
AI Is Eating Data Center Power Demand—and It's Only Getting Worse
AI's energy use already represents as much as 20 percent of global data-center power demand, research published Thursday in the journal Joule shows. That demand from AI, the research states, could double by the end of this year, comprising nearly half of all total data-center electricity consumption worldwide, excluding the electricity used for bitcoin mining.
The new research is published in a commentary by Alex de Vries-Gao, the founder of Digiconomist, a research company that evaluates the environmental impact of technology. De Vries-Gao started Digiconomist in the late 2010s to explore the impact of bitcoin mining, another extremely energy-intensive activity, would have on the environment. Looking at AI, he says, has grown more urgent over the past few years because of the widespread adoption of ChatGPT and other large language models that use massive amounts of energy. According to his research, worldwide AI energy demand is now set to surpass demand from bitcoin mining by the end of this year.
'The money that bitcoin miners had to get to where they are today is peanuts compared to the money that Google and Microsoft and all these big tech companies are pouring in [to AI],' he says. 'This is just escalating a lot faster, and it's a much bigger threat.'
The development of AI is already having an impact on Big Tech's climate goals. Tech giants have acknowledged in recent sustainability reports that AI is largely responsible for driving up their energy use. Google's greenhouse gas emissions, for instance, have increased 48 percent since 2019, complicating the company's goals of reaching net zero by 2030.
'As we further integrate AI into our products, reducing emissions may be challenging due to increasing energy demands from the greater intensity of AI compute,' Google's 2024 sustainability report reads.
Last month, the International Energy Agency released a report finding that data centers made up 1.5 percent of global energy use in 2024—around 415 terrawatt-hours, a little less than the yearly energy demand of Saudi Arabia. This number is only set to get bigger: Data centers' electricity consumption has grown four times faster than overall consumption in recent years, while the amount of investment in data centers has nearly doubled since 2022, driven largely by massive expansions to account for new AI capacity. Overall, the IEA predicted that data center electricity consumption will grow to more than 900 TWh by the end of the decade.
But there's still a lot of unknowns about the share that AI, specifically, takes up in that current configuration of electricity use by data centers. Data centers power a variety of services—like hosting cloud services and providing online infrastructure—that aren't necessarily linked to the energy-intensive activities of AI. Tech companies, meanwhile, largely keep the energy expenditure of their software and hardware private.
Some attempts to quantify AI's energy consumption have started from the user side: calculating the amount of electricity that goes into a single ChatGPT search, for instance. De Vries-Gao decided to look, instead, at the supply chain, starting from the production side to get a more global picture.
The high computing demands of AI, De Vries-Gao says, creates a natural 'bottleneck' in the current global supply chain around AI hardware, particularly around the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), the undisputed leader in producing key hardware that can handle these needs. Companies like Nvidia outsource the production of their chips to TSMC, which also produces chips for other companies like Google and AMD. (Both TSMC and Nvidia declined to comment for this article.)
De Vries-Gao used analyst estimates, earnings call transcripts, and device details to put together an approximate estimate of TSMC's production capacity. He then looked at publicly available electricity consumption profiles of AI hardware and estimates on utilization rates of that hardware—which can vary based on what it's being used for—to arrive at a rough figure of just how much of global data-center demand is taken up by AI. De Vries-Gao calculates that without increased production, AI will consume up to 82 terrawatt-hours of electricity this year—roughly around the same as the annual electricity consumption of a country like Switzerland. If production capacity for AI hardware doubles this year, as analysts have projected it will, demand could increase at a similar rate, representing almost half of all data center demand by the end of the year.
Despite the amount of publicly available information used in the paper, a lot of what De Vries-Gao is doing is peering into a black box: We simply don't know certain factors that affect AI's energy consumption, like the utilization rates of every piece of AI hardware in the world or what machine learning activities they're being used for, let alone how the industry might develop in the future.
Sasha Luccioni, an AI and energy researcher and the climate lead at open-source machine-learning platform Hugging Face, cautioned about leaning too hard on some of the conclusions of the new paper, given the amount of unknowns at play. Luccioni, who was not involved in this research, says that when it comes to truly calculating AI's energy use, disclosure from tech giants is crucial.
'It's because we don't have the information that [researchers] have to do this,' she says. 'That's why the error bar is so huge.'
And tech companies do keep this information. In 2022, Google published a paper on machine learning and electricity use, noting that machine learning was '10%–15% of Google's total energy use' from 2019 to 2021, and predicted that with best practices, 'by 2030 total carbon emissions from training will reduce.' However, since that paper—which was released before Google Gemini's debut in 2023—Google has not provided any more detailed information about how much electricity ML uses. (Google declined to comment for this story.)
