
Price of popular beer hiked in supermarkets including Sainsbury's and Morrisons
The price of your favourite San Miguel has been steadily increasing since Budweiser Brewing Group (BBG) took over its production in January.
1
Single bottles have been hit hardest, rising by an average of 34p to a hefty £2.55, according to an investigation by The Grocer.
Sainsbury's shoppers have seen the biggest jump, with prices going up twice since January, from £1.99 to a whopping £2.75.
Morrisons isn't far behind, with a bottle now costing £2.50, up from £2.20.
Multipacks are also affected, with a four-pack of cans now costing around £5.94. Even larger packs have seen a slight increase.
So, what's behind the price hike?
BBG blames "government-imposed duties and new packaging taxes," which they say have increased production and distribution costs.
The brewing and pub industry is dealing with a slew of financial pressure, including a rise in employee national insurance contributions and fresh charges on waste packaging, which have added £1 to the cost of a 12-pack of beers.
This follows a 3.6% increase in duty rates introduced in February.
This hated levy is charged on all drinks with an alcohol by volume (ABV) strength exceeding 1.2%, either at the point of production or upon importation.
Sainsbury's and Morrisons say a variety of factors are impacting prices.
Asda declined to comment.
However, it seems San Miguel has been struggling to keep its head above water. Sales have dipped since BBG took over, falling by a hefty 13.3% to £216.3million.
Despite the price increases, BBG is trying to keep the Spanish spirit alive with a big marketing campaign, promising a "Spanish Summer – No Matter, Where," complete with TV ads, social media buzz, and pub giveaways.
A BBG spokesperson said: "San Miguel remains a consumer favourite, and we look forward to activating it this year with exciting marketing and trade campaigns."
Other popular beer brands have opted to reduce alcohol content as a way to minimise the impact of rising costs and avoid price increases.
What brands have slashed alcohol content?
Coors is dropping the alcohol level of its lager from 4% to 3.4% in the coming weeks, joining a growing list of brands watering down their booze.
Earlier this year, Heineken dropped the alcohol level of its SOL brand drinks from 4.2% to 3.4%.
Grolsch was cut from 4% to 3.4% last year, leaving fans furious.
The beer, relaunched by Asahi in 2020 after being scrapped the year before, was previously sold at 5% ABV.
Kronenbourg saw its alcohol content drop from 5% to 4.6%, with Carlsberg Marston's insisting it could still 'deliver great taste and quality' despite the change.
Hophead, brewed by Asahi-owned Dark Star, also fell from 3.8% to 3.4% last year as part of a major revamp across the range.
Banks Amber Ale was reduced from 3.8% to 3.4% in mid-2023 as part of a move to encourage 'moderation' among drinkers.
John Smith's Extra Smooth, the UK's No.1 keg ale, had its ABV trimmed from 3.6% to 3.4% to support healthier drinking habits according to Heineken.
Fosters, the Aussie-themed lager, had its alcohol level cut from 4% to 3.7% back in 2022 as part of Heineken's drive to meet demand for lower-alcohol drinks.
What's happening at pubs?
Last week, the boss of Wetherspoons warned the price of a pint will go up by 20p in the coming days as breweries are already pushing through hikes on the back of costs pressures from Labour's tax hikes.
The pub industry had already faced demands for higher prices from breweries, which had increased their prices by around 7p per pint in the past week, Sir Tim Martin revealed.
"It means pints in pubs are going to go up by on average 15p to 20p this month", he said.
Despite this, Sir Tim said he won't be raising prices at his own pubs.
The British Beer and Pub Association recently warned that the price of a pint is expected to exceed the £5 mark, up from the current average of £4.80.
Simon Dodd, chief executive of Young's, announced plans to raise the chain's prices by 2.5% to 3%.
Similarly, Stonegate Group, which owns popular pubs like Slug & Lettuce, Walkabout, and Popworld, increased prices by 4% for its leased and tenanted pubs on May 2.
Meanwhile Heineken increased the price of its draught beer by an average of 2.97% for pubs in February.
In January, Wetherspoons raised the prices of some drinks and meal deals by up to 30p.
How can I save money at Wetherspoons?
FREE refills - Buy a £1.50 tea, coffee or hot chocolate and you can get free refills. The deal is available all day, every day.
Check a map - Prices can vary from one location the next, even those close to each other.
So if you're planning a pint at a Spoons, it's worth popping in nearby pubs to see if you're settling in at the cheapest.
Choose your day - Each night the pub chain runs certain food theme nights.
For instance, every Thursday night is curry club, where diners can get a main meal and a drink for a set price cheaper than usual.
Pick-up vouchers - Students can often pick up voucher books in their local near universities, which offer discounts on food and drink, so keep your eyes peeled.
Get appy - The Wetherspoons app allows you to order and pay for your drink and food from your table - but you don't need to be in the pub to use it.
Taking full advantage of this, cheeky customers have used social media to ask their friends and family to order them drinks. The app is free to download on the App Store or Google Play.
Check the date - Every year, Spoons holds its Tax Equality Day to highlight the benefits of a permanently reduced tax bill for the pub industry.
It usually takes place in September, and last year it fell on Thursday, September 14.
