Is This Stock the Best Way to Play Chinese AI?
While restricted from the latest and greatest chips for now, over half the world's AI researchers are in China.
As such, growth investors should try to have some China-related AI exposure in their portfolios.
Here's how a South African stock may offer the best way to play Chinese AI.
10 stocks we like better than Naspers ›
Would you believe that the best way to play China's AI ambitions may be a South African stock?
Artificial intelligence has the potential to change the economy. As such, investors should have exposure to some AI companies in their portfolios -- and that includes Chinese exposure. Even Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently noted that China is home to half of the world's AI researchers. And the January unveiling of the groundbreaking DeepSeek R1 model showed how China is able to innovate cutting-edge AI, even with limited silicon access.
Nevertheless, investing in China carries risks pertaining to its economy, its government, and the market mechanics of owning Chinese stocks. That's why the best way to expose oneself to Chinese AI may be South African holding company Naspers (OTC: NPSNY).
It's still very early in the AI races, and in truth, it's hard to know who is going to win out. It could be an upstart AI lab such as DeepSeek in China or OpenAI in the U.S., or one of the existing big tech giants.
In this investor's opinion, the existing incumbents are the best bet. These companies have huge technological and financial resources to invest in AI, and AI should also enable existing large businesses to boost revenue and lower costs through better automation and data science.
That's why Tencent (OTC: TCEHY) seems like good bet to be a big winner from Chinese AI. Tencent has the largest social media platform in China in WeChat, with more than 1.4 billion users. It's also the largest video game publisher in the China, the largest video and music streaming company, one of the two large digital payments companies, and one of China's cloud computing giants.
In addition, Tencent is building its own large model, called Hunyuan, which could lead to vast new AI opportunities if it ends being more performant than DeepSeek and other competitors over time.
Tencent stock doesn't trade on U.S. stock exchanges, but it does trade over the counter as an American depositary receipt. However, a better way to play Tencent may be through its largest shareholder, European-domiciled Prosus (OTC: PROSY), which owns more than 23% of Tencent's stock. And the best way to invest in Prosus may be in its largest shareholder, Naspers, which owns 43% of Prosus.
Naspers is a 110-year-old South African media company that was fortunate enough to invest in Tencent when it was just a startup in 2001. That investment eventually grew to be worth hundreds of billions, dwarfing Naspers' original business.
Naspers then sold portions of its Tencent stake over time, investing in new businesses across food delivery, fintech, classifieds, e-commerce, ed-tech, and other tech startups.
However, Naspers began to trade at a huge discount to the value of not only its net assets but also its Tencent stake alone. Management attributed that growing discount to its large size relative to the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. The thinking was that large index funds cap their asset weightings, which meant they had to sell Naspers stock once it reached a certain-sized allocation.
In 2019, Naspers created Prosus, a new entity it listed on the larger Euronext Exchange in Amsterdam, and spun it off to shareholders. Today, Naspers owns about 43% of Prosus, which owns all of Naspers' assets outside of South Africa, while Naspers owns some small additional South African assets on its own.
The plan didn't really work, though, as, Prosus still trades at a 30% discount its total net assets and even a 9% discount to the value of its Tencent stake alone. Meanwhile, Naspers trades at an even bigger 36% discount to the value of its assets, which is mainly just its 43% stake in Prosus.
Owning Tencent at a discount is an attractive proposition, but of course it won't make much of a difference if the valuation gap never closes. That being said, a new development at Prosus could change this dynamic.
Before this year, Prosus' businesses were free cash flow negative, so the company was dependent on Tencent stock sales and Tencent's dividend for cash for funding. However, in fiscal 2025, which ended in March, Prosus' non-Tencent businesses turned free cash flow positive for the first time, excluding Tencent's dividend, generating $36 million in positive free cash flow and improving free cash flow by nearly $1 billion over the past three years.
Prosus also has a new CEO in Fabricio Bloisi, who took over the job exactly one year ago. Bloisi is an entrepreneur and the very successful former CEO of iFood, now the largest food delivery company in Brazil, which Prosus fully acquired back in 2022.
Having a proven startup operator is a contrast with Prosus' prior leadership, and recent results appear to show Bloisi is raising the bar on execution.
Before today, if Prosus wanted to buy a company or repurchase its stock at a big discount, it would have to sell part of its Tencent stake. That probably played into the "conglomerate discount," as investors may not have liked the capital allocation of selling a high-quality business in Tencent to buy more risky and unprofitable startups.
However, if the other operating businesses continue to grow positive free cash flow outside Tencent, that could change sentiment. Prosus wouldn't have to sell as much or any Tencent stock and could benefit from future compound earnings growth.
If a Prosus/Naspers valuation rerating occurs, that could make Prosus and/or Naspers the most attractive way to play Tencent -- and with it, the growth of Chinese AI.