'You really have to deep-dive into the semiconductor supply chain to be able to make any sensible statement about the energy demand of AI,' De Vries-Gao says. 'If these big tech companies were just publishing the same information that Google was publishing three years ago, we would have a pretty good indicator' of AI's energy use.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Medtronic PLC (MDT) Q1 2026 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong Revenue Growth and Raised EPS Guidance
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Revenue: $8.6 billion, grew 8.4% reported and 4.8% organic. Cardiovascular Growth: 7% growth, driven by nearly 50% growth in cardiac ablation solutions. Neuroscience Growth: 3% growth, with mid-single-digit growth in cranial and spinal technologies. Medsurge Growth: 2% growth, with high single-digit growth in advanced energy. Diabetes Growth: 8% growth, including 11% growth in international markets. Adjusted Gross Margin: 65.1%, down 80 basis points year over year. Adjusted Operating Margin: 23.6%. Adjusted EPS: $1.26, $0.03 above the midpoint of guidance. R&D Investment: Up 7.7%, 100 basis points ahead of revenue growth. Fiscal Year '26 Organic Revenue Growth Guidance: Approximately 5%. Fiscal Year '26 EPS Guidance: Raised to $5.60 to $5.66. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with ODFJF. Release Date: August 19, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Medtronic PLC (NYSE:MDT) reported consistent mid-single-digit revenue growth, with EPS exceeding guidance. The cardiovascular segment showed strong performance, with nearly 50% growth in cardiac ablation solutions driven by innovative product rollouts. The company raised its EPS guidance for the full year, reflecting confidence in continued financial acceleration. Medtronic PLC (NYSE:MDT) is poised for growth in the second half of the fiscal year, with several product launches and market expansions planned. The planned separation of the diabetes business is expected to be EPS accretive and improve operating margins, enhancing shareholder value. Negative Points Neuroscience growth was below trend due to specialty therapies, though improvements are expected in subsequent quarters. The Medsurge segment grew only 2%, aligning with expectations but indicating slower growth compared to other segments. The diabetes segment faced challenges in the US market, with growth primarily driven by international sales. Gross margin decreased by 80 basis points year-over-year, impacted by business mix and manufacturing ramp-up costs. Tariffs are expected to have a negative impact of approximately $185 million for fiscal '26, though this is an improvement from previous estimates. Q & A Highlights Q: Can you provide an update on the CAS business and its impact on overall growth? A: Geoff Martha, CEO, explained that the CAS business is accelerating, with 72% growth in the US. The company is confident in its ability to accelerate growth over FY26, with new technologies and a strong pipeline expected to have an outsized impact on US growth. Thierry Pieton, CFO, added that the US growth was impacted by slower growth in certain areas, but expects improvement as new products ramp up. Q: What is the purpose of the new Board committees focused on growth and operations? A: Geoff Martha, CEO, stated that the committees will provide focus and support management, particularly in growth and operational performance. The committees will include new directors with deep medtech experience and will have more frequent interactions with management to drive focus and execution. Q: Is the $2 billion target for annual CAS sales achievable in fiscal '26? A: Geoff Martha, CEO, confirmed that the target of an additional $1 billion on top of the FY25 base is on track. While it might extend into FY27, the company is confident in achieving this near-term goal. Q: How will the new directors and committees impact capital allocation and EPS growth? A: Geoff Martha, CEO, emphasized that the company is entering a new chapter focused on value creation. This includes more M&A, portfolio optimization, and increased investment in growth drivers. The committees will help ensure these strategies are executed effectively. Q: Can you discuss the potential impact of renal denervation on Medtronic's growth profile? A: Geoff Martha, CEO, highlighted that renal denervation (RDN) is a significant growth opportunity, with a massive patient population. The company is investing in market development and expects RDN to be a major driver of growth, potentially becoming one of the largest product categories for Medtronic. Q: What is the status of the diabetes business separation and its impact on growth? A: Thierry Pieton, CFO, confirmed that the separation is on track, with completion expected within 15 months. The diabetes business is entering a strong innovation cycle, and the separation is expected to be a value-creating event for shareholders. Q: How is the Hugo robotic system performing in international markets, and what are the expectations for the US launch? A: Michael Marinaro, EVP, stated that Hugo is performing well in over 30 countries, with significant double-digit growth in current accounts. The system's modular design and partnership approach are key strengths. The company is preparing for the US launch, with FDA approval processes underway. Q: What are the growth prospects for Medtronic's slower-growing businesses? A: Geoff Martha, CEO, noted that several slower-growing businesses have specific growth accelerators, such as new products and market expansions. The company is focused on driving growth across all segments, with organic and inorganic strategies. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Premier Inc (PINC) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Exceeding Expectations and Strategic ...
