logo
University agreements with N.S. government outline funding, accountability rules

University agreements with N.S. government outline funding, accountability rules

CBC25-04-2025
Nova Scotia's 10 universities have signed new agreements with the province that outline funding, accountability requirements and stipulations the schools must abide by to access some of the money.
The two-year agreements, which have not yet been publicly posted, do not allow universities to increase tuition for Nova Scotia residents in undergraduate programs, but come with a two per cent increase in operating funds.
However, there are no restrictions on funding increases for students coming to Nova Scotia universities from other provinces, international students or graduate students, a spokesperson for the department of advanced education told CBC News.
According to a news release from the province, the 10 universities will see a boost of $7.7 million in the 2025-26 fiscal year, and $7.8 million the following year.
However, some of that operating grant will be held back if certain universities don't meet certain targets.
Those targets include filling at least 97 per cent of health program seats, ensuring housing is available for 15 per cent of students and that on-campus housing has a maximum vacancy rate of five per cent.
The agreements also continue the Nova Scotia University Student Bursary program, which reduces tuition by $1,283 for Nova Scotian students with a full-time course load. Nova Scotian students will also be given preferred admission in undergraduate health and bachelor of education programs beginning Jan. 1, 2026.
Universities will be required to increase work-integrated learning opportunities to ensure students have job-ready skills, the news release said.
Program reviews
Universities have previously expressed concern about Bill 12, legislation that would increase government oversight of schools, forcing them to align academic programs with the government's social and economic priorities, and allowing the minister of advanced education to appoint up to half of members on the board of governors.
It appears that some of those priorities are reflected in the agreements.
The news release says the agreements include a stipulation that universities must undergo a program review to ensure they "meet current educational standards, respond to labour market demands and are economically viable."
An internal memo from Acadia University president Jeffrey Hennessy that was obtained by CBC News this week called program rationalization — which he said involves reducing or discontinuing programs with low labour market need, low utilization and high program costs — was "perhaps the most sweeping and impactful section of the agreement."
The agreements also impose new financial reporting requirements that will be reviewed each year.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Uncertainty is the only thing that is certain': Sask. farmers react to Chinese duty on canola

time6 hours ago

'Uncertainty is the only thing that is certain': Sask. farmers react to Chinese duty on canola

