logo
Plastics treaty talks in deadlock as negotiations enter second week, India opposes product phase-out

Plastics treaty talks in deadlock as negotiations enter second week, India opposes product phase-out

Indian Express5 days ago
Deadlocks and divisions over scope and ambition of the draft text of first-ever Plastics Treaty marred negotiations, as they moved into the second and final week. India on Saturday aligned itself with oil producing nations such as Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iran, and opposed separate provisions on supply or measures to regulate primary polymers. Further, it also opposed inclusion of any phase-out lists for plastic products.
Around 190 countries have assembled in Geneva for what is seen as a make-or-break round of negotiations to achieve a global treaty to end plastic pollution, including in the marine environment.
Speaking for India, Vir Vikram Yadav, Chairman, Central Pollution Control Board said to the chair of the negotiations that the treaty's focus should be on addressing plastic pollution only, and it should not overlap with existing multilateral environmental agreements and mandate bodies like WTO and WHO.
'Separate article on supply or any measure to regulate the production of primary plastic polymers has larger implications in respect of the right to development of member states. Such approaches should be avoided. Similarly, inclusion of any global list with phase out dates under the Article on plastic products should be avoided,' Yadav said, reading out India's statement at the plenary.
The draft text of the treaty currently runs into 35 pages and contains nearly 1,500 brackets denoting the disagreements over the text and import of the language. This text is put together with the help of 'contact groups' which see representatives of countries discuss Articles of the treaty in detail.
Despite the vast gulf between country positions, Inder Andersen, Executive Director, United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) said that the treaty 'was within grasp', and even as the negotiations were not easy, they could deliver.
In Busan too, India had backed production cuts, however, this time it has explicitly backed Arab countries, and taken a position on omitting any lists of products that should be phased out. This is significant as India has already passed domestic regulation to ban single-use plastic products such as balloon sticks, cutlery, straws, and certain packaging, which is of high littering potential.
Under Annex Y of the plastics treaty's draft text, single use straws, cutlery, carry bags, rinse-off cosmetics, personal care products containing microbeads are some of the items included for phase-out. Yadav added that the treaty should have provisions on technical and financial assistance, including technology transfer, to developing countries to prevent and reduce plastic pollution. '…a stand-alone dedicated multilateral fund providing financial resources to developing countries for meeting costs for their compliance obligations is required,' Yadav said.
The Like-Minded countries India has aligned with have consistently opposed steps to cut plastic production, use of chemicals of concern in production in the treaty. Meanwhile, the European Union, Mexico, many African countries, Australia have pushed for 'high ambition', such as including production cuts and addressing the entire life-cycle of plastic production rather than focussing on plastic waste management.
Kuwait's representative said during the stocktake that countries must agree on what can be agreed upon and consensus must be the foundation of the treaty. 'There will be no successful treaty without half of the world's population…any attempt to move forward without consensus risks producing an instrument which is neither legitimate nor implementable.'
The formal deadline to achieve a global treaty, akin to the Paris climate treaty, ended in failure in Busan, Korea, last December. However, talks have carried on after it was decided to resume where things stalled in Busan. EoM
An award-winning journalist with 14 years of experience, Nikhil Ghanekar is an Assistant Editor with the National Bureau [Government] of The Indian Express in New Delhi. He primarily covers environmental policy matters which involve tracking key decisions and inner workings of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change. He also covers the functioning of the National Green Tribunal and writes on the impact of environmental policies on wildlife conservation, forestry issues and climate change.
Nikhil joined The Indian Express in 2024. Originally from Mumbai, he has worked in publications such as Tehelka, Hindustan Times, DNA Newspaper, News18 and Indiaspend. In the past 14 years, he has written on a range of subjects such as sports, current affairs, civic issues, city centric environment news, central government policies and politics. ... Read More
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sudan's famine enters dangerous new phase
Sudan's famine enters dangerous new phase

