Here's why 90% of Americans don't sleep through the night, according to expert
Sleep is of great importance to overall health, but many people struggle to get quality slumber.
In an annual survey by U.S. News, which was released in March, thousands of Americans weighed in on their sleep habits.
While the National Institutes of Health recommends seven to nine hours of sleep every night, 58% of people reported sleeping six to seven hours a night.
Heat Exposure Linked To Better Sleep, Experts Say – Here's Why
Meanwhile, one in five Americans (20%) reported only getting four to five hours.
The survey also found that 25% of respondents use over-the-counter or prescription sleep aids.
Read On The Fox News App
The largest finding revealed that 89% of U.S. adults wake up regularly during the night.
More than one in three (40%) Americans said they wake up often, even if it doesn't happen daily.
Sleep expert Wendy Troxel, PhD — a RAND Corporation senior behavioral specialist and licensed clinical psychologist in Utah — shared a few reasons Americans aren't sleeping through the night.
Just One Night Of Poor Sleep Could Have These Surprising Health Effects
"Given the stress and uncertainty in today's world, it is not particularly surprising that a striking number of people are facing trouble staying asleep," she said in an interview with Fox News Digital.
Other health conditions like chronic pain — or sleep disorders such as sleep apnea or insomnia — can also disrupt sleep, according to Troxel.
Environmental factors like pollution and rising global temperatures can also contribute to "fragmented sleep," as temperature can manipulate the circadian rhythm, the expert added.
"As part of the circadian rhythm (which regulates sleep-wake cycles among other things), the body's core temperature naturally decreases at night, signaling that it's time to sleep," she said.
"A cooler environment facilitates this temperature drop, promoting deeper and more restful sleep."
The recommended temperature for quality sleep is between 65 and 68 degrees Fahrenheit, according to experts.
Troxel recommended using breathable bedding, wearing lightweight sleepwear and using fans or air-conditioning to regulate temperature.
"Investing in temperature-regulating mattresses or mattress pads can also help maintain a comfortable temperature throughout the night," she advised.
Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter
Troxel also named menopause as a "significant factor" for sleep disruptions, with about 60% of women experiencing restless nights during this transition.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
"Hormonal fluctuations throughout the menstrual cycle and during menopause influence thermoregulation and can contribute to sleep disruptions in women," she said.
To prevent waking up in the middle of the night, Troxel shared that "one of the most effective strategies" is stimulus control.
"If you wake up and can't get back to sleep, get out of bed and do something calming but distracting, like reading a book or gently stretching," she suggested. "This can help break the habit of being awake and frustrated in bed."
"You want your brain to associate your bed as a sanctuary for sleep, not as a place for frustration and worry."
Troxel also encouraged people to resist the urge to check the clock in the middle of the night.
"Seeing the time at 3 a.m. only exacerbates stress and anxiety," she said.Original article source: Here's why 90% of Americans don't sleep through the night, according to expert
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
15 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Big Data Can Make America Healthier. Here's How to Do It Right
Big data can help make Americans healthier, and the Trump Administration has stated—in its recently released Make America Healthy Again report and elsewhere—that building a national big-data platform is one of its primary goals. As scientists who use large data sets to study health, we're excited about its potential and the willingness of the federal government to invest in it, particularly since big data has been underutilized in the U.S. compared with other developed countries—and since the number of ways it can be used grows nearly daily. It's a huge opportunity. But there are lots of concerns when assembling sensitive health data and combining it with other sensitive data, like credit scores, tax records, employment, educational records, and more. Some of those concerns with the Administration's plans have already surfaced. The Administration's first goal of assembling big data to studying autism has left some worried that if used inappropriately, such data could lead to harm, rather than help, for those with autism. Others worry that big data could be used to perform and justify shoddy research that supports predetermined conclusions without adhering to rigorous scientific methods—a concern reinforced by the discovery that the Make America Healthy Again report cited non-existent sources to support its claims. So how can we reap the benefits of big data while minimizing its risks? Here are some guiding principles: 1. Link the highly siloed health care and government data we already have The health care system already possesses health data on millions of Americans. Medical records are now almost always digitized, permitting doctors' notes, medical imaging, laboratory tests, insurance claims, and more to be linked (in theory) across doctors' offices, hospitals, nursing homes, and any other place people receive care. However, data collected about a patient in one setting often doesn't get connected to data from other settings—making it hard for researchers to get a full picture of what, exactly, is happening to each of us within the larger health care system. The federal government also has data on us that can be connected to health care data to answer important questions. For example, comprehensive and detailed data on Americans' occupations linked with health, insurance, and other data could help shed more light on relationships between our work and our health—helping to better answer curious questions like why taxi drivers are less likely to die from Alzheimer's disease or why female physicians don't outlive their male colleagues. The first step of making big data more helpful is to simply link the data—which, while possible, is difficult to accomplish without centralized effort. Once linkages have been made, data can be anonymized so that those studying sensitive questions aren't privy to confidential information about specific individuals. 