Canola producers say they're not surprised about China's latest move in its ongoing trade war with Canada. Everybody was kind of expecting this day to come. It was just a matter of when and what level the tariffs were going to be applied at, said Bill Prybylski, president of the Agricultural Producers Association of Saskatchewan. On Tuesday, China's Ministry of Commerce announced a 75.8 per cent preliminary duty (new window) on Canadian canola seed after an anti-dumping investigation it began last year. China claims the dumping of Canadian canola into the Chinese market is hurting its domestic canola oil market. The investigation — and the 100 per cent tariff levied on Canadian canola oil and meal in March — were launched in response to Canada's 100 per cent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles. Ottawa has said China has until September, when its investigation formally ends, to make a final decision on the duties, but it could extend the deadline by six months. 'Caught in the middle' While the latest round of canola tariffs were expected, that doesn't make the process any less frustrating for producers like Prybylski. We feel like we're caught in the middle of a trade war that we neither wanted, or started, or have any influence on, he said, speaking with CBC News from his farm near Yorkton, Sask., about 175 kilometres northeast of Regina. Multiple agricultural and canola associations say China's move effectively shuts Canadian canola out of the Chinese market. According to the Canola Council of Canada, China is the largest market for canola seed and the second largest market for Canadian canola. The latest data provided by the council (new window) shows Canada's canola exports to China totalled $4.9 billion in 2024. For now, producers are cautiously watching the price of canola. Rick White, president and CEO of the Canada Canola Growers Association, said it is too early to tell what those prices might look like. But with the harvest of this season's crop set to get underway in the coming weeks, there's no doubt this is going to be economically painful, he said. The price is likely to sag, the opportunity to deliver will likely be slowed and it could be a rough road here for the next year, White said. Prybylski agreed, saying he believes many producers will likely have to sell their products at a loss. Premier Scott Moe said he wants a quick resolution to this dispute and hopes to speak with Prime Minister Mark Carney soon. Photo: CBC / Don Somers Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe lamented the new duty's effects on producers in the province. Speaking in Saskatoon on Tuesday, Moe said he has reached out to Prime Minister Mark Carney to speak with him on the issue and get it dealt with immediately. Moe said the Canadian canola sector is larger than the steel, aluminum and electric vehicle industries combined. Our federal government cannot sacrifice a $43-billion canola industry, 200,000 jobs in that industry that is largely based, in fairness, in Western Canada, to protect the fledging electric vehicle industry, largely based in Eastern Canada, Moe said. WATCH | Canola farmers feel forgotten amid trade war, ongoing Chinese tariffs: In early June, Canadian and Chinese trade ministers committed to meet to address trade issues. In a post on social media Tuesday (new window) , the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said officials from both countries met four days ago and discussed trade and ways to deepen co-operation. The Prime Minister's Office deferred comment on China's latest canola tariff to the minister of international trade, who did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Saskatchewan Opposition NDP Leader Carla Beck urged Moe to visit China immediately. Given the level of threat we see right now, it doesn't make any sense to me that we are not using that office today to deal with this, she said in Regina. Moe said he's open to going on a trade mission to China with Carney. Saskatchewan has a trade office in Shanghai and Moe went there in 2018. China remains a top importer of Canadian canola, but it exports few electric vehicles to Canada. Canada has justified its levies on Chinese electric vehicles by arguing they protect planned investments at home. Canada also matched a similar move by then-U.S. president Joe Biden, who hit Chinese EVs with American tariffs. Chinese EVs are significantly cheaper than North American-made EVs, in part because of lower labour and environmental standards, and state subsidies. WATCH | From April: 'That's a big hit': China slaps 100% tariff on Canadian canola products: Cathy Holtslander, director of research and policy at the National