As well as its 12-day Real Ale Festival every Autumn, Wetherspoons also holds a Spring Festival.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
11 minutes ago
- The Independent
Next hikes outlook after sales boosted by weather and M&S woes
Next has upped its annual sales and profit outlook once again after better-than-expected trading thanks to hot weather and disruption at cyber attack struck rival Marks & Spencer. The womenswear and homewares chain posted a 10.5% rise in full-price sales for the second quarter to July 26, with growth of 10.9% for the half-year as a whole. In the UK, sales jumped by 7.8% in the second quarter as the group said it was boosted by 'better than expected weather and trading disruption at a major competitor'. M&S had to suspend online trading for nearly two months from mid-April after it was hit by a major hack. Next said the recent performance and forecasts for better-than-forecast second half trading means it now expects full-year sales to rise by 7.5% and for profits to increase by 9.3% to £1.11 billion. It had previously pencilled in sales growth of 6% and for profits to lift by 6.8%. The upgrade marks the group's third in just five months. But Next said it 'remains cautious for the second half', stressing that the improved outlook is for its international arm over the next six months. It said: 'In the UK, we believe we exceeded expectations in the second quarter as a result of better summer weather and trading disruption at a major competitor. 'We do not expect either of these factors to have a material effect in the second half, and so we are not increasing our guidance for UK sales in the second half.' It believes sales growth in the UK will slow sharply to 1.9% as the jobs market starts to falter following the Government's move to hike National Insurance contributions for employers, at the same time as rising the minimum wage. Next said: 'We expect UK employment opportunities to continue to diminish as we enter the second half, with the effects of April's National Insurance changes continuing to filter through into the economy as the year progresses. 'We believe that this will increasingly dampen consumer spending as the year progresses.' But an online marketing push for its international arm is bearing fruit, helping drive sales 28.1% higher in the first half and with growth of 19.4% now expected in the final six months. The results come after Next announced late on Wednesday that it had bought Seraphine – the maternity fashion firm, whose clothes were worn by the Princess of Wales during her pregnancies – after it recently collapsed into administration. Next paid £600,000 for the brand and announced it was bringing back Seraphine's founder Cecile Reinaud as an adviser to help relaunch the fashion label.


The Sun
12 minutes ago
- The Sun
Lloyds, Halifax and Bank of Scotland go down as customers unable to access banking apps
CUSTOMERS of three major banks have reported problems accessing their mobile banking this morning. Lloyds, Halifax and Bank of Scotland are all having issues, according to reports on outage monitor Downdetector. 1 Some 780 people have reported issues with Lloyds, while 402 reports have been made about Halifax. Bank of Scotland, which has fewer customers, peaked at 73 reports. Most people are reporting problems with their mobile banking apps.


Telegraph
12 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Andrew Bailey rests between us and reckless Reeves
The Chancellor and the governor of the Bank of England have had several disagreements over the past year. But their latest bust-up has crossed the line into intervention. Andrew Bailey shut down a meeting that Rachel Reeves had attempted to procure between the Treasury, the Bank's Prudential Regulation Authority and burgeoning challenger bank, Revolut, to try to hurry the authorisation of its banking licence. People familiar with the matter said the move to cancel the meeting was made over concerns the Bank's regulation should be independent from political interventions. They are absolutely correct, and this flagrant attempt from Reeves to force her 'growth at all costs' agenda at the expense of independence should be admonished. Despite its relative novelty, central bank independence is sacrosanct to the Western world. Even Donald Trump, who has persistently shown disregard for financial markets, has so far been forced to renege on his various attempts to replace the Federal Reserve chair, Jerome 'Mr Too Late' Powell, for fear of bond vigilante retribution. Here in the UK, it was Gordon Brown who finally brought about operational independence for the Bank of England, a policy that arrived surprisingly late in 1997. Ever since, it has been one of the few sacred cows of British politics, with parliamentarians of all stripes understanding the value of a credibly independent central bank. Given the policy's architect, it is all the more surprising that it is Rachel Reeves, who famously had a framed picture of Brown in her university bedroom, launching so many skirmishes against her former employer. I've written recently on Reeves's susceptibility to promises of growth, but this latest personal attempt to strong-arm the regulator into rushing its processes is a worrying step. This has nothing to do with my opinion on Revolut, but it is not a good look for the Chancellor to be seen to be effectively lobbying on the behalf of a private business. It will likely wind up an embarrassing and futile moment for Reeves, who has clearly made the move in a last-ditch effort to get Revolut to pick London when it eventually lists on a stock exchange. The bank has already expressed its preference to list in the US, with its co-founder expressing that he did not 'see the point' of listing in London. The news comes the same month that Bailey told the Treasury Select Committee in no uncertain terms that he disagreed with Reeves's assertion that regulation is 'the boot on the neck' of business. The FT reported his opinion was a touch stronger away from the cameras, with a colleague of his saying he was 'really p----d off' over the comments. There is certainly room for reforming the regulatory landscape in this country, but Reeves seems to be taking the Elon Musk approach of pulling out plugs and hoping it doesn't break. Bailey is not without his faults, but currently he seems to be the only person who remembers why we put some of this regulation in place to begin with. Another example is the huge clamour from the major UK banks to do away with ring-fencing, the regime that separates their retail operations from their investment banks. Reeves seems once again to have listened to whatever the City says it wants, and is open to such a move. But this regulation was imposed with good reason after the global financial crisis and should not be trifled with lightly. There may well be elements that can be improved, or even cause to scrap it, but this should be investigated from a more sensible standpoint than 'any regulation stifles growth'. I don't envy Reeves. The country has stagnated since 2010, and has been hit with several once-in-a-generation events. At each attempt to cut spending, she has been forced into a climbdown by a fearful Sir Keir Starmer, which has forced her hand into looking for a way to improve the nation's lot elsewhere. But while Starmer has been wrong to stand in her way on many occasions, Bailey is proving to be a rare voice of reason. Yes, Britain is stagnating and has been for a long time. We need to spur growth in this country, and regulations from planning to finance need to be tweaked. But tearing down the guardrails because nobody's fallen off the edge since you put them up isn't a plan for growth – it's a recipe for disaster.