2. Create capacity for researchers to securely link to other valuable data In addition to governmental data, many other sources of data can provide insights into our health. For example, smartwatches not only have data on how our hearts are beating (e.g., they can identify abnormal heart rhythms like atrial fibrillation), but they can also identify subtle changes in mobility that might be predictive of early neuromuscular diseases like Parkinson's disease. Meanwhile, grocery stores have data on the foods we eat, and with increasing interest in how diet affects our lives, these data could be linked to detailed measures of health. Similarly, social-media platforms possess data that can offer insights into changes in our mental health, and through large-scale analysis of online photos could even identify, in real time, early visible markers of disease. These are moonshots, of course, and whether we want to use data in this way is an open question. But the potential to improve health could be large. Creating a way for scientists to link outside data to existing government and health data—while responsibly maintaining individual anonymity after the linkage—could open many novel research opportunities. 3. Invest in data-research infrastructure Keeping all of these data sources organized, secure, and accessible to scientists is a tall order. Researchers who use big data often dedicate substantial resources to finding the data they need, organizing it, and ensuring its accuracy; the better the database is maintained, the easier it is for researchers to actually perform their analyses. The secure online platform where Medicare and other government health care data are currently accessed has been described by researchers as 'tedious and prone to system errors' and in need of major improvements. Meanwhile, security concerns have led the government to stop letting researchers store the data on their own secure servers, the easiest and most cost-effective way to actually work with the data. Access to Medicare data by researchers has become prohibitively expensive, costing about $30,000 a year or more for a single user to work on one project using the online platform. Proposals to drastically cut medical research funding have been reported, and if passed, these research funding cuts will come at the cost of discoveries to improve health that will never be made. High-quality research of any kind requires investment, whether it's in a biology lab under a microscope or working with data on powerful computers. A new data platform is only as valuable as researchers' ability to access it in a functional and cost-effective way. Any roadmap to designing a national data platform that links together health care and other sensitive data must consider the many valid concerns about collecting data in the U.S., including privacy concerns and how data will be used. The Pew Research Center finds that large majorities of Americans say they are concerned about how the government uses data collected about them (71%), while also admitting that they have little to no understanding of what the government even does with such data (77%). Here are some strategies—in addition to many of the cybersecurity and privacy safeguards already in place—to both protect the data and help earn the public trust: 1. Strictly limit data access to vetted researchers Mistrust and unease with government data collection is readily traceable to historical abuse of Americans' data (as well as recent allegations of improper access), so it's not surprising that many are wary of the Trump Administration's plans. Ensuring data cannot be weaponized by the government against individuals is perhaps the single biggest barrier to creating a useful database, but it can be done. Those currently using federal health care data must already undergo training and comply with very high data-security standards. Misuse of the data—such as even attempting to figure out the identity of an anonymous individual in the data—or failure to protect patient privacy can lead to criminal penalties. A platform of sensitive data without well-delineated restrictions on who can use it and what they can use it for is a recipe for problems. Other ongoing efforts by the Administration to compile data under the vague goal of 'increasing government efficiency' have been met with pushback and lawsuits from organizations concerned about data being used against members of the public. 2. Require analytical plans and ethics-board approval up front Current use of federal health data also requires researchers to provide the government detailed plans to justify the use of specific data. This allows the government to ensure that no more data than is needed to answer the specific question is provided to researchers. Researchers must also obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board prior to accessing and analyzing data, a second checkpoint. These boards, which exist in light of egregious failures of medical research ethics in the 20 th century, help ensure that analyses are designed to minimize risk to patients—even if it is only their data, and not their bodies, at risk. 3. Emphasize true transparency Transparency into who is using this sensitive data and what exactly they are doing with it can engender trust between researchers and the American public. Just like researchers already do for clinical trials, those accessing the data platform should specify their plans in advance, and those plans should be easily and publicly available. Transparency around which data were accessed and what computer code was used to analyze it not only promotes trust, but such data- and code-sharing practices among researchers make it easier to appraise the quality of the work, identify mistakes, and root out misconduct. We can only assume that Americans' unease with governmental data use stems from knowledge that, as with all powerful tools, linked data has the potential to be used in potentially harmful ways. But when in the hands of qualified scientists using rigorous scientific methods and privacy safeguards, a robust real-world data platform like this could lead to new discoveries about how all of us can lead healthier lives.
