Why We're Suing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission—and Still Believe in Nuclear Regulation
COMMENTARY Liz Muller, CEO and co-founder of Deep Fission
We believe in regulation. We also believe in common sense. That's why we've joined the states of Utah, Texas, Florida, Louisiana, the Arizona State Legislature, and fellow reactor developers Last Energy and Valar Atomics in a federal lawsuit aimed at modernizing the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC's) outdated licensing regime. This isn't about avoiding oversight. It's about unlocking the energy the country urgently needs—and removing the regulatory barriers that are stopping us from doing it. We are entering a new era of energy demand, and it's happening now. Data centers, artificial intelligence (AI), re-industrialization, and large-scale electrification are all converging to push our grid to its limits. According to recent estimates, U.S. electricity demand could rise as much in the next 15 years as it did in the previous 50. We are simply not prepared for that. Despite over a decade of serious investment in advanced nuclear, not a single advanced reactor is commercially operating in the U.S. The only new plant to come online recently—Plant Vogtle's Units 3 and 4—took 15 years and cost more than $35 billion, far more than originally projected. While it's an achievement in its own right, that pace and price point are nowhere near what we need to meet this moment. Meanwhile, today's regulatory process all but guarantees more of the same. Even with planned fee reductions, the NRC's system remains slow, expensive, and ill-suited for the new generation of safe, modular reactors designed to be simpler and faster to deploy. Let me be clear: the NRC is the gold standard for nuclear safety. We fully support its mission, and we intend to meet and exceed its standards. But when the process itself becomes the bottleneck—when it takes longer to license a safe, next-gen reactor than it does to build a factory or develop a whole new technology platform—then something's broken. And it's not just a bureaucratic problem. It's a national security problem. We're facing a choice: build the energy infrastructure this country needs—or fall behind. Here's the deeper issue: the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 was written with nuance. It said that a federal license is only required for nuclear facilities that pose a risk to public health or national security. That's a reasonable threshold. But since 1956, the NRC has applied that requirement to every reactor—regardless of scale, design, or risk profile. That blanket approach no longer makes sense. At Deep Fission, our underground reactors are fundamentally different. By design, they eliminate many of the traditional risks associated with nuclear power. We're not asking for an exemption from safety—we're asking for a modern framework that recognizes technological progress and allows low-risk systems to move through the process with appropriate speed and scrutiny. Other countries are moving fast. We can too. If the U.S. wants to remain competitive—if we want to power AI, industry, and a low-carbon future—we need to get serious about deployment. That means making the hard choices, fixing the broken systems, and rethinking how we regulate in a way that preserves safety and supports innovation. We don't have another decade to wait. We filed this lawsuit because we believe in nuclear power—and because we believe the United States can still lead. We believe the original intent of the law had it right. And we believe that with a smarter, more adaptive approach to regulation, we can meet this moment with clean, safe, affordable energy that's ready to scale. Let's modernize the system. Let's build the future. — is CEO and co-founder of Deep Fission.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

E&E News
a day ago
- E&E News
DOE puts 11 small reactor projects on a faster track
The Department of Energy selected 10 small nuclear reactor developers Tuesday to compete for DOE safety design approvals, stepping up its push to quickly advance nuclear technology. The department wants to have at least three new pilot plants operating by July 4, 2026 — demonstrating their safety and affordability. DOE said the newly selected companies will work with national laboratories to authorize reactors and 'unleash a new pathway toward fast-tracking commercial licensing activities.' Helping to pull reactor designs closer to a federal license will unlock private capital, according to department officials. Advertisement The option for developers to choose either DOE approval or the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's safety design process could set up first-ever competition to authorize new models for the utility marketplace. By law, the NRC has sole authority to license nuclear power plants, but a White House aide has instructed NRC officials that the independent commission would be expected to 'rubber stamp' design decisions approved by DOE.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Oklo Q2 2025 Preview: Is the 900% Run Justified by Regulatory and Deal Updates?
Oklo Inc. (NYSE:OKLO) will release its Q2 2025 results and a business update after the market closes on Monday, August 11, 2025. Analysts estimate a loss of $0.11 per share and no revenue. Despite its pre-revenue status, the stock has been highly volatile, surging more than 260% year to date and over 900% in the last twelve months on hopes that nuclear power will play a central role in future energy supply. Much of that optimism is tied to the company's Aurora powerhouse, now targeting initial operation in late 2027 or early 2028. Wall Street will be looking for any developments in Oklo's licensing process with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), where the company remains in the licensing stage for its first plant. Any delays would have a significant impact on investor confidence. Partnership activity is another focus this quarter. Oklo has announced deals with Liberty Energy (NYSE:LBRT) and Vertiv (NYSE:VRT) aimed at powering data centers. Investors will want to know how these partnerships are progressing and how they fit into the broader commercialization roadmap. Finally, with substantial development costs and no incoming revenue, attention will turn to Oklo's cash runway. Management will need to provide a clear strategy to manage expenses and secure funding for its first power plant without relying on excessive dilution. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Oklo Q2 2025 Preview: Is the 900% Run Justified by Regulatory and Deal Updates?
Oklo Inc. (NYSE:OKLO) will release its Q2 2025 results and a business update after the market closes on Monday, August 11, 2025. Analysts estimate a loss of $0.11 per share and no revenue. Despite its pre-revenue status, the stock has been highly volatile, surging more than 260% year to date and over 900% in the last twelve months on hopes that nuclear power will play a central role in future energy supply. Much of that optimism is tied to the company's Aurora powerhouse, now targeting initial operation in late 2027 or early 2028. Wall Street will be looking for any developments in Oklo's licensing process with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), where the company remains in the licensing stage for its first plant. Any delays would have a significant impact on investor confidence. Partnership activity is another focus this quarter. Oklo has announced deals with Liberty Energy (NYSE:LBRT) and Vertiv (NYSE:VRT) aimed at powering data centers. Investors will want to know how these partnerships are progressing and how they fit into the broader commercialization roadmap. Finally, with substantial development costs and no incoming revenue, attention will turn to Oklo's cash runway. Management will need to provide a clear strategy to manage expenses and secure funding for its first power plant without relying on excessive dilution. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.