Mint

time27 minutes ago

  • Mint

Sudan's famine enters dangerous new phase

With the world's attention focused on crises elsewhere, Sudan's war-induced famine is growing in what used to be productive farmlands. Staples of the Sudanese diet, such as sorghum and millet, have been unavailable in most markets, forcing people to survive on animal feed made of peanut shells. Now even that has become too expensive for most people because of constrained supplies. Heavy rains are cutting off roads, warring parties are blocking aid deliveries and farmers are reluctant to risk being killed while working the fields. The country is now in the middle of the long, dry period between harvests—from the middle of July to September. Famine could spread from six locations to 17, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, or IPC, an initiative supported by the United Nations and major relief agencies, said recently. 'Millions of people are already weakened after a sustained run of rising hunger; many do not have the strength to miss even a single meal a day," said Francesco Lanino, Save the Children's deputy country director for Sudan. More than two-thirds of the country's 49 million people need humanitarian aid, according to the U.N. With the U.S., formerly the largest donor to the mosaic of aid agencies working on the ground, now stripping back its contributions, a full-blown disaster is building unless the war ends. Darfur has been the site of two genocides over the past two decades. Both have been carried out by what is now called the Rapid Support Forces, a rebel group trying to overthrow Sudan's military government. The RSF, which is composed mainly of ethnically Arab fighters, has been targeting tens of thousands of Black Sudanese in Darfur. The Sudanese army's last stronghold is in Darfur's capital, El Fasher. Residents trapped there are subjected to daily bombings and ethnic violence. The RSF fighters, driving in pickup trucks mounted with machine guns, have repeatedly attacked displacement camps over the course of the war, raping women and killing men and teenage boys, rights groups say. Recently, RSF fighters attacked two famine-stricken displacement camps outside El Fasher, where they killed more than 40 civilians and injured dozens of others. The fighting, now in its third year, has triggered the world's largest humanitarian crisis, with the U.N. accusing both sides of using hunger as a weapon. The U.S. estimates that more than 150,000 people have been killed in the conflict. In August last year, the IPC's review committee declared that famine had taken hold in the Zamzam displacement camp, home to more than 500,000 people. Some 637,000 Sudanese are already living in famine, with an estimated eight million in need of emergency food assistance, according to the U.N. In the city of El Fasher, the U.N.'s World Food Program is supporting over 250,000 trapped residents with digital cash, but they can't find any food to purchase in the markets due to blocked roads, according to the U.N. 'Everyone in El Fasher is facing a daily struggle to survive," said Eric Perdison, WFP's regional director. 'People's coping mechanisms have been completely exhausted by over two years of war." Children at a camp in Sudan's Nuba Mountains last year. At a displaced-people's camp in South Darfur, some 13 children have died from starvation in early August, while many other residents are battling malnutrition, the Sudan Doctors Network said. In the Kordofan region, famed for its sorghum and wheat fields, residents have begun to starve to death, after escalating violence disrupted the main harvest, aid officials say. In areas around the Nuba Mountains, bags of food aid dropped from aircraft—to sidestep rebel-infested highways—often split open on landing, leaving famine-stricken residents scrambling to collect what food they can from the ground. The U.S. and Saudi Arabia have led talks to reach a truce between the warring factions, but with little success. During the signing of a peace deal between Rwanda and Congo in Washington in June, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that Washington's next priority would be to end Sudan's conflict. But there are powerful geopolitical factors in play, with countries like Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Russia and China all competing for influence. With a 400-mile Red Sea coastline, the country is perched on a strategic shipping lane between the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa. The U.S. has accused Russia of backing both sides, while Iran and the U.A.E. have also seized on the conflict to extend their influence across the region. Iran tried to persuade Sudan to let it build a naval base on its Red Sea coast, while the U.A.E. has been aiding the RSF to protect its economic interests in Sudan, which range from ports along the Nile River to vast farmlands and lucrative gold mining operations, according to researchers and activists. In response to a request for comment, the U.A.E. denied that it was aiding either side in the war and called for an immediate cease-fire and unhindered passage for humanitarian aid throughout the country. A camp hosting Sudanese refugees in Chad last year. The RSF has seized control of the strategic border region that straddles Sudan, Egypt and Libya, inserting themselves at the center of a vital trade corridor. The region also serves as a transit route for migrants trying to reach Europe from sub-Saharan Africa. Nearly four million Sudanese have fled to neighboring countries, most of them to Chad, South Sudan, Libya and Ethiopia. The influx has strained public resources in some of the most-fragile states and increased the spread of diseases such as cholera, measles and malaria, further straining underfunded refugee camps, according to the World Health Organization. Write to Nicholas Bariyo at

Muslim & NATO Nations BOIL Over Netanyahu Minister's Israel Dare: 'If You Recognise Palestine...'
Muslim & NATO Nations BOIL Over Netanyahu Minister's Israel Dare: 'If You Recognise Palestine...'

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Muslim & NATO Nations BOIL Over Netanyahu Minister's Israel Dare: 'If You Recognise Palestine...'

/ Aug 15, 2025, 08:21AM IST Arab nations, the UN, and European countries have strongly condemned Israel's recent settlement plan in the E1 area of the West Bank. Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced plans to construct over 3,000 housing units in this contentious region, a move he claims will "bury the idea of a Palestinian state." Critics argue that this development threatens the viability of a two-state solution by fragmenting Palestinian territories. The United Nations has called for Israel to reverse its decision, labelling the settlements as violations of international law. European leaders, including those from the UK and Norway, have echoed these concerns, warning that the plan could further entrench the occupation and hinder peace efforts. The situation remains tense as the international community watches closely.#IsraelSettlements #TwoStateSolution #WestBank #MiddleEastPeace #InternationalLaw #UNCondemnation #ArabNations #E1Settlement #PeaceNow #BezalelSmotrich

Idea of Palestinian state buried, there's nothing to recognise: Israel minister
Idea of Palestinian state buried, there's nothing to recognise: Israel minister

Economic Times

time10 hours ago

  • Economic Times

Idea of Palestinian state buried, there's nothing to recognise: Israel minister

MAALE ADUMIM: Israel's far-right finance minister announced a contentious new settlement construction in the Israeli-occupied West Bank on Thursday which Palestinians and rights groups worry will scuttle plans for a future Palestinian state by effectively cutting the West Bank into two separate announcement comes as many countries said they would recognise a Palestinian state in September. "This reality finally buries the idea of a Palestinian state, because there is nothing to recognise and no one to recognise," said Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich."Anyone in the world who tries today to recognise a Palestinian state-will receive an answer from us on the ground," he said. Development in E1, an open tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades, but was frozen due to US pressure during previous administrations. On Thursday, Smotrich praised President Donald Trump and US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee as "true friends of Israel as we have never had before." The E1 plan has not yet received its final approval, which is expected next week. The plan includes around 3,500 apartments to expand the settlement of Maale Adumim, Smotrich said. While some bureaucratic steps remain, if the process moves quickly, infrastructure work could begin in the next few months and construction of homes could start in around a year. Rights groups swiftly condemned the plan. Peace Now called it "deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution" which is "guaranteeing many more years of bloodshed."The announcement comes as the Palestinian Authority and Arab countries condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's statement in an interview on Tuesday that he was "very" attached to the vision of a Greater Israel. He did not elaborate, but supporters of the idea believe that Israel should control not only the occupied West Bank but parts of Arab countries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store