Farmers Union, said that although the latest canola announcement is not ideal, Canadians shouldn't panic. Speaking in Saskatoon, Holtslander said the sale of canola to export markets doesn't really begin until October. That means the effect may not be immediate. Holtslander said she believes the latest announcement is a negotiation tactic and could be resolved politically. The politics are extremely complex and unpredictable. I think uncertainty is the only thing that is certain now. Alexander Quon (new window) · CBC News · Reporter Alexander Quon has been a reporter with CBC Saskatchewan since 2021 and is happy to be back working in his hometown of Regina after half a decade in Atlantic Canada. He has previously worked with the CBC News investigative unit in Nova Scotia and Global News in Halifax. Alexander specializes in municipal political coverage and data-reporting. He can be reached at: Facebook (new window) Twitter (new window) With files from Alexander Silberman, Chris Edwards and The Canadian Press

Flight attendants' union says it declined arbitration proposal by Air Canada

timea day ago

Flight attendants' union says it declined arbitration proposal by Air Canada

The union representing Air Canada's flight attendants says it has declined a proposal by the airline to resolve negotiations through arbitration. In an update posted on the bargaining committee's website, the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) wrote that Air Canada had proposed referring the matter to binding interest arbitration. That process would bring a third-party arbitrator into the talks to mediate on specific items that haven't been agreed on by both sides and render a decision. It would also suspend the chance of a lockout or strike. CUPE members voted overwhelmingly in favour of a strike mandate last week, setting up a potential strike to begin as soon as 12:01 a.m. ET on Aug. 16. CUPE published a letter addressed to the president of its Air Canada component, Wesley Lesosky, and signed by Air Canada vice-president and human resources chief Arielle Meloul-Wechsler on Monday. After eight months of negotiation, we have been unable to reach a tentative collective agreement despite our best efforts, the letter says. Outlining the proposal, it adds that if we cannot agree on an arbitrator within 30 days of your agreeing to the proposal, we ask the Minister of Labour to name one. Air Canada has communicated to the union that the sides are too far apart, according to CUPE. The union says in its update that it intends to stay at the bargaining table. A representative for CUPE told CBC News that both sides are back to evaluating proposals after their exchange. CBC News has reached out to Air Canada for comment. Binding interest arbitration tends to be preferred by employers because you are avoiding the strike and the business disruption, said Malini Vijaykumar, employment and labour lawyer at Nelligan Law in Ottawa. Talks ongoing since March CUPE's Air Canada component represents more than 10,000 flight attendants who work for the major airline and its budget carrier Air Canada Rouge. Some of those workers held demonstrations outside four major Canadian airports on Monday for what the union called a day of action. The union says the most contentious issues at the bargaining table are wages — which it says have not kept pace with inflation — and unpaid work that occurs before boarding and after deplaning, such as safety checks and assisting passengers. CUPE said last week that it would continue talks with Air Canada until Aug. 15, the day before a potential strike. The two parties have been negotiating since March, when the previous 10-year collective agreement expired. But the talks reached an impasse in May, at which point the union filed for conciliation with the federal labour minister. At the time, Air Canada said that its pay structure is in step with other global carriers. Delta Air Lines is the only major North American airline that offers ground pay (new window) to its flight attendants, paying them at half their hourly rate for 40 to 50 minutes of boarding time depending on the flight destination and aircraft. Jenna Benchetrit (new window) · CBC News · Journalist Jenna Benchetrit is the senior business writer for CBC News. She writes stories about Canadian economic and consumer issues, and has also recently covered U.S. politics. She was part of the team that won a silver Digital Publishing Award in best news coverage for covering the 2024 U.S. election. A Montrealer based in Toronto, Jenna holds a master's degree in journalism from Toronto Metropolitan University. You can reach her at With files from Anis Heydari and Alexandra Mae Jones

