What is Palantir's Gotham software and why do German police want it?
Palantir is a data analytics and software company which develops platforms for analyzing large datasets for governments, intelligence agencies, the military, and commercial companies.
Officials from Germany's interior ministry argue that Gotham can play a crucial role in modernizing and achieving technological autonomy for German police forces, allowing officers to concentrate on their primary responsibilities by minimizing the time spent cross-referencing disconnected databases
At the same time, civil rights groups like the Society for Civil Liberties (GFF) and the Chaos Computer Club (CCC) have warned that adoption of the software could lead to 'dragnet surveillance', a loss of transparency, and police dependence on a foreign company.
What does Gotham actually do?
Gotham is a large data analytics platform which integrates previously disparate police databases.
In other words, it gives police or security authorities access to a vast amount of data.
Within seconds, it enables officers to find extensive information about individuals – not just names, address, and criminal records, but also social media content or mobile device data. In theory, these comprehensive profiles can reveal hidden connections between suspects and incidents, aiding in the prevention and investigation of crimes.
Why is everyone talking about it now?
The recent flurry of headlines in the German press were partly sparked when Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, of the conservative CDU, suggested that he was open to expanding Palantir's use by federal police and criminal investigation agencies (in a notable shift from his predecessor's position).
READ ALSO:
What to know about talking to the police in Germany
But much of the global attention is a result of the company's record-breaking Q2 2025 revenue announcement. Driven by soaring demand for AI technologies globally, the company posted revenues of more than a billion dollars in just three months.
Which police forces in Germany already use Gotham?
Three German federal states actively use Gotham: Bavaria (since 2024), Hesse (since 2017), and North Rhine-Westphalia (2019/20).
After lengthy political disputes
, Baden-Württemberg plans to adopt the software soon, pending amendments to the Police Act and with parliamentary oversight. Their contract is reported to be around €25 million for five years.
Is the investment justified?
Twenty-five million euros is a lot of money for just one state's police budget.
While detailed financial information from other states remains confidential, licensing fees and ongoing maintenance suggest substantial expenses. Though comprehensive performance data is scarce due to privacy concerns, Gotham reportedly played a key role in swiftly resolving a 2024 attack in Munich by effectively mapping suspects' movements.
Advertisement
What other concerns exist about the software?
Civil rights groups, notably the Chaos Computer Club (CCC), raise serious concerns regarding privacy and constitutional rights.
Spokesperson Constanze Kurz has called Gotham a form of "dragnet investigation" which risks sweeping in vast numbers of innocent people alongside suspects, violating the German legal principle of data processing for specific purposes (
Zweckbindung
).
Kurz and legal organizations like the Society for Civil Liberties (GFF) also criticise Palantir's proprietary software for its lack of transparency and the potential for misuse or the expansion of surveillance beyond legal norms.
According to current law, police in Bavaria can employ Gotham without any suspicion of wrongdoing, meaning that anyone filing a complaint or merely present at the scene of a crime can become subject to data scrutiny.
READ ALSO:
German federal police to be equipped with Tasers by end of 2025
Advertisement
"Anyone who files a complaint, or who is a victim of a crime, or even just happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time can attract police attention via this software," according to GFF lawyer Franziska Görlitz.
The GFF has filed a constitutional complaint against the large-scale data analysis in Bavaria on the basis that it breaches the fundamental right to informational self-determination and the confidentiality of telecommunications, which is guaranteed in the German constitution.
Are there additional concerns specific to Palantir as a company?
Palantir is tightly linked to US military and intelligence agencies, with founder Peter Thiel, a controversial figure known for authoritarian leanings, deeply involved.
Kurz describes Palantir as the "AI arms dealer of the 21st century," warning German authorities of the geopolitical and legal risks in handing sensitive police data to a US company subject to conflicting foreign laws and interests.
In an interview with the
Weizenbaum Institute,
she raised concerns about digital sovereignty, potential data transfers to the US, and insufficient democratic control over surveillance technologies.