This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Total Full Year Revenue: $986 million, $11 million above the midpoint of the guidance range. Adjusted EPS: $1.54, $0.11 above the high end of the guidance range. Fourth Quarter Net Revenue: $258 million, increased 1% sequentially. GAAP Net Income and EPS: $18 million or $0.22 per share. Adjusted EBITDA: $71 million, with a margin of 27.6%. Adjusted EPS for Q4: $0.46. Free Cash Flow: $181 million, with a conversion rate of 69%. Cash and Cash Equivalents: $84 million as of June 30. Outstanding Balance on Credit Facility: $280 million. Fiscal Year 2026 Guidance - Total Net Revenue: $940 million to $1 billion. Fiscal Year 2026 Guidance - Adjusted EBITDA: $230 million to $245 million. Fiscal Year 2026 Guidance - Adjusted EPS: $1.33 to $1.43. Q1 Guidance - Total Net Revenue: $230 million to $245 million. Q1 Guidance - Adjusted EBITDA: $45 million to $50 million. Q1 Guidance - Adjusted EPS: $0.27 to $0.32. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 11 Warning Signs with PINC. Release Date: August 19, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Premier Inc (NASDAQ:PINC) exceeded expectations in revenue and profitability, driven by strong performance in the Supply Chain Services segment. The company completed a $200 million accelerated share repurchase program, returning significant capital to stockholders. Premier Inc (NASDAQ:PINC) signed four large advisory deals and has a robust pipeline heading into fiscal 2026, indicating strong demand for its services. The acquisition of IllumiCare enhances Premier Inc (NASDAQ:PINC)'s ability to deliver real-time insights at the point of care, leveraging AI capabilities. The company's pharmacy and food portfolio continues to grow, attracting new members and serving as key differentiators within its GPO business. Negative Points Premier Inc (NASDAQ:PINC) faces significant headwinds such as reimbursement cuts, which are forcing health systems to rethink their cost structures. The Performance Services segment showed lower enterprise license revenue due to tough comparisons with the prior year. The company is still working to rebuild its sales funnel in the advisory business, despite recent large contract wins. Free cash flow decreased year-over-year due to higher performance-related compensation payments and timing of payments to Omnia. Premier Inc (NASDAQ:PINC) anticipates lower revenue and profitability in the first half of fiscal year 2026 due to the ramp-up of headcount to support advisory business success. Q & A Highlights Q: Can you discuss any changes in customer buying behavior in the Supply Chain Services segment, particularly in relation to potential tariffs? A: Michael Alkire, President and CEO, stated that there was no significant pull forward of buying behavior due to tariffs. Any increases observed were primarily due to regional issues rather than tariff-related concerns. Q: What is driving the momentum in the advisory business, and how much of it is market-driven versus execution on your end? A: Michael Alkire highlighted that the momentum is driven by market needs due to financial pressures on health systems and the strong execution by the team led by Dave Zito, President of Performance Services. The advisory business has signed four large deals recently, indicating strong market demand and execution. Q: Can you provide more details on the progress of the GPO contract renewals and the expected fee share stabilization? A: Glenn Coleman, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer, explained that the fee share is expected to increase to the mid-60% range in fiscal year 2026, with stabilization in the high 60s once all renewals are addressed. The process is nearing completion, with less than 20% of contracts remaining to be renewed. Q: Could you provide insights into the financial impact and strategic importance of the IllumiCare acquisition? A: Michael Alkire emphasized that IllumiCare addresses critical member pain points, offering significant savings per patient discharge and enhancing clinical decision support capabilities. Glenn Coleman added that IllumiCare is expected to contribute $8 million to $10 million in revenue for fiscal year 2026 and is breakeven on the bottom line. Q: What are the expectations for revenue and EBITDA growth in fiscal year 2027, and what factors will drive this growth? A: Glenn Coleman stated that growth in fiscal year 2027 will be driven by increased software business renewals, continued advisory business momentum, and synergies from the IllumiCare acquisition. Additionally, lower fee share headwinds and growth in Supply Chain Services are expected to contribute to the rebound. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript.

