El Salvador opens path for its president to stay in power indefinitely. Why critics aren't surprised
Watchdogs and critics of the self-described 'world's coolest dictator' said they've seen this coming for years, watching Bukele's administration slowly chip away at democratic institutions, attack opponents and consolidate power in the president's hands.
Bukele, who regularly posts streams of tongue-in-cheek remarks on social media, remained notably silent Friday. His government didn't respond to multiple requests for comment.
'It's not surprising. But that doesn't mean it's not severe," said Claudia Ortiz, one of the country's few remaining opposition lawmakers. 'The implication of this is more concentration of power, more risk of abuse of the rights of Salvadorans ... and the complete dismantling of all democratic checks and balances.'
Here's what happened overnight in El Salvador
On Thursday night, Bukele's New Ideas party and its allies approved changes to El Salvador's constitution, which were jammed through Congress by the party's supermajority.
The changes will:
The vote passed with 57 in favor and three opposed.
Damian Merlo, a U.S. lobbyist and consultant hired by Bukele's administration, defended the changes, noting that many European countries don't have term limits, and said the move only gives Bukele the option of reelection, not an automatic extension of his mandate.
"It's up to the people to decide who the leader will be," Merlo said. 'It's been made very clear by the electorate they are very happy with the president and his political party — and this move represents the will of the people of El Salvador.'
Why watchdogs aren't surprised
Ortiz, the opposition congresswoman, called the defense 'absurd,' and said that Merlo was citing countries — Germany and France — with democratic systems of government answering to the countries' parliaments. In El Salvador, power is now entirely concentrated in the hands of Bukele, she said.
Bukele, 44, was first elected president in 2019 after founding the New Ideas party, casting aside the country's traditional parties thoroughly discredited by corruption and lack of results. Bukele's highly controlled messaging of beating back the country's gangs and rooting out corruption have gained traction in El Salvador, especially as homicide rates have sharply dropped.
But critics say many of the moves he has justified as tackling corruption and violence have actually whittled away at the country's democracy.
Over the years, his attacks on opponents and critics have gradually escalated. In recent months, things have come to a head as Bukele has grown emboldened by his new alliance with U.S. President Donald Trump. A number of high profile arrests and a slew of other actions have forced more than 100 members of civil society — lawyers, activists and journalists — to flee their country as political exiles in the span of months.
A look back at some of the actions he's taken
Intensifying his crackdown in 2025
This year, watchdogs have warned that Bukele has ramped up his crackdown on dissent, emboldened by his new alliance with Trump.
What critics are saying
The recent constitutional reform has fueled a new wave of criticism by civil society in the Central American nation, with leaders saying that Bukele's government has finally done away with one of its last democratic norms.
Roxana Cardona, a lawyer and spokeswoman for the Movement of Social Justice and Citizen Control, said 'a democratic state has been transformed into an autocracy.' Cardona was among those to provide legal representation for Venezuelans detained in El Salvador and other Salvadoran youth accused of being gang members.
'Today, democracy has died. A technocracy has been born. Today, we live in a dictatorship,' she said.
Others, like human rights lawyer Jayme Magaña, said the idea of alternating power, crucial in a country that still has decades of civil war and dictatorships of the past simmering in its recent memory, has been broken. Magaña said she worried for the future.
'The more changes are made to the system of government, the more we see the state's repression of the Salvadoran population intensifying,' she said.
___
Janetsky reported from Mexico City.
Megan Janetsky And Marcos Alemán, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
For D.C., Threats of a Federal Takeover Were Familiar. Now They Are a Reality.
