US: Stocks mixed as China trade tensions fuel unease
[NEW YORK] Wall Street stocks saw a mixed end to the day on Friday (May 30), as trade tensions between the United States and China heated up with President Donald Trump accusing Beijing of violating a tariff de-escalation deal.
The Dow Jones Industrial Average edged up 0.1 per cent to 42,270.07, but the broad-based S&P 500 Index was flat at 5,911.69.
The tech-focused Nasdaq Composite Index slipped 0.3 per cent to 19,113.77.
'If it weren't for the trade war, the market would be feeling pretty good,' said Tom Cahill of Ventura Wealth Management.
'Inflation is definitely moving in the right direction,' he added, referencing an inflation gauge that cooled more than expected last month.
The Federal Reserve's preferred inflation measure – the personal consumption expenditures price index – rose 2.1 per cent from a year ago, down from the figure in March.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
But investors remained nervous as Trump took aim at China early Friday, writing on his Truth Social platform that Beijing 'totally violated its agreement with us.'
Washington and Beijing had agreed to mutually lower tariffs on each other's imports this month, bringing levels down from triple digits for 90 days.
Trump's remarks, however, reignited fears that the president could return to a more confrontational approach towards the world's second biggest economy.
Jose Torres, senior economist at Interactive Brokers, said in a note: 'Wall Street is worried that this Friday morning's remarks are just a warmup of what's to come.' AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
Going alone is not the answer to security questions: Chan Chun Sing
[SINGAPORE] Political and military leaders must arrest the temptation to go it alone when they feel insecure, as history has many examples of such an approach backfiring, Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing said on Sunday(June 1). This is as attempts to prioritise one's security without due regard for international laws and norms could easily lead to greater insecurity in others, sparking a vicious spiral that begets greater insecurity, Chan said at the sixth and final plenary session of the Shangri-La Dialogue. This applies to all aspects of security, including countries' economic well-being, he added, recalling a point made by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim at the forum a day earlier that faltering trade has consequences that ripple beyond any one region. Chan said today's world is not unlike the 1930s, when beggar-thy-neighbour policies arguably contributed to expansionist and irredentist foreign policies that culminated in World War II. As competition in the security and economic domains increase, so has the need for guardrails and communication channels to reduce the risk of miscalculation, he said. He cited how Singapore and Malaysia both respected an international tribunal's directive when there was a disagreement over reclamation works, and thereby managed to reach an amicable settlement. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'While the issue began with acrimony, the warmth and civility between the negotiating teams led to an amicable resolution,' he noted. The two neighbours still have their differences, but have continued to deepen cooperation, such as through the Johor-Singapore Special Economic Zone, he said. Chan emphasised that while great powers have great responsibilities when it comes to upholding international rules, small countries also have agency and responsibility in upholding the global economic and security order. On its part, Singapore is committed to engaging both the US and China without taking any sides. 'We believe that taking sides, regardless of issues and context, breeds irrelevance,' he said. 'And if one is irrelevant, it will almost certainly require (one) to take sides.' Instead, Singapore takes the side of principles that promote a more integrated global economic and security order, where states have a fair chance to compete and can improve the lives of their people through trade rather than war, he added. Noting that emerging security challenges have to do with threats against networked infrastructure that transcend borders, Chan said Singapore is working with Asean partners to develop principles to facilitate defence cooperation for the region's critical underwater infrastructure. Fellow speakers at the plenary also shared different ways by which small states can contribute to tackling security problems. Sweden's Defence Minister, Dr Pal Jonson, noted his country's expertise in psychological defence and in responding to information operations, and how small states like Sweden and Singapore are ranked well when in innovation and research capabilities. Papua New Guinea Defence Minister Billy Joseph said his country amplifies its voice by working through multilateral forums such as the South Pacific Defence Ministers' Meeting and the Pacific Islands Forum. The Pacific Response Group, a disaster coordination organisation formed in November 2024, helped Vanuatu following an earthquake there a month later, added Dr Joseph. Responding to a question about Singapore's diplomatic approach, Chan said small states are realistic that engagement is not on the basis of sympathy or