San Francisco Chronicle
28 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Where you live may affect your risk of dementia, UCSF study finds
In a major national study led by UCSF researchers, dementia rates among older Americans were found to vary sharply by region, with the Southeast facing the greatest burden and the Bay Area's broader region faring somewhat better. Published Monday in JAMA Neurology, the study drew on health records from more than 1.2 million veterans age 65 and older, served by the Veterans Health Administration, the largest integrated health system in the U.S. It is one of the largest efforts to date to chart geographic patterns in dementia, and its findings could guide how public health officials respond to one of the most pressing challenges of an aging population. Using the Mid-Atlantic region — including states such as Pennsylvania and Virginia — as the baseline, UCSF researchers found that dementia incidence was 25% higher in the Southeast, which includes Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama and Mississippi. Rates in the Northwest and Rocky Mountains were 23% higher, and in the South, including Texas and New Mexico, 18% higher. California was part of the Southwest region, which showed a 13% higher rate of dementia compared to the Mid-Atlantic. The Northeast, including New York and New England states, was 7% higher. 'The study underscores the need to understand regional differences in dementia and the importance of region-specific prevention and intervention efforts,' said senior author Dr. Kristine Yaffe, a professor at UCSF and the San Francisco VA Health Care System. 'Quality of education, early life conditions, and environmental exposures may be among those factors,' she said. The authors noted some limitations in the study, including that veterans 'may not be entirely representative of the general U.S. population, particularly regarding sex and gender distribution,' and have a higher prevalence of dementia risk factors, including traumatic brain injury, post-traumatic stress and depression. However, despite adjusting for race, age, cardiovascular disease and rurality, the regional patterns remained, highlighting the importance of local context in both risk and response, the authors added.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Talkiatry Chief Medical Officer and co-founder Dr. Georgia Gaveras, DO named to Modern Healthcare's 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives Class of 2025
NEW YORK, June 9, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Talkiatry, a leading provider of high-quality, in-network psychiatry and therapy services, is proud to announce that co-founder and Chief Medical Officer Dr. Georgia Gaveras, DO has been recognized by Modern Healthcare as one of the 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives for 2025. Detailed profiles of all the honorees are featured in the June 9, 2025 issue of Modern Healthcare's magazine and online at This program honors licensed clinicians in executive roles who are recognized by the senior editors of Modern Healthcare and selected for their exceptional achievements in driving innovation, improving outcomes, serving their communities, and demonstrating exemplary leadership both within and beyond their organizations. "Becoming a clinician doesn't automatically prepare one for a leadership role, helping to guide an organization or an industry. The 50 clinicians chosen this year as the most influential, some newcomers and some we have recognized previously, are having an oversized impact," said Mary Ellen Podmolik, editor-in-chief of Modern Healthcare. "Their work is benefiting their own teams in terms of clinical advancements and financial results and is leading to better patient outcomes." With more than 600 licensed psychiatrists and 150+ therapists treating children, adults, and seniors for conditions including ADHD, anxiety, bipolar disorder, depression, OCD, and PTSD, Talkiatry has expanded to 47 states and reaches over 70% of commercially insured Americans through partnerships with more than 60 insurance providers, including Blue Cross Blue Shield, Aetna, United Healthcare, Cigna, and Humana. As access has increased, Talkiatry's dedication to high-quality care continues to lead to positive patient outcomes. In peer-reviewed clinical findings, two out of three patients saw their anxiety symptoms drop below clinically significant levels, and a similar portion experienced the same improvement with depression. Notably, one out of three patients achieved full remission in under 15-weeks. Among those who did not reach these thresholds, the vast majority still reported measurable improvement. Talkiatry is a physician-led practice where quality care comes first. Clinicians have the autonomy to make the best decisions for their patients, supported by structured clinical leadership, peer collaboration, and continuous education. To deliver these outcomes, Talkiatry has built an environment that prioritizes clinician support and sustainability. All clinicians receive structured onboarding, access to ongoing clinical education, and support from dedicated teams that handle scheduling, billing, and credentialing. Talkiatry is a community of like-minded, mission-driven peers. Through clinical chats, mentorship, grand rounds, and peer case consultations, the organization fosters connection, knowledge sharing, and a sense of belonging. "This recognition is a testament to the vital work the Talkiatry team is doing to expand access to high quality mental health care, regardless of a patient's geography or circumstance. Being named one of Modern Healthcare's 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives reinforces the importance of our mission, and I am incredibly grateful to be part of a movement that is transforming the way mental health care is delivered in this country." - Dr. Georgia Gaveras, Co-Founder & Chief Medical Officer, Talkiatry. For information or questions about the 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives program, please contact: MH Awards mhawards@ About Modern HealthcareModern Healthcare is the most trusted business news and information brand in the healthcare industry. Modern Healthcare empowers healthcare leaders and influencers to make timely and informed business decisions. To learn more or subscribe, go to About TalkiatryTalkiatry is a national mental health practice that provides in-network psychiatry and therapy. Co-founded by Robert Krayn and Georgia Gaveras, DO, Talkiatry is solving the core challenges patients and clinicians face in accessing and providing high-quality mental healthcare. With over 2 million patient visits delivered by a growing team of 600+ full-time psychiatrists and 150+ full-time therapists, Talkiatry is the largest dedicated psychiatry practice in the U.S. Our technology platform removes administrative burdens so clinicians can focus solely on patient care, resulting in strong clinical outcomes and significantly lower burnout. At Talkiatry, we're reimagining psychiatric care to be accessible, human, and responsible. Learn more at and follow us on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram. Media Contactpress@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Talkiatry Sign in to access your portfolio