Ukrainians brace for betrayal as Trump prepares to meet Putin — with war still raging

timea day ago

Ukrainians brace for betrayal as Trump prepares to meet Putin — with war still raging

For many in Ukraine's front-line cities, enduring nightly attacks from Russian drones and missiles may be less terrifying than giving in to anything Vladimir Putin proposes during his upcoming summit in Alaska with Donald Trump. Almost every day, we hear Shaheds, said Arthur Korniyenko, referring to the Iranian-made drones laden with explosives launched by Russia — some nights in the hundreds. Korniyenko is a software developer based in the battle-scarred city of Zaporizhzhia, just 30 kilometres from the Russian front. A Russian strike on the region injured at least 12 people on Sunday. He says his company, Genova Web Art, has lost colleagues to Russian attacks. One of his 20 employees who was killed in fighting two years ago. Enlarge image (new window) Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks during a press briefing following phone calls with U.S. President Donald Trump, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kyiv, on May 19. Photo: Reuters / Thomas Peter He told CBC News he's extremely skeptical that Russia's president wants to end the war or intends to offer any substantial concessions in his upcoming summit with U.S. President Trump on Friday. I hope Donald Trump will understand that Putin lied to him ... and you can't negotiate with people like [Putin], he said. Ukrainians and their supporters, especially in Europe, are apprehensive about how the negotiations in Alaska, in whatever from they take, will play out. They fear the summit represents a moment of peril rather than an opportunity to forge a lasting peace driven by shared democratic values and the sanctity of international borders. Perilous moment Trump's comments Monday did little to mitigate those fears, as he appeared to suggest Ukraine's territorial integrity could be bartered away like a real estate deal. There will be some swapping and changes of land, he said in Washington, D.C., as he went to explain how Putin's forces have seized prime oceanfront property along the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov. It's always the best property, he added. Other observers frame the Alaska gathering as the latest act in a well-rehearsed performance, where Russia feigns interest in peace while preparing its next offensive. In the aftermath of his infamous Oval Office blowout (new window) with Trump in February, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy offered Russia an unconditional 30-day ceasefire, only to have Putin ignore it. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at the White House, in Washington, D.C., on Aug. 11. Photo: Reuters / Jonathan Ernst More recently, (new window) Trump, who has often appeared to treat Putin with unusual deference, has said he was disappointed in Russia's leader and even vowed to impose stiff economic sanctions within two weeks if Putin didn't make moves to end the war. But now, Trump has agreed to hold this summit — without making Putin give up anything in return. Uncompromising demands Russia's demands to end the war have remained largely unchanged since the early days of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. They comprise assuming full control over four eastern Ukrainian regions and Crimea, including territory that Ukrainian forces still hold; limits on the size of Ukraine's army; a ban on ever joining NATO or the European Union; and what Russia calls the de-Nazification of Ukraine, a vague term that's believed to mean (new window) the installation of a Russian-friendly president and government. All the framing is coming from Russia, says Roman Waschuk, a former Canadian ambassador to Ukraine, who still lives and works in the capital, Kyiv. There is no U.S. proposal, no multilateral plan. Everything is about accommodating, interpreting or responding to what Russia wants. Enlarge image (new window) Russian President Vladimir Putin welcomes Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff during a meeting in Moscow on Aug. 6. Photo: Sputnik/Gavriil Grigorov/Pool via Reuters Russia currently occupies around 20 per cent of Ukraine, while Ukraine holds only a tiny portion of Russian territory in Kursk. It brings back memories with regard to Munich [in] 1938, when the fate of the country was decided over the heads of this country, said Oleksandr Merezhko, chair of the committee on foreign policy and inter parliamentary relations in Ukraine's parliament. The year before the start of the Second World War, Nazi Germany signed a deal with Britain, France and Italy that ultimately led to the disintegration of Czechoslovakia, without the Czech government present. Many historians see it as the culmination of the British and French policy of appeasing Hitler that strengthened the Nazi regime and contributed to the start of the war in the fall of 1939. When you start negotiations with the idea of territorial swaps, you're just repeating Putin's narratives — you already agree to something which doesn't belong to you, said Merezhko. Enlarge image (new window) An engine of a Russian drone lies near an apartment building hit by Russian drone strike, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in the town of Bilozerske in Donetsk region, Ukraine, on Aug. 10. Photo: Reuters / Oleksandr Ratushniak Negative outcomes While the summit's agenda is shrouded in secrecy, several possible outcomes are circulating among diplomats, analysts and Ukrainians alike. None are straightforwardly positive for Ukraine. Trump may push for a ceasefire that freezes the current lines of control. Ukraine would retain sovereignty over most of its territory, but not the Russian-held areas of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson. The war stops, but the occupation remains. Waschuk, the retired Canadian diplomat, sees this as the most likely compromise scenario. It's unsatisfactory, but maybe vaguely tolerable. It allows Ukraine to survive militarily and continue toward the EU. But it doesn't stop Russia. It just delays the next phase. For Korniyenko, the software developer, such a deal amounts to a betrayal: We tried freezing things before, he said. And what happened? More invasion. More death. Enlarge image (new window) Ukrainian and European Union flags fly, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in central Kyiv on Aug. 11. Photo: Reuters / Gleb Garanich Russian troops seized Crimea and the eastern Donbas region in 2014, and a series of accords known as the Minsk agreements were later negotiated, with Western help, to reduce — but not permanently end — the fighting. Eight years later, Russia launched its full-scale invasion. Waschuk believes the risk of Ukraine being pressured to accept an imposed deal is high, possibly with threats of reduced military aid from the United States. It's already happening, he says. We're just seeing the trappings of diplomacy over something that's already in motion. Such a move could fracture the Western alliance, embolden Russia and humiliate Ukraine, he says. Worse, it could permanently damage trust between Kyiv and Washington, leaving Ukraine increasingly dependent on assistance from Europe and Canada to continue fending off the Russian invasion. In a social media post Monday (new window) night, Prime Minister Mark Carney underscored that Ukraine must be a party to any ceasefire negotiations and that decisions on the future of Ukraine must be made by Ukrainians. A Putin victory In the most cynical interpretation, the summit itself is already a victory for Putin. By standing as an equal with a U.S. president, Putin breaks out of international isolation and signals to his domestic audience that he's still a global player. Putin doesn't need a result, said Korniyenko. He just needs the meeting. That's already a win for his ego. Even if no formal agreement is reached, the mere shift in tone from Washington regarding the future of the war could have lasting consequences. Merezhko, the Ukrainian MP, says most of his countrymen have already resigned themselves to fighting on, regardless of the outcome of the Alaska gathering. Our only option — if we don't want to be subjugated and destroyed by Russia as a nation, as a state — is to continue to fight no matter what, because the alternative ... is total annihilation, he told CBC News. Waschuk echoes his concern. The danger isn't only in a signed deal. It's in the subtle downgrading of commitment — the quiet turning-away. Chris Brown (new window) · CBC News · Foreign correspondent Chris Brown is a foreign correspondent based in the CBC's London bureau. Previously in Moscow, Chris has a passion for great stories and has travelled all over Canada and the world to find them.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store