Advertisement
Palantir is named after the 'seeing stones' in Tolkien's Lord of the Rings. Gotham prompts images of Batman and the company's apparent determination to make itself indispensable to multiple armed forces and law enforcement agencies in multiple countries has prompted comparisons with Skynet in the Terminator films.
READ ALSO:
What are the digital IDs you can get in Germany?
Despite these touches of fantasy, however, Palantir is a very real company. Given its military origins (in Afghanistan in 2003), and its CEO Alex Karp's open acknowledgment of his company's role in helping 'kill bad guys faster,' the line it seeks to walk between enhanced security and invasive control raises numerous ethical and constitutional questions.
In 2009, six years after founding Palantir, Peter Thiel published an essay (The Education of a Libertarian) in which he wrote: 'I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.'
What happens next?
Currently, Palantir shows no signs of slowing its expansion. The company experienced a 340 percent increase in valuation in 2024, supported by long-term contracts with numerous police and military organizations worldwide.
In the United States, its Gotham software is employed by agencies including the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, NSA, and multiple military branches for tasks ranging from counterterrorism and intelligence analysis to fraud investigations.
READ ALSO:
Are German police racially profiling people at the border?
In Europe, besides Germany, Gotham supports Europol, Norwegian Customs, and Denmark's predictive policing platform POL-INTEL. Beyond Europe, the software is used by Ukraine to improve military targeting and document war crimes during the Russian war of aggression.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Ukraine: Trump hails 'progress' after envoy meets Putin – DW – 08/06/2025
Donald Trump said a meeting between US envoy Steve Wikoff and Vladimir Putin in Moscow was "highly productive." Despite this, this White House says new US sanctions on Russia are still coming. DW has more. Russian President Vladimir Putin has met with Steve Witkoff, US President Donald Trump's special envoy, for talks in Moscow. The meeting comes just days before a deadline set by Trump for Putin to agree to a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine. The Kremlin has urged patience regarding US-Russia relations, as anticipation builds around a potential meeting between Trump and Putin that has yet to be reserves in Ukraine are at their lowest in 12 years, analysis firm ExPro said on Wednesday. Storage facilities are currently less than a third full and the revelation comes after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky earlier on Wednesday accused Moscow of deliberately undermining its preparations for winter by striking a gas facility in the Odesa region. It is not yet clear how Wednesday's attack on the the southern region's gas interconnector, which is used to supply US and Azeri gas through Bulgaria and Romania, will affect future gas collection. Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov said the meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US envoy Steve Witkoff lasted around three hours. "A quite useful and constructive conversation took place," Ushakov told journalists. Putin and Witkoff discussed the conflict in Ukraine and the potential for improving US-Russia ties, Ushakov said. He added that Moscow had received certain "signals" from US President Donald Trump and had sent messages in return, without elaborating on details. The meeting comes just days ahead of a deadline set by Trump to agree to a Ukraine peace deal or face US sanctions. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video German politicians are debating whether to slash financial assistance for Ukrainian refugees. How does the country stack up against its EU neighbors when it comes to generosity in helping those fleeing war? Read the full story on aid provided for Ukrainian refugees in Germany and across Europe. Russian drones struck a gas pumping station in southern Ukraine, part of an LNG imports scheme from the United States and Azerbaijan, Kyiv's energy ministry said Wednesday. The ministry said the attack on the site near the Ukraine-Romania border was aimed "purely against civilian infrastructure" and targeting relations with Azerbaijan, the US and European partners. There was no immediate comment from Russia. The Kremlin said Russian President Vladimir Putin is hosting US President Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff for talks. The Kremlin did not immediately provide more information regarding the meeting. There had been doubts as to whether the two would meet during Witkoff's visit to Moscow but Russian state media said the meeting was to take place on Wednesday. Donald Trump has put a Friday deadline for Putin to agree to a peace deal with Ukraine or potentially face economic penalties that could also hit countries buying its oil. