leave the chamber or his podium. The speech would be over if he did.
Democrats were powerless to stop the huge bill, which Republicans are passing by using an obscure budget procedure that bypasses the Senate filibuster. So they were using the powers they do have, mostly to delay. In the Senate, Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York forced Senate clerks to read the bill for almost 16 hours over the weekend.
Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., similarly gained attention in April when he spoke for more than 25 hours on the Senate floor and broke the record for the longest continuous Senate floor speech in the chamber's history. Booker was assisted by fellow Democrats who gave him a break from speaking by asking him questions on the Senate floor, but Jeffries' 'magic minute' did not allow for any interaction with other members.
Republicans who were sitting on the floor when Jeffries started trickled out, leaving half the chamber empty. And as they anxiously awaited their vote, some mocked him on social media.
'Anything that drives House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries this crazy must be good,' posted South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham. 'Pass the One Big Beautiful Bill now.'
___
Associated Press writers Lisa Mascaro and Leah Askrinam contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
26 minutes ago
- New York Post
New York's special interests will eat Zohran Mamdani for lunch
For all his radicalism, Zohran Mamdani's program is often as vaporous as steam wafting from a Midtown manhole. It's a lot more about vibes than about delivering real change. His city-owned grocery store scheme, for starters, is almost entirely symbolic — not any real answer to the price-gouging he and his fans pretends is common at privately owned markets. The initial plan is only for one city store in each borough: That literally can't make any difference for most New Yorkers. And those five stores can't even be a meaningful test because it'd be a disaster for the new mayor if any of the stores failed. Tellingly, Mamdani brags that Chicago has already done a 'feasibility study' for city-owned groceries. Problem is, no one can read the Chicago analysis, because city leaders shelved it — almost certainly because they discovered that municipal-owned supermarkets have no chance of success. Contrary to what the hipster socialists imagine, groceries' profit margins are not rich but as thin as deli-sliced ham: Keeping the store going requires obsessive management — not the casual oversight that's given the world the phrase 'good enough for government work.' Of course, even Mamdani's plans to finance his stores is as airy as coffee-cart bagels: He said he'd tap the $140 million that the city already gives away to corporate grocery chains as a subsidy — except his crack crew misread the facts on the city's 'Food Retail Expansion to Support Health' program. That $140 million, it turns out, is how how much private store owners invested in the local economy after getting much smaller tax breaks, not city outlays a mayor could redirect. The socialist's confusion here recalls fellow DSAer Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's celebration when Amazon pulled out of the plan to build a major headquarters in Queens: This freed up $3 billion that New York could spend on schools instead of a corporate giveaway, she exulted. But no: The massive e-tailer had simply been promised (just like many other companies) tax breaks if it created so many jobs; with the deal dead, Amazon wouldn't generate any income for the state to hold off on taxing. Zeroed-out Zohran must have the same math tutor as AOC, because zilch is how much the city has on hand to pay for his food pantries posing as groceries. Of course, Mamdani actually got the funding for another of his pilot-project schemes — then lost it because he couldn't even cooperate with fellow Democrats. Ending fares on MTA buses is one of his big ideas for making NYC 'affordable'; he helped author a one-year experiment in fare-free buses on five routes in 2024 — only to see Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie quietly can the next year's funding after Mamdani refused to vote to pass the state budget. Reminder: Much of Mamdani's program — starting with getting $10 billion to cover many initiatives by hiking taxes on the rich — depends on getting Albany's OK, and he's going to need Heastie's enthusiastic support since Gov. Kathy Hochul has already said 'no go!' How will Heastie fight for a guy he already sees as a lightweight? Look: New York politics, state and city, is packed with deeply connected special interests — with public-sector outfits (unions, massive nonprofits) often more ruthless than the real-estate lobby and other private-sector players. Voters' revulsion at that corruption is a big reason Mamdani won the primary, but this crew will eat the pretty boy for lunch while he's busy filming his next viral YouTube.