Muriel Bowser, the mayor of Washington, D.C., was born just a year before the city's residents were given the right to elect their mayor. In the five decades since, Washington has wrestled with challenges common to many U.S. cities, like violent crime. It has also faced challenges that, given its peculiar status under federal law, it shares with no other American city. But even in Washington's unique history, there was no episode quite like the one that Ms. Bowser, in her third term as mayor, had to confront on Monday afternoon. 'We know that access to our democracy is tenuous,' the mayor said to reporters just hours after the city's most prominent resident, President Trump, announced that the federal government was going to take over the local police department and deploy the National Guard to the streets of Washington. 'While this action today is unsettling and unprecedented,' the mayor said, 'I can't say that, given some of the rhetoric of the past, that we're totally surprised.' Indeed, Mr. Trump has not been shy about his feelings toward the nation's capital, calling it a 'filthy and crime-ridden embarrassment' and 'a rat-infested, graffiti-infested shithole.' For a city that federal law leaves vulnerable to the prerogatives of the White House, the raw rhetoric was a warning. Under the Home Rule Act of 1973, which gave residents the power to elect a mayor and a city council, Washington has a degree of self-governance, but it is limited. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Judge Tells Trump Officials to Release Funds for Democracy Group
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration from withholding federal funding to the National Endowment for Democracy, a nonprofit established by Congress to bolster democracy worldwide that had been paralyzed by the loss of funding earlier this year. Judge Dabney L. Friedrich of the Federal District Court for the District of Columbia wrote in her 15-page ruling that the Trump administration had withheld funds from the nonprofit 'for impermissible policy reasons,' and that the endowment had suffered irreparable harm in the form of layoffs of critical staff members and suspension of several democracy-supporting initiatives. 'These harms to the endowment's global reputation and to the 'very existence of its programs' are irreparable,' Judge Friedrich wrote, ordering the release of $95 million in federal funds to the nonprofit — roughly 30 percent of its annual budget. The endowment, which has been denounced by major authoritarian powers like China and Russia, was one of several U.S.-backed human rights groups that fell victim to aggressive cuts mandated by the Department of Government Efficiency, a group led by Elon Musk that sought to slash much of the government soon after President Trump returned to office. The grants fund projects such as the development of software that allows citizens to view banned websites and efforts to support independent journalism, many of which ground to a halt after funding was suspended this year. When the nonprofit sued to release the funds in March, the Trump administration had been withholding $239 million in congressionally appropriated funding from the endowment. After the group sued, the administration released some of the funds.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Newsom again threatens tit-for-tat redistricting
California Gov. Gavin Newsom is warning President Donald Trump and Republican governors that if they go forward with redistricting proposals, he will also implement mid-decade redistricting efforts in his state. In a letter to the president Monday, Newsom said California 'cannot stand idly by' as Texas — and other GOP-led states — attempt to follow Trump's directive to create Republican-favored congressional maps. 'If you will not stand down, I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California to offset the rigging of maps in red states,' Newsom said. 'But if the other states call off their redistricting efforts, we will happily do the same. And American democracy will be better for it.' The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Newsom's letter comes as the battle over the Texas congressional map has begun to spread to other states, including Indiana. With Democrats needing to flip just three seats to reclaim a House majority, Trump pressed the Texas Legislature to draw a new map that would give Republicans an additional five congressional seats. Democrats around the nation condemned the effort even as Texas officials began to move forward with a plan. Texas Democrats have left the state to avoid voting on the new map, with some settling indefinitely in California. Vice President JD Vance, meanwhile, headed to Indiana last week to urge Republicans in the Hoosier state to also create a new map. Separately, Ohio is mandated to redraw districts in the state, while talks are underway in Missouri, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida. In total, Republicans could gain 10 or more seats ahead of the midterms. Newsom on Monday called the efforts 'hyper-partisan' and an attempt to 'rig' upcoming midterm elections. 'You are playing with fire, risking the destabilization of our democracy, while knowing that California can neutralize any gains you hope to make,' Newsom wrote. 'This attempt to rig congressional maps to hold onto power before a single vote is cast in the 2026 election is an affront to American democracy.' While Democrats have previously threatened to gerrymander their own maps if Republicans move forward with theirs, no moves have been made yet. In his letter, Newsom said district maps should be drawn by 'independent, citizen-led efforts.' In a Monday afternoon interview with Fox News, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott threatened to escalate his state's redistricting plans if Newsom moves forward with retaliatory redistricting. "If California thinks they're going to move their needle to the extreme and eliminate five Republican numbers of the United States Congress there, Texas is not going to do five: We will add 10 more Republican seats using the same procedure they are using in California," Abbott said. Jacob Wendler contributed to this report.