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Wednesday two people were killed after a Russian attack set ablaze a holiday camp in central Ukraine. Describing it as a "zero military sense" strike, Zelenskyy condemned the "cruelty" of the attack, "aimed at instilling fear." "Right now in the Zaporizhzhia district, our medics and first responders are helping those wounded in a Russian strike on an ordinary recreation center," Zelenskyy posted on X. "Twelve people have been injured. As of now, sadly, two people are confirmed dead." The Kremlin claims the Zaporizhzhia region as part of Russia. Ukraine's defense minister has expressed gratitude toward the US for approving more than $200 million (€175 million) in deals to supply arms to Ukraine, funded by allies and arising from agreements between the US and Ukrainian presidents. "Grateful to the U.S. for approving over $200M in Foreign Military Sales for Ukraine," Denys Shmyhal posted on X. "The first package includes equipment, repairs, and technical support for M777 howitzers, valued at $104 million. The second package, worth $99.5 million, covers transportation and cargo consolidation and other logistical services." Entirely funded by partner countries, these packages are a boost to Ukraine's defense and regional security," he added. Patience is required over Russian-US relations, the Kremlin said Wednesday. In remarks carried by the Russian TASS state news agency, spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: "There is, of course, inertia in this process," referring to the prolonged absence of a meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump. "It takes time for efforts to bring bilateral relations back onto a normal track." TASS reported that for the first time in modern Russian history more than six months have passed without a summit between the leaders of the two nuclear powers. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video US envoy Steve Witkoff arrived in Moscow on Wednesday, state media reported, where he will meet with Russian officials , with President Donald Trump's deadline to impose fresh sanctions over the war in Ukraine just days away. It is unclear whether Witkoff will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump has given the Kremlin until Friday to halt its offensive in Ukraine or face further sanctions. The White House has not been specific regarding potential penalties, but Trump has previously threatened to impose "secondary tariffs" targeting Moscow's remaining trade partners, including China and India. Trump said Tuesday that he would await the outcome of Witkoff's visit before moving forward. "We're going to see what happens," he told reporters. "We'll make that determination at that time." After arriving in the Russian capital, Witkoff was met by presidential special representative Kirill Dmitriev, Russian state news agency TASS said. Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he had had a "productive" conversation with his US counterpart Donald Trump. The Ukrainian president said "the key focus" of their conversation centered around "ending the war." "Many months could have already passed without war, had Russia not been prolonging it," he continued. "Today, we coordinated our positions, Ukraine and the United States. We exchanged assessments of the situation: The Russians have intensified the brutality of their attacks. President Trump is fully informed about Russian strikes on Kyiv and other cities and communities." Zelenskyy said the pair also spoke about sanctions on Russia with Trump's August 8 deadline for Putin to end the war looming large. "Their economy continues to decline, and that's exactly why Moscow is so sensitive to this prospect and President Trump's resolve," Zelenskyy said. Today's spotlight is firmly on Moscow, where US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff is meeting with Russian officials, just days ahead of a deadline set by his boss. President Donald Trump has warned that if Russia fails to agree to a ceasefire in Ukraine by Friday, it will face new sanctions. However, the lack of urgency in Moscow over the past few days suggests Witkoff may leave empty handed. In fact, sources close to the Kremlin say Russian President Vladimir Putin believes he is gaining ground in Ukraine, and that takes precedence over improving relations with the United States. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has used this moment to press his case for tougher sanctions on Moscow in a call with Trump ahead of Witkoff's visit. We'll be covering all these topics in this blog, with a focus on the ongoing war in Ukraine.