Fox News
28 minutes ago
- Fox News
Elon Musk launches ‘America Party' after Trump signs historic spending bill: 'Waste & graft'
Elon Musk says the two-party system is broken, and he just launched a new political party to prove it. On Saturday, Musk announced on X, the social media platform he owns, the formation of the "America Party," calling it a direct response to what he described as a corrupt political establishment that no longer represents the American people. The announcement followed a viral July 4 poll on X, where Musk asked whether voters wanted independence from what he called the "two-party (some would say uniparty) system." Over 1.2 million votes were cast, with 65.4% saying "yes." "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it," Musk posted Saturday. "When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom." The move came just after President Donald Trump signed the "big, beautiful bill" into law Friday at the White House. The sweeping $3.3 trillion legislation includes tax cuts, infrastructure spending and stimulus measures and has drawn criticism from fiscal conservatives and libertarians. Though Musk did not reference the bill directly in his America Party posts, the timing suggests rising friction between the billionaire and the president. Musk has previously warned that unchecked spending by both parties threatens the long-term health of the economy. The new party, according to Musk's posts, will target a few key seats in Congress. The goal is to create a swing bloc powerful enough to hold the balance of power and block what Musk sees as the worst excesses of both Republicans and Democrats. Some on the right voiced concern in the comments section that a third party could split the conservative vote and help Democrats win more easily. "Your third party will disproportionately take votes from the right vs the left and give the left an easier path to power," conservative commentator Shawn Farash posted. Others, like Joey Mannarino, urged Musk to focus instead on reforming the GOP from within. Critics also pointed out that the X poll was informal, not limited to American voters and vulnerable to bots. Third parties have traditionally had a difficult time gaining ground in American politics as the system is built for two dominant parties. With the Electoral College, winner-take-all elections and strict ballot access laws, outsiders cannot meaningfully compete. Even when a third-party candidate catches fire, it rarely lasts beyond a single election cycle. One of the biggest third-party efforts in recent history was Ross Perot's 1992 run. He earned nearly 19% of the popular vote as an independent but didn't win a single Electoral College vote. It was the closest a third-party candidate got to the White House after President Teddy Roosevelt's famed Bull Moose Party run in 1912 against his onetime protégé, William Howard Taft. Others, like Ralph Nader, have tried with the Green Party, and Gary Johnson with the Libertarian Party, but no third-party candidate has come close to winning national HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPThe White House did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Secret Super Stocks: If You Invested $1K in These 3 Companies 5 Years Ago, See What You'd Have Today
Most people think you need to be rich to make big money in the stock market. But what if all it took was spotting the right stock at the right time and investing just $1,000? While you might try to strike it big with well-known names like Apple, Tesla or Amazon, there are smaller companies that put up incredible returns. Discover More: For You: Take a look at three high-performing 'unknown' stocks over the past five years. If you had invested just $1,000 in each, you'd be sitting on over $230,000 right now. Let's break down the three silent winners and what made them explode. Note that these stocks were available at very low prices because they were 'penny stocks' that were only available as an Over-The-Counter (OTC) stock. You must use a broker that supports OTC trades to invest in stocks like these. Kolobri Energy Inc. (KGEI) is a small oil and energy company located in Oklahoma. Previously known as BNK Petroleum Inc., the company owns and operates Caney Shale oil wells — extracting crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids from the wells. The stock took off in early 2022 and has since skyrocketed from less than $0.10 per share, to over $7 per share. If you'd dropped just $1,000 into Kolibri five years ago, you'd be sitting on over $100 grand today. KGEI has returned 10,429% in the last 5 years alone. This would have turned your $1,000 investment into $105,290! Kolibri stock has already had a massive upside move, but there is still room for continued growth. The stock still has a relatively low price-to-earnings ratio (around 12), and continues to grow revenue year-over-year. Never heard of Viewbix? You're not alone. Viewbix Inc. is a smaller Israeli-based digital advertising platform that focuses on providing solutions for clients through search and digital content. This Ad-tech company stock was only available as an OTC stock until recently, when it was listed on the Nasdaq under ticker symbol VBIX. If you were buying OTC stocks back in 2020, you'd have been able to pick up this stock for around $0.05 per share. The company stock was relatively flat until late 2022, when it shot up from around $0.08 per share to over $3 per share within a year. It now sits around $4.50 per share, which is a 6,917% increase since 2020! If you invested $1,000 in Viewbix Inc. 5 years ago, you'd have around $70,170 today. And now that the company has listed on the Nasdaq exchange, there's more potential growth. Just keep an eye on revenue, which has been declining in recent years. Plus the company has yet to turn a profit, so proceed with caution. BioHarvest Sciences Inc. (BHST) is a biotech company doing futuristic things with plant cells — think dietary supplements and functional foods, all made in a lab. It also dabbles in cosmetics and health pharmaceuticals as well. If you were an early investor in BHST 5 years ago and dedicated to purchasing shares over the counter, you'd have bought them at around $0.12 per share. But with recent company growth and uplisting to the Nasdaq exchange in 2024, BHST stock is now trading for over $7 per share. This means your $1,000 would have turned into $57,190! This is another company still in growth mode, and hasn't seen a profitable year yet. But with revenues doubling year-over-year, there may still be even more upside potential. Just recognize this is still a very speculative investment. Seeing these eye-popping returns, you might be tempted to drum up $1,000 to drop in a small, unknown stock. But most micro-cap stocks don't see this type of growth — as many simply go out of business — leaving investors with $0. Plus, most of these explosive stocks have seen massive gains for investors that bought before being listed on a major exchange. This means purchasing Over-The-Counter (OTC), which requires working with a broker that supports OTC listings. It's higher risk, higher (potential) rewards. But if you're willing to do the leg-work of market research, technical analysis, and dig into the details of dozens of stocks, you might find a diamond in the rough. Just don't invest any money you aren't willing to lose. Editor's note: All stock prices were sourced from Stock Analysis. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 6 Hybrid Vehicles To Stay Away From in Retirement How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on Secret Super Stocks: If You Invested $1K in These 3 Companies 5 Years Ago, See What You'd Have Today Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data