charity, but on being successful and having value-add. Singapore's approach is to look at the principles that will best enable it to survive and thrive, he added. For instance, on Ukraine, Chan said the principle the Republic holds dear is that of the sovereignty of nations, as it would be a dangerous world if one country can march into another on the basis of wanting to right the wrongs of history. Holding to this principle meant it has stood up to great powers in the past for doing the same, as the greater risk is of the principle no longer being observed by countries big and small, he added. On questions about understanding China's perspectives, Chan said it is in the interest of everyone to work with China, and vice versa. This year's summit was the first time since 2019 that China did not send its defence minister, which raised questions about Beijing's continued engagement with the region. If China perceives that the world does not respect or understand it sufficiently, it is incumbent upon the country to use every opportunity possible, including the Shangri-La Dialogue, to get its voice heard and make clear its stance, said Chan. He urged countries to deepen efforts to understand others, so that they do not end up with simplistic interpretations or misreadings of other people's intentions. Chan was also asked if Singapore would apply the concept of self-determination to the case of Taiwan. Responding, he said it was scary to hear simplistic explanations that try to frame the conflict as one between democracy and autocracy, or to draw 'unhelpful parallels' between Taiwan and Ukraine. How the issue is going to be resolved, if not managed, will have to be determined by the Chinese people on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, he added. People on both sides share similar end goals of having security, including economic security, and the hope is that channels of communication can be opened so they can discuss where their shared future lies, said Chan. Chan said his final takeaway from the forum was the need for deeper cooperation, given the complexity of the issues confronting the world. 'Today, the challenges that we face are not geographically isolated challenges (but) are interwoven,' he said. 'And to solve those issues... we need to build the solutions at the network level, and all of us can contribute to that – be it big or small countries.' THE STRAITS TIMES
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
In changing times, young Germans gun for defence sector jobs
For the first time in 2025, German arms manufacturers were among exhibitors at the fair as they hunt for staff to meet surging demand. PHOTO: REUTERS KARLSRUHE, Germany - In a country with strong pacifist traditions due to its dark World War II history, German student Mika Scheid had never considered working in the arms industry – until Russia invaded Ukraine. That was a 'personal turning point', said the 25-year-old studying at the prominent Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, who was spurred into becoming an armed forces reservist and now wants to work for a military equipment manufacturer. 'People are beginning to understand that the Bundeswehr (the German armed forces) is now clearly focused on defending the country' and Nato, said the engineering student during a job fair organised by the institute in western Germany. He was among young Germans at the event expressing interest in the defence sector, a sharp break from the past amid growing hostility from Russia as well as concerns about US security commitments to Europe under President Donald Trump. For the first time ever in 2025, German arms manufacturers – which are some of the world's biggest but had in the past kept a relatively low profile – were among exhibitors at the fair as they hunt for staff to meet surging demand. There were some signs of unease, with Germany's biggest weapons maker Rheinmetall pulling out after a handful of students voiced anger at the presence of arms manufacturers. Still, there is a sense the long-running stigma surrounding the sector has eased since the outbreak of the Ukraine war. And the opportunities in the industry may be welcome at a time that Germany's economy is mired in a downturn. The European defence sector employs about 600,000 people and is expected to grow strongly, including in Germany where new Chancellor Friedrich Merz plans to greatly ramp up military spending. Shifting attitudes 'The political discourse we have had since 2022 has led Germans to change their way of seeing things,' said Ms Eva Brueckner, a consultant from the headhunting firm Heinrich and Coll, which helps defence companies find staff. Since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine over three years ago, candidates have expressed fewer ethical and moral concerns about defence sector jobs, she said. Another student at the fair, Mr Nico Haenelt, was enquiring about an internship at the stand of industrial giant Thyssenkrupp's submarine-making unit. While the 19-year-old says his parents had quite a pacifist worldview, recent geopolitical upheavals have shaped his own outlook. 