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Immigration: Germany seeks 'safe countries of origin' – DW – 08/06/2025
A verdict by the European Court of Justice is set to impact Germany's policies aiming to curb irregular immigration. It will stimy plans to determine 'safe countries of origin' for possible deportations. Safe countries of origin are those whose citizens do not have to fear state persecution, according to assessments by the German government or the European Union. Whether such assessments are accurate is a matter for debate that often ends up in court. Last week, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that EU countries are allowed to designate safe countries of origin to fast-track asylum procedures if authorities disclose the sources for their assessment. The court also found that for a country to be designated as safe, it must offer adequate protection to the entire population, including minorities. The Luxembourg-based court also said that while having a fast-track procedure does not violate EU law, the designation of safe countries must be subject to judicial scrutiny so migrants can challenge decisions made on their asylum claims. Germany has its own list of safe countries of origin. Asylum seekers from these countries hardly stand a chance of being granted asylum in Germany. Currently, eight European non-EU and two African countries are on this list. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The new German coalition government of center-right Christian Democrats and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) had agreed to add more countries to the list. "We are continuously assessing whether more countries meet the requirements. In particular, a country will be classified as safe if fewer than 5% of asylum seekers from that country have been accepted over at least a five-year period." It remains to be seen whether these plans will be as easy to implement as it sounds in the coalition agreement following the ECJ ruling. A spokesperson for the interior ministry, which is responsible for asylum policy, said that the ruling will be reviewed. Yet the German government still intends to reform the process for determining whether a country of origin is safe. In the future, safe countries of origin are to be determined by decree. This would mean that neither the Bundestag nor the Bundesrat (the upper house of parliament representing the 16 federal states) would have a say in the matter. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The coalition has already submitted a draft bill on this issue, which is to be voted on after the parliament's summer recess. The first debate already took place last July. Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt took that opportunity to criticize what he sees as an insufficient number of deportations of rejected asylum seekers: "Our goal now is to remove the obstacles to effectively limiting illegal migration," he said. One such obstacle that the CSU politician highlighted was the fact that, under current law, people who have been ordered to leave the country are entitled to legal representation before their planned deportation can be enforced. This is one of the regulations that is to be abolished. Dobrindt hopes that this will also speed up deportations to countries already listed as safe. Within the European Union, there are already discussions about setting up joint centers for the repatriation of rejected asylum seekers. The interior ministers of EU member states discussed this at their meeting in Copenhagen last July. This is an idea that Dobrindt is in favor of. He pointed out that it can be difficult for individual member states to reach deals with non-EU countries, while it could be more expedient when several EU countries work together. Several countries already have concrete plans in place. "I wouldn't rule this out for Germany either," said the German interior minister. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In Dobrindt's view, many of the people who came to Germany in the past were not eligible for asylum. He hopes that the planned reform will send a clear message: "People who come from a safe country of origin should not make the journey. Those who cannot stay should not come in the first place." Some members of the political opposition in Germany hope that the European Court of Justice's ruling will force the federal government to change its course on asylum policy. "The ECJ ruling on safe countries of origin is a major success for human rights and the individual right to asylum in Europe," said Green Party MP Filiz Polat. She added that the plan to classify safe countries of origin by means of a legal directive without oversight by the Bundestag and Bundesrat is not possible. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Clara Bünger of the Left Party has also called on the governing coalition to carry out a comprehensive review of the list of safe countries of origin."Georgia and Moldova should be removed from this list immediately. The reason given was the precarious human rights situation in the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Also, the EU member state Czechia considers only parts of Moldova as safe, while the Transnistria region is controlled by pro-Russian separatists and therefore considered unsafe. The ECJ ruling, according to Bünger, "also represents a clear repudiation of the federal government's plans to classify other countries, such as Tunisia and Algeria, as safe." Same-sex sexual relations are punishable by law in both Tunisia and Algeria. Classifying these countries as safe would conflict with a key criterion established by the European Court of Justice's ruling: countries deemed safe third countries must ensure the safety of their entire you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Immgration: Germany seeks 'safe countries of origin' – DW – 08/06/2025