Business Insider
14 minutes ago
- Business Insider
What the 'hidden job market' really is and how to make it work for you
Sometimes, the best way to land a job at a company is to get rejected by them first. In the months before graduating from Cornell University in 2023, Jahnavi Shah said she applied to over 500 jobs and secured five interviews, but none led to a full-time offer — at least not right away. Several months later, she'd be fast-tracked into a role thanks to a contact she'd made during that stretch. All it took was a good initial application, a LinkedIn connection — and a little patience. "It's a great reminder that even if an opportunity doesn't work out immediately, staying on the radar can make a difference," said the 24-year-old, who lives in San Francisco. Here's what happened: Disappointed to not land a role she'd interviewed for at identity verification startup Persona, Shah connected with the recruiter on LinkedIn anyway. Months later, she'd accepted a part-time contract role but was still looking for full-time employment. When she received a congratulatory message from the Persona recruiter, Shah checked Persona's careers page, where she saw a new job posted just a few days earlier. She applied, landed an interview, and received an offer after sharing three references. Shah said she was told only one interview was required because the company was already familiar with her. "I believe my previous interview experience gave the team a solid understanding of my profile and potential," she said. Shah is among the workers who have battled a challenging job market in recent years. Amid economic uncertainty, ranging from tariffs to the early impacts of AI adoption, US businesses are hiring at nearly the slowest pace in more than a decade. Open roles are taking longer to fill — if they're filled at all — and some job seekers say they're sending out dozens of applications without ever hearing back from employers. In this environment, it can feel like hiring happens behind closed doors — like there's a membership to an exclusive club that some job seekers simply don't have access to. In some cases, a club of this sort does exist, but getting in is more accessible than it seems. Landing an interview, even if you're rejected, can sometimes be enough to secure future opportunities. Business Insider has heard from hundreds of Americans over the past year who are struggling to find work as US businesses slow hiring and flatten management structures. Share your story by filling out this quick form and read more below: A laid-off Accenture manager has been job hunting for 21 months. Recruiters keep telling him he's too expensive. I'm a 53-year-old middle manager who can't find a job. I burned through my savings and even resorted to selling plasma — this market is a black hole. From six figures to $25 an hour: These struggling job seekers are settling for lower-paying jobs to pay the bills Job searching in 2025? It's a mess no matter how old you are. Getting into the 'hidden job market' can give candidates an edge Bonnie Dilber, senior manager of talent acquisition at the automation software company Zapier, said she believes the vast majority of roles are publicly posted on platforms like LinkedIn and Indeed — with some exceptions, such as senior executive positions, jobs at stealth startups, and roles at small mom-and-pop businesses. However, she said some companies do regularly hire through what she calls the "hidden job market" — prioritizing a select pool of candidates and, in some cases, skipping a public job posting altogether. Often, though, that pool isn't full of people with insider connections, but of prior applicants who stayed on the company's radar, she said. Over her career, Dilber said she's hired "countless" people who impressed during interviews but were initially rejected due to factors like timing or location. When circumstances changed, the company reached back out and fast-tracked them for other openings. At her company, for example, she said they might post a role like technical support specialist or account executive — positions typically filled in high volumes — and hire a handful of candidates. A couple of months later, when new openings arise, they might revisit the same applicant pool rather than reposting the job. If a strong runner-up had made it to the final round, they might extend an offer without even conducting another interview. "Someone could look at that and think 'no job was posted but someone got hired,' but in reality, those are applicants from existing candidate pools that a company makes many hires from," she said. Other employers are also finding ways to give rejected candidates a second shot. Sean Barry, Allstate's vice president of talent acquisition, said the company implemented a system last year that flags qualified candidates who were initially turned down and recommends them for other roles. So far, it's helped Allstate hire more than 100 people, many of them for claims positions. "While they might've been a no-go for that role at that time, it certainly doesn't mean that they're not a fit for the company and potentially a fit for another need," Barry previously told Business Insider. Dilber said she's benefited from processes like this herself. On two occasions, she applied for a role and was the runner-up — only to be contacted shortly after about a different opportunity, with a shorter interview process since the company was already familiar with her. She said her top advice for job seekers is to focus on submitting applications for roles they're well qualified for — and to use networking and referrals to strengthen those efforts whenever possible. Even if it doesn't lead to an offer right away, a strong application — especially one that leads to an interview — can open doors down the line. "Your best bet is always to apply with a strong application — and a referral if possible — rather than worrying about jobs that were never posted," she said. When a rejected job application turns into a dream job offer Sometimes, getting rejected doesn't lead to a job at that employer — but it can open doors elsewhere. In 2024, Alicia Strata applied for an administrative assistant job but didn't get the position. However, the third-party recruiter the company worked with suggested a part-time office support role at another company that he thought might be a good fit — so she decided to give it a shot, even though she wasn't particularly interested in the position. During the interview, Strata said she kept getting asked marketing questions that didn't align with the job description. Halfway through, she learned there had been a mix-up: the company was actually looking to hire a marketing professional. It was exactly the kind of role she'd been hoping to find since graduating with a degree in marketing communications. The interviewers thought she seemed like a great fit, and she started working at the company a month later. "It was amazing to walk into the interview not even wanting the role, and walk out thinking it could be my dream career," she said. Landing jobs through connections made during interviews isn't a new phenomenon. After graduating in December 2007 with a degree in communication arts, Allyson Noonan struggled to land a job, so she worked part-time at Anthropologie and babysat. One day, someone who interviewed her for a job she didn't get contacted her, saying she had a friend in the industry looking for an entry-level position that she thought she'd be a fit for. This position turned out to be her first full-time job at a PR agency, which she started in June 2008. "This experience taught me that it's wise to take every interview you can — even if you're not sure it's a good fit," she said.