'If the world were more peaceful, I would probably also look in other areas,' said Mr Haenelt, who studies mechatronics, which mixes elements of engineering and computer science. To attract talent, defence companies are offering perks ranging from paying for relocation costs to gym memberships, according to accounts given to AFP. Diehl, whose products include ammunition and missiles, even offers scholarships to young people to fund their studies in the hope they will subsequently apply for jobs with the company. 'Conservative' sector With the German economy struggling, some hope the improving fortunes of the defence sector could provide a boost. There are already signs that arms makers might throw a lifeline to some troubled companies. Rheinmetall, whose profits have soared since the start of the Ukraine war, in 2024 struck a deal to hire workers from Continental as the ailing auto supplier cuts thousands of jobs. Still, beyond the traditional reluctance of young Germans to work in the defence sector due to the country's past, there are other challenges in recruiting for the industry. 'The sector is very conservative, and people who don't come from this background may have difficulty integrating,' said the headhunter, Ms Brueckner. And not all the students at the job fair were rushing to find jobs in the arms industry. Mr Niklas, a computer science student who only gave his first name, said his priority was to find a job with 'meaning', such as in the fields of health or sustainable development. As for the arms industry? 'Never', he insisted. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
S-Reits with Singapore office assets post resilient Q1 2025 amid positive rent reversions and high occupancy
[SINGAPORE] Singapore-listed office real estate investment trusts (S-Reits) reported a broadly resilient performance in the first quarter of 2025, underpinned by positive rental reversions, stable occupancy, and continued demand for prime office space despite macroeconomic uncertainties. The six S-Reits with Singapore office exposure – CapitaLand Integrated Commercial Trust (CICT), Mapletree Pan Asia Commercial Trust (Mpact), Suntec Reit , Keppel Reit , OUE Reit , and Lendlease Global Commercial Reit (LReit) — recorded positive rental reversions for their local office assets, with some achieving double-digit growth. Keppel Reit, a pure-play office S-Reit with mostly Singapore assets, reported positive rental reversion of 10.6 per cent across its portfolio, supported by new leasing demand and expansions from financial and technology tenants. Attributable net property income from its Singapore portfolio rose 3.3 per cent on year to S$66.4 million in Q1 2025. LReit also reported a 13 per cent rental uplift for its Jem office lease, while Suntec Reit reported a positive rental reversion of 8 per cent for its Singapore office portfolio in Q1 2025, its 27th quarter of positive rent reversion. CICT and OUE Reit posted rental reversions of 5.4 per cent and 9.9 per cent, respectively, for their office portfolios, while Mpact achieved 2.2 per cent at Mapletree Business City (MBC) and 7.4 per cent at its other Singapore office assets. Occupancy across S-Reits Singapore office portfolios remained healthy. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Suntec Reit's office portfolio maintained high committed occupancy of 98.7 per cent, while Keppel Reit, OUE Reit and CICT similarly reported committed occupancies ranging between 96.3 and 97.9 per cent for their Singapore office assets. Mpact's Singapore assets had occupancy ranging from 91.2 per cent at MBC to 99.5 per cent elsewhere, while LReit's Jem office building was fully occupied. Leasing activity was driven by tenants in the financial services, technology and professional services sectors. Looking ahead, Reit managers observed that tenants are likely to be more cautious in terms of demand for office space given potential headwinds from geopolitical tensions, slower global growth, and cautious business sentiment. However, limited supply of new office space expected in Singapore's core CBD area from 2025 to 2027 is expected to support rental stability. Managers also noted that the flight-to-quality trend remains prominent in Singapore's office sector, with newer office developments in prime locations better positioned to weather the uncertainty. The six S-Reits trade at an average price-to-book ratio of around 0.64, slightly below the sector average of 0.73, according to Bloomberg data. Reit managers expect performance of their Singapore office assets to remain stable. Suntec Reit noted that rent reversion for its Singapore office assets is expected to be modest, in the range of positive 1 to 5 per cent. Property consultancy JLL said in its Q1 office market report that Singapore's office rents registered a fourth consecutive quarter of marginal growth of less than 1 per cent quarter on quarter. It noted that office demand should stay positive, driven by supportive government policies and businesses seeking to capitalise on South-east Asia's growing need for wealth management, fintech and artificial intelligence solutions. JLL added that the positive demand coupled with limited new supply are expected to keep office rents and capital values on a stable to modest growth path over the next 12 months, barring any unforeseen economic shocks. The writer is a research analyst at SGX. For more research and information on Singapore's Reit sector, visit for the S-Reits & Property Trusts Chartbook.