Before you buy stock in Naspers, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Naspers wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $713,547!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $966,931!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,062% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
Billy Duberstein and/or his clients have positions in Naspers and Prosus. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Nvidia and Tencent. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Is This Stock the Best Way to Play Chinese AI? was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
When your AI assistant writes your performance review: A glimpse into the future of work
David Ferrucci is managing director of the nonprofit Institute for Advanced Enterprise AI at the Center for Global Enterprise When I asked my AI assistant how much time I'd spent working on a collaborative writing project with it, I wasn't expecting an existential reflection on the future of work. I just wanted a number. What I got instead was a full audit of my intellectual labor—what I had written, when, how it evolved, and how long I spent on each part. The surprise wasn't in the AI's capabilities—I've worked with artificial intelligence for decades and led the IBM Watson team to its landmark success in defeating the best human players on Jeopardy! in 2011. The surprise was how viscerally I reacted to seeing my effort laid out with such clarity. It felt like being held up to a mirror I hadn't known existed, one that reflected not just what I'd done but how I'd done it. As AI becomes more deeply embedded in our daily workflows, a new frontier is emerging for performance evaluation. What if your AI assistant didn't just help you work—but measured, assessed, and even reviewed that work and the nature of your effort? That question is no longer theoretical. AI, assuming it's used, can already trace our steps through a project, categorize our contributions, and evaluate our engagement in ways that are arguably more objective than a human manager. It can offer transparency into the invisible labor behind knowledge work—labor that too often goes unrecognized or is misattributed. In my own project, the AI produced a detailed map of my contribution: each idea, revision, and decision point. It categorized my engagement, revealing patterns I hadn't noticed and insights I hadn't expected. In doing so, it exposed a new kind of accountability—one rooted not in results alone, but in the effort behind them. This level of visibility could be transformative. Imagine being able to see precisely how team members contribute to a project—not just who speaks up in meetings (as evidenced by transcripts) or turns in polished presentations, but who drafts, refines, questions, and rethinks. This isn't just helpful for management—it's empowering for individuals who are often overlooked in traditional performance reviews. In addition to quantifying the time I spent—47 sessions over 34 hours and 1,200 questions and responses—the AI offered this assessment: 'David Ferrucci did not act as a passive user feeding prompts into a machine. Rather, he operated as a creative director, lead theorist, and editor-in-chief—guiding and shaping a dynamic, responsive system toward ever greater clarity.' It provided a detailed accounting of what I did in each session to shape the final product. It's also a little terrifying. With this transparency comes the risk of surveillance. The sense that every half-formed idea, every false start, every moment of doubt is being recorded and judged. Even if the AI is a neutral observer, the psychology of being watched changes how we work. Creativity requires a safe space to be messy. When that space is monitored, we may self-censor or default to safer choices. Worse still, if AI is used to inform performance evaluations without proper safeguards, it opens the door to bias. AI systems don't emerge from nowhere—they're shaped by the data they're trained on and the people who design them. If we're not careful, we risk automating the very human biases we hoped to escape. There's also the question of attribution. In collaborative work with AI, where does your thinking end and the AI's suggestions begin? Who owns the insights that emerge from a coauthored conversation? These are murky waters, especially when performance, promotion, and compensation are on the line. And yet, the potential remains powerful. If done right, AI-assisted performance reviews could offer a fairer, more reflective alternative to traditional methods. Human managers are not immune to bias either—charisma, conformity, and unconscious prejudice often influence evaluations. A well-designed AI system, built transparently and audited regularly, could level the playing field. To get there, we need strict design principles: Transparency: No black-box evaluations. People must understand how the AI is judging their work. Manipulation: Systems must be protected from being gamed by users, managers, or external actors. Consistency: Standards must apply equally across roles, teams, and time. Auditability: Like humans, AI should be accountable for bias and error. Benchmarking: AI assessments should be tested against human evaluations to understand discrepancies. Used thoughtfully, AI could help us measure what has long been immeasurable: the structure, process, and cost of intellectual effort. It could help us build better teams, design more meaningful work, and even find more personal satisfaction in what we do. But we must approach this future with caution. The goal isn't to let AI assign grades or replace managers. It's to enrich our understanding of work—who's doing it, how it's done, and how it can be better. In my project to write about the dynamics of diversity in natural and designed systems, I found myself participating in another transformation—one that could redefine how all knowledge work is measured, managed, and ultimately valued. The future of collaboration is not man versus machine, but man with machine—in an open, visible process where every contributor can see, learn from, and be fairly assessed for their effort. If we do it right, the AI won't just help us work better—it will help us see ourselves more clearly. The opinions expressed in commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs of Fortune. Read more: Informatica CEO: How to future-proof your career in the age of AI I've led teams at Google, Glean, and GrowthLoop. Here's why AI is making me a more human leader How to lead when machines can do everything (except be human) Why despite all the AI upheaval, there's never been a better time to be human This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta deepens AI push with 'Superintelligence' lab, source says