A verdict by the European Court of Justice is set to impact Germany's policies aiming to curb irregular immigration. It will stimy plans to determine 'safe countries of origin' for possible deportations. Safe countries of origin are those whose citizens do not have to fear state persecution, according to assessments by the German government or the European Union. Whether such assessments are accurate is a matter for debate that often ends up in court. Last week, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled that EU countries are allowed to designate safe countries of origin to fast-track asylum procedures if authorities disclose the sources for their assessment. The court also found that for a country to be designated as safe, it must offer adequate protection to the entire population, including minorities. The Luxembourg-based court also said that while having a fast-track procedure does not violate EU law, the designation of safe countries must be subject to judicial scrutiny so migrants can challenge decisions made on their asylum claims. Germany has its own list of safe countries of origin. Asylum seekers from these countries hardly stand a chance of being granted asylum in Germany. Currently, eight European non-EU and two African countries are on this list. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The new German coalition government of center-right Christian Democrats and Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) and the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) had agreed to add more countries to the list. "We are continuously assessing whether more countries meet the requirements. In particular, a country will be classified as safe if fewer than 5% of asylum seekers from that country have been accepted over at least a five-year period." It remains to be seen whether these plans will be as easy to implement as it sounds in the coalition agreement following the ECJ ruling. A spokesperson for the interior ministry, which is responsible for asylum policy, said that the ruling will be reviewed. Yet the German government still intends to reform the process for determining whether a country of origin is safe. In the future, safe countries of origin are to be determined by decree. This would mean that neither the Bundestag nor the Bundesrat (the upper house of parliament representing the 16 federal states) would have a say in the matter. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The coalition has already submitted a draft bill on this issue, which is to be voted on after the parliament's summer recess. The first debate already took place last July. Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt took that opportunity to criticize what he sees as an insufficient number of deportations of rejected asylum seekers: "Our goal now is to remove the obstacles to effectively limiting illegal migration," he said. One such obstacle that the CSU politician highlighted was the fact that, under current law, people who have been ordered to leave the country are entitled to legal representation before their planned deportation can be enforced. This is one of the regulations that is to be abolished. Dobrindt hopes that this will also speed up deportations to countries already listed as safe. Within the European Union, there are already discussions about setting up joint centers for the repatriation of rejected asylum seekers. The interior ministers of EU member states discussed this at their meeting in Copenhagen last July. This is an idea that Dobrindt is in favor of. He pointed out that it can be difficult for individual member states to reach deals with non-EU countries, while it could be more expedient when several EU countries work together. Several countries already have concrete plans in place. "I wouldn't rule this out for Germany either," said the German interior minister. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In Dobrindt's view, many of the people who came to Germany in the past were not eligible for asylum. He hopes that the planned reform will send a clear message: "People who come from a safe country of origin should not make the journey. Those who cannot stay should not come in the first place." Some members of the political opposition in Germany hope that the European Court of Justice's ruling will force the federal government to change its course on asylum policy. "The ECJ ruling on safe countries of origin is a major success for human rights and the individual right to asylum in Europe," said Green Party MP Filiz Polat. She added that the plan to classify safe countries of origin by means of a legal directive without oversight by the Bundestag and Bundesrat is not possible. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Clara Bünger of the Left Party has also called on the governing coalition to carry out a comprehensive review of the list of safe countries of origin. "Georgia and Moldova should be removed from this list immediately. The reason given was the precarious human rights situation in the breakaway regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Also, the EU member state Czechia considers only parts of Moldova as safe, while the Transnistria region is controlled by pro-Russian separatists and therefore considered unsafe. The ECJ ruling, according to Bünger, "also represents a clear repudiation of the federal government's plans to classify other countries, such as Tunisia and Algeria, as safe." Same-sex sexual relations are punishable by law in both Tunisia and Algeria. Classifying these countries as safe would conflict with a key criterion established by the European Court of Justice's ruling: countries deemed safe third countries must ensure the safety of their entire you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