By Jaspreet Singh (Reuters) -Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has reorganized the company's artificial intelligence efforts under a new division called Meta Superintelligence Labs, according to a source on Monday. The division will be headed by Alexandr Wang, former CEO of data labeling startup Scale AI. He will be the chief AI officer of the new initiative at the social media giant, the source said. The high-stakes push follows senior staff departures and a poor reception for Meta's latest open-source Llama 4 model, challenges that have allowed rivals including Google, OpenAI and China's DeepSeek to seize momentum in the AI race. Zuckerberg hopes the new lab will fast-track work on artificial general intelligence - machines that can outthink humans - and help create new cash flows from the Meta AI app, image-to-video ad tools and smart glasses. Over the past month, Zuckerberg personally led an aggressive talent raid, floating offers for startups including OpenAI co-founder Ilya Sutskever's Safe Superintelligence (SSI) and courting prospects directly on WhatsApp with million-dollar pay packages. Earlier this month, the Facebook and Instagram parent invested $14.3 billion in Scale AI. Apart from Wang and some Scale AI staff, the new division will reportedly include SSI's co-founder and CEO, Daniel Gross. Former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman will co-lead the Superintelligence Labs with Wang and head the company's work on AI products and applied research, according to the source. Zuckerberg has also brought on 11 new hires in the AI field, including researchers from OpenAI, Anthropic and Google, the source said. The new appointments include former DeepMind researchers Jack Rae and Pei Sun; several OpenAI alumni such as Jiahui Yu, Shuchao Bi, Shengjia Zhao and Hongyu Ren; as well as Anthropic's Joel Pobar, who previously spent more than a decade at Meta, according to the source. Earlier this month, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman said Meta had offered his employees bonuses of $100 million to recruit them. But some analysts worry that Meta's AGI bet could be another moonshot to yield near-term returns. Its other big bet, the Reality Labs unit, has burned through more than $60 billion since 2020, with little to show beyond the Ray-Ban smart glasses and Quest headsets. Together, big tech companies are expected to spend $320 billion on AI this year. In 2024, Microsoft spent $650 million to scoop up most of Inflection AI's staff, including co-founder Mustafa Suleyman, while Amazon poached key talent from Adept. Yet the finish line for AGI remains elusive: Meta's chief AI scientist, Yann LeCun, has said current methods will not be enough to reach the holy grail of the technology, while SoftBank's Masayoshi Son pegs the breakthrough within a decade.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
AI and Creators: 2 WrapPRO Livestream Roundtables — Sign Up Now
Two timely panels. One powerful look at what's shaping content, culture, and creativity. As artificial intelligence and the creator economy continue to redefine the entertainment landscape, TheWrap is convening two forward-looking livestream roundtables on July 23 and August 14 that bring together top voices in tech, content creation and Hollywood. With Hollywood shifting from caution to curiosity, WrapPRO will host a timely roundtable unpacking the creative, ethical and practical implications of artificial intelligence across the entertainment value chain. This panel will feature leading filmmakers, producers, tech innovators and creatives discussing: ✓ Transformative Innovations: How AI is reshaping production, post-production, VFX and storytelling. ✓ Creative Controversies: Balancing AI-assisted tools with artistic integrity. ✓ Opportunities vs. Pitfalls: Exploring the promise of AI alongside its ethical and workforce impact. ✓ Practical Adoption: What's working in the field now and what's still just hype. This session is designed for anyone eager to understand how AI is not just disrupting Hollywood — but reinventing it. Register Now The lines between traditional entertainment and the creator economy are blurring fast. Digital-first talent is building loyal audiences that rival (or exceed) those of major networks. Meanwhile, studios and streamers are looking to creators for IP, partnerships and new paths to monetization. In this dynamic conversation, leading voices from both worlds – creators, distributors, and entertainment executives – will explore how this convergence is reshaping the business of content. From TikTok to television, YouTube to the box office, Creators are no longer just influencers – they're power players. ✓ Creators as Studios: How digital talent is driving development pipelines ✓ Hollywood's New Playbooks: What traditional entertainment is learning from creators. ✓ The Monetization Matrix: Where brands, audiences and revenue intersect. ✓ Fan-Fueled Influence: How data, authenticity, and audience connection are shaping new forms of star power. With creators breaking barriers across platforms and formats, this discussion will explore how the content ecosystem is evolving — and what it means for the future of entertainment. Register Now TheWrap is committed to leading critical conversations around industry disruption. As AI and creator-led models take center stage, WrapPRO is tapping into these forces to inform, connect, and elevate the next wave of innovation and talent shaping the entertainment business. These upcoming virtual panels follow WrapPRO's recent conversation on California's Film Production Crisis, which featured key voices including Assemblyman Rick Chavez Zbur, California Film Commission Executive Director Colleen Bell, Producers Guild of America CEO Susan Sprung, Directors Guild of America Western Executive Director Rebecca Rhine and writer-producer and Stay in LA member Noelle Stehman — underscoring TheWrap's commitment to convening thought leaders on the most urgent issues facing Hollywood today. The post AI and Creators: 2 WrapPRO Livestream Roundtables — Sign Up Now appeared first on TheWrap.